Stuck at home during the ChiCom Virus quarantine, I started listening to the audiobook of Gosnell: The Untold Story of America's Most Prolific Serial Killer, by Ann McElhinney and Philem McAleer. I was surprised by how little I remembered from having read the hard copy version. As I listened, I found myself wanting to comment again and again to McElhinney and McAleer. I've realized that over 30 years of studying abortion malpractice and malfeasance gives me a unique perspective. I want to share that with my readers -- and with the authors of this groundbreaking, must-read book. I am not going to give a blow-by-blow account of what the authors cover. My commentary will be limited to what I can add from what I've observed.
I began research into abortion in the fall of 1983, after becoming pregnant with my son in very difficult circumstances. I had been taught in college that poor women who can't feed the children they already have need abortions. It's the only way they can fulfil their responsibilities to their born children. There I was in that situation. My husband and I had pawned our wedding rings to buy food for our daughter. I was skipping meals myself. At four months into the pregnancy I was still able to fit into clothing from the girls' department, a miniskirt and top for a job running a golf swing analyzer at a mall kiosk. I wasn't even beginning to show.
I knew that the entity growing inside my body was a baby, as precious as my daughter. But I had only just graduated from college in June. During those four years I'd absorbed a lot of the Leftist culture of the university setting. The only way I could afford to feed my daughter was to starve myself, which was starving my unborn baby. My primary responsibility was to feed Lisa. It was clear that I had to bite the bullet, to go against my conscience, to bear the moral and emotional burden of aborting the growing child within me.
There was a Planned Parenthood within walking distance. All I had to do was pick up the phone and make the appointment.
But I couldn't do it.
If I'd had prochoice friends, I'm sure that the phone call would have been made. My friends would have reassured me that I was making the right choice, however difficult it was. I had to think of Lisa. I had to think of the damage I'd inflicted on my unborn child already by starving myself to feed her. I had to do it.
Fortunately, there was somebody different in my life. My husband's best friend, Eddie. Eddie was the prochoice movement's worst nightmare: a prolife Catholic man. But Eddie was able to see what my husband and I couldn't see: that the problem was our living situation. My husband was in the Army, stationed at Fort Ord. We only had one month of temporary housing provided so we'd had to find a place quickly. The apartment we'd found was in Salinas, over a half-hour drive from the Presidio of Monterey where my husband commuted daily to the Defense Language School. We were far from the commissary or even an ordinary grocery store. And our apartment hadn't come with a refrigerator. We'd only been able to afford a bar fridge. We didn't have enough room to store enough food for a week. I made trips to a local mini mart where food was astronomically expensive. The cost of gas for my husband's commute was draining what little money we had. Clearly, Eddie insisted, we needed to find a cheaper place closer to the Presidio.
My husband and I balked. We'd searched. The area around Fort Ord was notorious for expensive housing and enlisted personnel who couldn't afford to feed their families. A 13-year-old boy, Danny Holly, had hanged himself in the hopes that having "one less mouth to feed" would ease his family's desperate financial situation. What hope was there that we could find a better place to live? We were convinced that it was hopeless. Eddie persevered. He pestered and finally one Saturday morning he physically pushed us towards the door and said, "You're looking for an apartment. Now."
We found one that day. It was much nicer, much cheaper, across the street from a grocery store, and in a spot where my husband could carpool to work. Within a few months we were caught up on our debts and not only feeding ourselves but able to invite guests to dinner.
The experience left me with a profound distaste for the prochoice movement, whose rhetoric had very nearly led to the needless death of my unborn son. I quickly volunteered at the local Birthright, where part of my training was to read Bernard Nathanson's Aborting America, a memoir of his role in launching NARAL -- then the National Association for the Repeal of Abortion Laws, now NARAL Pro-Choice America. I learned that deceit had been part and parcel of the prochoice movement from its inception. I have a low betrayal tolerance. I became determined to dig deeper.
I started doing research at the library, looking at News Bank. There I discovered the first two of the hundreds of abortion deaths I've since documented: Gloria Aponte and Ellen Williams. Both had died due to appalling malpractice. Gloria's abortionist, Hanan Rotem, had allowed his receptionist to administer general anesthesia. The clinic where Ellen had her abortion, Dadeland Family Planning, was a hell hole. Both deaths bear witness to the type of systematic slovenliness that would reach its full flower in Kermit Gosnell decades later. The response to the revelations about Dadeland -- a closing of ranks by the self-appointed protectors of women's rights -- sowed the seeds for that deplorable blossom. I only came to see this myself gradually.
During the 1980s, Operation Rescue began a program of blockading abortion facilities. News coverage of one of those blockades include a photo of a group of prolifers holding signs shaped like tombstones, each commemorating a woman who had died from a "safe and legal" abortion. Clearly Ellen and Gloria had not been flukes. I attended a prolife rally in DC. Somebody had left behind an "Abortion Death Log" that fell into my hands. I tracked down its author, Kevin Sherock. Sherlock was a dogged abortion death researcher who documented his work well. He went on to publish Victims of Choice based on that research. Sherlock's research uncovered scores of deaths, some with very few details available, some with an abundance. I'd encounter Kevin Sherlock again.
