People forget, but no president was more supportive of immigration than Ronald
Reagan—legal immigration, that is. Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich
and his wife Callista present portraits of notable American [legal] immigrants
very much in the Reaganesque tradition in Journey to America with Newt and
Callista Gingrich, which airs this Tuesday night on PBS.
It
might seem like a blindingly obvious point, but Prof. Susan Hanssen helpfully
points out legal immigration is good, because it allows those who follow the
law coming here can fully benefit from the rule of law as a recognized member of
society. Conversely, illegal immigration is bad for the same reason. Indeed,
all of the Gingrichs’ subjects came to America legally, duly taking citizenship
over time.
This
is quite a starry lineup, including Golden Age movie star Hedy Lamarr, whose contributions
as an inventor and scientist are also cogently explained. In fact, the Gingrichs
largely cover the same territory as Bombshell: The Hedy Lamarr Story,
but with greater economy. As you would expect from the Catholic Gingrichs,
their coverage of Saint Frances Xavier Cabrini, the first American citizen beautified
into Sainthood, is also quite strong. It also reminds potential visitors the
Cabrini Shrine in upper Manhattan is lovely often overlooked attraction.
Perhaps
the most controversial segment focuses on the late Henry Kissinger, reminding
viewers the future Secretary of State came to America with his Jewish family, as
penniless refugees from National Socialist Germany. It makes you wonder why the
hard left likes to smear Kissinger (a diplomat), who happens to be Jewish, as a
“war criminal,” instead of Robert McNamara, Dean Rusk, or William Rogers, but not
really.
Arthur Conan Doyle would probably hate this adaptation of his mummy short
story, for the same reason many of his fans will enjoy it. Departing from the
original text, it creates a role that is clearly implied to be you-know-who. Of
course, he could justifiably complain the annual BBC series, A Ghost Story
for Christmas had no business adapting his creepy yarn, because it is about
a mummy, not a ghost. Still, maybe screenwriter-director Mark Gatiss might
argue a mummy is an undead spirit that loiters malevolently, much like a ghost.
Regardless, there is plenty of gothic tweediness in Lot No. 249, which
airs tomorrow on Buffalo Public Television (airing a Ghost Story for
Christmas, more-or-less for Christmas, as it was originally intended).
Abercrombie
Smith is a very smart but not quite genius Oxford medical student, who treats Edward
Bellingham, the eccentric Egyptology scholar in the digs next-door for
exhaustion, nervous collapse, or really just some kind bizarre trance-like
state. Whatever you call it, viewers can tell he has been dabbling in black
arts.
Sure
enough, soon thereafter, Bellingham’s campus rival is throttled by a mysterious
hulking figure. For an Oxford student, Smith puts two and two together relatively
quickly, deducing Bellingham has found a way to reawaken and control the mummy
he bought at auction—that would be lot number 249. However, before confronting
Bellingham, he wishes to “consult” his unnamed friend, a detective hoping to
soon move to Bakers Street, who is decidedly not inclined to give credence to
the supernatural.
Indeed,
the Holmesian references are quite amusing. Gatiss also amps up the gay
subtext, which almost feels unnecessary for a story set in the rarified world
of elite British public (meaning private) school alumni. Frankly, Mummy makeup technology
really hasn’t needed to advance much since Boris Karloff bandaged-up in 1932,
so this one looks just as well as most of the ones that came before.
He was like the Orson Welles of the Renaissance. Everyone knew he was
brilliant, but he still had trouble finishing projects. Of course, he left
behind enough to judge his genius—like the Mona Lisa. He led an eventful life,
which is fortunate since he has already been the protagonist of fictional series
from Starz and CW. Now the true Renaissance man becomes Ken Burns’ first
non-American subject when the two-part Leonardo da Vinci (co-directed by
Sasha Burns and David McMahon) premieres this Monday and Tuesday on PBS.
Yes,
Leonardo was illegitimate, but the battery of historians and talking heads do a
nice job explaining why that really wasn’t such a big deal at the time.
Frankly, the same was true for his presumed sexuality in pre-Savonarola
Florence. There is still a good deal of speculation regarding Leonardo’s life,
particularly his early years, but the law firm-sounding trio of Burns, Burns,
and McMahon do a nice job of covering all the periods of his life, from Vinci
to Florence and then onto Milan and eventually France.
Logically,
they focus and good deal on his work, particularly his sketches, codices, and
scientific journals. Frankly, they make a convincing case Leonardo really was
hundreds of years ahead of his time, especially with regards to his deductions
regarding the structure and mechanics of the human heart.
Of
course, it is also frustrating to hear about all the commissions he left
incomplete or had canceled at the last minute. Arguably, they had to give “Vetruvian
Man” roughly equal time as the Mona Lisa and the Last Supper,
because that is what they had to work with.
