[81]
The proposals of the
defendant are quite different: the accuser is to prosecute without risk, the
culprit to be given up incontinently and without trial; and if any person, or
indeed any entire city, shall intervene to prevent the destruction of all those
usages which I have described and the overthrow of all the tribunals I have
mentioned; tribunals introduced by the gods and frequented by mankind from that
day to this,—and to rescue the victims of outrage and lawless
violence, he proposes that any such person shall be banned; for him also he
allows no hearing and no trial, but punishes him instantly and without trial.
Could any decree be more monstrous and more unconstitutional?
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.