hide
Named Entity Searches
hide
Sorting
You can sort these results in two ways:
- By entity
- Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
- By position (current method)
- As the entities appear in the document.
You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.
hide
Most Frequent Entities
The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.
Entity | Max. Freq | Min. Freq | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Grandison | 10 | 0 | Browse | Search |
United States (United States) | 10 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Grant | 9 | 3 | Browse | Search |
Forrest | 8 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Michigan (Michigan, United States) | 8 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Louisiana (Louisiana, United States) | 8 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Atlanta (Georgia, United States) | 8 | 0 | Browse | Search |
John Hanes | 6 | 0 | Browse | Search |
Mary Smith | 6 | 0 | Browse | Search |
C. A. Cuthbert | 6 | 0 | Browse | Search |
View all entities in this document... |
Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: April 6, 1864., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.
Found 65 total hits in 26 results.
Coles (Illinois, United States) (search for this): article 9
The military despotism in the United States--speech of Senator Saulsbury.
The unexpected ebullition of popular feeling in illinois and Missouri, following close upon the speech of Senator Salisbury, of Delaware, shows that the people of the United States are getting tired of the military despotism of Lincoln — fired unto death, for in this "little affair" in Coles county, they have put their lives in the seale for freedom.
The speech of Mr. Saulsbury was directed against military interference in elections.
He said:
The Senator from Michigan, (Mr. Howard,) had said that the time was unpropitious for the passage of such a bill as this.
He would commend to him and others who thought like him the example of a distinguished British statesman, who, when the rights of the English subjects were at stake, rose in his place in Parliament and declined to discuss questions of war so long as private rights were in jeopardy.
Under these constant encroachments of power we shall wake u
Arkansas (Arkansas, United States) (search for this): article 9
Missouri (Missouri, United States) (search for this): article 9
The military despotism in the United States--speech of Senator Saulsbury.
The unexpected ebullition of popular feeling in illinois and Missouri, following close upon the speech of Senator Salisbury, of Delaware, shows that the people of the United States are getting tired of the military despotism of Lincoln — fired unto death, for in this "little affair" in Coles county, they have put their lives in the seale for freedom.
The speech of Mr. Saulsbury was directed against military interference in elections.
He said:
The Senator from Michigan, (Mr. Howard,) had said that the time was unpropitious for the passage of such a bill as this.
He would commend to him and others who thought like him the example of a distinguished British statesman, who, when the rights of the English subjects were at stake, rose in his place in Parliament and declined to discuss questions of war so long as private rights were in jeopardy.
Under these constant encroachments of power we shall wake u
Gulf of Mexico (search for this): article 9
Maryland (Maryland, United States) (search for this): article 9
Delaware (Delaware, United States) (search for this): article 9
The military despotism in the United States--speech of Senator Saulsbury.
The unexpected ebullition of popular feeling in illinois and Missouri, following close upon the speech of Senator Salisbury, of Delaware, shows that the people of the United States are getting tired of the military despotism of Lincoln — fired unto death, for in this "little affair" in Coles county, they have put their lives in the seale for freedom.
The speech of Mr. Saulsbury was directed against military interferays down the broad proposition that the military orders concerning elections are law, and therefore the proclamation of the Governor of Maryland was a usurpation of power; yet, strangely, he compliments the man who never was Governor of the State of Delaware by the voice of the people, but who was act over them by the force of the bayonet, because he issued a proclamation for the people to be obsequiously obedient to the orders of their master, General Schenck.
If the soil of Maryland had been
United States (United States) (search for this): article 9
The military despotism in the United States--speech of Senator Saulsbury.
The unexpected ebullition of popular feeling in illinois and Missouri, following close upon the speech of Senator Salisbury, of Delaware, shows that the people of the United States are getting tired of the military despotism of Lincoln — fired unto death, for in this "little affair" in Coles county, they have put their lives in the seale for freedom.
The speech of Mr. Saulsbury was directed against military interfeUnited States are getting tired of the military despotism of Lincoln — fired unto death, for in this "little affair" in Coles county, they have put their lives in the seale for freedom.
The speech of Mr. Saulsbury was directed against military interference in elections.
He said:
The Senator from Michigan, (Mr. Howard,) had said that the time was unpropitious for the passage of such a bill as this.
He would commend to him and others who thought like him the example of a distinguished British statesman, who, when the rights of the English subjects were at stake, rose in his place in Parliament and declined to discuss questions of war so long as private rights were in jeopardy.
Under these constant encroachments of power we shall wake
Michigan (Michigan, United States) (search for this): article 9
Salisbury (search for this): article 9
The military despotism in the United States--speech of Senator Saulsbury.
The unexpected ebullition of popular feeling in illinois and Missouri, following close upon the speech of Senator Salisbury, of Delaware, shows that the people of the United States are getting tired of the military despotism of Lincoln — fired unto death, for in this "little affair" in Coles county, they have put their lives in the seale for freedom.
The speech of Mr. Saulsbury was directed against military interference in elections.
He said:
The Senator from Michigan, (Mr. Howard,) had said that the time was unpropitious for the passage of such a bill as this.
He would commend to him and others who thought like him the example of a distinguished British statesman, who, when the rights of the English subjects were at stake, rose in his place in Parliament and declined to discuss questions of war so long as private rights were in jeopardy.
Under these constant encroachments of power we shall wake
George F. Fisher (search for this): article 9