I went to work at Life Dynamics, a renegade prolife organization headquartered in Denton, Texas. We provided litigation support to plaintiff malpractice attorneys representing abortion-injured women and the families of those who died. What started out as a report to summarize what we had in our files turned into Lime 5, an expose of the scope of the malpractice problem and the combination of cover-up and emabling by the abortion lobby -- especially the National Abortion Federation -- and bureaucrats at the Centers for Disease Control.
While at Life Dynamics I experienced another eye-opener. We had obtained tapes of years and years of meetings and seminars held by the National Abortion Federation. If I had my wish, every recorded minute of every word spoken at those seminars and meetings would be readily available to the public. They include some of the most damning words ever uttered about what goes on behind the scenes in America's abortion clinics. The things David Daleiden recorded came as no surprise to me. They were totally in keeping with what I'd heard on those tapes from the late 1980s through mid 1990s. Nothing has really changed beyond technology making even more ghoulish endeavors possible.
When I left Life Dynamics, I took my files on a CD-ROM and eventually started first a web site, then a blog, then a wiki devoted to abortion deaths. I branched out to include deaths from the pre-legalization era as well because I don't believe that only one type of abortion death is tragic and unnecessary. The site that hosted my wiki closed down, but I was able to salvage most of the content, now at the Cemetery of Choice.
I have kept up-to-date on abortion deaths and malpractice and owe a massive debt of gratitude to Operation Rescue for how meticulously they document every cause of malpractice and death they encounter. They have prevented cover-ups with their perseverance and determination to dig until they get to the truth.
When the Gosnell story broke, I got a copy of the Grand Jury Report as quickly as I could and spent nearly a week of sleepless nights converting it into a searchable wiki plus commentary -- alas since relegated to the Internet Archive after my wiki host shut down. In all honesty, the only thing that really shocked me about the Gosnell story is that he was vigorously and successfully prosecuted. Yes, he was the worst I'd ever seen, but it was a mere matter of degree. Animals in clinics, filth, untrained staff, stockpiled fetal remains, bureaucratic indifference, and the abortion lobby getting away with their lame excuses because a complicit media spreads them unquestioningly are all par for the course in abortion practice. The aftermath -- that nothing has changed -- is also no surprise. Filthy clinics are uncovered, stockpiled fetuses are stumbled across, bureaucrats and officials turn a blind eye, babies are born alive and killed, women's lives are cut short by malpractice, and the media continue to uncritically defend the indefensible by covering it up.
I had long hoped that if given enough information about how appalling abortion practice really is, prochoice citizens would rise up and demand that the "safe" part of "safe and legal" be taken seriously. After thirty years, I'm ready to abandon that dream. Once you start to really care about how the women are treated, becoming a prolifer is inevitable. Once you become a prolifer, you are dismissed out of hand. Of course you say bad things about abortion -- you're one of Them. The fact that we are Them because the bad things are true can't penetrate the wall of fog the abortion lobby and its media lapdogs create. Denial: It's Not Just a River in Egypt.
I have no idea how long it will take to reach the tipping point, where the entire house of lies collapses under its own weight. I have come to doubt that it will come in my lifetime. Still, if I can even poke at that foundation of lie, maybe I can do my part to undermine it. Maybe, for my granddaughters, the days of Safe and Legal Abortion will be universally seen as shameful as the days of The Peculiar Institution of slavery.
In the mean time, I will do everything I can to get the truth out. One piece of that will be sharing and adding to the work of McElhinney and McAleer. Hats off to you, Ann and Philem. Would that all journalists were as honest and courageous as you.
Showing posts with label abortion activism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label abortion activism. Show all posts
Friday, April 03, 2020
Saturday, January 31, 2015
Why Did Abortion-Rights Groups Tolerate This Clinic and its Pervy, Quacky Docs?
State suspends Lathrup Village abortion clinic license after failed health inspection
According to the Michigan Attorney General’s Office, the state has suspended the license of a local clinic where abortions are performed after authorities discovered several health code violations. .... According to a document sent to the facility by the Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs, the center failed to maintain a sterile facility and inform a patient of risks, consent or complications of a procedure. Workers allegedly were performing charting improperly, and did not have adequate supplies and tools, among other things.
Dr. Jacob Kalo owns the facility and Dr. Reginald Sharpe, who was also mentioned in the article, evidently does abortions there. Kalo has an unsavory history. He was investigated in 1998 after two patients reported that he had sexually abused them. More on him elsewhere.
Reginald Sharpe |
Dr. Reginald Sharpe has not, to my knowledge, been accused of sexual abuse, but he does have a history of malpractice, including the death of a 26-year-old patient in 2008. Life Site News reported that Sharpe had perforated the patient's uterus, and once the instruments were inside her pelvic cavity had managed to cut a uterine blood vessel and lacerate her intestines and her liver. Because I have only just now learned of this patient's death, I will begin searching for substantiating documents. Since the woman's family sued, there will be court documents regarding the case.
Sharpe had already been reprimanded in 2005 for "general negligence or failure to exercise due care, including negligent delegation to or supervision of employees or other individuals" at his facility. The Board of Osteopathic Medicine detailed Sharpe's care of patient "R. C." I will refer to her as "Reba."
On February 24, 2005, Reba had gone to Sharpe's facility, Women's Advisory Center, for an abortion to be preformed by Dr. Rudolfo Finkelstein. On the first day, Finkelstein performed an ultrasound and told Reba that she was 23.5 weeks pregnant and needed to undergo an immediate abortion. Reba returned on March 1 for Finkelstein to insert laminaria (small sterile seaweed sticks used to dilate the cervix) in preparation for the procedure the following day. Sharpe then told Reba that he would be the one to perform the abortion.
On March 2, Sharpe administered a sedative then began the procedure. After a few minutes, Sharpe told Reba that the fetus was too high in the uterus and he would have to let her rest quietly for a while so that he could complete the abortion when the fetus was in a better position. She was moved to the recovery room. Fifteen minutes later, Sharpe checked in on Reba, then left the facility.
Over the next several hours, Reba had painful contractions and profuse bleeding. She asked staff to contact Sharpe, and they kept telling her that he'd be back soon. The only care they provided was to move Reba to a different room and replace the bloody bedding. Reba began asking staff to either let her mother come back to her or to call an ambulance, but this request was refused. At 12:20 p.m., about three hours after Sharpe had left, Reba screamed for her mother, who heard her and demanded to be brought to her daughter. Reba was in full labor. Her mother asked the assistants to help, and when they refused she delivered the weak but live-born infant herself.
Reba's mother asked the staff to call an ambulance, but they refused so she called from her own cell phone. EMS staff were denied entrance to the building. While they waited to get in, Reba's mother spoke to Sharpe on the phone, and he said he'd be there in five minutes.
Eight minutes after EMS arrived, clinic staff grudgingly unlocked the door but told the medics that their help wasn't needed because Sharpe would be there soon. They demanded access to the patient. They found her with a racing pulse and alarmingly low blood pressure, the placenta still in place and the 27-week baby's cord not cut. After waiting more than 15 minutes for the arrival of Sharpe -- who had spoken to medics on the phone and insisted that they not transport Reba to the hospital -- the medics took Reba to the ambulance and moved to a nearby parking lot. They assessed Reba again. Her blood pressure was still low and her pulse was still high, so EMS gave up on waiting for Reba's doctor and transported her to the hospital, where a doctor attended to the delivery of the placenta and assessed the baby, which had died.
The fact that anybody would allow this man to treat patients is alarming in and of itself. Even more alarming is the fact that prochoicers never investigated this clinic and the backgrounds of the doctors that patients were trusting with their care. Abortion-rights groups never seem to have trouble pulling together the resources to go after prolife pregnancy centers, despite the fact that they've never been able to document a single case of one of those centers causing a woman's injury or death. But they somehow show no interest in checking up on abortion facilities that endanger, injure, and kill women.
What are their priorities?
Sunday, October 12, 2014
Who Benefits from Abortion-Rights Efforts?
Abortion rights activists are fighting tooth and nail against laws
and regulations that hold abortion clinics to the same standards as
other outpatient surgical facilities. They assert that it is for women's
benefit that they fight to keep the state from tightening standards for
abortion clinics. But who is it that really benefits?
Let's look at some of the clinics that closed down in the wake of the Texas law that Wendy "Abortion Barbie" Davis fought so hard against and ask, "Cui bono?"
Let's look at some of the facilities Davis and her friends were fighting so hard to keep open.
Abortion Advantage (operating under several different names) was fined for repeated health violations: in March 2003 for $11,400 and in September 2007 for $1,950. Violations included:
One of Routh Street Clinic's doctors, Jasbir Ahluwalia had lost hospital privileges in 1996 due to improper handling of high-risk pregnancies. He had already been sued in 1991 and 1995 by three women whose abortions he botched, one of whom wound up needing a hysterectomy, and sued in 1995 by a woman who ended up losing a kidney because he stitched one of her ureters shut during a hysterectomy. In 2002, the Dallas Morning News noted that Ahluwalia had been sued after causing severe brain damage to their child during delivery.
Hilltop Women's Reproductive Health Services threw fetal remains in the trash, where a neighborhood dog found them. The dog's whose owners gave the remains to prolifers who then notified the authorities -- who chose to do nothing. If the state is turning a blind eye to a clinic dumping fetal remains outside the clinic, what are they turning a blind eye to behind the clinic's doors?
Women's Center of Houston's doctor Richard Cunningham was sued for his involvement in an ordeal suffered by a teenage abortion patient and her baby. After the insertion of laminaria (sterile seaweed sticks) to dilate her cervix for a late abortion, the teen changed her mind. Another doctor working with Cunningham lied to the girl, telling her that it would very much endanger her to remove the laminaria and stop the procedure, and put in more laminaria to further dilate her cervix. After leaving the clinic, the teen, increasingly upset, returned and spoke first to the other doctor then to Cunningham, who again lied, telling her that she could bleed to death if they removed the laminaria. After half an hour of badgering the girl to continue the abortion, Cunningham told her to look in the yellow pages for an anti-abortion group and dismissed her from the clinic. The girl and her mother immediately went to a hospital, but by then the teen's cervix had been too far dilated to keep her from going into labor. She gave birth to a 1 lb. 13 oz. baby girl who struggled for life in the NICU for six months before dying in February of 1992. Cunningham had also performed a fatal abortion on Sheila Watley in 1987.
