TalkLeft: The Politics Of Crime

Readers Must Login or Create an Account to Comment

All (none / 0) (#93)
by FlJoe on Wed Feb 01, 2017 at 05:56:10 AM EST

the reporting has said otherwise.

Parent

And (none / 0) (#94)
by TrevorBolder on Wed Feb 01, 2017 at 06:05:34 AM EST

The reporting is wrong...Once again

Parent

Say's (none / 0) (#95)
by FlJoe on Wed Feb 01, 2017 at 06:11:50 AM EST

who? Mr. Alternate facts Spicer.

Parent

Who said (none / 0) (#96)
by TrevorBolder on Wed Feb 01, 2017 at 06:19:07 AM EST

It didn't get reviewed?
Any one who knows? Or just anonymous?

It was just another event where the press ran with their preferred narrative, to once again have it blow up.

Parent

: Maybe (none / 0) (#101)
by FlJoe on Wed Feb 01, 2017 at 07:26:39 AM EST

you are right, maybe the press got it wrong or maybe the administration is lying.
I have one question though, if it did get a proper review where the heck is the memo. It seems to me it should have surfaced by now.
You are asking the press the prove the negative, when the proof of the positive could be made in a heartbeat.
Maybe I am missing something, but I imagine that if such an approving report existed, it would already have released as justification by the administration.

Parent

Then it should be easy (none / 0) (#97)
by TrevorBolder on Wed Feb 01, 2017 at 06:21:29 AM EST

To prove Alternative Facts wrong again....

But I haven't seen that

If Spicer is lying,I would have thought it would be real easy to prove it,

And the press is chomping at the bit to do so.

I haven't seen anything

Parent

: Why can't (none / 0) (#102)
by Ga6thDem on Wed Feb 01, 2017 at 08:01:35 AM EST

the alternative facts group release the memo? It seems easy enough to do. It certainly looks like Spicer is lying through his teeth once again.

Parent