[94]
It happened lately, before Caius Orchinius, my colleague,
that the judges refused to sanction a prosecution against Faustus Sulla, in a cause concerning
some money which remained unpaid. Not because they considered that Sulla was an outlaw, or
because they thought the cause of the public money insignificant or contemptible; but because,
when a tribune of the people was the accuser, they did not think that there could be a fair
trial. What? Shall I compare Sulla with Junius? or
this tribune of the people with Quinctius? or one time with the other time? Sulla, with his
great wealth, his numerous relations, connections, friends, and clients; but in the case of
Junius all these things were small, and
insignificant, and collected and acquired by his own exertions. The one a tribune of the
people, moderate, modest, not only not seditious himself, but an enemy to seditious men; the
other bitter, fond of raking up accusations, a hunter after popularity, and a turbulent man.
The present a tranquil and a peaceable time; the former time one ruffled with every imaginable
storm of ill-will. And as all this was the case, still in the case of Faustus those judges
decided that a defendant was brought before the court on very unfair terms, when his adversary
was in possession of the greatest power known to the state, which he could avail himself of to
add force to his accusations.
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.