hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
United States (United States) 76 0 Browse Search
Abe Lincoln 44 0 Browse Search
Maryland (Maryland, United States) 22 0 Browse Search
France (France) 20 0 Browse Search
Winfield Scott 18 0 Browse Search
William H. Seward 14 0 Browse Search
Illinois (Illinois, United States) 14 0 Browse Search
Canada (Canada) 12 0 Browse Search
Charles D. Dreux 11 1 Browse Search
Fortress Monroe (Virginia, United States) 10 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in a specific section of The Daily Dispatch: July 11, 1861., [Electronic resource]. Search the whole document.

Found 6 total hits in 2 results.

Abe Lincoln (search for this): article 15
issued a proclamation warning both parties from violating this neutrality. Inasmuch as all of Lincoln's acts were gross usurpations of power and clearly in derogation of the Constitution, Kentucky d feed the insurrectionists." The objection to it, as thus stated, is that it will prevent Lincoln from carrying on a war of invasion against States which lie beyond the neutral territory. He sd no obligation to maintain the Union." The truth is, that neutrality in this war simply brands Lincoln's acts as usurpations, and the Union which upholds as a despotism. But his acts being usurfrom its encroachments, and preserve the liberties and rights of the States and of the people. Lincoln will not recognize such neutrality. Nothing will do but abject obedience to his tyranny, and sarried on under the mockery of upholding free government upon the earth?--Will she adopt all of Lincoln's sophisms, and approve his perjured acts, by which he has overturned the Constitution and woul
is at perfect liberty to refuse obedience to an unconstitutional authority. But it was a delusion to suppose that the usurper would respect this neutrality. Assuming that, while a State remains in the Union, it is bound to obey all its edicts, no matter how arbitrary or unconstitutional, he claims perfect allegiance and demands the right to prosecute hostilities against the Southern States, across Kentucky soil. He says that this neutrality is impossible and would "tie the hands of Unionists and feed the insurrectionists." The objection to it, as thus stated, is that it will prevent Lincoln from carrying on a war of invasion against States which lie beyond the neutral territory. He says it "recognizes no fidelity to the Constitution and no obligation to maintain the Union." The truth is, that neutrality in this war simply brands Lincoln's acts as usurpations, and the Union which upholds as a despotism. But his acts being usurpations, and his Union a despotism, neutr