hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
The Daily Dispatch: January 14, 1862., [Electronic resource] 12 0 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Your search returned 12 results in 3 document sections:

038--making an aggregate of 109,615, exclusive of 20,615 of the three months volunteers now disbanded. From Washington — charge of disloyalty against Adjutant-General Thomas, &c. From a Washington letter to the Baltimore Clipper, of the 8th inst., we clip the following: Rumor is wonderfully pertinacious, for, though discomfited yesterday, she returns to the charge to-day. Notwithstanding all this, Adjutant-General Thomas is at his post as usual; and as for the story about the daughter, it is true she has seceded, but it was with a newly-wedded husband to Philadelphia about two weeks ago. [The charge against Gen. Thomas is the want of loyGen. Thomas is the want of loyalty to Lincoln's dynasty.-- Eds. Dis.] Another of those wholesale visitations was made last night by the Provost Guard about half-past 10 o'clock, upon the Columbia Restaurant, on Pennsylvania avenue, near 3d street, kept by G. A. Springman. It is to be presumed that there was justifiable reason for what was done, for it is
C. S. District Court. --In the case of the Confederate States against Wileman Thomas, for the sequestration of money in his hands belonging to an alien enemy, an order was yesterday entered to pay the same to the Receiver. Confederate States against the Charlottesville and University Gas. Company: Stock belonging to alien enemies ordered to be transferred to the Receiver. Confederate States against John H. Nicholas: Order for sale of property belonging to an alien enemy. James V. Brooke, of Fauquier, has been appointed a Commissioner in this court.
He therefore submitted a motion to lay the resolutions upon the table. The Senate refused to agree to the motion — ayes 15, noes 20. The constitutional question involved was discussed by Messrs. Johnson, Neeson, Robertson, Newton, and Thomas, of Henry. The vote was then taken on the first resolution, and it was rejected. Mr. Robertson moved the indefinite postponement of the remainder of the series.--Agreed to — yeas 21, nays 17. On motion of Mr. Thomas, of Fairfax, thes 20. The constitutional question involved was discussed by Messrs. Johnson, Neeson, Robertson, Newton, and Thomas, of Henry. The vote was then taken on the first resolution, and it was rejected. Mr. Robertson moved the indefinite postponement of the remainder of the series.--Agreed to — yeas 21, nays 17. On motion of Mr. Thomas, of Fairfax, the vote by which the first resolution was rejected was reconsidered, and laid upon the table. On motion, the Senate adjourn