Showing posts with label 35mm. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 35mm. Show all posts

Friday, February 21, 2014

REVIEW: Sony Alpha a7–Cheaper and More Practical than the a7R

Sony Alpha a7 Mirrorless Digital Camera
Sony Alpha a7 Mirrorless Digital Camera

The Sony a7R that I reviewed impressed the hell out of me. It’s a very, very good camera that will blow peoples minds when its paired with great lenses. However, it had some shortcomings in terms of everyday usability that had me wondering if the Sony a7 was the better choice for those who can only see more than just megapixel statistics.

Body wise the a7 is identical to the a7R which is a good thing, because this is a very good camera body. The menu system usability leaves a lot to be desired, but the wealth of buttons, knobs and feature all result in pleasant shooting experience. What’s more, features like focus peaking are super handy when manually focusing.

The burst mode of this camera and its AF performance are sufficient enough that I feel good recommending this camera for parents – with one caveat – shoot in shutter priority or manual mode. However, one huge limitation of this camera is the lack of a built in flash so save money for an external flash – which sadly takes away some of the portability of this camera.

This camera is a little hefty as compared to other mirrorless cameras, but it feels well enough built that it should hopefully stand up to wear and tear well.

As I mentioned in my a7R review (which I suggestion you read), the electronic viewfinder (EVF) is brilliant. What’s more the rear screen is very good and this camera will even display images at a full 4k (3840×2160 pixels / 8.3MP) if you hook it up to a 4k TV.

Which is better, the Sony a7 vs a7R?

Now before the Sony fan boys get their panties in a bunch, YES I do agree that the image quality of the a7R is indeed superior to the a7. However, it’s a bit like saying a Bugatti Veyron Super Sport is faster than a Bugatti Veyron original – both the a7R and a7 are excellent, so you aren’t getting a bad camera with either one. What’s more in typical web posting and print sizes your spouse won’t likely see the advantage of the a7R over the a7 – when you are using a tripod.

Like all super megapixel cameras, the a7R requires higher shutterspeeds to get a crisp shot than its lesser megapixel sibling, so if you are shooting handheld the odds of getting a blurry shot with the a7R go up. This is why I strongly believe that if you handheld shoot under normal lighting conditions more than you use your tripod or studio lights then the a7 is the better camera in terms of usability. Of course the inverse is true too – if you are primarily a studio shooter or landscape photographer who always uses a tripod then by all means go for the a7R. In the real world that’s a small number of people, so if you are new to cameras of this caliber then you’ll be much happier with the a7. What’s more, if you have kids the superior burst mode performance and hand holding friendliness of the a7 will serve you much better than those blurry and out of focus extra megapixels on the a7R you thought you had to have because it has more megapixels.

Here’s a good video from DigitalRev TV that definitely mirrors many of my observations of these two cameras (well, except for the last part about the colors <g>):

Bookshelf Test

The following shots are done on a tripod with all camera default settings except I also enable RAW. The full gallery of bookshelf images can be found HERE, but I’ve included a noteworthy images below. Please keep in mind that the images are not crooked – the camera is level, but the bookshelf has sagged over time due to weight so I use camera level instead of adjusting the camera for a level shot of the bookshelf.


f/2.8 @ 35 mm, 3.2s, ISO 100, No Flash

Like the a7R, the image quality and color is fantastic. Yes, the a7R has an advantage (comparable image) but this is pretty freakin spectacular. All bookshelf testing was done using the same camera settings and environment with the Sony Sonnar T* FE 35mm f/2.8 ZA lens.

If you want to fault this camera, fault it for its price, but not its image quality. High ISO performance is pretty impressive too – especially when you turn in-camera noise reduction OFF and use Noiseware (Tutorial) as I discussed in my a7R article.

Please read my a7R article bookshelf test results as the only difference here is that the a7 seems to be just a little softer and ironically (and perhaps counter intuitively) exhibits a little more bokeh in the test images.

Lenses Tested

In addition to the FE 28-70mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Kit Lens, I also used these lenses during my review:

Samyang 85mm f/1.4 Aspherical IF Lens for APS-C Sony E-Mount Cameras
Samyang 85mm f/1.4 Aspherical IF Lens for APS-C Sony E-Mount Cameras

B&H tells me this is a hot selling lens so they encouraged me to try it out for this review, but in retrospect I probably should have tested out the Samyang 14mm f/2.8 ED AS IF UMC Lens for Sony E Mount. The reason why is that I wasn’t super impressed with the 85mm. It’s a cheap lens and it performs like a cheap lens which I think diminishes the quality that possible from this sensor, so if you are the type of person who would put no-name generic tires on a luxury sports car then this lens is for you.

In the photo gallery, photos from this lens do not have aperture information and the lens is simply shown as --- in the metadata. In my testing I felt like f/5.6 and f/8 gave the best results, but it had the most chromatic aberrations that I’ve seen from a lens in a long time.

Honestly, if you’ve really gotta go cheap on the lenses I’d suggest choosing from Sigma’s selection of Sony E-Mount lenses.

Sony Sonnar T* FE 35mm f/2.8 ZA Lens
Sony Sonnar T* FE 35mm f/2.8 ZA Lens

I tested this lens with the a7R, so I had to test it with this camera (especially for the bookshelf shots where I knew people would want to do comparisons between the two cameras). This is a very good lens that will satisfy you more than the more flexible kit zoom lens, but the range is hard to work with. Personally, I’d still buy the zoom for its practical use and pick up the Sony 55mm over the 35mm.

I will be testing the Sony A-Mount to E-Mount Lens Adapter with Translucent Mirror Technology adaptor, but I didn’t have any test images at the time I wrote this article.

Real World Sample Images

The following images come from in-camera JPEG’s using the camera default noise reduction settings. Most camera settings are the default with the exception of RAW+JPEG, a desired White Balance, a desired focus point, and occasionally a desired creative style being used.

I’ve included the designations Kit and Samyang to denote when I used the kit lens versus the Samyang for 85mm images. If no designation and 35mm, then the 35mm prime was used.

All images are copyright Ron Martinsen – ALL RIGHTS RESERVED


f/5.6 @ 70 mm, 1/100, ISO 6400, No Flash

Gorgeous color and sharpness even with the kit lens and high ISO


f/4.5 @ 28 mm, 1/100, ISO 5000, No Flash, Manual Focus, Handheld

Using focus peaking I was able to easily dial manual focus to emphasize inside the flower


f/4.5 @ 42 mm, 1/100, ISO 2000, No Flash

The kit lens does a decent job


f/? @ 85 mm (Samyang), 1/100, ISO 640, No Flash, Manual Focus

This shot made me get excited about the Samyang lens, but it would often disappointed.
Having to shoot manual focus also means a higher number of blurry shots when handheld


f/4 @ 35 mm, 1/80, ISO 1000, No Flash

The 35mm is a pretty sweet lens


f/4 @ 40 mm, 1/125, ISO 1600, No Flash

Kids are best shot using M mode with AF on, but even with the kit the results are great
Be sure to look at the eyes if you open the original


f/4.5 @ 43 mm, 1/60, ISO 3200, No Flash

This is almost D600 good, and it’s good enough if you ask me


f/9 @ 35 mm, 1/40, ISO 6400, No Flash

Great dynamic range and metering under tough conditions


f/5.6 @ 35 mm, 1/60, ISO 5000, No Flash
, Shade WB
The ultimate camera torture test, but it did well (except for horrible internal noise reduction)


f/3.5 @ 28 mm, 1/60, ISO 6400, No Flash

Unless I used flexible spot focus points, I’d often get blurry shots like this


f/3.2 @ 35 mm, 1/60, ISO 320, No Flash

The spot AF is good and the 35mm is razor sharp


f/3.5 @ 28 mm, 1/125, ISO 6400, No Flash

Tough conditions, but I felt the a7 handled it well

 
f/2.8 @ 85 mm (Samyang), 1/60, ISO 2500, No Flash
, Manual Focus, Handheld
This camera will get the most out of any lens. Notice how sharp
the eyes look with no editing. Now listen for my wife beating me for sharing this no makeup photo with you!


Samyang chromatic aberrations on the handle are easy to see here

NOTE: Green here is a reflection from a green object in the background

Conclusion

f/4 @ 40 mm, 1/60, ISO 6400, No Flash, Heavily Edited
This camera will have you taking pictures of everything again
f/4 @ 40 mm, 1/60, ISO 6400, No Flash, Heavily Edited (Original)

This is the kind of camera that gets you excited about photography and its compact size makes you want to take it everywhere. From an excellent electronic viewfinder (this and the a7R are the only ones I’d really use) to outstanding image quality, this is a camera that will delight most users.

With my only gripes being the lack of a built-in flash and the same gripes I have about every Sony camera, I can easily give this camera my HIGHEST RECOMMENDATION. What’s more, if I had to choose a camera that was released in 2013 that impressed me the most, this would definitely be the one that stole the show. In fact, if I were going to buy a mirrorless camera, this would be the one (and yes, even more so than the Fujifilm X-E2).

Now, if it could just catch up to Fujifilm in terms of high quality lens offerings I think it would definitely give Fujifilm cause for concern. In fact, from a image quality standpoint Canon and Nikon should be worried as well!

Where to order

Click here to learn more or order this camera on the B&H web site. My friends at Amazon have it available here.

Other articles you may enjoy

If you enjoyed this article, you may also enjoy these:

Disclosure

If you make a purchase using links found in this article, I may make a commission. It doesn’t cost you a penny more, but it does help to support future articles like this.

NOTE: This site requires cookies and uses affiliate linking to sites that use cookies.

If you enjoyed this article, please support future articles like this by making a donation or saving money by using my discount coupon codes. Either way, your support is greatly appreciated!

This blog is intended for freelance writing and sharing of opinions and is not a representative of any of the companies whose links are provided on this site.

The opinions provided are of Ron Martinsen alone and do not reflect the view of any other entity

Wednesday, December 4, 2013

REVIEW: Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Series Lens–The Best Sigma I’ve Ever Tested

Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Series Lens
Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Series Lens

I never would have bothered to review this lens had I not seen a Facebook post from one of the best Fashion photographers / print masters ever, Douglas Dubler. He mentioned in a casual personal posting that this was a very sharp lens that impressed him. I almost dropped dead on the spot because Douglas is the kind of guy who does NOT settle for second best, so to me this was like a Formula 1 race car driver hopping out of their car and bragging about the performance of their Buick! I was like – what the heck???!!!! However, I know Douglas well and he’s a tough New Yorker who tells it exactly like it is. If he says something is good, it’s fantastic and no amount of money in the world is going to make him say that if it isn’t true.

With this in mind my mind as I arrived out to see Douglas in New York for the PhotoPlus Expo, I asked him to take me by the Sigma booth to show me this lens he was so excited about. While I was there they were kind enough to offer me a test drive of this lens to prove that Douglas hadn’t sold out because this really was a great lens.

After using this lens occasionally around my house, I quickly got excited about its potential. I decided to buy some flowers and bring a few models over to the studio to see what it could do. Read on to see if it lived up to the hype, or if I’d be disappointed yet again.

Sample Images

Copyright Ron Martinsen – ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Taken using a Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM | A Lens
for Canon, Nikon, Sony, Pentax, & Sigma DSLR's
Image Copyright Ron Martinsen – ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Model: Adriana Cristina

The shot above was post-processed for impact, but you can click it to see the full unedited in-camera original.

Excluding the shot above, all of the images below and in the gallery are all in-camera JPEG’s take using a Canon 1D X. Zero post-processing has been done on these photos beyond what Canon does for its internal in-camera RAW processing, so what you see below is what you can expect to get with this camera and lens combo. 6D users should get nearly identical results under identical conditions, and 5D Mark III users can expect results that are almost as good.

I did not test this lens with any other cameras, so I can’t comment on their quality – however I’d expect similarly excellent results with other camera bodies as well. The only variants would be the performance of the sensor and in-camera processing results.

35mm is also a terrible focal length for portraits (I prefer 200mm), but photos of people really help you see the strength of this lens. As a result, I’ve included a few mug shots below just to illustrate this point.


