Post-apocalypse movies are a popular genre – what will
people do after civilization breaks? Whatever the catalyst – atomic war, zombie
viruses, aliens, the Rapture… the movies imagine what humans will do after the
big, transformative event. Typically, there is starvation and death (a lot of
death!), a breakdown of legalities, loss of culture from a failure to educate the
next generation, a few who fight back… Now, think about how this is exactly
what happened when Europeans, with European diseases, European concepts of land
ownership and European weapons, arrived in the Americas.
Wherever Europeans arrived, within a generation entire cultures
and populations were wiped out. The initial causes were smallpox and other
diseases (plague, measles, influenza, scarlet fever, leptospirosis…) – with epidemics
in 1616-19, 1631-33, 1645, 1650-52 and 1670 – capped by exclusion from traditional
lands and outright war. The first spate of diseases was the worst, and was
thought of by the English as divine intervention. King James I is quoted as saying “There hath,
by God’s visitation, reigned a wonderful plague, the utter destruction,
devastation, and depopulation of that whole territory…” Pre-contact with
Europeans, the Algonquin region that extended from Long Island to Maine
numbered 100,000 to 150,000 people. One hundred years later it was one-tenth
that.
As a result, the Puritans who made up the “Great Migration”
from England, 1620-1640, found this to be ‘empty’ land that had until recent years
been cleared and farmed by the native populations. This was easily returned to
productive farmland – a process of combining the native crops of corn, beans
and squash, with European wheat and an assortment of edible animals (cattle,
hogs, sheep, goats and chickens). With crops suitable for winter storage plus
domesticated animals to eat, the colonists did not have to rely so heavily on
hunting, nor move to the seashore for the summer months. Instead, they owned
and farmed and prayed in place.
The native populations that had lived in our area were referred
to as ‘Nipmuc’ and may have numbered as many as 10,000. Nipmuc has many alternative
spellings, such as Nipmug, Neetmock and Nipnet, all generally accepted as translating
to “fresh water people.” The Nipmuc were not so much a tribe as a geographical
area of peoples speaking an Algonquin dialect, previously either subject to or
allied with strong neighboring tribes, such as the Pequot to the south, Masachuset
to the east, Wampanoag to the southeast and Pocumtuc to the west. They grew
corn and other crops, hunted deer and moose, and in the spring enjoyed the bounty
of herring, alewives and shad swimming upriver to spawn.
The Puritans were firm believers in Christianity and
farming. In that order. Some of the native peoples who had survived the
diseases converted and gathered into what were referred to as the Praying Indian
Villages. One of these was Nashobah, now Littleton. What is now Maynard and part
of Stow went by the name Pompositticut, said to mean “land of many hills.” There
are no artifacts or known history to suggest this was a densely settled place. In
contrast, Concord was originally referred to as Musketaquid for “grassy plain.”
Stow, as created in 1683 had attached to it a narrow strip of land extending
west beyond the Nashua River. This came about when Lancaster
and Groton were
created in the 1650s. A corridor of land had been left between the two for the
Native Americans of Nashobah to travel west to winter hunting regions
All this accommodation crashed to an end with King Philip’s
War of 1675-76. Metacom, also known as Metacomet and by the English name Philip,
was a Wampanoag chief. Attempts to maintain a truce between the Wampanoag and
the English colonists were frayed by colonial expansion and scattered acts of
violence on both sides. In the summer of 1675, the actions of the native
Americans coalesced into concerted attacks on towns across the Plymouth, Massachusetts
Bay, Rhode Island, New Haven and Connecticut colonies. Locally, history has it
that natives met atop Pompositticut Hill to decide whether to attack Concord or
Sudbury (the answer: Sudbury).
Found this post the morning after Indigenous People’s Day 2020. Having lived in Maynard for 15 years now, it was long overdue that I learned more this important part of our area’s history. Hoping to learn more about how people lived here before the Europeans arrived. Thank you!
ReplyDeleteMore details will be in "Maynard Massachusetts - A Brief History" publication mid-November 2020.
ReplyDeleteSo important to preserve this history
ReplyDelete