Showing posts with label 70D. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 70D. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 15, 2015

REVIEW: Nikon D7200 + 18-140mm Lens–The Perfect Camera for Parents?

Nikon D7200 DSLR Camera with 18-140mm Lens
Nikon D7200 DSLR Camera with 18-140mm Lens

I’ve been a big fan of the Nikon D7xxx series ever since I reviewed the D7000. It’s always been a solid performer, so when I reviewed the D7100 I was considered picking one up for myself. I’m a Canon shooter, so I didn’t need another camera – especially one that couldn’t use my existing lenses, but that’s just how much I liked the predecessor to the Nikon D7200.

After some seat time with this camera I’ve discovered that everything that I liked about the predecessor returns plus it gets a EXPEED 4 processor, WiFi & NFC included as well as much improved buffer to hold more images before you have to wait for the files to write to the memory card. Click here to see a complete comparison chart.

What the improvements really mean is that you’ll be able to take 3x the number of photos (compared to the D7100) before you are waiting on the camera to finish writing, and you’ll be able to use much higher ISO’s with acceptable performance. How high is subjective, but I personally found ISO 25,600 to be usable for personal use and even 12,800 to be quite good.

What I’ve always really loved about the D7xx series is that it has a great balance of ease of use with a wide spectrum of advanced features. This means that even the most advanced photographer will likely get excited about D7200 features like:

  • An 4 level adjustable Auto ISO that comes in handy in Aperture Priority because you to control how aggressive the camera is at shooting slower or faster shutter speeds. At its fastest setting faster shutter speeds will be chosen to minimize blurry shots or having to use an arbitrarily high minimum shutter speed setting (or manual mode). I wish all cameras had this (especially my Canon’s!). It should also be noted that this feature is supported in Manual mode with exposure compensation too for the maximum in flexibility!
  • An auto white balance that favors warm temperatures (Auto2) so skin tones look healthier rather than technically correct (although still not as warm as you’ll get with Canon – which some people love, and others hate).
  • Fast physical button access to exposure compensation, flash exposure compensation, bracketing, metering modes, video recording, and more.
  • A usable built-in flash. While off-camera and hot shoe flashes are better, it’s good to have something when in a pinch and Nikons popup flashes perform better than the competing products I’ve tried.
  • 51 focus points accessible quickly via multi-selector button along with support for remembering separate portrait versus landscape orientation points.
  • Built-in intervalometer for doing time lapse photography
  • Two user programmable mode dial points for your favorite settings (U1 & U2)
  • Scene and Effects modes for amateur photographers who want to leverage the internal technology to its fullest so they can focus on shooting instead of camera settings
  • Programmable buttons for when you’d rather move things around or expose functionality that would otherwise require a menu visit.

While many of these feature are neither new nor available only on this camera, what I like about the D7200 is that it is a great bridge between features offered on more advanced pro bodies while retaining some of the ease of use features of the entry level bodies. It really is a camera that you can grow with from first time DSLR shooter all the way to the semi-pro level. The burst mode performance also makes it great for both wildlife shooters as well as parents who have been struggling with blurry shots of their little bundle of joy indoors. The great high ISO performance also means those shots won’t suck when you go to edit them.

Kite Test

I don’t typically do a kite test on a camera in this price range because it requires a sophisticated AF system that isn’t easily confused, but after spending time with the D7200 I began to have confidence it could handle it. Here’s a good example of where the D7200 performed admirably:


f/2.8 @ 75mm for 1/2000 sec at ISO 720
with Nikon 70-200mm (unedited)

Photographing people with kites is tough because you not only have to worry about tracking your subject, but also keeping the kite in the frame. As a result you leave extra space when framing, so having some extra megapixels to spare when you crop will come in handy! I ended up with usable shots like the ones above and below, but I definitely could use a much tighter crop. Thanks to a good image file size, it is quite easy to crop without losing any important detail from the image (assuming your output isn’t a huge print).

Click here to see 36 images from my kite testing including my favorite one below…


Kai’s first lift off with a kite
f/2.8 @ 70mm for 1/2000 sec at ISO 2200
with Nikon 70-200mm (unedited)

The value of 24 megapixels

Megapixels are often overrated because in reality people rarely print anymore, so the largest output most people often see their images displayed is on their 1080p HDTV (which is only 2 megapixels!). Even a UHD 4k display only requires 8 megapixels, so generally speaking we often discard megapixels when downsizing our images to the web or in small prints.

With that said, having some extra megapixels around does have one advantage and that’s to crop and still have a usable image for displaying on the web. I mentioned this above, but here’s a much better example:

D7200-3-122_zoomed
f/11 @ 200mm for 1/640 sec at ISO 280 – Edited to show detail
100% crop – See full-size original below

While the shot above isn’t going to win awards because it is bad on so many levels, what is interesting is that I wasn’t out shooting eagles. I was shooting something else entirely when I spotted something huge flying overhead. I raised the camera and fired off a couple shots (hence the unnecessary f/11!). As you can see from below, I had no clue it was kind of bird it really was:


Uncropped original

Despite being in full automatic AF mode I was able to successfully capture this image and with the bring enough detail out to see the underbelly of the bird using only the JPEG (RAW had been disabled when I was testing something different).

While this lame image won’t be appearing in any wildlife photography magazines, it does show the value of megapixels when cropping and the strength of the D7200 AF system. I had the wrong settings and wasn’t ready, but yet I came away with a shot that I could clean up and post on Facebook as proof that I saw a eagle circling above me.

When people ask me why they need a DSLR in these days of great cellphone cameras and mirrorless systems, I use cases like this to show that the DSLR still has great value. Yes, other cameras may have the megapixels and resolution, but few have everything they need to pull it all together. While poor, this shot clearly identifies the eye of the bird and the separation of wings from the in-camera JPEG.

Now imagine if I had a 400mm lens and was actually ready for this shot with better camera settings! On this camera that would be the 35mm (full-frame) equivalent of 600mm thanks to the 1.5x crop factor which comes in handy in scenarios like this. Wildlife shooters on a budget are going to enjoy what this camera brings to the table!

Swing Test


f/4 @ 86mm for 1/1000 sec at ISO 2000
with Nikon 70-200mm (unedited)

When a camera shows signs of being good for parents I get my kids to be my swing test subjects. If you’ve ever tried to take photos of kids on swings then you know what a challenge it can be getting a decent shot, so in the world of real life shooting it’s one of the bigger challenges for both the parent and the auto focus system.

While this is certainly no D750 or D4s caliber performer, it did do a very good job for a fraction of the cost. The AF system was by no means flawless as I would see a few missed focus shots in most series, but I’d occasionally get an entire burst that was usable.


f/4 @ 86mm for 1/1000 sec at ISO 800
with Nikon 70-200mm (unedited)

Click here to see the beginning of 83 swing test shots I did including this one which is the beginning of a continuous burst of 65 straight images (JPEG only) that were done without releasing the shutter button.

Real World Shots

My real world shots are about showing pictures taken from real life activities that haven’t been planned or labored over for hours. These are casual snapshots where only a few frames are shot and the best is taken for your review. Shots featured here use the kit lens first section and then the 70-200mm at the end where noted.

Most camera settings are in-camera defaults and the unedited in-camera JPEG is shown. Unless noted, Auto2 white balance is used with the Standard picture control setting. Aperture priority or manual mode was used with Auto ISO and all shots are handheld.

The goal here is to capture shots you’d expect to be able to capture yourself and results you could expect to see on your computer before post-processing.

Click the images to see the unedited, full-size, in-camera JPEG original images. All photos in this article are Copyright © Ron Martinsen – ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. You may view the images on your computer while this article is active in your browser, but you may not retain, print, edit, or otherwise use any images without my written consent.


f/5.6 @ 140mm for 1/500 sec at ISO 100

I felt this was a wow shot for a straight out of the camera result with a kit lens. Excellent dynamic range with reasonable sharpness and great shadow detail. It wasn’t long ago that you needed a couple extra grand to get these kind of results!


f/5 @ 52mm for 1/1000 sec at ISO 100

The Shade white balance turned this image a bit too yellow and camera meters always turn white to gray (tip: overexpose by 1/3rd stop), but what you are left with here is a RAW image that has all the data it needs for a decent image. The kit lens requires f/5 at 52mm so that hurts this shot especially due to its poor bokeh quality, but I’ve definitely seen worse from a kit lens.


f/5.6 @ 140mm for 1/800 sec at ISO 100

While I was unimpressed with the kit lens,
beginners are going to be pleased with this level of detail


f/5.6 @ 140mm for 1/640 sec at ISO 100

Excellent shadow detail is a given with this camera


f/5.6 @ 66mm for 1/200 sec at ISO 500

The purpose of this ugly shot is to show off the tremendous dynamic range from the super bright areas on the left that still retail some detail to the intense dark creek bed which still offer clearly visible rocks and ripples. This impressive for a camera this affordable!


f/4 @ 32mm for 1/500 sec at ISO 1250

I got a little overzealous in cheering my son on in this 10 shot burst series, but that’s easily correctable with a rotate in editing. What’s interesting is that the high ISO is not even noticeable as the image quality is excellent  for the entire series. Even more impressive is that the AF system nailed every shot while in full auto mode.


f/3.8 @ 23mm for 1/160 sec at ISO 100

I chose the wrong shutter speed and failed to add exposure compensation for the backlighting, but the D7200 gave me a shot I can still use – especially with raw processing. I was very pleased with the shadow detail of the face and the brightly lit background


f/5.6 @ 18mm for 1/160 sec at ISO 100

Kit lens users will appreciate that they can go pretty wide at 18mm as shown here,
or very deep as shown below taken from the same spot


f/5.6 @ 140mm for 1/500 sec at ISO 720

Full zoomed in from above, detail at the end of the trail is clearly visible at 140mm
thanks to the crop factor which makes this an effective 210mm reach


f/5.6 @ 27mm for 1/80 sec at ISO 220

My dynamic range torture test here shows how shadows under the escalator to bright areas in the glass and building outside are all within range – impressive!

Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 VR II Photos

The following photos were all taken handheld with the Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 VR II instead of the kit lens…


f/3.5 @ 200mm for 1/640 sec at ISO 720

With a proper lens incredible detail can be captured with respectable bokeh.
Be sure to click to view the pollen on the original at 100% – impressive!


f/4 @ 200mm for 1/640 sec at ISO 1000

Using the 70-200mm felt like I had a different camera body.
Zoom in to check out the detail on the main flower!


f/5.6 @ 195mm for 1/200 sec at ISO 2200

I was very impressed with the sharp detail despite this high ISO.
I was also very pleased that, despite being handheld and zoomed in tight,
I got such crisp detail on the tips of the flower!


f/2.8 @ 190mm for 1/200 sec at ISO 280

While a full frame FX sensor would have been better here, I was
once again impressed with the image quality from yet another D7xxx series body

To view the entire gallery of unedited original in-camera JPEG’s, visit http://photos.ronmartblog.com/nikon/d7200.

Bookshelf Shots

CLICK HERE to see or download my full collection of various bookshelf shots. You can also click the images below for a full-size original. While I can’t imagine why anyone would want to use them, please note that all are Copyright ® Ron Martinsen – All Rights Reserved.

As I’ve noticed in the past, the Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 VR II causes the camera to expose brighter than other lenses in this test. Feel free to balance the exposure of the bookshelf shots for a better comparison on your computer for a more accurate comparison, but the net result is still that the image quality is very good for the 70-200 compared to the softer kit lens.


f/4 @ 70mm for 6 sec at ISO 100 (70-200mm f/2.8 VR II)

Based on the images above and below I’d classify the image quality of the D7200 to be very good, but there are definitely better cameras on the market – for much larger price tags. As p


f/5.6 @ 140mm for 6 sec at ISO 100 (Kit Lens)


f/5.6 @ 18mm for 1/250 sec at ISO 12800

ISO 12800 was the maximum ISO I felt comfortable with for dark shots, but in bright light 25,600 is totally usable. I review a lot of incredible cameras so I wouldn’t call this great high ISO performance, but it’s definitely better than any mirrorless that I’ve tested in this price range.

Video Performance

I’ve shot some video and will be including them here next week. Overall I thought video performance was average for DSLR in this price range. Parents shouldn’t consider any DSLR a replacement for their camcorder or cell phone – both of which are more foolproof – but with careful planning excellent video results are within reach with the D7200.

Compared To…

Generally speaking, I expect that the average buyer of this camera is going to be upgrading from an existing Nikon already. However, in the world of DSLR’s I thought I’d toss in my 2 cents about how I think this camera stacks up to the following:

  • Canon 70D (review) – I don’t see this as a competing product. I felt the D7100 really surpassed the 70D, so the D7200 blows it away on everything but price. Yes, the fps are similar, but until Canon replaces this camera with something newer I wouldn’t consider it to be a significant competitor to the D7200.
  • Canon 7D Mark II (review) – While I personally prefer the controls layout of the D7200, the 7D Mark II does offer a much higher FPS and theoretically more advanced auto focus system. Overall, I still prefer the D7200 for its overall keeper rate based on what I find to be an easier to use autofocus system.

    Image quality-wise, I find the 7D Mark II to be better than I expected before this review. I figured the D7200 would destroy the 7D Mark II but upon close examination the differences between the two favor the 7D Mark II – but it comes at a $500 premium!

    I do believe the D7200 is a lot more “mom friendly” after the correct settings have been dialed in by someone who understands how to configure it properly. 
  • Canon 6D (review) – Not really an apples to apples comparison, but I’m including it as the price will have some people considering it as an alternative. What it lacks in FPS and advanced AF system, it certainly makes up for in significantly superior image quality. I think most people considering the D7200 for its AF and burst mode performance would certainly be better off with the D7200 over the 6D, but if image quality is your only concern then the 6D is naturally the winner.
  • Nikon D610 (review) – Yes, this is a lot more camera for not a lot more money so if you can afford it then go for it. With the D610 you do lose a little bit in burst mode and AF performance, but you gain superior image quality. I love the D610, but until its replacement with the EXPEED 4 comes out, I think the D7200 is still a good choice for those who need a sports camera or one that keeps up with active kids.
  • Nikon D750 (review) – Again oranges vs apples, and the D750 easily earns extra $1k in price over the D7200 for superior image quality. Yes, the D7200 can basically match the burst mode performance when adjusted for image size, the images you get from the D750 are simply sublime. If you have the extra $1k, get it, but if your budget is tight the D7200 is a great start and leaves more budget for something far more important –  great lenses!
  • Nikon D810 (review) – It’s makes very little sense to compare these, but I’ve been asked so many times to compare the D7100 to the D810 that I figured I had to say something here.
    In my opinion, the D810 is a special purpose camera that’s great for landscapes and studio photography, but it is less than ideal as an all-purpose travel/everyday camera. Even 4k display owners and those who print large 16x24” prints will have all the megapixels they need with the D7200. If you even think that these two need to be compared, then this is definitely not the right camera for you – the D7200 is.

Models below the D7200 in the Nikon lineup are simply not in the same league in my opinion. Those are entry level cameras whereas this is a camera that an amateur can use and a semi-pro photographer will love. As a result, I’m not including them here as they are more suited for discussions when comparing cameras like the Canon Rebel T6s

Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-140mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR Lens

Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-140mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR Lens
Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-140mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR Lens

When considering the crop factor, this lens is a 27-210mm (35mm equivalent). This is an awesome range, but like all lenses I’ve tested that try to cover so much range – it falls short on image quality. While I wouldn’t classify it as bad – especially if you never print or zoom in – it does create a softer image than this sensor is capable of displaying (based on what I saw with the 70-200mm). As a result, I’d opt against the kit and just go with the body only when ordering.

Conclusion

Photography is expensive so it’s easy to get caught up in the upgrade game or jonesing for what others have. I teach a lot of students who have made the wrong choices, so that’s why I get excited about this camera. This camera is a solid performer so I know I’ll never tell a student who uses it that “you’d probably be better off if you had got this other camera” when they are complaining about blurry shots or image noise.

Yes, a great photo can be made with any camera, but the mere mortals do best when they have the right tool that does a lot of the heavy lifting for them. The D7200 is just that – a camera that puts the fun back into photography by increasing your keeper rate. As a result, I highly recommend the D7200 for parents and those who take photography seriously, but who also need to keep their expenses in check!

Where to order

Click here to learn more or order on B&H’s web site.

Other articles you may enjoy

If you enjoyed this article, you may also enjoy these reviews and articles:

Disclosure

If you make a purchase using links found in this article, I may make a commission. It doesn’t cost you a penny more, but it does help to support future articles like this.

NOTE: This site requires cookies and uses affiliate linking to sites that use cookies.

If you enjoyed this article, please support future articles like this by making a donation or saving money by using my discount coupon codes. Either way, your support is greatly appreciated!

This blog is intended for freelance writing and sharing of opinions and is not a representative of any of the companies whose links are provided on this site.

The opinions provided are of Ron Martinsen alone and do not reflect the view of any other entity

Wednesday, November 27, 2013

REVIEW: Nikon D610 - Part I of II (Real World Shots)

Nikon D610 DSLR Camera (Body Only)
Nikon D610 DSLR Camera

I titled my D600 review “Nikon D600–My Favorite Nikon Ever?!!!” because at that point in time (October 2012) I was still getting over my disappointment of the D800. The D600 still went on to be my DSLR of the year (alongside the Canon 6D), but for the Nikon platform in 2012 I felt it was “the” camera to own when all factors (price, image quality, size, etc…) were considered. In short, it was my preferred “everyday” camera for the Nikon platform. In fact, I liked it so much that I almost bought one (but my investment in Canon gear stopped me).

Fast forward over a year later and a LOT has changed, but surprisingly not much changes on the D610. You basically get a marginally faster burst mode and a quiet shutter burst mode (great for event photographers). Despite this disappointing list of improvements, I enjoyed its predecessor so I decided to have an extended evaluation period with this camera over a variety of conditions as I had done with its predecessor.

Real World Sample Images

The following sample images were all taken with the D610 and the Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8G ED lens and no flash. The images are not processed in any way (no crop, rotate, sharpen, nothing). These are the in-camera jpeg’s that have simply been renamed and uploaded. You can click the photos to download the original files and you can visit the gallery to get more samples not featured in this article.

For comparison, please read my D600 article or visit the Nikon D600 Sample Gallery.


Beautiful model under studio lights sample is in camera with no crop or edits
f/10 @ 70 mm, 1/125, ISO 100


The dinner rose test – impressive for ISO 5600 (when viewed at realistic sizes)
f/2.8 @ 70 mm, 1/60, ISO 5600


Overall I thought the D610 did good with this tough mixed color scene
f/4 @ 70 mm, 1/60, ISO 900, No Flash


Smoke, red, movement, lights, – this shot has a lot to look at to see how the D610 handles complex situations
f/4 @ 70 mm, 1/60, ISO 3200, No Flash


Handheld at night – solid as expected
f/5.6 @ 70 mm, 1/125, ISO 5000

 


f/11 @ 35 mm, 0.6s, ISO 100 (Tripod)


Incredible dynamic range
f/5.6 @ 70 mm, 1/60, ISO 2000


f/5.6 @ 26 mm, 1/125, ISO 12800 or 25600 - Nikon hides the h mode ISO's from Lightroom


f/9 @ 50 mm, 1/60 ISO 12800


f/7.1 @ 24 mm, 1/30, ISO 1100


Auto white balance (2) torture test
f/2.8 @ 42 mm, 1/60, ISO 3200


The burst mode improvement didn’t seem to help much with my busy toddler
f/2.8 @ 56 mm, 1/250, ISO 2000


The performance of the tonal range of the blacks here was impressive
f/10 @ 70 mm, 1/125, ISO 100

Conclusion

Click here to see my conclusion in part II.

Where to order

Click here to learn more or order from B&H. Sign up for my deals newsletter to keep up on sales announcements for this camera and much more.

Other articles you may enjoy

If you enjoyed this article, you may also enjoy these:

Disclosure

If you make a purchase using links found in this article, I may make a commission. It doesn’t cost you a penny more, but it does help to support future articles like this.

B&H provided me with a loaner camera and lens so I could bring this article to you.

NOTE: This site requires cookies and uses affiliate linking to sites that use cookies.

If you enjoyed this article, please support future articles like this by making a donation or saving money by using my discount coupon codes. Either way, your support is greatly appreciated!

This blog is intended for freelance writing and sharing of opinions and is not a representative of any of the companies whose links are provided on this site.

The opinions provided are of Ron Martinsen alone and do not reflect the view of any other entity

Wednesday, October 9, 2013

MINI-REVIEW: Sony a3000–Great Deal or Garbage?


Sony Alpha A3000 Digital Camera with 18-55mm Lens

When I first saw that Sony was offering the A3000 with the same 18-55mm lens that I had on the NEX-7 that I reviewed for less than $399, I was shocked! I figured there had to be a misprint because a mirrorless camera with a APS-C sensor, an electronic view finder and a good lens shouldn’t be that cheap!

Like most people, I my skepticism quickly made me think – that camera is probably total garbage! Typically I wouldn’t even bother reviewing a camera like this, but since I enjoyed the NEX-7 so much I wondered if this was really a bulky NEX-7 or a marketing scam.

While I didn’t enjoy this camera enough to put it through my typical level of testing, I did use it enough to think that it was a heck of a bargain! The lens is great and the images are certainly better than some higher priced DSLR’s I’ve tested in the past. It’s also way better than many smaller sensor cameras at this price point, so how can it be this cheap?

The answer seems to be buttons, knobs, a few more megapixels and a much better LCD is what you get for an extra $1000. Actually, that’s note entirely accurate are there are more features that make the NEX-7 my preferred Sony camera, but only geeks and hard core photographers are going to be able to tell the difference between the final photo results.

Do not buy this camera as a gift for your geek

I’m going to flat out insist that people shouldn’t buy this camera for their significant others as a gift. I know it sounds bad, but the reality is that often times I’ve seen disasters where a sweet spouse tries to buy her loved one something that seems cool – only to have their spouse disappointed.

This camera has all of the logical checkboxes that might lead one to believe that this is the perfect holiday DSLR for the guy who always wanted a real DSLR, but this camera is clearly designed for people who don’t care much about gadgets or gear and only want something that gets the job done. Maybe it’s because I live in the high-tech Seattle area, but few people I know fall into this camp.

This is a camera you buy for yourself for your personal use, and if you like it you’ll feel proud of yourself for the deal you got. If not, you can return it without guilt or hurting feelings, and that’s the way it should be.

If you do want to buy a camera for your geek, then check out my Which Camera Should I Buy? article for advice that is more likely to please your loved one.

Real World Sample Pics

As always, these images ALL RIGHTS RESERVED (yes, even the lame ones <g>). You may not save, edit, print, redistribute or otherwise use them without expressed written permission.

These are taken from in-camera JPEG’s with zero modifications taken during everyday life events. Nearly all were taken in Aperture Priority (A) mode unless otherwise noted, and all were handheld. The goal of these samples is to show you exactly what you’d expect to get if you were taking your own real world shots.

Unfortunately I only had a short time to play with this camera because I was testing two other cameras out at the same time. However, I did make a few snapshots which have similar shots taken with the Canon 70D and Nikon D5200. You can view their galleries and locate similar (not identical) images of the same scenes to see how this camera compares at a fraction of the price.

The Canon and Nikon are more expensive and not really direct competitors to this camera, but I thought it did okay next to the shots I did using those others cameras at the same time. My goal isn’t to say these are comparable cameras, but rather share shots I took with these others cameras at the same time.


Sunset Scene Mode
f/16 @ 55 mm, 1/400, ISO 100, Shade White Balance


f/5.6 @ 55 mm, 1/100, ISO 500, Auto White Balance
at sunset


f/5.6 @ 54 mm, 1/125, ISO 100,
Shade White Balance


8192 x 1856 in-camera panorama - f/11 @ 33 mm, 1/100, ISO 100


f/4.5 @ 39 mm, 1/60, ISO 3200, No Flash, Auto White Balance

Conclusion

I really missed not having another wheel and some kind of D-Pad or Joystick on this camera. This really inhibited me from getting the results I wanted or missing shots. I also think the LCD for both the rear of the camera and the electronic viewfinder are horrible. With the bad news out of the way, I think this camera is a steal at this price!

With a very good lens that you can change with other great Sony E-Mount lenses, a decent APS-C sensor, a great pano mode, in camera stabilization and an excellent price I think that it’s the perfect camera for non-gadget geek beginners. Teens and those who want a DSLR quality without the DSLR investment price will enjoy having a “real” camera, but they’ll appreciate the ease of use thanks to the auto features. It’s mirrorless design makes it smaller, lighter, and quieter than DSLR as well, yet the camera has a surprisingly solid high quality feel.

A good grip, a pop up flash and hot shoe makes it a camera worth a lot more than it’s sales price. In fact, this camera reminds me a bit like ink jet printers where they darn near give you the printer for free because they know they’ll make thousands off you in ink and paper. This camera has a quality that feels subsidized to get you on the Sony platform, so it’s a deal that is hard to beat. In fact, it’s like getting a decent camera for only $100 with a good lens that retails for $298 as of the time of this writing.

Where to order

Click here to order or learn more about the a3000 at B&H.

Other articles you may enjoy

If you enjoyed this article, you may also enjoy these:

Disclosure

If you make a purchase using links found in this article, I may make a commission. It doesn’t cost you a penny more, but it does help to support future articles like this.

NOTE: This site requires cookies and uses affiliate linking to sites that use cookies.

If you enjoyed this article, please support future articles like this by making a donation or saving money by using my discount coupon codes. Either way, your support is greatly appreciated!

This blog is intended for freelance writing and sharing of opinions and is not a representative of any of the companies whose links are provided on this site.

The opinions provided are of Ron Martinsen alone and do not reflect the view of any other entity

Monday, October 7, 2013

REVIEW: Canon 70D and EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

Canon EOS 70D DSLR Camera Kit with 18-55mm and 55-250mm Lenses
Canon EOS 70D DSLR Camera Kit with 18-55mm and 55-250mm Lenses

If you are just visiting my blog, you can see the first part of this review in my article entitled REVIEW: Canon 70D First Look with Real World Sample Photos. My apologies for the long delay in doing part II, but a family medical emergency had me offline for a while.

This weekend I finally got a chance to finish putting the 70D through its paces so that I can bring you the final installment of this review. I also had a chance to pair it up with the latest version of the 55-250mm lens in addition to using it with my 24-70mm f/2.8L II lens.

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM Telephoto Zoom Lens
Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM Telephoto Zoom Lens

Since I don’t test cameras that can use EF-S lenses very often, I decided to use this as a chance to play with one of Canon’s newer STM lenses. There are three versions of this lens floating around, but I got the latest version from B&H which is the first to be an STM lens.

SLRGear has a good in-depth review of non-STM version of this lens, and I’m sure they will be testing the STM version in the near future. Check here for the latest SLRGear review. I thought I’d share my thoughts which are more subjective than scientific for this particular lens.

While this lens won’t be showing up on my “Which lens should I buy?” article, I thought it was a good performer for a beginner lens. At the time of this writing, it was under $350 USD, which makes it a pretty good value for a lens covering this much range.

Of course one-size fits most lenses sound great to the newbie, you only need to use an L series lens to quickly realize why Canon offers over 100 lenses. The more you specialize with a lens, the better the results (i.e., a 135mm f/2L will destroy this lens at 135mm).  However, it’s tough to get started in DSLR photography, so this isn’t a bad way to get your feet wet while you save for the good lenses.

The AF performed fairly well, but the minimum focus distance is pretty brutal (2.79' (85 cm)) if you like to get close to your subjects (i.e., close portraits or macros). The STM works a as advertised and is very quiet. The image stabilization (IS) is okay, but it didn’t feel like it was as effective as some of my better lenses like the 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM.

The most positive thing I can say about this lens is that it doesn’t suck (for a beginner). This may sound funny, but older kit lenses were pretty awful. I still stick to my lens recommendations, but I think new users who don’t pixel peep against shots taken with better lenses will most often be satisfied with its results.

Real World Sample Images 


Canon EOS 70D, f/5.6 @ 55 mm, 1/500, ISO 100, No Flash, Shade White Balance

In the next two shots I demonstrate what it really means to go from 250mm (max zoom) in the shot below to the 55mm (min zoom). While my example has a horizon that is crooked as a politician, you get the idea that this lens may not be the sharpest but it’s handy!


Max Zoom
f/5.6 @ 250 mm, 1/250, ISO 100, No Flash


Min Zoom
f/4 @ 55 mm, 1/800, ISO 100, No Flash


f/5.6 @ 237 mm, 1/640, ISO 100, No Flash, Shade White Balance


I was satisfied with most of the shots I got with this lens
f/4 @ 55 mm, 1/320, ISO 100, No Flash


f/5 @ 117 mm, 1/500, ISO 160, No Flash

Click here to visit a full gallery of images taken with the 70D using the Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM Telephoto Zoom Lens. All of the images are the original in-camera JPEG files with no modification beyond file metadata changes.

It should be noted that some images use JPEG normal instead of JPEG fine due to a mistake I made while turning off RAW for a moment so I could do a HDR shot. I’m unsure of how many images have the wrong compression setting, but this could cause some of the images to look slightly softer than they really are.

Living with the 70D

This camera has the same basic layout as the 6D with the cool high resolution articulating touch screen from the T5i. Surprisingly this touch screen didn’t annoy me as much as the one from the T5i, but it could just be that I’m getting used it. I did find the screen to be excellent and the pivoting display that allows for self pictures as well as tough macro and over the head shots is always welcome.

Overall, I found myself very satisfied with the build quality despite its small size. It’s the first xxD series that I actually liked since the 40D, so that’s a big surprise after many disappointing releases.

The burst mode isn’t terribly impressive in real world use, especially if you shoot raw, so don’t sell your 7D just yet. The AF system is also fairly watered down from what you’d find in a 5D Mark III or 7D, but its effective.

I did enjoy the viewfinder which also has the option to show a digital level. It’s a 98% viewfinder so you’ll typically pick up a little extra scene elements in the edges from what you see in the viewfinder, but it didn’t bother me much in the real world use. I did appreciate the clarity of the viewfinder though.

The Q menu with touch screen was very nice because it allows you to get to what you want by pressing Q then just tapping the item you want with your finger on the LCD. This speeds up operation which is important as this camera features fewer buttons than what I am comfortable with on my 5D Mark III and 1D X.

The built-in flash works much like Nikon’s in that it sucks less than built-in flashes of years ago. A 600EX-RT or even a cheaper 430EX II is going to give better results, but it’s nice to have when you are in a pinch and need some fill light.

I was disappointed that its live view was a little noisy compared to what I’m used to with Canon cameras when used in long exposure scenarios (at max zoom in). However, the 10x zoom still allowed me to get the results I needed.

The small body is more on par with a Nikon D5200, but it has a wonderfully deep grip that I really enjoyed. In practice the size was never an issue and my thumb could easily navigate all of the controls. Nikon’s have always been better for their abundance of well placed physical buttons, and Canon doesn’t really catch up here, but I found this no worse to use than a 6D. Canon shooters will be right at home, and new DSLR owners should enjoy it.

A Word About Canon In-Camera Noise Reduction

image
Always make sure you set your “High ISO Speed NR” setting to Low on Canon Cameras

While it is taboo to say it or admit it anywhere forum trolls travel, some people actually use the JPEG images from their cameras. If that’s you, then be warned that the 70D is identical to all Canon DIGIC 4 & 5 cameras in that it’s in camera noise reduction is too aggressive after the Low setting. This is important because the camera default is Standard and it obliterates too much detail in the name of removing noise as you can see in the image above.

Notice how in this image, taken at ISO 3200, the image on the right has lots of nice detail with no major noise. Notice how the image on the left looks soft with details missing – this is overly aggressive noise reduction from the in-camera Standard mode.

You can click the image above to see this in action, or you can look at the full-size camera original JPEG’s at Standard here and Low here.

If you find that you still need addition noise reduction on your JPEG or your RAW images, then just use Noiseware (winner of my Noise Reduction Roundup). It does a much better job of preserving detail and removing noise than Canon’s in-camera results.

Bookshelf Images


ISO 6400 is about as high as I would go with this camera
f/4 @ 24 mm, 1/15, ISO 6400, No Flash, Auto White Balance, Low Noise In-Camera Reduction

My overall opinion is that this camera has pretty solid ISO performance up to 3200, and it drops rapidly after that. I’d consider ISO 6400 as high as I’d realistically want to go in real world usage. On the other hand, the sensor captures incredible detail and has a wonderful dynamic range so overall I was very impressed. It is no match for the 6D, but it seems better than a 7D in my opinion.

These are taken from in-camera JPEG’s with zero modifications. Nearly all were taken in Aperture Priority (Av) mode using a timer and a tripod with stabilization turned off. The goal of these samples is to have a common measuring stick in a controlled environment by which you can measure the lens and sensor performance. What’s more you can also compare these to bookshelf shots of other cameras that I’ve reviewed to get an idea of how a camera really compares. See my other camera reviews for links to additional bookshelf images.

As mentioned above, I did change the High ISO Speed NR setting to Low from the Standard to avoid smearing too much detail. I also took these images with my 24-70mm f/2.8L II lens at its sharpest setting - 24mm @ f/4.

Click here to start viewing the images at ISO 100 and up. Be sure to check the caption for the settings used.

Visit http://photos.ronmartblog.com/canon/70d for a full gallery and click the images to see the full-size originals. All images are copyright Ron Martinsen – ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. You may view them, but you may not store, edit, print, distribute or otherwise reuse any images without written consent.

HDR


In-Camera HDR was disappointing

Despite being on a tripod with images that should merge well, the in-camera processing still clipped off quite a bit of the image (see other bookshelf shot above for a comparison). This is pretty lame, but what’s even worse is that there’s no option to save the images that built the HDR so that you can go use software on your computer at a later time. As a result, I hated the built-in HDR feature.

The hand-held auto aligning was no where as good as what I experience with my 5D Mark III, so this is one of those tripod only HDR features. Generally speaking HDR works best with a tripod, so this isn’t necessarily a show stopper – but it’s annoying to know that this feature has been dumbed down for marketing reasons.

My advice is to stick with bracketing and use Photomatix – it’s much better and you don’t lose the edges of your image to in-camera cropping.

Video

In my review of the Think Tank Photo TurnStyle™ Sling Bags, I used the 70D to record the two YouTube videos with the continuous focusing Live View: Dual Pixel CMOS AF. This feature is supposed to offer camcorder-like auto focusing performance on a DSLR. When paired with a STM lens like the EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM I was using in the video, you are supposed to get silent (as compared to USM lenses) and fast auto focusing.

As you can see from the videos in that article, this feature sorta works most of the time but it has a lot more misses than I typically get from a cheap camcorder. In short, it’s the best I’ve seen on a DSLR, but still crap compared to camcorders. Hopefully firmware updates over time will make it better, and I commend Canon for at least trying to make this work.

Conclusion (and compared to the Nikon D7100)

Overall, I’ve got to say that I was very satisfied with the 70D. While I’d probably say that the Nikon D7100 is the better overall camera, the 70D is a very close second. I prefer Canon’s lens options much more than Nikon’s (overall), so if you are already invested in Canon I’d go for a 70D over the D7100. If you are just getting started then you’ll find that the D7100 has much better controls, but the in-camera images won’t look as rich and saturated as you get with the Canon. I’d also give the 70D the nod for superior video performance and a far better LCD display.

I’d highly recommend this camera to someone looking to leverage their existing EF-S lens collection, but I’d encourage a close friend to spend a little more and get a 6D if they wanted to be on the Canon platform. The image quality of the 6D is much better, especially at higher ISO’s, so you’ll be get more usable images at ISO 6400 and 12,800 with the 6D.

Where to order

Click here to order or learn more about the Canon 70D at B&H.

Other articles you may enjoy

If you enjoyed this article, you may also enjoy these:

Disclosure

If you make a purchase using links found in this article, I may make a commission. It doesn’t cost you a penny more, but it does help to support future articles like this.

I borrowed and returned the gear reviewed in this article from B&H.

NOTE: This site requires cookies and uses affiliate linking to sites that use cookies.

If you enjoyed this article, please support future articles like this by making a donation or saving money by using my discount coupon codes. Either way, your support is greatly appreciated!

This blog is intended for freelance writing and sharing of opinions and is not a representative of any of the companies whose links are provided on this site.

The opinions provided are of Ron Martinsen alone and do not reflect the view of any other entity