Showing posts with label RFID. Show all posts
Showing posts with label RFID. Show all posts

Friday, May 24, 2013

Discovered: Nokia seeking U.S. import ban against HTC One in new (second) ITC complaint

I just reported on Nokia's new RFID-related U.S. patent infringement lawsuit against HTC in the Southern District of California, which others also discovered (Bloomberg, Priorsmart). What others haven't noticed yet -- but will presumably notice later today -- is that Nokia has also filed a second ITC complaint against HTC. Unlike the San Diego complaint, the ITC complaint hasn't become publicly available yet, but on the ITC's electronic document system I found this list of confidential exhibits filed by the Alston & Bird firm on Nokia's behalf (click on the image to enlarge):

The titles of those 20 attachments provide the following indications:

  • The complaint involves at least two patents, the numbers of which end with '345 and '945 (Exhibits 015, 017, 042, and 044). The San Diego complaint is not a companion (mirror) lawsuit of the ITC complaint but both complaints involve different patents.

  • The HTC One is one of the accused devices (Exhibit 026).

  • Broadcom (Exhibit 022) and Qualcomm (Exhibit 047) chips are key to the infringement allegations.

  • Like the Southern California filing this one appears to relate to radio frequency stuff (Exhibits 026 and 053), presumably RFID like in the federal lawsuit.

This filing comes a week before the trial in the investigation of Nokia's first complaint against HTC, which it brought in May 2012.

This is reminiscent of Nokia's litigation tactics against Apple. In March 2011 it also brought a second ITC complaint (in that case, after the trial in the first investigation, but also prior to a final ruling). Three months later, these parties settled (the fact that Nokia was making considerable headway in Mannheim, Germany, with rulings scheduled for the week following the settlement, may have played a far greater role than that second ITC complaint).

UPDATE: List of asserted patents

Subsequently to publishing this post I obtained a list of the six patents asserted in Nokia's new ITC complaint:

  1. U.S. Patent No. 6,035,189 on a "method for using services offered by a telecommunication network, a telecommunication system and a terminal for it"

    Nokia' infringement allegation relates to the ability of HTC Android devices to install new features on the phone, such as through the Google Play store, likely to trigger an intervention by Google like in the already-ongoing ITC investigation

  2. U.S. Patent No. 6,373,345 on a "modulator structure for a transmitter and a mobile station"

    The objective of this invention is to maximize the signal-to-noise ratio for mobile transmissions of speech and other data. A workaround may result in a degradation of speech quality and data speeds.

  3. U.S. Patent No. 6,711,211 on a "method for encoding and decoding video information, a motion compensated video encoder and a corresponding decoder"

    Nokia alleges that VP8, among other video codecs, infringes this patent. I'll do a separate post on this. This is another patent likely to result in a Google intervention.

  4. U.S. Patent No. 7,187,945 on a "versatile antenna switch architecture"

    This is about compact but multi-frequency-capable radio frequency (RF) components.

  5. U.S. Patent No. 8,140,650 on "use of configurations in device with multiple configurations"

    Nokia alleges that HTC uses the claimed invention to manage app-specific permissions in a convenient and secure manner.

  6. U.S. Patent No. 8,363,824 on a "portable electronic device"

    This has to do with the layout of components inside a phone, allowing an appealing design and high performance at the same time, and Nokia believes this reads on (among other things) unibody handsets.

With this week's nine new patents-in-suit (six patents at the ITC, three in the Southern District of California), the number of patents Nokia has in action against HTC totals 50.

If you'd like to be updated on the smartphone patent disputes and other intellectual property matters I cover, please subscribe to my RSS feed (in the right-hand column) and/or follow me on Twitter @FOSSpatents and Google+.

Share with other professionals via LinkedIn:


Nokia files another U.S. lawsuit against HTC, asserts three RFID-related patents

Yesterday I wrote that Nokia's patent enforcement against HTC and ViewSonic was progressing, but not as fast as Nokia presumably thought when it brought the original complaints in the U.S. and Germany in late April 2012. Nokia appears to agree that it needs to unleash more patents from its vast portfolio in order to get HTC to settle: it filed a new complaint, over three patents (from the same patent family) related to RFIC (radio frequency ID), in the Southern District of California (this post continues below the document):

13-05-23 Nokia v HTC Patent Complaint

The three patents in suit are U.S. Patent No. 7,775,432, U.S. Patent No. 8,308,065 and U.S. Patent No. 8,366,000, all entitled "Terminal, Method and Computer Program Product for Interacting With a Signaling Tag". This patent family also has some European members (such as EP1685689 and EP1965555), which Nokia might assert in the UK, Germany or other European countries. Here's claim 1 of one of the U.S. patents:

A method, comprising: receiving, at an apparatus, information regarding an electronic device including a radio frequency identification transceiver through a radio frequency identification interface; determining whether the apparatus is actively operating an application in a state of presenting data; and in an instance in which the apparatus is actively operating an application in a state of presenting data, transmitting data associated with the active application to the electronic device including the radio frequency identification transceiver.

The accused products include (but are not limited to) the HTC One S, HTC One V, HTC One X, HTC Evo 4G LTE, Droid Incredible 4G LTE, Droid DNA, HTC One X+, HTC First, HTC One, and HTC One VX. Nokia is seeking an injunction as well as damages.

Nokia has previously asserted approximately 40 different patents against HTC in the U.S., UK and Germany. The most recent German filing was made in mid-April and mentioned in a Nokia statement. The two Nokia v. HTC hearings I watched at the Munich I Regional Court yesterday had 2013 case numbers and were apparently filed only about three months ago.

Simultaneously with its new U.S. RFID-related complaint Nokia also filed the mandatory notice of related cases and pointed to the ITC investigation of its complaint against HTC (which will go to trial in about a week and involves, among other things, a tethering patent) as well as some Delaware lawsuits. Nokia stresses that there's no overlap between those cases pending on the East Coast and the new complaint brought in Southern California, where Nokia's U.S. operation has an office. Technologically that's true (it also appears that Nokia purposely selected very new products for the California filing), but HTC will presumably try to get the new cases transferred to Delaware and consolidated into the cases pending in that district, arguing that it promotes judicial efficiency, conserves party resources, and saves travel time for third-party witnesses (if it can argue that there will be any overlap with respect to such witnesses; with RFID at issue, it's actually more likely that third-party witnesses, such as employees of chipset makers, are based in California).

The Delaware court is proceeding on a schedule that comes down to a 2015 trial, and if any additional patents had to be consolidated into the Delaware case, there could be further delay. HTC also played this kind of game with Apple, which at the time of the parties' settlement had 32 patent assertions against HTC waiting to be adjudged in that district. Like Nokia, but with a weaker case for denying technology overlap, Apple had also tried to assert patents in another district (Southern District of Florida) but HTC won a transfer (it also got a case over standard-essential patent issues transferred) to Delaware. Apple was frustrated and said "HTC's transfer-and-stay strategy treats [the Delaware-based court] as a dumping ground for Apple's offensive cases". That's a scenario Nokia will definitely try to avoid, but courts enjoy considerable discretion in ordering transfers to other districts in which earlier-filed patent cases involving the same parties are pending.

If you'd like to be updated on the smartphone patent disputes and other intellectual property matters I cover, please subscribe to my RSS feed (in the right-hand column) and/or follow me on Twitter @FOSSpatents and Google+.

Share with other professionals via LinkedIn: