hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
Abraham Lincoln 22 0 Browse Search
Beauregard 18 10 Browse Search
R. Scott 18 0 Browse Search
Missouri (Missouri, United States) 14 0 Browse Search
Tennessee (Tennessee, United States) 12 0 Browse Search
John Withers 10 0 Browse Search
George Baker 10 0 Browse Search
Ross Daniel 10 0 Browse Search
United States (United States) 10 0 Browse Search
Edward Crutchfield 10 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: August 7, 1861., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 7 total hits in 6 results.

as the information which I had, but Col. Taliaferro informs me that portions of all his companies were in the fight except one. I also stated that the companies in the engagement behaved gallantly I am informed that my language is calculated to carry with it the implied statement that the officers did not behave well. Such was not my meaning. I intended to say that all of the 23d engaged in the fight behaved bravely, as I was informed. I will also here supply an omission made in my former statement. I am informed that Lieut. Brown, of the Danville Artillery, and Lieut. Washington, of the Confederate Army, who were officers of the Danville Artillery in the fight, acted in the most gallant manner. The mention of these honorable names is not intended to reflect upon the conduct of others not mentioned and about whose behavior I am not informed. I will be the last man to (knowingly) do injustice to a brother soldier. Samuel V Fulkerson, Col. Com'dg 37th Regt. Va.Vol.
Angustus Brown (search for this): article 19
as the information which I had, but Col. Taliaferro informs me that portions of all his companies were in the fight except one. I also stated that the companies in the engagement behaved gallantly I am informed that my language is calculated to carry with it the implied statement that the officers did not behave well. Such was not my meaning. I intended to say that all of the 23d engaged in the fight behaved bravely, as I was informed. I will also here supply an omission made in my former statement. I am informed that Lieut. Brown, of the Danville Artillery, and Lieut. Washington, of the Confederate Army, who were officers of the Danville Artillery in the fight, acted in the most gallant manner. The mention of these honorable names is not intended to reflect upon the conduct of others not mentioned and about whose behavior I am not informed. I will be the last man to (knowingly) do injustice to a brother soldier. Samuel V Fulkerson, Col. Com'dg 37th Regt. Va.Vol.
Washington (search for this): article 19
s the information which I had, but Col. Taliaferro informs me that portions of all his companies were in the fight except one. I also stated that the companies in the engagement behaved gallantly I am informed that my language is calculated to carry with it the implied statement that the officers did not behave well. Such was not my meaning. I intended to say that all of the 23d engaged in the fight behaved bravely, as I was informed. I will also here supply an omission made in my former statement. I am informed that Lieut. Brown, of the Danville Artillery, and Lieut. Washington, of the Confederate Army, who were officers of the Danville Artillery in the fight, acted in the most gallant manner. The mention of these honorable names is not intended to reflect upon the conduct of others not mentioned and about whose behavior I am not informed. I will be the last man to (knowingly) do injustice to a brother soldier. Samuel V Fulkerson, Col. Com'dg 37th Regt. Va.Vol.
s the information which I had, but Col. Taliaferro informs me that portions of all his companies were in the fight except one. I also stated that the companies in the engagement behaved gallantly I am informed that my language is calculated to carry with it the implied statement that the officers did not behave well. Such was not my meaning. I intended to say that all of the 23d engaged in the fight behaved bravely, as I was informed. I will also here supply an omission made in my former statement. I am informed that Lieut. Brown, of the Danville Artillery, and Lieut. Washington, of the Confederate Army, who were officers of the Danville Artillery in the fight, acted in the most gallant manner. The mention of these honorable names is not intended to reflect upon the conduct of others not mentioned and about whose behavior I am not informed. I will be the last man to (knowingly) do injustice to a brother soldier. Samuel V Fulkerson, Col. Com'dg 37th Regt. Va.Vol.
John Taliaferro (search for this): article 19
. Headquarters 37 th Reg't, Dep. N. W. Va., Monterey 3d Aug., 1861. To the Editors of the Dispatch:--In my communication to you published a few days ago, I stated that two or three companies of the 23d Regiment Virginia Volunteers, (Colonel Taliaferro's,) were engaged in the fight at Cheat River. This was the information which I had, but Col. Taliaferro informs me that portions of all his companies were in the fight except one. I also stated that the companies in the engagement behavedCol. Taliaferro informs me that portions of all his companies were in the fight except one. I also stated that the companies in the engagement behaved gallantly I am informed that my language is calculated to carry with it the implied statement that the officers did not behave well. Such was not my meaning. I intended to say that all of the 23d engaged in the fight behaved bravely, as I was informed. I will also here supply an omission made in my former statement. I am informed that Lieut. Brown, of the Danville Artillery, and Lieut. Washington, of the Confederate Army, who were officers of the Danville Artillery in the fight, acted
August 3rd, 1861 AD (search for this): article 19
[for the Richmond Dispatch.] the Northern Army. Headquarters 37 th Reg't, Dep. N. W. Va., Monterey 3d Aug., 1861. To the Editors of the Dispatch:--In my communication to you published a few days ago, I stated that two or three companies of the 23d Regiment Virginia Volunteers, (Colonel Taliaferro's,) were engaged in the fight at Cheat River. This was the information which I had, but Col. Taliaferro informs me that portions of all his companies were in the fight except one. I also stated that the companies in the engagement behaved gallantly I am informed that my language is calculated to carry with it the implied statement that the officers did not behave well. Such was not my meaning. I intended to say that all of the 23d engaged in the fight behaved bravely, as I was informed. I will also here supply an omission made in my former statement. I am informed that Lieut. Brown, of the Danville Artillery, and Lieut. Washington, of the Confederate Army, who were officers