In the mid to late 2000s, there were scores of documentaries about PTSD. Today, when
they are not so politically useful to the anti-war cause, there have almost completely
disappeared. Anthony Marquez noticed a similar phenomenon with Gold Star
families. They received an initial outpouring of support, but after a year or
so, people largely forgot them. That is why Marquez decided to personally
check-in with the families of all 17 fellow Marines of his unit who died in
Sangin, Afghanistan. Filmmaker Manny Marquez follows his brother’s cathartic journey
in Make Peace or Die: Honor the Fallen, which airs this Monday on PBS,
as part of the current season of Independent Lens.
Sangin
will be remembered as one of the deadliest destinations ever for the Marine
Corps. Not surprisingly, his experiences there haunted Marquez years after the
fact. As part of his self-proscribed therapy, he hand-crafted (or chainsaw-crafted)
memorial statues for each Gold Star family, which he hand-delivered. Realizing
how quickly the community support evaporates for Gold Star families, Marquez
resolved to revisit the same families one year later (this time with his brother
following him).
Most
were incredibly welcoming, even though his visits inevitably rekindled the pain
of their loss. He hardly knew some of their sons, but he could still relate
through their shared experiences. At times, he even questions his mission, but
eventually doubles down, inviting the families to a special commemoration ceremony
at Camp Pendleton. Along the way, he assembles a special dress uniform,
consisting of garments and medals contributed by the seventeen families.
There
are several deeply emotional moments in Make Peace or Die (the title
refers to Corps 1st Battalion, 5th Marines’ motto—as in
make peace with us, or else). However, the sequence that will absolutely destroy
viewers documents the final hours of Marquez’s military service dog, who even
had a Marine honor guard for the fateful last trip to the vet’s office. No
matter how tough you think you are, you are going to be choked up.
This
is a powerful film that should have had much more attention on the festival
circuit. Obviously, Marquez approached his subjects with the best of intentions.
After all, his parents appear in the documentary, as well as his brother. Of
course, nobody wants to question the motives of some the docs that came out so regularly
during the George W. Bush administration, but isn’t it so strange how they just
aren’t being produced anymore (with the exception of this film)?
The mezzotint print-making process might seem old-fashioned, but one of its
leading practitioners was M.C. Esher, whom M.R. James might have appreciated,
at least for his use of initials. Typically, mezzotints never change, but not
the one in this M.R. James short story. Understandably, that rather bedevils
its new custodian in Mark Gatiss’s The Mezzotint (part of the A Ghost
Story for Christmas annual series in the UK), which airs on participating PBS
stations.
Edward
Williams definitely stays true to his school. He curates the traditional
Ox-bridge-ish university’s decorative arts museum and spends most of personal
time at the U club with his old college mates. Each day is largely the same,
but that is how he likes it, until a mysterious mezzotint arrives for his appraisal.
Williams
had not thought much of it, but his golfing friend Binks sees more in it. In
fact, he describes a rather different picture, with a moon rising above the
country house and a shadowy figure just starting to enter the frame. Weirdly,
those elements had not been in the picture before, because, as Williams soon
deduces, it changes slightly every time he looks at it. That sounds crazy, but
Williams’s old school chums Garwood and Nisbet confirm it, much to their own
surprise. It confuses all the three alumni, but Williams also feels an uneasy suspicion
that the dark figure will do something horrible when he finally enters the
house.
Of
course, the mezzotint surely must represent events that occurred when it was
printed in the 1800s, right? Yet, to Williams, it feels like a tragedy slowly unfolding
before his eyes, especially when he learns he might have a personal connection
to its town of origin. That last bit is all Gatiss, but it is a nice macabre
little wrinkle. Regardless, it is strange no previous anthology series has
taken a shot adapting it, especially considering it requires no special effects—just
a quality print-maker.
In
fact, this is one of Gatiss’s best “Ghost Stories for Christmas,” or just plain
“Ghost Stories,” if you are watching on PBS. The mezzotint is a clever gimmick
and Gatiss maximizes its full Twilight Zone-ish potential.
Aubrey Judd is so old school, he largely built his reputation on radio. He
still hosts the same long-standing ghost story program, but, much to his
frustration, annoying hipsters now write most of the tales he reads. However,
the script gets flipped in more ways than one in Mark Gatiss’s The Dead Room,
which airs on participating PBS stations over the coming month.
Unlike
The Tractate Middoth, this week’s Ghost Story (formerly
“for Christmas”) is not based on a M.R. James classic. Here we have a Gatiss
original, but perhaps he should have stuck with the master.
Regardless,
hammy Judd is a perfect fit for the great Simon Callow. Frankly, Judd finds
tonight’s story a bit tacky, because of the violence, but his new producer,
Tara, believes it is the kind of contemporary work they need to spruce the show
up. Ironically, they must record this week’s production in the old, shabby studio
the show used to be produced in years ago.
Initially,
Judd finds it rather nostalgic to return to his old “haunt.” At least that is
what he tries to project for the benefit of Tara and Joan, their ancient,
taciturn foley artist. Yet, he soon hears strange noises nobody else notices.
Perhaps most ominously, the pages of his script in explicably re-arrange
themselves into a completely different story. It rather unnerves him, but
somehow he fails to recognize the significance of it all.
In
terms of story, Dead Room is passable, but it is no M.R. James yarn.
Clearly, Gatiss tries to bring “updated” contemporary social sensibilities to
the venerable Ghost Story for Christmas tradition, but it possibly
backfires. After all, Judd’s identity is central to his character and his actions,
but they consequently lead to the sins he must account for.
Nevertheless,
it is a pleasure to listen to Callow unleash his inner Vincent Price as he
waxes poetic over great ghost stories and other assorted pleasures of life. Callow
has the voice for it, so he ought to narrate more spooky tales for real.
Do not call them a “ghost band.” For years, they played with Tito Puente
and other great Latin bandleaders, so they are not about to stop now. They
still sound great and keep gigging with a regularity younger musicians would
envy. The reminiscences are almost as enjoyable as the music in Mari Keiko
Gonzalez’s Mambo Legends: The Music Never Ends, which airs tomorrow on
PBS, as part of the current season of Voces.
Led
by bandleader John “Dandy” Rodriguez, under the “music direction” of Jose
Madera, the Mambo Legends Orchestra is sort of like a Puente tribute band,
because his music dominates their set lists. They all played El Rey, but most
also had stints in the Machito and Tito Rodriguez bands, the other two of the
big three Latin bands.
They
are all accomplished and have plenty of stories to tell, like baritone
saxophonist Carmen Laboy, who was the first women to perform on-stage with Puente’s
band. We also hear from saxophonist Mitch Frohman, who happened to be a Jewish
kid from the Bronx, who discovered Latin jazz and dance music when he sat in
with Joe Cuba, while gigging with another band in the Catskills.
It
turns out, you probably heard a lot of Frohman’s work. Years ago, he recorded
multiple improvisations for episodes of Sex and the City. However, he has
yet to receive full and fair compensation. And just like that, another musician
gets a raw deal.
For many [stupid] people, books are sort of like ghosts. They relics from
the past, bearing witness to the folly we might have prevented, had we only
read more of them. However, a part-time librarian might have a legitimately haunted
book on his shelves, which is bizarrely in-demand throughout Mark Gatiss’s The
Tractate Middoth, based on the classic M.R. James story, which airs on
participating PBS stations over the coming month.
Although
originally produced by the BBC as part of their annual Ghost Story for
Christmas, PBS apparently believed the productions they licensed better fit
Halloween season. Neither is wrong per se, because James is timeless—and hopefully
so are books.
Intellectually
gifted but financially challenged William Garrett rather enjoys working
part-time in the library, while pursuing his advanced studies, even though “Sniffer”
Hodgson, the supervising librarian, is a pompous blowhard. At least he did,
until John Eldred requests the Tractate Middoth, an ancient Hebrew text.
The
first time Garrett tries to pull it, he believes a mysterious shrouded figure coincidentally
retrieved it before him. The next time Eldred calls to request it, Garrett
passes out on the way to its shelf, overcome by the supernatural pollen
suddenly swirling about. Clearly, that volume holds sinister secrets, involving
its former owner, the nasty Dr. Rant, who maybe orchestrated all this weirdness
while expiring on his deathbed, as we partially saw during the prologue.
Tractate
Middoth is
a particularly British ghost story. Indeed, it is easy to imagine how James’s
tale might have inspired some of the early library business in A Discovery of Witches. If the story sounds familiar, maybe it is because Leslie Nielsen
also portrayed the intrepid librarian on the early-1950s Lights Out anthology
show.
TV Prime Minister Robert Sutherland outlasted Boris Johnson Liz Truss, and
Rishi Sunak. He might be the most reassuring PM since Jim Hacker on Yes,
Prime Minister. However, Sutherland could use a Sir Humphrey, because many
of his cabinet members follow their own agendas, often against the interests of
his administration. It gets so bad, his flamboyantly arrogant Conservative
Party rival Archie Glover-Morgan is more friend than foe this time around—or at
least it’s a close call. That will be a problem when the next crisis strikes in
the 6-part COBRA: Rebellion (a.k.a. season three), which premieres
tonight on PBS.
To
embarrass her father, Sutherland’s daughter Ellie joined an extremist
environmental group occupying tunnels under a contested construction site.
However, she needs daddy to save her when a freak sink-hole collapse traps her
underground. The disaster site turns into a crime scene when remnants of an
explosive device are discovered. Awkwardly, the activist trapped with her knows
an awful lot about it. Logically, suspicion also falls on Ellie, requiring her
father to maintain impartial treatment towards her.
That
does not sit so well with his wife Rachel, with whom his marriage was already
strained. Fortunately, he can finally count on the wise counsel of his chief of
staff, Anna Marshall. Like Lloyd Bridges in Airplane!, she picked the
wrong day to return from sick leave, after waking from her second season coma. Indeed,
she wants to be in the cabinet briefings (the so-called COBRAs) to support
Sutherland—and anywhere else he might need her . . . support.
Somehow,
a fictional Middle East kingdom that is absolutely not supposed to represent
Saudi Arabia is also mixed up in the expanding crisis. Apparently, they
kidnapped the dissident Princess Yadira, who was a women’s rights activist back
home and a legal resident of the United Kingdom. Sutherland is quite put out
that they would conduct such an operation on British soil, but the ruthlessly
ambitious Defense Minister, Victoria Dalton is determined to preserve British defense
contractors’ lucrative deals with the oil-rich kingdom.
Uncharacteristically,
Glover-Morgan, who ascended to the deputy PM position in season two, advises
caution to both. While he wants to preserve the defense contracts, he also wants
no part of the regime’s reported human rights abuses. In fact, the subtle evolution
of Glover-Morgan, from jerky to rather waggish, is one of the best developments
in Rebellion.
David
Haig practically chortles with delight firing off zingers and scheming behind-the-scenes.
He is like Frank Underwood or Francis Urquhart in either version of House of
Cards, except Glover-Morgan is more human, more principled, and arguably a
true patriot, despite his devious, roguishness. Honestly, if he were the lead
of the next season, it would be jolly good fun.
In
comparison, Robert Carlyle is still a bit bland as Sutherland, but he projects
a sense of sound judgement and temperament that frankly a lot of Americans are currently
yearning for. Lisa Palfrey is still appropriately shifty and morally ambiguous
as Intelligence Chair Eleanor James. Edward Bennett is also entertainingly
snide and pompous as Glover-Morgan’s former ally, press secretary Peter Mott,
who has turned against the Deputy PM. However, Marsha Thomason is dull as dish
water playing former Sutherland advisor and current Labour shadow minister,
Francine Bridge, whose duties apparently solely consist of walking about
looking heroically concerned. Similarly, a lot of viewers would prefer to leave
Holly Cattle’s character, nauseatingly petulant Ellie Sutherland buried in the
collapsed tunnel.
Do you like dolphins? If so, you should despise Putin. Since the launch of
his illegal invasion, the Ukrainian wildlife reserve on the Black Sea has found
the corpses of at least 5,000 dolphins, but they estimate thousands more have
died. Clearly, animals have suffered from Russia’s military aggression, just
like the Ukrainian people. Yet, despite the chaos and danger, ordinary
Ukrainians have risked their lives to rescue animals both wild and domestic. Viewers
need to watch their brave efforts, which Anton Ptushkin documents in “Saving
the Animals of Ukraine,” premiering this Wednesday on PBS, as part of the
current season of Nature.
It
sure is funny how everyone who was so concerned about the animals in the
Baghdad Zoo have had so little to say about the animals of Ukraine. Regardless,
the entire world saw images of desperate Ukrainian refugees carrying their
beloved pet cats and dogs. As a result, at least one NGO talking head had to
dramatically rethink they way he thought about refugees. Inevitably, many pets
were still left behind, often not intentionally, but rather due to unexpected
Russian bombardments. Zoopatrol was organized to save those animals, either by
jail-breaking them outright, or noninvasively feeding them through front-door
peep-holes (this mostly works for cats).
Perhaps
their most famous rescue is Shafa, who was found by drones trapped on the
exposed ledge of a completely bombed-out seventh-floor apartment, where she had
been perched for sixty days, with minimal food or water. Despite her advanced
age, they successfully nursed Shafa back to health. Since then, she has become
an online sensation, symbolizing Ukrainian resilience in her own grumpy cat
way.
Likewise,
Patron the Jack Russell terrier has also become an international influencer,
thanks to his work sniffing out landmines. Patron’s small size gives him an
advantage over other ordinance-detecting dogs, because he is too light to
set-off mines calibrated for human weight. That little guy is a charmer.
Unfortunately,
many of the stories Ptushkin documents are profoundly sad, like the two animal
shelters that took very different approaches when evacuating their human
staffs. Tragically, both shelters were near Hostomel Airport, which Putin’s
thugs and mercenaries bombed into rubble, greatly distressing the animals in
the process. Clearly, several on-camera experts suggest one shelter handled the
challenge in a much more humane manner, but the real villain is Putin, who put
both shelters directly in harm’s way.
Even if you did not follow jazz in the 1990s, you might recognize, or at
least have heard Joshua Redman from his musical appearances in Robert Altman’s Kansas
City and Louis Malle’s Vanya on 42nd Street, two great
films with famous American places in their titles. That was also the theme of
Redman’s latest album, Where Are We. Each track refers to a specific
city or state, often combining several geographically related songs into medleys.
Redman performs selections from the album live-in-concert during the latest
episode of Next at the Kennedy Center, which premieres tomorrow on PBS.
Somewhat
counter-intuitively, the broadcast starts with its strongest performance, an
appropriately bluesy rendition of Count Basie and Jimmy Rushing’s “Chicago
Blues.” Redman’s quintet (the leader on tenor, Aaron Parks on piano, Brian
Blade on drums, Joe Sanders on bass, and vocalist Gabrielle Cavassa) definitely
takes down the decibel level compared to the roaring Basie Band, but Parks’ rhythmic
comping still gives it a snappy groove.
Inspired
by the George Floyd killing, “After Minneapolis (Face Towards Mo[u]rning)” has
a Spartan, plaintive vibe that somewhat recalls some of the recordings by
Redman’s father, Dewey Redman, a giant of the free jazz movement—and also one
of its most accessible artists. There are some beautiful moments, but, somewhat
ironically, the “message” sometimes literally gets lost in Cavassa’s breathy
delivery, which almost sounds like wordless vocalizations.
“Streets
of Philadelphia” and “Hotel California” both have similar tempos, emotional
vibes, and themes of alienation. However, they great “enticements” for non-jazz
listeners, reinterpreting Springsteen and the Eagles, but in ways their fans
can recognize and relate to.
Probably,
the other highlight of the one-hour program is the concluding medley, which combines
“Stars Fell on Alabama” with Coltrane’s “Alabama,” which he composed following
the Alabama church bombing that murdered four little girls. It is considered his
only “protest song.” Coltrane’s “Alabama” is complex and challenging, but there
is also a lot of “church” in there, which Redman gets at nicely. (Reportedly,
Coltrane based it on the cadence of Martin Luther King’s eulogy).
When I was a kid, all the real intellectuals were conservatives. They were
scholars like Allan Bloom, economists like Milton Friedman, theologians like
Richard John Neuhaus, jazz critics like Ralph de Toledano, and first and
foremost, William F. Buckley Jr., who in addition to being a commentator, was also
a concert harpsichordist and spy novelist. In contrast, the left was a
you-grease-my-palm-I-grease-yours alliance of unions and special interests seeking
handouts and payoffs. They have not changed much, but the right has—and not for
the better. Arguably, Buckley was the movement’s indispensable man.
Director-producer Barak Goodman chronicles Buckley’s life and career as the
chief strategist and spokesman of American conservatism in The Incomparable
Mr. Buckley, which airs Friday as part of the current season on American
Masters.
Even
as an undergraduate, Buckley a troublemaking intellectual. He entered Yale as
part of the first class to overwhelmingly consist of fellow returning WWII
veterans and he left with the material for his first bestseller, God and Man
at Yale. Non-left-wingers were a fractured lot, divided into religious
traditionalist, libertarian capitalists, and hawkish Cold Warriors, but Buckley
united them into a reasonably cohesive coalition through their opposition to
Soviet expansionism and oppression.
Buckley
played a critical role as Conservatism’s gatekeeper and arbiter of legitimacy.
He famously excommunicated the conspiracy theory-mongering John Birch Society,
while trying not to alienate their more casual followers. Goodman skips over
Buckley (and his National Review colleague Whittaker Chambers) similarly
dismissing Ayn Rand and her Objectivists, probably because they were never as
consequential on the national political stage. Over the last ten years, we
desperately needed another William F. Buckley, but there was only one.
Goodman
and the disembodied voices of his commentators give the National Review editor
his due credit for building the movement and guiding it to a spectacular
victory when Buckley’s friend ally, Gov. Ronald Reagan, won the presidency and
ultimately the Cold War. Yet, it is not hagiography. Incomparable takes
a tough look at some of the positions Buckley staked out during the Civil
Rights Era, but it provides a much fuller perspective than did Best of
Enemies, Morgan Neville’s Buckley vs. Vidal doc.
It became the music of the Church, but it developed out of elements that
came from the old devil blues and the sinful nightclub music that was jazz.
Eventually, gospel influenced jazz in return, with the rise of Soul Jazz and spawned
Soul music through its fusion with R&B. Gospel music became a revered
institution, yet it continues to evolve, in ways writer, host, and executive
producer Henry Louis Gates chronicles in the four-part Gospel, which
airs Monday and Tuesday on PBS.
Technically,
it did not all start with former (or reformed) blues musician Thomas A. Dorsey,
because gospel evolved out of traditional spirituals, but he was its W.C. Handy.
Dorsey wrote and promoted many of gospel’s original classics. Rev. J.M. Gates,
who was a bestselling recording artist in his own right, for his sermons,
championed Dorsey within his considerable Church network. His close collaborator,
Sally Martin also played a critical behind-the-scenes business role. In fact,
Dorsey’s music was his business. Unlike so many jazz and blues artists, Dorsey
was incredibly shrewd when it came to copyrights and publishing.
Logically,
Mahalia Jackson is the heroic touchstone figure in Gospel, in much the
same way Louis Armstrong was in Ken Burns’ Jazz. If anything, fans might
argue she deserves even more screen time, considering her pivotal role
supporting the Civil Rights movement. Fiftysome years after her death, she
continues to be the greatest crossover success in gospel history.
Given
their focus on Dorsey and Jackson, the first two episodes of Gospel are
clearly the best. It also covers Sister Rosetta Tharpe, who probably also
deserves more screen attention (since she inspired Elvis Presley), but at least
Gayle Wald, the author of her excellent biography, Shout, Sister, Shout appears
as an on-camera expert. The second episode also introduces Aretha Franklin (who
needs no introduction), but Gospel presents her father, the Rev. C.L.
Franklin in a radically different light than did Genius: Aretha.
The
third episode is still pretty solid, covering the explosion of popularity for
Gospel on the international festival circuit, Franklin’s return to gospel with
the Amazing Grace concert and live recording, and the rise of Andrae
Crouch.
Barbara Parker is from Blackpool, not Liverpool, but to snobby Londoners in the
early 1960s, they might as well be the same place. She is not stupid, but she
is a little naïve, but again, the so-called “smart set” acts like they are the
same thing. However, she might just teach them a thing or two in the six-part Funny
Woman, adapted by Morwenna Banks from Nick Hornby’s novel, which premieres
tonight on PBS.
First
of all, set your understandable fears to rest. There is absolutely no Barbra
Streisand to be found anywhere in this series. However, there is a good deal of
vintage Pet Clark pop. The 1960s are just beginning to swing, but not for anyone
in Blackpool, so Parker makes the big move to London. Initially, she lands a
job in a swanky department store (one of many similarities with Miss Maisel),
where she meets her long-suffering roommate Marj Harrison.
Unfortunately,
the most likely way to social climb for most of her fellow shopworkers is as
the kept sidepiece of a rich customer. That is not for the independent-minded
Parker, so she quits. She was also fired, but whatever. Just when things look
bad, she signs with theatrical agent Brian Debenham, who is a bit creepy, but
not in a sexual way. Redubbed, “Sophie Straw,” she still struggles for gigs,
until she talks her way into an audition for a new sitcom produced by the
progressive Dennis Mahindra.
Obviously,
Mahindra is her Mr. Right, but he is inconveniently married to an unfaithful TVC
network colleague. Clearly, her cad of a co-star, Clive Richardson is Mr. Wrong
but he is confident enough to make his move. Ted Sargent, TVC’s head of “light
entertainment” does not much care for her modern sensibility or her Blackpool
accent, but viewers seem to love her.
Funny
Woman is
a chipper period rom-com that clearly wears its inclusive spirit on its sleeve.
However, the fab fashions and soundtrack keep the vibe quite buoyant. Gemma
Arterton’s upbeat performance also helps power the show along at a healthy
gallop. Her scenes on the sitcom set are somewhat reminiscent of shows like That
Girl, in nostalgic kind of way.
Arterton
also has great chemistry with Arsher Ali’s Mahindra. Tom Bateman doubles and
triples down on pompous arrogance as Richardson, but Banks and series director
Oliver Parker make it convincing from the dramatic context that Parker/Straw’s
relationship with him is mostly due to her getting caught up in the momentum of
her sudden fame.
Roald Dahl would be appalled by the prospect of sensitivity readers censoring
his work. He always believed his young readers were smart enough and
sufficiently snarky to appreciate his humor. It turns out Beatrix Potter would
agree. She happens to meet the young Dahl just when she is getting pushback
from the 1920’s equivalent of a sensitivity reader in David Kerr’s Roald
& Beatrix: The Tail of the Curious Mouse, which airs on select PBS
stations throughout December (starting today).
It
is historically accurate that young Dahl’s father passed away a little more than
a year after the death of his older sister. Other circumstances of the
comfortable Dahl household were fictionalized for the sake of holiday film
conventions. However, it is also true young Dahl successfully set out to meet
his literary idol, Beatrix Potter, the author of Peter Rabbit. According
to Abigail Wilson’s amiable screenplay, Sofie Dahl allowed her grieving son to
make the journey, providing only modest parental oversight, hoping it would yield
therapeutic benefits.
Despite
her happy marriage to William Heelis, Potter has grown eccentric and
curmudgeonly. As Christmas approaches, she prefers to putter in her garden,
rather than writing her next guaranteed bestseller. To spur her along, Potter’s
publisher has dispatched the prim Ms. Anne Landy, who has a bone to pick with
Potter regarding some of her more macabre rhymes. In fact, if Landy has her
way, Potter will revise them, making them far less colorful. If “trigger
warnings” were a thing in the 1920’s, Landy would have been an ardent
proponent.
In
between the live action storylines, Kerr intersperses stop-motion animated
segments, following a little boy mouse, whose life clearly parallels young
Dahl. The animation (directed by Thomas Harnett O’Meara) is stylishly
nostalgic, evoking fond memories of the finer vintage Christmas specials, in
the best way.
In
fact, Kerr and Wilson consistently find the right tone for Roald &
Beatrix. Of course, it is sentimental, but never excessively so. It always
feels just right for holiday seasonal viewing. Yet, the bit with Ms. Landy has surprising
bite and it could not be more relevant.
The very idea of re-writing Orwell’s 1984 is Orwellian, but that is
the current woke state of publishing. The plan is to tell the story from Julia’s
perspective, to reflect contemporary feminist theory. If they stay true to
Orwell, it should be almost exactly like Winston Smith’s story, except Julia
has the added irony of belonging to the Party’s “Junior Anti-Sex League,” which
strived to make their dystopian society celibate and genderless (thereby rendering
the new “angle” moot). Apparently, DI Annika Strandhed understands 1984 better
than Orwell’s heirs, but she does not always emphasize the most important parts
in the latest episode of Annika, premiering tomorrow night on PBS.
As
a detective with the Scottish Marine Homicide Unit, Strandhed is summoned to
remote Jura Island in the Hebrideans, where George Orwell wrote 1984.
Unfortunately, she is not thrilled to be ferried in aboard a chopper. Her team
says she is afraid of heights, but she really has a fear of falling from a
great height, which is only rational. Regardless, an unknown male was found floating
in the river encased in a solid block of ice, so he is either dead or the Thing
from Another World.
Of
course, he was murdered and the jokey tattoo on his butt will make the
identification easier. If he was killed on tiny Jura it will greatly reduce the
potential suspects. It is one of the least populated islands in the Hebrideans,
especially if you factor out the shrinks attending a convention, awkwardly including
Jake Strathern, Strandhed’s daughter’s former analyst, who is now using them as
a case study.
Strandhed’s
initial thoughts on 1984 focus on the ways the Ministry of Love forces dissident
prisoners to face their greatest fears. For most readers, the corrupting power
of propaganda and newspeak are more significant. However, her thoughts eventually
shift to the omnipresent surveillance. Ironically, surveillance footage
provides a big break in the case, so quiet little Jura has its share of Big
Brother as well.
Ironically, DI Annika Strandhed has an easier time talking to viewers than her teen
daughter Morgan or her DS, Michael McAndrews, with whom she shares some awkward
personal history. Breaking the fourth wall is her thing. She often dishes to
viewers regarding each episode’s case and her own personal issues. Strandhed (you
can see why they simply called the series “Annika”) also has healthy interest
in literature, which she demonstrates with her musings on Robert Louis
Stevenson’s Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. It is not exactly a
Halloween episode, but it is the closest PBS has to offer when the latest
episode (S2E3) of Annika premieres Sunday.
Fabian
Hyde, a green-sustainable energy tycoon has been murdered and it is clear the
locals did not agree with his environmental do-gooder PR image. That starts Annika’s
reflections on Stevenson and his fascination with duality—the idea that someone
can be two very distinct personas simultaneously. She fears McAndrews might
also see her as a Jekyll and Hyde, after revealing a very personal secret
during the previous episode.
To
really drive the point home, Strandhed gets deep-faked by a Scottish
defund-the-police-style activist, making her sound like a crass opportunist. It
is certainly a topical subplot and Strandhed’s Stevenson monologues add some welcomed
color (he was Scottish after all). However, the mystery itself is overly
simplistic and obvious even by 1970s Quinn Martin standards (which has been a
longstanding critical knock on the series).
It is not like these kids had it easy to begin with. In many cases, their
alcoholic parents had yet to inquire regarding their status, even after Ukrainian
social services revoked their parental rights. Then their welcoming halfway
home in Eastern Ukraine was forced to evacuate when Putin launched his illegal
invasion. When the troops crossed the border, filmmaker Simon Lereng Wilmont had
already finished shooting his Academy Award-nominated documentary A House
Made of Splinters, which airs Monday on PBS stations, as part of the
current season of POV.
Unlike
Eastern Front and 20 Days in Mariupol, House Made of Splinters
is not a war film, but the Russian dirty war in Donbass was indeed
stretching Ukraine’s already strained resources for social services. Frankly,
the three kids Wilmont focuses on are lucky to be there. Longtime educator/case
workers Margaryta Burlutska and Olga Tronova provided a sheltering environment
for the children, who were suddenly dealing with abandonment issues on top of
everything else.
The
Lysychansk Center was sort of a way station. Eventually, their residents either
leave for a state-run orphanage or foster parents recruited by Burlutska and Tronova.
Generally, fostering is the preferable option, but it essentially means the
foster children have given up hope for a further life with their dysfunctional
birth parents.
The
three focal children all must come to terms with that reality, which is
definitely some very real-life drama. It is also very depressing. However,
thanks to Burlutska and Tronova, some of the kids have relatively happy endings—at
least until the Russians invade.
How many times must the citizens of Iran take to the streets to protest
their oppressive clerical regime, before the governments of the liberal West
finally do something tangible to support them? Sadly, we are still asking. Who
in the Biden administration could object to the most recent Iranian protest
slogan: “women, life, freedom?” It is indeed Iranian women who were at the
forefront of the latest round of protests and it has been Iranian women who
have been dying as a result. Drawing on a wealth of protest footage posted (at
least temporarily) to social media and authenticated by third parties, Nightline
documents the demonstrations and the regime’s brutal response in director Majed
Neisi’s “Inside the Iranian Uprising,” which premieres on digital this Thursday.
It
all started with the murder Mahsa (Jina) Amini, a Kurdish Iranian woman, who
died in a Tehran hospital, after having been arrested by the Iranian Morality
Police. Her story went viral throughout Iran and around the world, after
reporters (one of whom, Niloofar Hamedi, has since been arrested) published
photos of Amini in a coma and her parents grieving in the hospital.
Many
women were so outraged, they took to the streets, burning their hijabs in public
protests, even though that very definitely made them targets for the same savagery
that killed Amini. One of those was Nika Shakarami, a 16-year-old YouTube
influencer, who mysteriously disappeared after burning her hijab in a protest,
until the government finally produced her body nine days later, claiming she
was the victim of a highly convenient suicide.
Yet,
some of the most horrific accounts of torture in this Frontline report
come from men, like the medical student who bravely offers an on-camera description
of how he was sodomized with a police baton. Neisi and the Frontline producers
mask the identity of another torture victim, using a British voice actor to
overdub his shocking account of how the so-called Morality Police raped him and
another man while they were in custody.
His name should ring a bell and not for singing the theme song to Thunderball.
Unfortunately, a lot of English majors can graduate without reading Fielding
these days and the 1963 adaptation has steadily lost its critical cachet since
winning the Best Picture Oscar. Frankly, the story of the roguish foundling
will probably be new to a lot of viewers, but they might not necessarily be
watching PBS’s Masterpiece. However, older fans of costume dramas will
be interested to see how Gwyneth Hughes’ four-part adaption departs from the
novel and Albert Finney film when Tom Jones premieres tomorrow on PBS.
Squire
Allworthy was a decent widower, who raised Tom Jones as his own, when he discovered
the foundling mysteriously left in his chambers. Frankly, he might be a little
too upright, but Jones always appreciated his kindness. In contrast, Jones’ legitimate
cousin, William Blifil, and the heir to the estate always hated him, with
visceral intensity. That is partly is so determined to be matched with Sophia
Western, with whom Jones is clearly smitten. It is quite mutual, but Squire
Western is not about to marry her off to a man of Jones’ dubious lineage.
In
this adaptation, Miss Sophie is the Squire’s granddaughter. Her father recently
passed away on the family’s Jamaican plantation and her mother, a slave, died
in childbirth. That was not in the original Fielding. Sophie Wilde (who previously
played another Sophie namesake in The Portable Door) is one of the
brightest, most watchable members of this ensemble, but her character’s acutely
tragic backstory conflicts with Fielding’s original bawdy mock-epic tone, which
Hughes still tries to preserve.
Hughes
also largely dispenses with the ironic narrator, which was the whole point of
Fielding’s novel (and a major reason why post-structuralist literary critics
are drawn to Eighteenth Century literature). There are brief voice-overs,
recorded by Wilde, at the start and close of each episode, presumably conceived
as a means for Sophie Western to “reclaim the narrative,” but they have little
wit.