home
MotorMouth of the Oval Office | 68 comments (68 topical)

Readers Must Login or Create an Account to Comment

My understandings (5.00 / 2) (#7)
by BackFromOhio on Tue May 16, 2017 at 12:01:18 AM EST
he leaked classified info thereby declassifying it, but US did not have approval of the country that provided the info to do so. Evidently there were many mmore details that WaPo and WSJ held back in order not to compound the error.

Query whether any international law was broken?

This is scary to me given that Russia and US have different positions on the mideast  

Let us never again hear about HRC's handling of confidential info.

This is analogous to the comparison of impeaching Bill Clinton for lying about a tryst and the Republican's resistance to impeaching Orange Julius for multiple serious causes. Emoluments clause anyone?

Simply inconceivable....

J. Turley just said (none / 0) (#10)
by CaptHowdy on Tue May 16, 2017 at 08:19:25 AM EST
if McMaster repeats the lies he told the press yesterday to congress it would be an indictable federal offense.

Parent
even if he is not (none / 0) (#11)
by CaptHowdy on Tue May 16, 2017 at 08:37:44 AM EST
under oath.

wonder how willing he will be to do that after just being totally undercut by president bozos tweets this morning.

Parent

For McMaster it isn't lies (none / 0) (#19)
by Militarytracy on Tue May 16, 2017 at 09:50:53 AM EST
It's military law. The President instantly declassifies whatever he speaks. He is commander in chief. McMaster cannot question this either. That for him is illegal. He is not a civilian you guys.

Mattis can question what happened, Kelly can too, HR McMaster cannot question what happened. Not today.

Parent

then there is the BS (5.00 / 1) (#65)
by CaptHowdy on Tue May 16, 2017 at 03:44:48 PM EST
i just saw him shoveling about how the real problem is "leaks"

he is a mouth piece and has zero credibility.

Parent

That's a soldier (none / 0) (#71)
by Militarytracy on Wed May 17, 2017 at 11:48:39 AM EST
He does not have comprehension of free speech or even what it's used for. He signed his rights away for that long ago, and then as he was promoted he was given back some rights to speak his mind.

And this all worked when you have an ethical President with reverent power. All the BS works.

But right now my husband lays on the couch holding his own head in his hands. His head hurts, and he mumbles stuff about brainwashed....not making this up. It's really happening in my own home nightly :)

Some are rolling around on their sofas mumbling, others are shouting nonsense at the air. We r so phucked

Parent

then he should not (none / 0) (#64)
by CaptHowdy on Tue May 16, 2017 at 03:43:20 PM EST
have the job he has

Parent
Nope, he should not be the NSA (none / 0) (#72)
by Militarytracy on Wed May 17, 2017 at 11:50:45 AM EST
Who should be, who can be? Who will even take that effing job right now?

Parent

MotorMouth of the Oval Office | 68 comments (68 topical)

Readers Must Login or Create an Account to Comment

  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft