previous next


The Constitutionality of secession.

--The London Standard, of the 2d of October, has a ‘"leader"’ in reply to an essay in McMillan's Magazine, on the American question and the right of secession. We quote the following extract:

‘ A State withdrawing from an alliance of a permanent nature may, according both to principle and precedent, be justly compelled to return by war, if other means fail.

If half a Confederacy secede, however, both policy and justice would be better satisfied by a peaceable separation; and the case of the Federal (American) Government, in the present war is as doubtful as any case ever was. It rests its defence on the unconstitutionality of secession, and every act of coercion it has yet attempted is, at least, equally unconstitutional.* * * * * * * *

The fact that the South cannot be attacked without breaking the very compact by which the attack is justified is surely a strong reason for letting it alone.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide Places (automatically extracted)

View a map of the most frequently mentioned places in this document.

hide People (automatically extracted)
Sort people alphabetically, as they appear on the page, by frequency
Click on a person to search for him/her in this document.
McMillan (1)
hide Dates (automatically extracted)
Sort dates alphabetically, as they appear on the page, by frequency
Click on a date to search for it in this document.
February, 10 AD (1)
hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: