Showing posts with label 2004. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2004. Show all posts

Sunday, May 23, 2021

My 2004 Oscar Ballot

All right, yesterday we finished our look at all of the races of 2004 with the Oscars (check out links below to all of the past Oscar contests).  As I stated last week, going forward we will be doing the My Oscar Ballots (where I pick who I would've nominated in every Oscar category) at the end of each season, and we just happened to perfectly land the end of our 2004 run with the My Ballots (this wasn't intentional, I actually thought there'd be a gap, but you gotta appreciate synergy when you can get it).  We'll start our new Oscar Viewing Project next week, and then going forward we'll have a My Oscar Ballot at the end of each season as our finale, so this will be the last one for ten weeks, but don't worry-we'll have our twice weekly OVP articles every week, so keep coming back for Oscar obsessiveness.  In the meantime, here is who I would've picked had I selected the nominees in 2004:

Picture

The Aviator
Bad Education
Before Sunset
Closer
Downfall
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind
The Incredibles
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
House of Flying Daggers
Kill Bill, Volume 2

Gold: Few films stir as much in me as Before Sunset, a sequel that is somehow significantly better than a predecessor that was also a landmark, wonderful romance.  This movie has a tad more bitter, and it does something few sequels are able to achieve-build on the relationships of its leads, making them decidedly more complicated (even at the film's end).
Silver: Alfonso Cuaron's take on the Harry Potter universe invited a slew of naysayers who were startled by how it didn't take a more exact take on the books like Chris Columbus' films.  Turns out, of course, that Cuaron was making the best film in the series, ingenious, creative, & spirited.
Bronze: The films of Zhang Yimou are always mesmerizing, visual feasts for the eyes and senses.  House of Flying Daggers, though, remains my favorite-a colorful, sweeping, & forbidden love story that always transports me back to my formative film-watching years.

Director

Alfonso Cuaron (Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban)
Oliver Hirschbiegel (Downfall)
Richard Linklater (Before Sunset)
Martin Scorsese (The Aviator)
Zhang Yimou (House of Flying Daggers)

Gold: I'm going to switch this up a little bit and give this trophy to Cuaron, whose movie has the handicap of not necessarily following bad movies (I liked all of the HP films, something you've likely caught on to as we've continued this series since I've put them all in a lot of categories, including Best Picture), but because he totally upended a series, and did it successfully-no small feat.
Silver: Yimou is right behind him, though, as House of Flying Daggers is one of his greatest feats.  This is beautifully shot, with grand-scale action scenes that slowly build on themselves, culminating in a crescendo finale that will stay with you always.
Bronze: Richard Linklater's films feel so organic that you rarely attribute them to the director but instead the writers & actors.  But that doesn't mean he doesn't have a firm lens on the film, making sure to implement a sort of ticking clock urgency over Celine & Jesse.

Actor

Jim Carrey (Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind)
Leonardo DiCaprio (The Aviator)
Bruno Ganz (Downfall)
Gael Garcia Bernal (Bad Education)
Ethan Hawke (Before Sunset)

Gold: A close race for me again, but I'm going to tip the hat to Bruno Ganz, who had a gargantuan role to encompass with Downfall, trying to both maintain the true core of a monster while giving startling hints of the human in his performance, making him all the more terrifying.
Silver: A tight race here with Jim Carrey, whose Joel in Eternal Sunshine is such a hapless man, kind but deeply flawed, trying to make sense of a love story that he no longer has control over, and isn't sure how he wants it to end.
Bronze: Ethan Hawke's Jesse is a tough role to play-he becomes a successful writer in this film, but he's also at a crossroads in his failing marriage, in love with a ghost...who has just briefly entered his life again.  Hawke plays him in this film as a man-on-a-mission, to where he doesn't know, but he wants to leave with answers this time.

Actress

Annette Bening (Being Julia)
Julie Delpy (Before Sunset)
Nicole Kidman (Birth)
Imelda Staunton (Vera Drake)
Kate Winslet (Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind)

Gold: As we profiled in the Best Actress contest (again, see below), this was a really challenging category for me, and one of the few times I might have wanted to play the "tie" card if I had it.  That said, I think that Winslet's work here is not just the best but the most challenging, a wholly original creation that feels warm-but-prickly in her capable hands.
Silver: Seconds behind her is Bening, playing her Julia to the hilt, finding a way to combine more with better as an aging actress who is determined to get the final applause over her last curtain, and she's going to have a blast while doing it.
Bronze: Imelda Staunton's Vera Drake is so inward, so run-of-the-mill.  That shouldn't be confused for being ordinary though, because there's nothing ordinary about making a woman that you pass by on the street into a fully-fledged human being, capable of secrets & beliefs that even her own family doesn't acknowledge.

Supporting Actor

Brad Bird (The Incredibles)
David Carradine (Kill Bill, Volume 2)
Jim Carrey (Lemony Snicket's A Series of Unfortunate Events)
Clive Owen (Closer)
David Thewlis (Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban)

Gold: Of the whole splendid Closer cast, perhaps no one feels best-suited for the role than Clive Owen (at the time the least-known of the actors in the film).  He plays his Larry as a man on the hunt, the only character in the film not capable of looking at his own feelings, even as he handles the rest of the cast's with a sledgehammer.
Silver: David Thewlis gets best-in-show for me of the Azkaban players, giving a subdued nature to a character who has madness brimming from within.  I loved the way that he takes one of the least-defined major characters in Rowling's series & provides texture.
Bronze: David Carradine is given a gargantuan task in Kill Bill, living up to four hours worth of revenge fantasy as the movie unfolds.  He lives up to it by underplaying Bill, someone who is obviously dangerous but whose danger doesn't need explanation-you can see it in the measured way he speaks & moves.

Supporting Actress

Cate Blanchett (The Aviator)
Darryl Hannah (Kill Bill, Volume 2)
Corinna Harfouch (Downfall)
Virginia Madsen (Sideways)
Natalie Portman (Closer)

Gold: Cate Blanchett comes storming into The Aviator, fully possessed of Katharine Hepburn.  It's very difficult to play a famous actor like this, but she does it beautifully balancing Hepburn's onscreen persona with the glimpses of the real we get offscreen (the great actors never stop acting, and Blanchett understands this).
Silver: Virginia Madsen knows that Maya will appear inauthentic if it isn't a totally inhabited character...the "life of wine" monologue has too many risks to become cliche or pablum in lesser hands. But she commits-she knows this woman exists, and is real (rather than some male fantasy), and she shines as Sideways' best player.
Bronze: Natalie Portman emerged from her child stardom with this role, similar to Winslet playing a "complicated" manic-pixie-dream-girl.  But while Winslet's Clementine is prickly, Portman's Jane is only sharp on the outside, far more vulnerable inside than she lets on as Jane exposes every layer of herself.

Original Screenplay

The Aviator
Bad Education
Birth
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind
The Incredibles

Gold: Eternal Sunshine is the film that every other Charlie Kaufman film feels slightly down toward, mostly because the bar is just too high to ever achieve again.  Terrific dialogue & a tough, dense, central romance, Kaufman's work has never been so elegant & well-captured.
Silver: Possibly the best-plotted superhero movie ever made, The Incredibles is full of wry humor (god bless Edna Mode-that Brad Bird nomination up-above is not a typo), and a look at the reality of superheroes is such a confident piece-of-work.
Bronze: Pedro Almodovar's films are captivating, always giving us a freshness that other filmmakers struggle to keep organic.  That's particularly true in this neo-noir, with us continually guessing the shifting motives of all of the players.

Adapted Screenplay

Before Sunset
Closer
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
Mean Girls
Sideways

Gold: Before Sunset is the perfect script.  I love talk-y films like this, where we don't know what will be discovered in conversation & what secrets will pour out, and this is maybe the best of them, a movie where long-held truths emerge as two people confess the good (and the disappointing) of their youths.
Silver: Patrick Marber's Closer is also all talk, but while Before Sunset has a beating heart underneath it, Closer brings a dump truck of cement to encase anyone whose heart might try to sneak into this movie, his cold dialogue ready to trip up anyone daring to breathe.
Bronze: Adaptation isn't just about creating a great script, it's also about seeing the best you can in the source material & letting it transcribe to the cinema.  Books aren't mean to be movies, they're meant to be books.  Alfonso Cuaron knows this, plucking the best parts of Harry Potter and leaving the rest behind to create a movie that can stand apart from its daunting origin.

Animated Feature Film

The Incredibles
Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow
The Spongebob Squarepants Movie

Gold: This category was an AMPAS one in 2004, so we're sticking with it, but really, we should have just pronounced a coronation for The Incredibles, by far the best animated film of the year, and one that is an action-packed joy from start-to-finish.
Silver: Sky Captain is a questionable inclusion for animated feature, but honestly it involves so little in terms of actual real-life people, what else do you call this but animated, and I found the spirit of adventure running through it (and the technical prowess of the effects) enough to my liking that it deserves this citation.
Bronze: We'll finish off an (admittedly tepid) year for cinematic cartoons with Spongebob, which finds the absurdist joy of the TV series (which inspired an entire generation in the way Harry Potter and Star Wars before it) with a feature-length movie that is filled with ridiculous humor (there's a reason this series launched so many memes-it's a cartoon that knows how to make you laugh with your eyes).

Original Score

Bad Education
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
House of Flying Daggers
The Incredibles
Lemony Snicket's A Series of Unfortunate Events

Gold: A tight race between #1 & 2 (a recurring refrain in 2004, but my love for some of these films is well-matched to the others), I'm giving Newman's more original creation in Lemony Snicket the trophy, giving Daniel Handler's story a bit of mischief, throwing in electronica of all things to encourage the strange "what era is this?" feel of the tale.
Silver: John Williams' last sequel to genuinely stretch him (let's be real here, and I love the guy, but the Star Wars sequels are trading on old glory), with the Knight Bus sequence showing that he is still the inventive guy who can match a film's mood (it reminds me so much of his work with the Cantina Band).
Bronze: We're back with House of Flying Daggers again, here which uses the "Lovers" motif to great effect, but also adding a rumbling drum to the score that feels almost like it's part of the attack during the action sequence.

Original Song

"Al Otro Lado Del Rio," (The Motorcycle Diaries)
"Double Trouble," (Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban)
"Look to Your Path" (The Chorus)
"Lovers," (House of Flying Daggers)
"Old Habits Die Hard," (Alfie)

Gold: A weaker year overall for Best Original Song is disguised by a really great song as our gold medalist.  "Lovers" may play in full over the end credits, but it is hinted at so often throughout the movie (similar to "My Heart Will Go On" in Titanic), that when you hear its melancholic ballad, it feels like a recap of the movie rather than something tacked on.
Silver: "Old Habits Die Hard" is not, its worth noting, a song that feels like it's hinted at throughout the rest of the movie (and not a great movie, at that), but its such a catchy Mick Jagger tune that I couldn't skip it here even if it's too good for this movie.
Bronze: John Williams has a bit of help from Shakespeare (only a few lines of this aren't from the bard), but I'm not as strict with rules like this as the Academy, and this is a great little (unexpected) treat nestled into Prisoner of Azkaban.

Sound Mixing

The Aviator
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
House of Flying Daggers
The Incredibles
Kill Bill, Volume 2

Gold: Few films understand how to use their score in the way that House of Flying Daggers does, serving almost as an echo for some of the sound mixing (look at the way they make the cascade of bamboo flying through the air almost musical).  The Oscar snub here is baffling.
Silver: Cuaron knows how to ensure that John Williams' score never overwhelms but instead aids the film that it houses, and as a result we get a lot of the great dialogue moments that he's added (and the teen angst).
Bronze: The great score brings parts of it to light, but the entire roaring adventure of The Incredibles feels right-at-home, as the line readings are read with character & the dialogue is expertly over-layed with the additional car chase or action sequences.

Sound Editing

Collateral
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
House of Flying Daggers
The Incredibles
Kill Bill, Volume 2

Gold: I'm going to sound like a broken record on the technical achievements of House of Flying Daggers but it's just impossible to deny.  The way they create fight scenes almost as if they're blowing past your ears, and feel so organic to the weapons onscreen...it's a total triumph.
Silver: The roar of the giant drill might have been the best single sound effect of any movie in 2004, but The Incredibles is not a one-trick pony.  It instead gives us a great set of superhero skills (each Parr family member has their own accompanying soundboard).  
Bronze: The musical cues of course give Kill Bill its iconography, but the sword-fighting in Volume 2 is probably the ticket here.  The second volume never matches the playfulness of the original, (it's two stories with a more somber second half), but the sound editors make sure you still hear the heightened changes in the fights as the Bride pushes to live up to the title.

Art Direction

The Aviator
Downfall
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
House of Flying Daggers
Lemony Snicket's A Series of Unfortunate Events

Gold: A cascade of color & design, House of Flying Daggers totally paints the screen with its elaborate sets, and great use of dense bamboo forests.  There's an overwhelming majesty to the film from the start, and then the movie just keeps it coming.
Silver: One of those cases of "most" and "best" colliding, The Aviator recreates a meticulous Hollywood glamour while giving in to the era's opulence.  The best part, though, might be the way the team authentically constructs Hughes' arsenal of planes.
Bronze: While Harry Potter borrows to some degree from its predecessors, there's enough newness & expansion of the universe (specifically the Knight Bus & Hogsmeade) that I can't skip the great design that Stuart Craig is doing here.

Cinematography

The Aviator
Bad Education
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
House of Flying Daggers
The Passion of the Christ

Gold: The cinematographers play with House of Flying Daggers' shifting color palette, using the film's overwhelming shading (specifically with green), to inform the lighting decisions, elevating the movie to an almost mythical feel.
Silver: Say whatever you want about The Passion's controversies, Caleb Deschanel is hitting a home-run when it comes to the cinematography.  The oil painting feel, as if he's almost ripping some of these scenes out of a bloodied Caravaggio work, comes across masterfully on the screen...Deschanel understands Gibson's vision even if there are times Gibson doesn't.
Bronze: The noir appeal of Bad Education is found in the way the camera treats Gael Garcia Bernal's "femme fatale," initially innocent but later more tactical we see as the camera lustily examines him, the way that he's seducing not just the protagonist, but the audience as well-Garcia Bernal owes a lot of his work here (his best) to the cameramen.

Costume Design

The Aviator
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
House of Flying Daggers
Lemony Snicket's A Series of Unfortunate Events
Troy

Gold: Sandy Powell is a genius (duh), and of course she has great flare in The Aviator in recreating the looks of iconic stars like Katharine Hepburn & Ava Gardner, but she also knows how to get beyond the exteriors of these women-look at the way she makes Hepburn's pants feel like they're dominating Hughes by upending his expectation of women-Powell more than any other costume designer, knows how to add character touches to her work.
Silver: I'm running out of superlatives to throw at House of Flying Daggers, but it cannot be denied that the costume work is excellent here.  The designers worked well with the art directors, ensuring that all of their clothes match the palettes behind them, each scene feeling like everything is perfectly choreographed.
Bronze: Colleen Atwood makes sure that everyone in Lemony Snicket looks like they're attending Queen Victoria's funeral by way of Hot Topic, which sounds like cattiness, but it's not...Handler's novels have such a strange motif, that the only way to go was well-regarded steampunk.

Film Editing

Collateral
Downfall
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
House of Flying Daggers

Gold: Action sequences are often cited for this category by default with Oscar, which isn't fair (editing can be great across all genres).  However, when it's done well, like we see with House of Flying Daggers, it's easy to see why this is such a default.  The work here is so precise, a whirling symphony of goosebump-erupting chills.
Silver: A very worthy silver (and in a different field, a solid winner) is Eternal Sunshine.  This is a hard film to edit, as we crash between what is real & what is being torn down...the editing comes center stage because we have to see the story of Joel & Clementine's relationship falling apart through the disappearing memories that the editors are pulling from us.
Bronze: The speed of Prisoner of Azkaban, giving us a story that needs to feel fresh to an audience that knows it by heart, is one of the film's greatest assets-the editors keep the story relentless & well-paced, so as to keep you guessing even if you know the conclusion.

Makeup & Hairstyling

The Aviator
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
Hellboy
Lemony Snicket's A Series of Unfortunate Events
The Passion of the Christ

Gold: Using its playful makeup to full effect, Lemony Snicket gives us totally transformed characters (Jim Carrey's Olaf springs from the pages), but the makeup artists aren't just going for the big.  Look at Violet's slightly uneven bangs or Aunt Josephine's unmoving bun, the way they use these visual cues hint at the character's larger personality.
Silver: Before "X actor is unrecognizable" became a meme (and something of value in this category), The Aviator was doing it wonderfully, particularly Kate Beckinsale's glamorous Ava Gardner.  Transforming a half dozen movie stars into cinematic icons is no easy task, and Scorsese's epic lives up to it.
Bronze: Hellboy wasn't hit in a general sense in 2004, but the extensive makeup work & graphic novel motif that it inspired would become omnipresent in movies for the next two decades, so it's hard not to give it a nod here even if the film isn't nearly as good as its technical effects.

Visual Effects

The Aviator
The Day After Tomorrow
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
House of Flying Daggers
Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow

Gold: The gigantic polar vortex effects of The Day After Tomorrow are extraordinary.  The realism in this film, and the ingenuity in making weather such a daunting challenge for the audience...the movie may be stupid but the effects are stupid amazing.
Silver: Putting the werewolf aside, the rest of Prisoner of Azkaban is that rare combination of technically brilliant, genuinely beautiful, & story-building effects.  The Knight Bus and the Buckbeak character both spring off the screen & dazzle.
Bronze: Sky Captain's effects are not for everyone, as they overwhelm and occasionally the realism is hurt by having a bit too much CGI (it's in animated feature for a reason, because that's how it oftentimes reads).  That said, this type of green-screen acting was groundbreaking at the time, and the way that the visual effects artists combine its actors with so much retro (virtual) set design is extraordinary.


Other My Oscar Ballots: 200520072008200920102011, 201220132014201520162019

Saturday, May 22, 2021

OVP: Picture (2004)

OVP: Best Picture (2004)

The Nominees Were...


Michael Mann & Graham King, The Aviator
Richard N. Gladstein & Nellie Bellflower, Finding Neverland
Clint Eastwood, Albert S. Ruddy, & Tom Rosenberg, Million Dollar Baby
Taylor Hackford, Stuart Benjamin, & Howard Baldwin, Ray
Michael Landon, Sideways

My Thoughts: And we are finishing it up!  I said after 2005 that we had just finished our most succinct OVP ballot ever, but 2004 was even tighter-we finished all 20 categories within ten weeks, a personal goal I've had every season & one that we actually reached!  We will start our next season next week (our "Introduction to the Year" article I'm hoping to have on Monday, as I'm done watching all of the contests of that year), but before we go we need to knock out both Best Picture & our new "My Oscar Ballot," which I'll have out tomorrow.  We've talked about these movies a lot over the past ten weeks, so I won't hold you up any longer-let's find out my choice for Oscar's top prize of 2004.

We'll start with the film that Oscar chose in this field, Million Dollar Baby.  Clint Eastwood's second win in this category is not a bad film (something that I thought initially, mostly because I was more focused on other movies competing that year).  It's also not a great film.  Eastwood is capable of greatness, but while this has elements of his most successful cinematic elements (Eastwood is weirdly good at looking at characters in isolation), it doesn't always work.  I don't feel like Maggie works as a protagonist-she remains too much of a blank slate for me as a character, and while that helps in the development of Eastwood's broken coach, it doesn't make the film cohesive enough for me.  Also, and I can't remember if I've mentioned this yet since it's not super relevant, but since it's unlikely we revisit this movie in-depth again in a series, the first date I ever went to with a guy was to Million Dollar Baby...little trivia about yours truly.

I kind of feel the same about Finding Neverland, though it doesn't have the same ambition that Eastwood brings to his picture.  We have a pleasant movie (this is a fine enough film), but it's one that has a blank slate star.  Unlike Swank, who I don't usually gravitate toward, Johnny Depp pre-Mad Hatter was generally an actor I could subscribe to, and it's weird to say this to modern audiences, but this doesn't work the way it's supposed to because Depp so underplays his JM Barrie, not because he's giving it too much zaniness.  The story is fine, and I liked the concept, but this is the sort of movie you quickly forget after seeing it, and I suspect that if it hadn't been the last gasp of the Weinsteins at Miramax, this would've been replaced by some other picture.

Recently on Twitter, I saw a mutual mention how it's hard to get excited about musical biopics anymore, because they're just so tired, telling the same story over-and-over again.  Ray might seem like the prototype, but it's honestly just another in a long line of such movies, as by 2004 this style of movie was old hat.  Foxx's central performance is one I don't care for (I don't think he gives enough of himself in the non-singing scenes, and when he is singing...it's actually Ray Charles).  The movie is rife with cliche, and has the personality of a jukebox musical.  I didn't like it, and it has so little there that I don't really have much more to add.

This isn't the case for The Aviator, though, another biopic from 2004.  Biopics need to have some sort of artistic perspective on their subject, which Martin Scorsese brings to his tale of Howard Hughes.  Scorsese knows Old Hollywood better than any other director working, and he imbues this film with both a sense of realism about that world but also the majesty.  Scorsese isn't shy about showing Hughes & his crew as glamorous figures, giving us that sense of wonder before the fall, and he uses bright, sometimes intentionally mis-colored cinematography (remember the blue grass?) to pay homage to different lensing styles from the era.  The movie's ending isn't quite as sharp as it could've been, and occasionally Scorsese overdoes it with Hughes' relationship with his mother, but this is a successful picture.

The same can be said for Sideways, a movie that was polarizing at the time, but I thoroughly enjoyed.  The film is one of those movies that isn't meant to speak for everyone, and is unapologetic about that-this is a very specific type of intellectual exercise, but it works because it shows the humanity in all of its characters.  You don't have to understand the people played by Thomas Haden Church & Virginia Madsen as reflections of yourself to not understand their own failings & dreams.  Sideways occasionally struggles under Paul Giamatti's angry inner-monologue, and some of the humor might be a bit broad, but I think it's a strong film that shows the unusual nature of friendship & growing older.

Other Precursor Contenders: The Globes split their nominations between Comedy/Musical and Drama, but in 2004 they cheated so we actually have 11 nominees.  Drama went to The Aviator, here beating Closer, Finding Neverland, Hotel Rwanda, Kinsey, and Million Dollar Baby (six rather than five), while Comedy/Musical gave it to Sideways over Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, The Incredibles, The Phantom of the Opera, and Ray.  The PGA was still five-wide then, and went with The Aviator as its victor over Finding Neverland, The Incredibles, Million Dollar Baby, and Sideways, while BAFTA favored The Aviator over Eternal Sunshine, Finding Neverland, The Motorcycle Diaries, and Vera Drake.  In terms of sixth place, my gut says it was Hotel Rwanda, with its two acting nominations & a writing citation rather than Eternal Sunshine or Vera Drake.  This is driven more through actually living through this season rather than precursors (since the latter two have more traditional benchmarks), something I need to keep in mind as we look to future sixth place conversations.
Films I Would Have Nominated: You'll find out the full list tomorrow, but to keep with tradition here, I just want to say that it's a shame that Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, which was clearly in the Academy's wheelhouse (Best Actress nominee, Screenplay Win) got skipped out in this field.  It's more interesting, quite frankly, than the whole shebang.  The rest you have to find out when we conclude our season in the morning.
Oscar’s Choice: Oscar went with Million Dollar Baby, which as you can see with the precursors was an atypical choice compared to the season.  This was driven by late-breaking momentum for Eastwood's film, which opened later in the year & had time to grow.  I predicted this on Oscar night (I double-checked), though it was very clear that Aviator had a shot at both of the big prizes, and these losses surely led to Martin Scorsese getting his moment-in-the-sun two years later (that he'd get it over Eastwood himself in 2006 seems fitting, and considering their congenial relationship, probably something Eastwood enjoyed).
My Choice: I won't make Martin Scorsese wait that long to take the big prize.  The Aviator is a fine film, and while Sideways gives it a run for its money, the scope & scale of The Aviator (and the success Scorsese brings to it), get it my prize.  Behind them I'll put Million Dollar Baby, Finding Neverland, and Ray.

And with that, we close 2004!  Are you with me over in Team Marty, or were feeling the love for Clint in this lineup?  Do you think Miramax was the deciding factor in Finding Neverland making it over Hotel Rwanda for the fifth slot?  And overall-what is your favorite movie of 2005?  Share your comments below!


Past Best Picture Contests: 20052007200820092010201120122013201420152016, 2019

Monday, May 17, 2021

OVP: Director (2004)

OVP: Best Director (2004)

The Nominees Were...


Martin Scorsese, The Aviator
Clint Eastwood, Million Dollar Baby
Taylor Hackford, Ray
Alexander Payne, Sideways
Mike Leigh, Vera Drake

My Thoughts: We are starting the final week of the 2004 Oscar Viewing Project.  We will be hitting three articles this week (I cannot promise the days that these will land as I have a very busy "real life" week ahead, but they will happen at some point between now & Saturday)-Best Director, Picture, and My Oscar Ballot, as well as kicking off our 14th season on Sunday.  You've been with us a while (and if you haven't, there's links to a bunch of our past contests below to catch you up), so let's get started with, I don't know...Clint Eastwood (movie stars tend to get first billing in Hollywood, so commencing with him feels the most natural).

Clint Eastwood's films of the past decade have been marked by political appraisals of his offscreen behavior, most notably viewing his pictures through the lens of his 2012 appearance at the Republican National Convention, but while his movies have always had an anti-establishment vibe, it does feel like they have taken on a more noted libertarian tone in the past 10 years (though, not to give away the ending of Million Dollar Baby, but this one does as well even if that's not its most marked characteristic).  Eastwood does imbue a sense of anguish as his camera moves through the story of Maggie's eventual tragedy, but it also doesn't add a lot.  Blue-tinted cinematography & thoughtful whispering next to a routine story might make for solid popcorn fare, but it never feels all that elevated, and while that's fine, if you're going to give someone an Oscar, they should be elevating the actual picture beyond what is on the page.

That's what Martin Scorsese brings to The Aviator.  Scorsese was very much in the throes of his "please give me an Oscar" phase in 2004 (he'd get more experimental in the years after The Departed), but just because you're making Academy-friendly movies doesn't mean they can't be great.  The Aviator knows that you can't have Howard Hughes without also bringing in the true glamour of this figure, and trying to show modern audiences why his final chapter was so unusual to the public-at-large.  Scorsese does that, exhibiting a rapid descent for Hughes, but also giving us a truly fully-fleshed out movie, with long insightful chapters into the figure (and side characters who escaped his gravitational orbit like Katharine Hepburn & Ava Gardner).  It's a biopic with perspective.

That's not the case with Ray.  Taylor Hackford's look at singer Ray Charles came along at a time when musical biopics were all the rage (we're in another run of that right now thanks to the recent blockbuster success of Bohemian Rhapsody), but the problem with them was that they were so cookie cutter, and while Ray was one of the most successful examples of this, it was hardly the first (most of the musical biopics of this era were clearly stealing from the very successful Temptations miniseries that aired in the late 1990's).  Hackford doesn't help Foxx bring out enough of Ray Charles, who always feels just-out-of-reach to the audience, which is a problem when the biopic is focused directly on him.  As a result, you leave the film humming a lot of great music, but not feeling like you've understood the man behind the songs in a way you don't understand all musicians.

Alexander Payne brings a better understanding to his characters in Sideways, which doesn't have the handicap of being based on a real person, and therefore can expand a bit what we're trying to understand about these figures.  Payne's approach is to let everything sit, much like a fine glass of wine allowed to breathe, and have the audience first get to know the main quartet of players before letting our opinions of them change too much.  This hands-off approach gives the film a relaxed feel, which some don't love, but I quite enjoyed because as things happen it feels more meaningful.  Conversation is an underrated way to get across key life events in a film (when we're trained to focus more on events), and Payne does this beautifully (it helps that he's also a writer), having the most pivotal perspective shifts happen simply through a conversation with someone you don't realize is changing your life.

Our final nominee is Mike Leigh, the only person we won't be returning to later this week for Best Picture.  Leigh's movies are always thoughtful & no one quite knows the power of shifting perspective like Mike Leigh.  This is true of Vera Drake, where Leigh puts the early focus on our main character, someone we're meant to think we can understand just by looking at her, and then watch as we learn things about her that we otherwise couldn't have realized.  This is a challenge that Leigh undertakes knowing the risks-if we feel like we're not alongside Vera's family, gaining additional understanding of the title character, it will feel rather conventional, but Leigh utilizes his leading lady's excellent performance to full effect to make Vera Drake feel like it's filled with surprises as we move to its conclusion.

