Maybe I could even have title this post: the social dimension of life.
Many people seem to interpret "survival of the fittest" as relating to the fitness studio. While the fittest are simply those who survived. Whether you survive depends on lot on your tribe and only partially on your self, if you do not behave too stupidly.
Frank Forencich speaking at the Ancestral Health Symposium, 2012, explains this social part of health and a full life.
Frank Forencich is blogging at The Exuberant Animal and is a refreshing sound in the paleo world. His posts are thought provoking and well worth reading.
Showing posts with label trust. Show all posts
Showing posts with label trust. Show all posts
Friday, 1 February 2013
Sunday, 1 May 2011
Against review - Against anonymous peer review of scientific articles
Being a scientist and a friend of science, I hope that the abolishment of the anonymous peer review system will end power abuse, reduce conservative tendencies and in general make science more productive, creative and fun. This essay has two parts. First, I will discus and illustrate the disadvantages of the peer review system by a number of examples, and then I will give some ideas for reforms inside the review system.
The quality of reviews
The peer review system is there to guarantee a high quality standard for scientific papers. If all scientists were rational, selfless and fully objective beings with unlimited amounts of time, this system would be a good idea to find errors before publishing. However, if you put real scientists into the equation, scientists that are normal humans, your get a low quality of review and a system that is prone to power abuse.
Labels:
peer review,
publishing,
scientific community,
trust
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)