ὡς—ἐν κεφαλαίῳ εἰπεῖν For this absolute use of the Inf, especially with ὡς, cf. 32 § 13 ὡς εἰπεῖν ἐν κεφ., 11 § 2 ὡς ἁπλῶς εἰπεῖν, and other examples in Rehdantz, Index ii, s. v. Infinitiv 3. S.]
οὐχ ἵνα κ.τ.λ. Boeotus would say that it was done merely to secure the dower of my mother, he having before evaded payment on the plea of having another name, § 18. This is why the subjunctive is used, and not λάβοιμι, referring only to the past intention.
καλῆται ‘That the defendant may go on being called Boeotus.’