Other Precursor Contenders: The Globes have always favored a movie star for this category, so Clint Eastwood began his eventual date with Oscar as the victor for the HFPA, beating out Scorsese, Payne, Mike Nichols (Closer), & Marc Forster (Finding Neverland).  BAFTA didn't go for Million Dollar Baby anywhere, so they gave their trophy to Mike Leigh, here over Forster, Scorsese, Michael Mann (Collateral), & Michel Gondry (Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind).  The DGA also went with Clint Eastwood, here over Forster, Hackford, Payne, & Scorsese.  I have to assume, considering he hit all three precursors (and was nominated for Best Picture) that Marc Forster was just out-of-reach of Oscar (honestly-how many people can claim an Oscar Best Picture nomination, as well as a Globe/BAFTA/DGA nod and still not be a nominee?).
Directors I Would Have Nominated: We'll get into the "My Ballot" later this week so I won't talk too much here about it to save spoilers for later, but I do wonder why the Academy didn't go for Zhang Yimou for a nomination.  House of Flying Daggers was a directorial achievement of the highest-order, and there was conversation leading into the Academy Awards that he might be the surprise (instead they went with Mike Leigh)...it's a pity considering he has yet to be nominated in the years since that they didn't take this opportunity.
Oscar's Choice: It was relatively close at the time, but Eastwood prevailed once again, keeping Marty in the Oscar wilderness for a few years longer.
My Choice: Scorsese, and it's not particularly close-this is the only film that feels like you watch and think not only that it's excellent, but that it's being driven by great direction.  Behind him (in order) is Alexander Payne, Mike Leigh, Clint Eastwood, & Taylor Hackford.

Those were my thoughts-how about yours?  Are you over on Team Clint or would you like to relax with me on Team Marty?  Do we think Mike Leigh, who was at one point pretty fashionable with the Academy, will ever win an Honorary Oscar or is his moment past?  And how did Marc Forster dominate the precursors but strike out here?  Share your thoughts in the comments!
Past Best Director Contests: 20052007200820092010201120122013201420152016, 2019

Wednesday, May 12, 2021

OVP: Actress (2004)

OVP: Best Actress (2004)


The Nominees Were...

Annette Bening, Being Julia
Catalina Sandino Moreno, Maria Full of Grace
Imelda Staunton, Vera Drake
Hilary Swank, Million Dollar Baby
Kate Winslet, Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind

My Thoughts: When I write these articles, most often I'm writing them with an idea of how I'm going to rank the nominees, and usually I stick to that.  While I don't always know what I'm going to say about the contenders, I have an idea of roughly the order that they might turn up, and it's rare that I change my mind talking about them out loud.  The 2004 Best Actress contenders, though, are a race where I genuinely change my mind all the time.  The race features three actresses giving some of the best work of their careers, three terrific performances that I struggle to be able to discuss without tripping over myself, and honestly leave flummoxed as to who is the "best" of the bunch.  So...this one's going to be a mystery for both of us.

Before we get to those performances, though, let's discuss the also-rans (since the eventual winner is genuinely a mystery to me, I'm going to lay down the cards pretty quickly on the remaining nominees).  Catalina Sandino Moreno managed to land a nomination for Maria Full of Grace in spite of that film being disqualified for Foreign Language Film for being "insufficiently Colombian" (early on it was the frontrunner for that category).  Sandino Moreno gives a heavy-handed performance as Maria, playing her inwardly, oftentimes far-too-much, as the movie goes on.  It's a tough role, and one that's in a very serious movie, but Sandino Moreno does most of her acting through her eyes, which can work...it's just not enough to save a movie that relies more on subject matter to carry its story than its actual characters.  Still, I'm not going to knock this too hard just because it was such a hard-fought nomination (the only Colombia film in history to be nominated for an acting prize)...it's just kind of a middling performance.

The same is true for Hilary Swank.  Swank is not bad in Million Dollar Baby, but that this performance dominated the whole season is a real question in terms of Oscar's taste.  Swank spends much of the film letting a lack of expression be her domineering trait, allowing the audience do most of the heavy-lifting in our interpretations of her Maggie.  It's a blasé piece of work, five years after her first win (in a weird way Swank is quite similar to Luise Rainer in that she won two Oscars with virtually nothing else-to date-of note in films, though unlike Rainer Swank has kept working in the pursuing decades).  Eastwood & Freeman are much better in the movie, giving at least a story behind their performance, but Swank's work is mostly reliant upon physicality and reacting...we don't know who this woman is, and she's at her best when she's being interpreted by the other actors in the film.  That's maybe a decent directorial trick to have an actor pull off, but it's not a great performance.