In 2010 their other doctor, Shah Siddiqi, was disciplined for malpractice involving two non-abortion patients. One suffered permanent damage after he botched back surgery and failed to diagnose what he'd done wrong. Another patient lost function in her left hand due to an infection caused by a spinal procedure and Siddiqi failed to quickly diagnose and treat the infection.
Whole Women's Health of McAllen: disposed of fetal remains and other biohazardous waste in a dumpster.
Douglas Karpen closed his clinic soon after the law was passed, without waiting for the injunction to be sorted out.
He was the main doctor involved in the refusal to stop an abortion after the teenage patient changed her mind. (See Richard Cunningham, above.)
He let a teenage abortion patient bleed to death, after having lied to her parents about the risks to their daughter.
Glenda Davis bled to death after an abortion at Karpen's Aaron Family Planning. Rather than call an ambulance when Glenda started to hemorrhage, employees just pushed her out in a wheelchair and loaded her into an employee's car.
Three former employees provided photographic evidence that Karpen was killing live-born infants.
On two occasions, the owner of a car dealership next door to Karpen's clinic had to call authorities to report that the clinic sewer had backed up, spilling recognizable fetal parts onto his lot.
The mainstream media, who evidently consider "journalism" to consist of getting a talking points sheet from abortion-rights groups, have failed to report on the conditions at any of the closed clinics, but have instead just uncritically and unquestioningly parroting the words of those organizations.
Who would benefit if abortion-rights advocates successfully block state crackdowns on abortion clinics? Who would benefit if abortion clinics aren't held to the same standards as other outpatient surgical facilities? Who would benefit if Wendy Davis had her way?
It wouldn't be the women walking into those abortion clinics.
Let's look at some of the clinics that closed down in the wake of the Texas law that Wendy "Abortion Barbie" Davis fought so hard against and ask, "Cui bono?"
Let's look at some of the facilities Davis and her friends were fighting so hard to keep open.
Abortion Advantage (operating under several different names) was fined for repeated health violations: in March 2003 for $11,400 and in September 2007 for $1,950. Violations included:
- failure to maintain a safe and sanitary environment
- failure to maintain appropriate infection control
- failure to maintain complete and accurate medical records including documentation of medications administered
- failure to ensure that staff who provided patient care were certified in basic life support
- failure to meet minimum standards for administering sedation
One of Routh Street Clinic's doctors, Jasbir Ahluwalia had lost hospital privileges in 1996 due to improper handling of high-risk pregnancies. He had already been sued in 1991 and 1995 by three women whose abortions he botched, one of whom wound up needing a hysterectomy, and sued in 1995 by a woman who ended up losing a kidney because he stitched one of her ureters shut during a hysterectomy. In 2002, the Dallas Morning News noted that Ahluwalia had been sued after causing severe brain damage to their child during delivery.
Hilltop Women's Reproductive Health Services threw fetal remains in the trash, where a neighborhood dog found them. The dog's whose owners gave the remains to prolifers who then notified the authorities -- who chose to do nothing. If the state is turning a blind eye to a clinic dumping fetal remains outside the clinic, what are they turning a blind eye to behind the clinic's doors?
Women's Center of Houston's doctor Richard Cunningham was sued for his involvement in an ordeal suffered by a teenage abortion patient and her baby. After the insertion of laminaria (sterile seaweed sticks) to dilate her cervix for a late abortion, the teen changed her mind. Another doctor working with Cunningham lied to the girl, telling her that it would very much endanger her to remove the laminaria and stop the procedure, and put in more laminaria to further dilate her cervix. After leaving the clinic, the teen, increasingly upset, returned and spoke first to the other doctor then to Cunningham, who again lied, telling her that she could bleed to death if they removed the laminaria. After half an hour of badgering the girl to continue the abortion, Cunningham told her to look in the yellow pages for an anti-abortion group and dismissed her from the clinic. The girl and her mother immediately went to a hospital, but by then the teen's cervix had been too far dilated to keep her from going into labor. She gave birth to a 1 lb. 13 oz. baby girl who struggled for life in the NICU for six months before dying in February of 1992. Cunningham had also performed a fatal abortion on Sheila Watley in 1987.
In 2010 their other doctor, Shah Siddiqi, was disciplined for malpractice involving two non-abortion patients. One suffered permanent damage after he botched back surgery and failed to diagnose what he'd done wrong. Another patient lost function in her left hand due to an infection caused by a spinal procedure and Siddiqi failed to quickly diagnose and treat the infection.
Whole Women's Health of McAllen: disposed of fetal remains and other biohazardous waste in a dumpster.
Douglas Karpen closed his clinic soon after the law was passed, without waiting for the injunction to be sorted out.
He was the main doctor involved in the refusal to stop an abortion after the teenage patient changed her mind. (See Richard Cunningham, above.)
He let a teenage abortion patient bleed to death, after having lied to her parents about the risks to their daughter.
Glenda Davis bled to death after an abortion at Karpen's Aaron Family Planning. Rather than call an ambulance when Glenda started to hemorrhage, employees just pushed her out in a wheelchair and loaded her into an employee's car.
Three former employees provided photographic evidence that Karpen was killing live-born infants.
On two occasions, the owner of a car dealership next door to Karpen's clinic had to call authorities to report that the clinic sewer had backed up, spilling recognizable fetal parts onto his lot.
