hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
United States (United States) 26 0 Browse Search
Danville (Virginia, United States) 19 3 Browse Search
Seward 18 12 Browse Search
McClellan 14 2 Browse Search
Garibaldi 12 0 Browse Search
Abraham Lincoln 12 0 Browse Search
Dorn 12 0 Browse Search
Seymour 11 5 Browse Search
George S. Foote 8 0 Browse Search
Martinsburg (West Virginia, United States) 8 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: October 10, 1862., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 9 total hits in 3 results.

Atlanta (Georgia, United States) (search for this): article 9
New counterfeits. The Atlanta (Ga.) Confederacy gives a description of some new $100 bills, counterfeits of Hoyer & Ludwig's plate. They are not the same set afloat some time since. In a package of $4,000, presented at a bank in Atlanta by a respectable merchant, $1,500 were in these bad bills. The Confederacy says. The previous counterfeits were not the same size of the genuine, and could be detected by measurement, as we described; but there now base issues are so nearly the saAtlanta by a respectable merchant, $1,500 were in these bad bills. The Confederacy says. The previous counterfeits were not the same size of the genuine, and could be detected by measurement, as we described; but there now base issues are so nearly the same size that measurement cannot be applied as a test. There are, however, several points about them which a careful observer can detect. First. On the left hand end of the bills is a sailor standing up; and above his head is a shield on which the following words are inscribed. "Receivable in payment of all dues except export dues," in the genuine the lower point of this shield is about the 16th part of an inch above the sailor's hat. In the counterfeit the point of the shield is imperfe
New counterfeits. The Atlanta (Ga.) Confederacy gives a description of some new $100 bills, counterfeits of Hoyer & Ludwig's plate. They are not the same set afloat some time since. In a package of $4,000, presented at a bank in Atlanta by a respectable merchant, $1,500 were in these bad bills. The Confederacy says. The previous counterfeits were not the same size of the genuine, and could be detected by measurement, as we described; but there now base issues are so nearly the samby readers generally. The mallet is made black, the sailor's disheveled hair is smoothed down, the handle on the iron box is right, and the woman's head is in the right place. All the points of difference are remedied, so that only an experienced person can detect them by their general appearance. Now, what are the people to do! We advise them to refuse every 20, 50, and 100 of the Hoyer & Ludwig plates. The Government has sailed for them. Let them be sent in and no more circulated.
A. W. Gray (search for this): article 9
blacker ink. A man skilled in such matters can see at once that they are written by an effort, and not by a free, easy, natural hind. We have seen only one counter sit fifty, though several of them have been detected in this city.--They are also a superior imitation of the genuine; so perfect are they that we are unable to discover any striking points of dissimilarity — none that we can describe which the common reader can understand, save perhaps one. The bill before us is signed "A. W. Gray, for Treasurer." The word "for" is in small common italics, and "Treasurer" is in small capitals, thus; "for Treasurer." In the counterfeit, the hair line on which the signature is written passes across the "f " in the word "for." and touches the tops of the letters "or."--In the genuine, the word "for" is below the line on which the signature is written. It crosses the upper portion of the "f, " but does not touch the "or" being above them. This is the only distinction we are able to de