hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
Gen Lovell 29 1 Browse Search
Turner Ashby 26 0 Browse Search
United States (United States) 16 0 Browse Search
Galveston (Texas, United States) 15 3 Browse Search
Jackson 14 4 Browse Search
Mexico (Mexico, Mexico) 12 0 Browse Search
Beauregard 12 2 Browse Search
Butler 12 6 Browse Search
Belle 10 0 Browse Search
Mississippi (United States) 10 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: June 12, 1862., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 36 total hits in 21 results.

1 2 3
United States (United States) (search for this): article 1
— or, which is the same thing, they are forbidden to invoke the blessings of Heaven upon a gallant army in expelling such a foe from their midst. In forbidding us to pray for the success of our, cause, they require us to pray for the success of theirs. Office Mil'y Comm'dt of New Orleans. City Hall, May 28, 1862. hereafter, in the churches in the city of New Orleans, prayers will not be offered up for the destruction of the Union or Constitution of the United States, for the success of the rebel armies, for the Confederate States, so called, or any officers of the same, civil or military, in their official capacity. While protection will be afforded to all churches, religious houses and establishments, and religious "services are to be had as in times of profound peace," this protection will not be allowed to be perverted to the upholding of treason or advocacy of it in any form. Where thus perverted, it will be withdrawn. G. F. Shepley, Military Commandant.
Louisiana (Louisiana, United States) (search for this): article 1
Butler's rule in New Orleans The following correspondence, which appears in a late number of the New Orleans Deltas, explains the reason why Mayor Monroe was sent to Fort Jackson. It will be seen that Butler deliberately reaffirms, though pretending to quality, his base libel upon the ladies of New Orleans. The qualification, if possible, is more infamous than the original offence: State of La., Mayoralty of New Orleans., City Hall, May 18th, 1862. Major Gen. Benj. F. Butter, Commanding U. S. Forces: Sir --Your general order No. 28. of date of 15th inst., is of a character so extraordinary and astounding, that I cannot, holding the office of Chief Magistrate of this city, chargeable with its peace and dignity, suffer it to be promulgated in our presence without protesting against the threat it contains, which has already roused the passions of our people, and must exasperate them to a degree beyond control. Your officers and soldiers are permitted by the terms of
Duncan (search for this): article 1
ouching Order No. 28 was supposed to have been ended. But this course did not suit the keepers of John T. Monroe, and in the evening of the same day Gen. Butler received the following letter: Mayoralty of New Orleans, City Hall, May 16, 1862. Major General Butler: Sir --Having misunderstood you yesterday in relation to your General Order No. 28, I wish to withdraw the endorsement I made on the letter addressed to you yesterday. Please deliver the letter to my Secretary, Mr. Duncan, who will hand you this note. Your obedient servant, John T. Monroe, Mayor. To this General Butler returned the following answer: Headq'rs Department of the Cully, New Orleans, May 18, 1862. Sir. --There can be, there has been, no room for misunderstanding of General Order No. 18. No lady will take any notice of a strange gentleman, and a fortiori of a stranger simply in such form as to attract attention, Common women do. Therefore, whenever woman, lady
John T. Connor (search for this): article 1
d, gesture or movement, meant to insult any one of his officers or soldiers. And the order implied to no others, save those that had insulted the troops. The Mayor said with this explanation he was satisfied, and would withdraw his letter. He therefore signed the following written apology, and left for his home: General Butler: This communication having been sent under a mistake of fact, and being improper in language, I desire to apologize for the some and to withdraw it. John T. Connor, Mayor. May 16, 1861. Now the matter touching Order No. 28 was supposed to have been ended. But this course did not suit the keepers of John T. Monroe, and in the evening of the same day Gen. Butler received the following letter: Mayoralty of New Orleans, City Hall, May 16, 1862. Major General Butler: Sir --Having misunderstood you yesterday in relation to your General Order No. 28, I wish to withdraw the endorsement I made on the letter addressed to you yest
Commending (search for this): article 1
ly to assure you that you were mistaken in listener. We have not intended, and do not intend, to advocate the destruction of cotton or other crops by the Southern people. We believe it to be a barbarous and wanton waste of property, not to be tolerated by the civilized world. Very respectfully, Your obedient Serv'ts, C. F. Whisen& Co. Upon the publication of the foregoing note the Bee may resume its publication and the business of its Office. Benj F. Builer, Major General Commending. How the people are to pray. Usurping the prerogative of the Almighty, as will be seen by the following order, our enemies have undertaken to prescribe the from and the substantiae of the people's prayers. They are required to pray for the success of those who have invaded their homes, insulted their wives and daughters, and attempted to arm their slaves and incite them to insurrection — or, which is the same thing, they are forbidden to invoke the blessings of Heaven upo
