It was pretty well attended...
So was the GMT chat next day...
and the GMT chat storify of NephJC 22
Nikhil does the BK storify
So our NSMC intern, Nikhil Shah not only did a super job of writing the sumary up for the BK virus #NephJC 22, he also has done a great job of curating the first chat into a storify.
NephJC 22: GMT chat
The American chat (mostly by virtue of its longevity) still has more participants and tweets, but the GMT (EU/African) chat makes up by being fun and entertaining. Tom Oates, Paul Phelan, Francesco and their merry band of tweeters make for delightful reading. Jungle Juice, scud missiles and more. See some highlights below
#NephJC number 22 is in the can.
The BK nephropathy discussion was interesting. No one was interested in further exploring quinolone for BK, which I guess indicates that this was a compelling study.
All and all it was a very interesting discussion and I learned a lot.
Storify forthcoming.
Palliative care chat #HPM on Wednesday at 9EST
March is Kidney awareness month and in honor of that, Pallimed, the Hospice and Palliative Care Blog is talking about intersection of nephrology and palliative care. They asked NephJC co-creator, Joel Topf to host their chat. This happens on Wednesday. Topf wrote the introduction:
Have you ever read a journal article and as soon as you finished the abstract you had this forbidding feeling that if the authors actually proved what they claimed to have discovered your medical life will never be the same?
This happened when I read, Functional Status of Elderly Adults before and after Initiation of Dialysis by Tamura et al. in 2009.
The study simply looked at mortality and functional status of nursing home residents who initiated dialysis. The cohort consisted of 3,704 Americans. The average age of this predominantly white (64%) female (60%) cohort was 74 years. The outcomes were horrifying:
- Within three months of starting dialysis 61% had died or had a decrease in their functional status
- By one year that figure was 87%
- By one year only 1 in 8 patients had maintained their functional status from before dialysis
While this study did not track patients who deferred dialysis it is hard to imagine they could do much worse. The view of dialysis as a way to improve functional status by clearing uremia leading to improved nutrition and other downstream benefits was revealed to be a false hope. Instead we have a treatment that appears to be too rough for frail, at-risk patients and left them significantly worse than they were before dialysis.
The discussion section of the article had a sentence that should be embroidered to every nephrologists white coat:
“...kidney failure may be a reflection of terminal multiorgan dysfunction rather than a primary cause of functional decline, and thus the initiation of dialysis may not rescue patients from an inevitable decline.”
As nephrologists we need to elevate conservative, non-dialytic, therapy to be a clear option for patients, one that should be discussed along with peritoneal dialysis and transplant. Conservative care should not merely be a last resort when all other options have been exhausted.
I hope you will join us as we discuss the intersection of nephrology and palliative care this Wednesday at #hpm chat.