Swank in 1999 beat Annette Bening for her trophy, and she famously did the same in 2004, taking the trophy from Bening for Being Julia.  Being Julia is the least-remembered of the three "big" performances in this category, and it is (while still a great movie), the least of the three actual films on its own merits.  But Bening owns the screen here, and makes Julia Lambert a totally unique creation.  Borrowing from the best divas, she plays Julia as a shrewd, brilliant, but impetuous figure, putting the cruelty of a world-leaving-her-behind (even though she's far from ready to give up the limelight, and as she shows through the film, the limelight should be staying on her) in every moment of the movie.  Her triumphant final act, when she "ad libs," totally owning those who thought they'd gotten one-over on her is magic, and Being Julia becomes the kind of movie that is truly elevated by one outstanding central piece-of-work.  This might be my favorite performance from Annette Bening, which is saying something.

It's also saying something, though, that Kate Winslet's Clementine Kruczynski is perhaps her greatest piece-of-work (I told you this would be hard).  Winslet plays Clementine as a free-spirit "manic pixie dream girl" who is truly complicated (or "fucked up," as she'd put it in the film).  It's a hard role to land-she has to make Clementine not likable in the way we traditionally associate with romantic comedies, but she's also the kind of character that will make you fall in love with her.  That's not easy, and what is at the crux of Eternal Sunshine being a genuinely beautiful movie: these people love each other in spite of themselves, and whether or not they can make it work, that love (tough, raw, sometimes ugly) is tangible throughout Winslet's work.  It's bravura stuff.

Staunton gets the most traditionally dramatic part, but also the least showy of the three women.  Staunton's Vera Drake, an ordinary housewife who helps young women in difficult situations by performing abortions on them, is a triumph of understated acting.  Staunton makes Vera not only be ordinary, but feel ordinary-the way she goes about her day, she is someone who you pass by on the street, and she's okay with that.  This makes her atypical behavior as a woman who performs abortions so extraordinary-this secret life isn't something she considers unusual or outside-her-realm, but instead something that you do in the same way you buy bread or help a neighbor who has tripped on the sidewalk.  Abortion is the sort of gut check issue where people come in with callous, almost malignant attitudes about the other side of the debate, but Staunton's Vera Drake is so brimming with soul that you almost feel like she could bridge the gap.  An astonishing piece-of-work.

Other Precursor Contenders: The Globes separate their nominations between Drama and Musical/Comedy, so we have ten women nominated for these awards.  Swank won for Best Drama, over Staunton as well as Scarlett Johansson (A Love Song for Bobby Long...which I've never seen & feel a little bad about-anyone else see this movie or have any memory of it?), Nicole Kidman (Birth), and Uma Thurman (Kill Bill Volume 2), while Bening bested Winslet, Ashley Judd (De-Lovely), Renee Zellweger (Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason), & Emmy Rossum (The Phantom of the Opera).  SAG went with the same lineup & winner as Oscar, while BAFTA totally swung for the fences, giving their trophy to Staunton while nominating Winslet for both Eternal Sunshine and Finding Neverland, and also nominating Zhang Ziyi (House of Flying Daggers) and Charlize Theron a year late for Monster.  In terms of sixth place, I honestly think that Oscar didn't really have a lot of competition other than these five, but at the time I recall the closest contender was Thurman, with Rossum a distant seventh, so that's probably what it was.
Actors I Would Have Nominated: Obviously three of these contenders would make my personal Top 5, and so close to the end (we'll do "My Ballots" next week) I don't want to play my cards too much here since you already know 60% of my nominees.  That being said, I do wonder what would have happened if Uma Thurman had somehow been able to compete for the full Kill Bill franchise in one year...the second half isn't as good as the first, but combined this is also the role of her lifetime, and it's a pity that she didn't score a nod either in 2003 or 2004 for her work in this series.
Oscar’s Choice: Oscar, despite not yet having given a trophy to either Bening or Winslet yet in 2004 (half of that they've since corrected) chose to give the award to Swank, likely by a bigger margin than her more celebrated first win.
My Choice: We'll go backwards here.  Swank is last, since she does the least with her performance of the bunch, and I think she gets a better film to work within than Sandino Moreno (so not getting more out of that script is a larger crime).  In bronze, I'm going with Staunton.  If she as in 2003 or 2005, she'd win, so this is a performance that deserves credit.  For the win, I'm going to go with...Winslet?  I think so.  It's a harder role to nail, and though Bening gets the best scene in the movie, Winslet's performance is just a bit more well-rounded.  Literally, though-in all of the years of the Oscars if I was only afforded one Best Actress tie this is probably where I'd use it-it's that close...picking one over the other feels a crime with work this strong.  I will continue to go back-and-forth in my head on this, but in terms of the official OVP, Kate Winslet gets this trophy.

Those are my thoughts, but now I want to hear yours!  Are you with me (cautiously) in Team Kate or do you prefer the runaway winner of Swank?  How exactly is it that Swank beat three performances that are all clearly better than hers (was it a genuine vote split)?  And where does Uma Thurman stand in your personal 2003 & 2004 ballots?  Share your thoughts in the comments below!


Past Best Actress Contests: 20052007200820092010201120122013201420152016, 2019