Benjamin F. Butter (search for this): article 1
Butler's rule in New Orleans The following correspondence, which appears in a late number of the New Orleans Deltas, explains the reason why Mayor Monroe was sent to Fort Jackson. It will be seen that Butler deliberately reaffirms, though pretending to quality, his base libel upon the ladies of New Orleans. The qualification, if possible, is more infamous than the original offence: State of La., Mayoralty of New Orleans., City Hall, May 18th, 1862. Major Gen. Benj. F. Butter, Commanding U. S. Forces: Sir --Your general order No. 28. of date of 15th inst., is of a character so extraordinary and astounding, that I cannot, holding the office of Chief Magistrate of this city, chargeable with its peace and dignity, suffer it to be promulgated in our presence without protesting against the threat it contains, which has already roused the passions of our people, and must exasperate them to a degree beyond control. Your officers and soldiers are permitted by the terms of
Shepley (search for this): article 1
or, which is the same thing, they are forbidden to invoke the blessings of Heaven upon a gallant army in expelling such a foe from their midst. In forbidding us to pray for the success of our, cause, they require us to pray for the success of theirs. Office Mil'y Comm'dt of New Orleans. City Hall, May 28, 1862. hereafter, in the churches in the city of New Orleans, prayers will not be offered up for the destruction of the Union or Constitution of the United States, for the success of the rebel armies, for the Confederate States, so called, or any officers of the same, civil or military, in their official capacity. While protection will be afforded to all churches, religious houses and establishments, and religious "services are to be had as in times of profound peace," this protection will not be allowed to be perverted to the upholding of treason or advocacy of it in any form. Where thus perverted, it will be withdrawn. G. F. Shepley, Military Commandant.
Butler (search for this): article 1
Butler's rule in New Orleans The following correspondence, which appears in a late number of the New Orleans Deltas, eyor Monroe was sent to Fort Jackson. It will be seen that Butler deliberately reaffirms, though pretending to quality, his is epistle, the Provost Marshal brought the Mayor before Gen. Butler. The Mayor was then told that the language of the lettefollowing written apology, and left for his home: General Butler: This communication having been sent under a mistakrs of John T. Monroe, and in the evening of the same day Gen. Butler received the following letter: Mayoralty of New Orleans, City Hall, May 16, 1862. Major General Butler: Sir --Having misunderstood you yesterday in relation to your Gnt servant, John T. Monroe, Mayor. To this General Butler returned the following answer: Headq'rs Departmenin the Picayune: New Orleans May 21, 1862. To Major-Gen. Butler, Commander in-Chief of the Department of the Gul.:
John T. Monroe (search for this): article 1
ns The following correspondence, which appears in a late number of the New Orleans Deltas, explains the reason why Mayor Monroe was sent to Fort Jackson. It will be seen that Butler deliberately reaffirms, though pretending to quality, his base not to say to the Christianity, of the age, in whose name I make this protest. I am, sir, your obedient servant, John T. Monroe, Mayor. Immediately upon the receipt of this epistle, the Provost Marshal brought the Mayor before Gen. Buow the matter touching Order No. 28 was supposed to have been ended. But this course did not suit the keepers of John T. Monroe, and in the evening of the same day Gen. Butler received the following letter: Mayoralty of New Orleans, City rday. Please deliver the letter to my Secretary, Mr. Duncan, who will hand you this note. Your obedient servant, John T. Monroe, Mayor. To this General Butler returned the following answer: Headq'rs Department of the Cully, New
Picayune (search for this): article 1
t, as I have not, hate a single word of that order, it was well considered, and if obeyed, will protect the tone and modest women from all possible insult. The others will take care of themselves. You can publish your letter, if you publish this note and your apology. Respectfully, Best. F. Betish, Major-General Commanding. Backed down. The New Orleans has ingloriously backed out of its positions on cotton burning, as will be seen from the following correspondence in the Picayune: New Orleans May 21, 1862. To Major-Gen. Butler, Commander in-Chief of the Department of the Gul.: General — Our article of the 16th inst., in reference to cotton, was thought by you to have been "an elaborate though covert argument in favor of the cotton-burning mob. " We desire frankly to assure you that you were mistaken in listener. We have not intended, and do not intend, to advocate the destruction of cotton or other crops by the Southern people. We believe it to be
1 2 3