Canon EOS-1D X, f/4 @ 35 mm, 1/60, ISO 3200, No Flash. Handheld


Canon EOS-1D X, f/2.8 @ 35 mm, 1/80, ISO 1250, No Flash, Handheld


Canon EOS-1D X, f/8 @ 35 mm, 1/160, ISO 100, No Flash

Mugshot #1 shows the incredible sharpness in Adriana’s hair and eyes,
despite being a horrible focal length to photograph people!


Canon EOS-1D X, f/10 @ 35 mm, 1/160, ISO 100, No Flash

Mugshot #2 shows rich color and warmth in this intentionally underexposed shot


Canon EOS-1D X, f/1.4 @ 35 mm, 1/13, ISO 100, No Flash

Delicious bokeh abounds at its maximum aperture of f/1.4


Canon EOS-1D X, f/16 @ 35 mm, 10s, ISO 100, No Flash

Stopped down to its minimum aperture of f/16 still produced great results


Canon EOS-1D X, f/1.4 @ 35 mm, 1/40, ISO 320, No Flash
(Handheld)
Beware f/1.4 has a very shallow DOF so don’t expect to live at f/1.4 all the time
Vignetting is extreme at f/1.4 compared to other apertures


Canon EOS-1D X, f/2.8 @ 35 mm, 1/40, ISO 2500, No Flash

Don’t ignore f/2.8 as you’ll be handsomely rewarded
with better
DOF and wonderful sharpness


Canon EOS-1D X, f/9 @ 35 mm, 1/160, ISO 100, No Flash

I got my son to jump in the studio and stay still for 2 seconds to capture the detail
of this traditional Korean outfit. Zoom into the patch and prepare to be impressed!


Canon EOS-1D X, f/8 @ 35 mm, 0.6s, ISO 100, No Flash

f/8 is great so lots of delicious detail is available for landscape shooters


Canon EOS-1D X, f/4 @ 35 mm, 1/125, ISO 5000, No Flash
 (Handheld in wind)
f/4 has a great balance of extreme center sharpness and a nice fade around the edges


Canon EOS-1D X, f/9 @ 35 mm, 1/100, ISO 12800, No Flash, Handheld, High ISO & Wind

We can’t always shoot in perfect conditions, so here’s what you get when
all the odds are against you – I can live with that!


Canon EOS-1D X, f/9 @ 35 mm, 1/15, ISO 6400, No Flash, Handheld

High ISO and handheld again, but also real world challenges still perform admirably


Canon EOS-1D X, f/8 @ 35 mm, 1/160, ISO 100, No Flash

Not my best shot of Adriana, but I wanted to capture black feathers on the shadow side
and this model’s gorgeous blue eyes in the light to show that f/8 is definitely great!

Click here for a full gallery of over 65 images (and nearly 1GB) unprocessed JPEG images exactly as they came out of the camera. Some images repeat because they’ve been taken at different apertures, and some are intentionally underexposed to offer more detail in the shadows to offer more tonal range to explore. All non-studio images at ISO 100 were taken on a Leica tabletop tripod and ball head, but the rest (including the studio) were all handheld. The outdoor handheld shots were taken using the tripod against my body for additional stabilization.

Bookshelf Test

Fans of my blog are intimately familiar with my bookshelf test. If you aren’t, then just check out the camera reviews at the end of this article for links to learn more.

I was very impressed with the sharpness that this 35mm lens offers. The gallery has many more shots, but I wanted to show the maximum aperture of f/1.4 here as well as the sweet spot at f/5.6 (based on what I see for the blur test on SLRGear.com)


Canon EOS-1D X, f/1.4 @ 35 mm, 2.5s, ISO 100, No Flash

Just what you want at f/1.4 – razor sharp center with nice bokeh at the edges


Canon EOS-1D X, f/5.6 @ 35 mm, 30s, ISO 100, No Flash

The sweet spot is definitely sweet!

Sigma USB Dock

Sigma USB Dock attaches like a lens cap for focus adjustments and other advanced feature access
Sigma USB Dock attaches like a lens cap for focus adjustments
and other advanced feature access

One advantage of buying Canon lenses is that you can use the EOS Utility to download your peripheral illumination correction and distortion control data from Canon’s web site. This gives you virtually distortion and vignette free in-camera images, but this feature only works for supported Canon lenses. The Sigma USB Dock brings the ability to fine tune the focus, update the firmware (yes, lenses have firmware), and advanced settings (like AF / OS speed for supported lenses).

It’s a really cool enhancement that cost less than $60. I’ll be reviewing one of these over the next 30+ days, so come back to my blog to learn more about it!

Conclusion

Crunch, crunch, crunch – what’s that sound???!!!

Yeah, it’s me eating a little humble pie because I’ve been overly harsh on Sigma in the past. Much of my previously negative opinions came from being underwhelmed by lenses I tried around 2007 & 2008. Since that time Sigma has had tremendous success and it’s clear that they’ve invested their profits into improving quality and performance.

I consider this Art Series lens to be as good as or better than any Canon L lens that I’ve tested, and that’s a HUGE statement coming from me. I never thought I’d ever say that about a Sigma lens because even its much loved Sigma 85mm f/1.4 EX DG left me impressed with the sharpness but underwhelmed with the color, brightness and build quality. I wasn’t alone in my concerns about Sigma quality, but it is VERY clear that this ain’t your granddad’s cheap ass Sigma lens – this is really the good stuff.

I wholeheartedly HIGHLY recommend this Sigma lens. It’s truly outstanding!  At $899 (as of the time of this article) it’s a great value too, so I’ve put it on my wish list for the next time I have spare bucks to buy a 35mm prime.

My only gripe about this lens was that it’s a bit dark and vignettes heavy at f/1.4.

Where to order

Click here to learn more or order at B&H web site.

Click here to learn more or order at Amazon.

Click here to learn more or order at Adorama.

Other articles you may enjoy

If you enjoyed this article, you may also enjoy these:

Disclosure

If you make a purchase using links found in this article, I may make a commission. It doesn’t cost you a penny more, but it does help to support future articles like this. Sigma has loaned this lens to me for the purpose of evaluating it – at my request.

NOTE: This site requires cookies and uses affiliate linking to sites that use cookies.

If you enjoyed this article, please support future articles like this by making a donation or saving money by using my discount coupon codes. Either way, your support is greatly appreciated!

This blog is intended for freelance writing and sharing of opinions and is not a representative of any of the companies whose links are provided on this site.

The opinions provided are of Ron Martinsen alone and do not reflect the view of any other entity

Wednesday, November 27, 2013

The Amazing Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM | A Lens for Canon, Nikon, Sony, & Pentax

Copyright Ron Martinsen – ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Taken using a Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM | A Lens
for Canon, Nikon, Sony, Pentax, & Sigma DSLR's
Image Copyright Ron Martinsen – ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

This image was taken with a Canon 1D X 1/160 sec at f/8, ISO 100 at 35mm, and I’ve got to say it’s the most impressive Sigma lens I’ve ever used. This was also the first of the new “Art” series lens that I’ve tested, so I’m now eager to try more!

I was going to save this picture for the full article, but I decided to share it now as a teaser to the full article which will come during the first week of December. Click here to see a larger version.

If you see any deals form authorized dealers (see “where to order” below), then I highly recommend picking this lens up!

Conclusion

Click here to learn more about this lens on Sigma.com, and come back for my full review which will feature full-size image files with zero post-processing to show how amazing the images are that come straight out of this lens!

Where to order

Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Series Lens
Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Series Lens

Click here to learn more or order at B&H web site.

Click here to learn more or order at Amazon.

Click here to learn more or order at Adorama.

Other articles you may enjoy

If you enjoyed this article, you may also enjoy these:

Disclosure

If you make a purchase using links found in this article, I may make a commission. It doesn’t cost you a penny more, but it does help to support future articles like this.

The image shown does have basic photo editing and sharpening, but the full article will show the out of camera original.

Sigma has loaned this lens to me for the purpose of evaluating it – at my request.

NOTE: This site requires cookies and uses affiliate linking to sites that use cookies.

If you enjoyed this article, please support future articles like this by making a donation or saving money by using my discount coupon codes. Either way, your support is greatly appreciated!

This blog is intended for freelance writing and sharing of opinions and is not a representative of any of the companies whose links are provided on this site.

The opinions provided are of Ron Martinsen alone and do not reflect the view of any other entity

Tuesday, November 6, 2012

B&H Deals of the Week from Nikon, Lexar, Tamron & Canon Pre-Orders + 500mm II NOW IN STOCK

B&H is now taking pre-orders on the new Canon 24-70 f/4L IS and Canon 35mm f/2 IS lenses that Canon announced last night. Click the images or links below to get on the waiting list for your copy:

New Canon 24-70 f/4L IS
Canon 24-70 f/4L IS

New Canon 35mm f/2 IS
Canon 35mm f/2 IS

Canon 500mm f/4L IS II Now In Stock

Canon 500mm f/4L IS II Now In Stock
500mm f/4L IS II

Nikon D600 w/ 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6G AF-S ED VR Lens – $150 OFF

Nikon D600 w/ 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6G AF-S ED VR Lens – $150 OFF
Nikon D600 w/ 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6G AF-S ED VR Lens

One of my favorite Nikon cameras, the D600, is also in stock and on sale for $150 off! If I had some spare cash, I’d probably pick this one up myself!

Tamron 70-200 f/2.8 with Vibration Control for Canon, Nikon and Sony is only $1499

Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 SP Di VC USD Zoom Lens only $1499
Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 SP Di VC USD Zoom Lens

Lexar 64GB CompactFlash Memory Card Professional 400x (UDMA 7) only $169.95!!!

Lexar 64GB CompactFlash Memory Card On Sale
Lexar 64GB CompactFlash Memory Card On Sale

Disclosure

If you make a purchase using links found in this article, I may make a commission.

NOTE: This site requires cookies and uses affiliate linking to sites that use cookies.

If you enjoyed this article, please support future articles like this by making a donation or saving money by using my discount coupon codes. Either way, your support is greatly appreciated!

This blog is intended for freelance writing and sharing of opinions and is not a representative of any of the companies whose links are provided on this site.

The opinions provided are of Ron Martinsen alone and do not reflect the view of any other entity

Thursday, March 31, 2011

Part II: Epson Perfection V750-M Pro Scanner Review

image
35mm Slide Holder (one of many holders included)
Image Courtesy of B&H

If you are just starting to read my Epson Perfection V750-M Pro Scanner review, please start by reading REVIEW: Epson Perfection V750-M Pro Scanner –Part I.

In Part II I’m covering the challenge of scanning film negatives in SilverFast Ai software included with the V750 and using a reference digital SLR photo to highlight the differences.

Canon 5D Mark II Digital SLR In-Camera JPEG

Mouse over to see before, mouse out to see after
Canon 5D Mark II w/ 24-105mm - f/22 for 1/60 sec @ ISO 400 – 35mm focal length
Raw to sRGB JPEG 12 Conversion in DPP 3.9
Faithful Pure Raw (hover) vs Camera Settings Raw (Mouse Out)

In the first part of the article I showed what Costco gave me for prints from my film, and as another point of comparison the image above shows what the Canon 5D Mark II captured. As you can tell this image is quite a bit darker but the image is rich, the noise is non-existent and the image is very sharp. In-camera processing (in the mouse-out shot) does some of those things automatically to give you the best result possible, but you can see from the faithful raw above (mouse over) that it’s not a huge difference. While I wouldn’t call this perfect, it is a technically accurate portrayal of this scene under the shooting conditions (it was cloudy and dark).

With this new reference point, let’s proceed again to doing more scans…

SilverFast Ai – Transparency Negative Scan Mode

Mouse over to see before, mouse out to see after
Canon EOS 3 w/ 24-105mm - f/22 for 1/60 sec with Kodak UltraMax ISO 400
SilverFast Ai Kodak Max 400 AutoSharpen Auto Adjust 48->24bit Color Adobe RGB to sRGB
Hover over for +3ev w/ Color Cast Removal off
Mouse out for 0ev with Color Cast Removal on
Digital ICE Max Quality

During my testing I found that the 48->24bit Color version was sufficient since I had to down convert to sRGB 8-bit jpeg anyway. AutoSharpen doesn’t really do much but AutoAdjust (the button next to zoom below) does a decent job of giving you a usable image. I took all these settings did some testing and found that Digital ICE with Maximum Quality (to remove dust on the negative) produced the best result, but noise was still heavily present.

This software supports a 16 pass feature to remove noise, but in my case it just made the image more blurry. Noise was always very significant in all my scans, but for now I’ve not done anything about it.

You can choose the film you shot with when you scan negatives so I chose the closest thing I could find – Kodak Max 400. I wish there was an option for none, but sadly there isn’t. There’s also color cast removal (CCR) which seems to make a difference but it isn’t always obvious if it is for the best.

Lastly, just like with RAW images on a digital SLR, you can increase or decrease the exposure by up to 3 stops (according to the software manual) so the images above include both +3 and 0. Overall I liked the 0ev and while the color isn’t perfectly accurate, the image looks very nice. Detail is excellent throughout the image – more so than in the Costco print.

Here’s the settings I used:

SilverFast Ai General - Transparency Negative
Negatives are called Transparency

NegaFix - Kodak Other Max 400
You are forced to pick a film. The CCR tries
to automatically correct color casts, and the
brightness feature is reminiscent of raw
because you can adjust your exposure .

image
24-bit (8-bit file) was good enough for this exercise.

SilverFast Prescan Window - Zoomed Out
Using the Negative Guide helped to align the images in a way that SilverFast Ai
could quickly detect the shots (with minor positioning/sizing adjustments)

SilverFast Ai Prescan Window - Zoomed In
Zoom in to see what is going on for the selected negative frame
(NOTE: +3ev Version shown)

Despite SilverFast Ai’s controls to make adjustments (as one would do in Lightroom, Adobe Camera Raw, etc…) I refrained from using these features (just as I had refrained with the digital images). Given the nature of scanning it would be best to make these adjustments in the scanning software than in post-scan editing, but then the results here would be influenced by my edits rather than showing the scanners starting point as you see here.

SilverFast Ai’s Color Cast Correction Controls

I found the white balance/color cast correcting features of the software to be horrible compared to what we are spoiled with in modern digital raw processing software. Unless you have a PhD in color, most mere mortals are going to have a hard time getting anywhere using this software (which is where it is best to make these kind of changes).

Comparing the Digital to the Film Scan

Now this article isn’t about film versus digital as digital has won that war in my mind. Instead, this comparison is more about the performance of scanning an film negative at ISO 400 to see what errors could be introduced in the process. As you can see below there are white balance differences and noise is a big problem.


Digital SLR Image with Faithful with No In-Camera Edits


Scan with No Exposure Compensation


Scan with +3ev Exposure Compensation

Both scans have their merits but the results are quite different. I suspect part of it is that the auto adjustment for the darker image had a bigger impact on the color shift that happens. I think both shots are good and usable but neither is accurate. The bottom shot is the most accurate but the one above it is most visually pleasing. Keep this in mind when doing your own scanning as your objective should usually be to create a visually pleasing result – even if it isn’t 100% faithful to the original.

NOTE: The film and digital camera framing differences are due to camera body size differences when mounted on the tripod.

More Information

There’s lots to cover so I broke this article into multiple parts. Here’s links to the other parts of this review:

Lean more about this scanner at Epson’s website or order its replacement, the V850, at B&H or Amazon.

If you like this topic, be sure to check out my Printing Series too!

Disclosure

Epson provided this scanner for my review. I may get a commission if you use the links in this article, so please use them and help support the blog!

NOTE: This site requires cookies and uses affiliate linking to sites that use cookies.

If you enjoyed this article, please support future articles like this by making a donation or saving money by using my discount coupon codes. Either way, your support is greatly appreciated!

This blog is intended for freelance writing and sharing of opinions and is not a representative of any of the companies whose links are provided on this site.

The opinions provided are of Ron Martinsen alone and do not reflect the view of any other entity