The mainstream media, who evidently consider "journalism" to consist of getting a talking points sheet from abortion-rights groups, have failed to report on the conditions at any of the closed clinics, but have instead just uncritically and unquestioningly parroting the words of those organizations.
Who would benefit if abortion-rights advocates successfully block state crackdowns on abortion clinics? Who would benefit if abortion clinics aren't held to the same standards as other outpatient surgical facilities? Who would benefit if Wendy Davis had her way?
It wouldn't be the women walking into those abortion clinics.
Wednesday, June 04, 2014
Gearing Up for When the Inevitable Happens
HT: Jill Stanek
Big Abortion is in a sorry state, with loud lamentations and dramatic hand-wringing such as this Planned Parenthood post. Their cry is that laws setting medical standards for abortion clinics are "restricting and eliminating safe and legal abortion access via technicality and needless regulation."
Their intended-to-be alarming little animated GIF shows both the real and projected closings of abortion facilities due to state requirements that they stop making do with doctors that can't get hospital admitting privileges.
Note that each and every closing is characterized as a loss of "access to safe and legal abortion," with no qualifiers whatsoever. If the place does abortions, the presumption is that it's safe for women to entrust themselves to the care that place provides.
The Lie of "Access"
As we've seen from Planned Parenthood's GIF, the mere existence of an openly operating, presumably legal abortion facility is "access" to "safe and legal" abortion.
I might remind the reader that this same presumption of "safe and legal" care was made of Kermit Gosnell. In fact, the presumption of safety in Gosnell's case was so powerful that reputable prochoice organizations and abortion clinics referred patients to him -- one of whom later learned that Gosnell had severed her unborn baby's feet and kept them in a jar. Furthermore, a National Abortion Federation clinic hired him part-time and allowed him to take their patients to his Philadelphia "house of horrors" to be doped within inches of their lives by untrained staff then set aside to moan and writhe on torn recliners under blood-stained blankets amid the fleas and cat feces until their living, viable babies would be expelled and then killed by a scissors to the spinal cord. Even more to the point, the paramount value placed on "access" -- and the presumption that any legal abortionist is a safe abortionists -- is the excuse that Pennsylvania authorities used to turn a deliberate blind eye to the goings-on under Gosnell's roof.
As the post goes on, Planned Parenthood pooh-poohs the idea that abortionists should be required to provide continuity of care for their hospitalized patients. "Providers," Planned Parenthood assures us, "already have plans in place in case of an emergency to ensure patient safety."
I might remind the reader that the emergency phone number that prochoice "hero" LeRoy Carhart provided to his patient Jennifer McKenna-Morbelli actually rang to Carhart's wife's equestrian-supply business answering machine. Attempts made, first by Jennifer and then by her family, to reach Carhart delayed the treatment that might have saved Jennifer's life. Is that the sort of "plan" that Planned Parenthood has in mind? If this is what one of their heroes provides, what can patients expect at lower-quality facilities?
Cause for Alarm
The abortion business is currently in a downward spiral. Every year there are fewer abortions and more clinic closures. To people who dislike abortion, this is a good thing. But if abortion is your bread and butter, that's a scary thing. It's scary for abortion clinic owners, who are watching their livelihood vanish. It's scary for abortion practitioners, who are finding fewer and fewer places where they can fly in with their pockets empty and fly out with them full. It's scariest of all for professional abortion-rights activists, because the money that keeps their jobs funded all comes from the abortion clinics that are shutting down at an increasing rate.
Thus, the professionals are facing a choice: Go to work promoting something other than abortion, or batten down the hatches and keep the abortion business afloat.
A Two-Part Strategy
The strategy is two-part, and we need to be ready. Right now we're seeing the groundwork. They're raising the alarm and working to establish two ideas in people's minds:
The second takes a bit more than a moment's thought but also becomes clearly false upon examination. Nobody thinks that women are reflexively going to reach for the rustiest coathanger in the closet if there's not an Acme Reproductive Services just down the street. Some women will travel further to arrange an abortion, some will ferret out a doctor closer to home that doesn't advertise but will do the occasional abortion, and the most fortunate will find that the initial panic passes and they come to welcome the new baby.
The point of the abortion lobby's efforts in general, and Planned Parenthood's in particular, isn't to get people to think. The idea is to prevent people from thinking by hammering an idea into their heads before they even have a reason to think about it. There are two techniques used currently:
Having established the "legal = safe" and that the alternative to "safe, legal abortion" is only "unsafe abortion" and not help addressing the woman's actual problems, the preparations are already in the works for any contingency that they can play to the abortion lobby's benefit. You can be certain they're ready for those states that will soon be without a dedicated abortion facility. We've seen this sort of thing play out before, so we know what's going to happen.
We need to take a lesson to prevent needless tragedy -- a specific needless tragedy that the abortion advocacy movement desperately needs to regain momentum.
It's important to note up front that it is not the average pro-choice citizen who is gearing up to create and exploit a tragedy. It's Big Abortion -- an unholy alliance of population control zealots, abortion practitioners, eugenicists, and Sandra Fluke-style feminists. They are putting the pieces in place, and average prochoice citizens are being primed to play their part in protecting Big Abortion's interests under the guise of protecting women.
Big Abortion is losing traction. The main thing they need to regain momentum is a corpse. If you think they're not gearing up to produce one, think again. We only need to look back to 1976.
Lessons From the Past
In 1976, the Hyde Amendment went into effect, banning the use of Federal funds to pay for abortions except to save the mother from an immediate threat to her life. The measure was named for its author, Congressman Henry Hyde. Abortion advocates had been keening from the moment the Hyde Amendment was up for vote. They painted a ghastly picture of coathanger-impaled women littering the streets as poor women were driven to desperation by lack of "access," just as today abortion enthusiasts are keening about what will happen if we start actually holding abortion clinics up to standards more rigorous than what you see in a bus station men's room.
When the Hyde Amendment went into effect, abortion advocates ramped up the hysteria and waited for a death, any death, they could hang around Henry Hyde's neck. On October 3, 1977, the Big Abortion vultures got what they'd been waiting for: a dead woman they could use as leverage in the fight to once again force taxpayers to fund elective abortions.
On September 26, 1977, 27-year-old Rosie Jimenez had shown up at the emergency room of McAllen General Hospital in the Texas border town of McAllen, suffering from septic shock caused by an infection from an illegal abortion. She was put in intensive care, but died on October 3.
The initial response of the abortion lobby to news of Rosie's death was little short of euphoric. They had their trophy, their dead woman whose face they could hide behind in order to push for the restoration of tax money flowing into abortion clinics.
An Unexpected Investigation
One voice stood out from the crowd: Ellen Frankfort, author of Rosie: the investigation of a wrongful death. Ms. Frankfort was disgusted with the bulk of the prochoice movement, who seemed content to pounce on Rosie's death and then milk it for political gain. She began an investigation into what had led Rosie to her death, and she found a lot that neither the Centers for Disease Control nor abortion advocacy organizations had been willing to look for, since all they'd wanted was political leverage. Unlike Ellen Frankfort, they weren't looking for the real culprit behind Rosie's death: they'd had a bogeyman in mind even before she'd died, in the form of Henry Hyde.
Off to McAllen Ms. Frankfort went, to learn all she could. She learned:
The Reaction
The doctors reported the death to the CDC. The CDC notified their allies in the abortion lobby. Rosie's death was quickly trumpeted nationwide as proof that Henry Hyde was a murderer and that taxpayers should immediately resume funding elective abortions to prevent another such death.
It is worth reiterating, when we look at Rosie's death, that prochoice groups had been very successful in spreading the word that public funding for abortion had been cut -- Rosie's friend and cousin, as well as her physician, were well aware of this fact -- but they had pointedly failed to also pass out the word that Planned Parenthood still referred for abortions on a sliding scale, and that private funds were available. It's almost as if the public-relations departments of Planned Parenthood and other abortion-advocacy groups had deliberately increased the odds of a tragedy like Rosie's death in order to provide the corpses needed in order to prop up a drive to restore tax monies to abortion facilities.
Lessons for Today
Let's start with some simple facts:
A Crucial Point
Many states have taken steps to make abortion facilities put up or get out. The first woman that an abortionist kills in one of those states will become a martyr to the abortion cause in a way we haven't seen since Ms. published the crime scene photo of Geri Santoro in 1973. But it's not 1973 any more.
In 1973, it was hard to muster a groundswell of fear and outrage because after all Geri had been dead for nearly a decade and Roe vs. Wade had just supposedly put an end forever to women's gruesome abortion deaths.
Abortion rights groups, from the local NOW chapter to the International Planned Parenthood Federation already have established relationships with the mainstream news organizations. The new martyr that the abortion machine creates will become the focus of a campaign that will have all the fury and media hype that Big Abortion can muster. The result will be a well-coordinated assault that will make D-Day look like it was thrown together haphazardly by a bunch of drunken frat boys.
We also need to remember that Big Abortion will find out about the dead woman long before we will. They have connections in public health agencies that we simply don't, because they began planting them there back when Planned Parenthood was still calling itself the Birth Control League. Those connections will give them adequate lead time before allowing the story to break. Public health officials will not be neutral sources of information -- though of course they will pretend to be. They will be a key part of the orchestrated media blitz, just as the Centers for Disease Control was a key player in the media campaign when Rosie Jimenez died. The specifics of which woman Big Abortion manages to get killed, and under what specific circumstances, will be well known to the abortion lobby, and we will be playing catch-up to find out what really happened.
Look at the traction the international abortion movement is gaining in Ireland from the death of a woman who was not promptly given antibiotics during a miscarriage. It took a wild stretch of the imagination to blame that woman's death on lack of "safe and legal abortion," but that hasn't stopped the abortion machine and its media lackeys. Ireland is poised to come under the control of Big Abortion. Can you imagine what hay they can make with a death they have actually engineered and prepared for? The press releases are already drafted, templates for rally signs are awaiting a photograph, and the logistics for "spontaneous" rallies have long since been worked out and are being updated as circumstances change. We know this because we've seen how flawlessly coordinated Big Abortion has always been when a tragedy strikes.
So Now What?
I don't have all the answers, but I have a good starting point: The prolife movement already has everything in place necessary to prevent there from ever being another abortion death. We have pregnancy help centers. No woman needs to be without friends, help, and hope. The abortion machine has recently launched another assault on those who dare to stand in their way.
Our work needs to be two-pronged:
Big Abortion is in a sorry state, with loud lamentations and dramatic hand-wringing such as this Planned Parenthood post. Their cry is that laws setting medical standards for abortion clinics are "restricting and eliminating safe and legal abortion access via technicality and needless regulation."
Note that each and every closing is characterized as a loss of "access to safe and legal abortion," with no qualifiers whatsoever. If the place does abortions, the presumption is that it's safe for women to entrust themselves to the care that place provides.
The Lie of "Access"
As we've seen from Planned Parenthood's GIF, the mere existence of an openly operating, presumably legal abortion facility is "access" to "safe and legal" abortion.
Abortionist Gosnell |
Abortionist Carhart. |
I might remind the reader that the emergency phone number that prochoice "hero" LeRoy Carhart provided to his patient Jennifer McKenna-Morbelli actually rang to Carhart's wife's equestrian-supply business answering machine. Attempts made, first by Jennifer and then by her family, to reach Carhart delayed the treatment that might have saved Jennifer's life. Is that the sort of "plan" that Planned Parenthood has in mind? If this is what one of their heroes provides, what can patients expect at lower-quality facilities?
Cause for Alarm
The abortion business is currently in a downward spiral. Every year there are fewer abortions and more clinic closures. To people who dislike abortion, this is a good thing. But if abortion is your bread and butter, that's a scary thing. It's scary for abortion clinic owners, who are watching their livelihood vanish. It's scary for abortion practitioners, who are finding fewer and fewer places where they can fly in with their pockets empty and fly out with them full. It's scariest of all for professional abortion-rights activists, because the money that keeps their jobs funded all comes from the abortion clinics that are shutting down at an increasing rate.
Thus, the professionals are facing a choice: Go to work promoting something other than abortion, or batten down the hatches and keep the abortion business afloat.
A Two-Part Strategy
Providers
already have plans in place in case of an emergency to ensure patient
safety. - See more at:
http://www.plannedparenthoodaction.org/elections-politics/blog/latest-tactic-restrict-safe-and-legal-abortion-admitting-privileges/#sthash.EGrnzx3Z.dpuf
The strategy is two-part, and we need to be ready. Right now we're seeing the groundwork. They're raising the alarm and working to establish two ideas in people's minds:
- Legal abortion practices are always trustworthy and safe.
- If there is no handy legal abortion practice, women will universally resort to risky methods to achieve abortions.
The second takes a bit more than a moment's thought but also becomes clearly false upon examination. Nobody thinks that women are reflexively going to reach for the rustiest coathanger in the closet if there's not an Acme Reproductive Services just down the street. Some women will travel further to arrange an abortion, some will ferret out a doctor closer to home that doesn't advertise but will do the occasional abortion, and the most fortunate will find that the initial panic passes and they come to welcome the new baby.
The point of the abortion lobby's efforts in general, and Planned Parenthood's in particular, isn't to get people to think. The idea is to prevent people from thinking by hammering an idea into their heads before they even have a reason to think about it. There are two techniques used currently:
- Keep referring to "safe, legal abortion" as if "safe" and "legal" were two parts of one whole. The constant pairing of "safe" and "legal" together links them in the mind, so that if one is heard, the other is presumed.
- Change the opposite of "legal" to "unsafe." Abortion-rights activists now speak only of "legal" abortion and "unsafe" abortion as though that were the natural dichotomy. This is no accident. The intention is to establish an unexamined idea that if "legal" abortion is not available, only "unsafe" abortion is available, and that the only way to eliminate "unsafe" abortion is to replace it with "legal' abortion. It's the biggest PR coup for the abortion lobby since the term "pro-choice" was coined in the 1960s.
restricting
and eliminating safe and legal abortion access via technicality and
needless regulation. - See more at:
http://www.plannedparenthoodaction.org/elections-politics/blog/latest-tactic-restrict-safe-and-legal-abortion-admitting-privileges/#sthash.EGrnzx3Z.dpuf
restricting
and eliminating safe and legal abortion access via technicality and
needless regulation - See more at:
http://www.plannedparenthoodaction.org/elections-politics/blog/latest-tactic-restrict-safe-and-legal-abortion-admitting-privileges/#sthash.EGrnzx3Z.dpuf
restricting
and eliminating safe and legal abortion access via technicality and
needless regulation - See more at:
http://www.plannedparenthoodaction.org/elections-politics/blog/latest-tactic-restrict-safe-and-legal-abortion-admitting-privileges/#sthash.EGrnzx3Z.dpuf
Having established the "legal = safe" and that the alternative to "safe, legal abortion" is only "unsafe abortion" and not help addressing the woman's actual problems, the preparations are already in the works for any contingency that they can play to the abortion lobby's benefit. You can be certain they're ready for those states that will soon be without a dedicated abortion facility. We've seen this sort of thing play out before, so we know what's going to happen.
We need to take a lesson to prevent needless tragedy -- a specific needless tragedy that the abortion advocacy movement desperately needs to regain momentum.
It's important to note up front that it is not the average pro-choice citizen who is gearing up to create and exploit a tragedy. It's Big Abortion -- an unholy alliance of population control zealots, abortion practitioners, eugenicists, and Sandra Fluke-style feminists. They are putting the pieces in place, and average prochoice citizens are being primed to play their part in protecting Big Abortion's interests under the guise of protecting women.
Big Abortion is losing traction. The main thing they need to regain momentum is a corpse. If you think they're not gearing up to produce one, think again. We only need to look back to 1976.
Lessons From the Past
In 1976, the Hyde Amendment went into effect, banning the use of Federal funds to pay for abortions except to save the mother from an immediate threat to her life. The measure was named for its author, Congressman Henry Hyde. Abortion advocates had been keening from the moment the Hyde Amendment was up for vote. They painted a ghastly picture of coathanger-impaled women littering the streets as poor women were driven to desperation by lack of "access," just as today abortion enthusiasts are keening about what will happen if we start actually holding abortion clinics up to standards more rigorous than what you see in a bus station men's room.
When the Hyde Amendment went into effect, abortion advocates ramped up the hysteria and waited for a death, any death, they could hang around Henry Hyde's neck. On October 3, 1977, the Big Abortion vultures got what they'd been waiting for: a dead woman they could use as leverage in the fight to once again force taxpayers to fund elective abortions.
On September 26, 1977, 27-year-old Rosie Jimenez had shown up at the emergency room of McAllen General Hospital in the Texas border town of McAllen, suffering from septic shock caused by an infection from an illegal abortion. She was put in intensive care, but died on October 3.
The initial response of the abortion lobby to news of Rosie's death was little short of euphoric. They had their trophy, their dead woman whose face they could hide behind in order to push for the restoration of tax money flowing into abortion clinics.
An Unexpected Investigation
One voice stood out from the crowd: Ellen Frankfort, author of Rosie: the investigation of a wrongful death. Ms. Frankfort was disgusted with the bulk of the prochoice movement, who seemed content to pounce on Rosie's death and then milk it for political gain. She began an investigation into what had led Rosie to her death, and she found a lot that neither the Centers for Disease Control nor abortion advocacy organizations had been willing to look for, since all they'd wanted was political leverage. Unlike Ellen Frankfort, they weren't looking for the real culprit behind Rosie's death: they'd had a bogeyman in mind even before she'd died, in the form of Henry Hyde.
Off to McAllen Ms. Frankfort went, to learn all she could. She learned:
- Rosie had already undergone two abortions at taxpayer expense. (Hence, she had no idea what an abortion would actually cost, and had been taught that it was the government's job, not hers or her lover's, to keep her uterus empty.)
- (Thanks to the efforts of the abortion lobby) Rosie's friends and relatives knew that there were no more free abortions, and told her so.
- Her regular doctor abandoned her; he simply told her there were no more free abortions, without referring her for any help (either for a sliding-scale abortion or help with addressing her life issues that made her feel like abortion was her only choice).
- Rosie's cousin brought her to a lay midwife in McAllen who charged $120 to perform an abortion using a catheter, a procedure once used by doctors but since abandoned because of infection risk.
- The sliding-scale abortions (that Planned Parenthood and other abortion advocates pointedly failed to raise awareness about) cost $130 -- only $10 more than the illegal abortion. (This is something Rosie probably would have known if not for the fact that the government, not Rosie herself, paid for the previous two abortions.)
- The day before her abortion, Rosie had spent $8 on a cake for a friend's baby shower. She had a scholarship check for $800 in her purse. (Rosie could have afforded a legal abortion; she just evidently was never told that such an option was available.)
- Rosie, predictably, took ill, waited to go to the hospital until she was moribund, and in spite of heroic efforts by the doctors there she died.
The Reaction
The doctors reported the death to the CDC. The CDC notified their allies in the abortion lobby. Rosie's death was quickly trumpeted nationwide as proof that Henry Hyde was a murderer and that taxpayers should immediately resume funding elective abortions to prevent another such death.
It is worth reiterating, when we look at Rosie's death, that prochoice groups had been very successful in spreading the word that public funding for abortion had been cut -- Rosie's friend and cousin, as well as her physician, were well aware of this fact -- but they had pointedly failed to also pass out the word that Planned Parenthood still referred for abortions on a sliding scale, and that private funds were available. It's almost as if the public-relations departments of Planned Parenthood and other abortion-advocacy groups had deliberately increased the odds of a tragedy like Rosie's death in order to provide the corpses needed in order to prop up a drive to restore tax monies to abortion facilities.
Lessons for Today
Let's start with some simple facts:
- As long as people perpetrate abortions, there will be a certain number of women who die as a result of those abortions. This is true whether the abortions are legal or illegal.
- If the woman dies from a "safe" legal abortion (Tonya Reaves, Christin Gilbert), the abortion rights machine will minimize the death and wait for any bad press to blow over.
- If the woman dies from a quacktastic legal abortion (Karnamaya Mongar, Carolina Gutierrez), the abortion rights machine will do the convoluted routine of "It's all the antichoicers' fault because they regulate and inspect abortion clinics and won't give them money."
- If the woman dies from a politically useless illegal abortion (Daisy Roe, Kris Humphrey), the abortion machine will ignore it.
- If the woman dies from a nice gory "back alley" style illegal abortion, the full-blown, aggressive Blame Game will begin in earnest. It will be Rosie Jimenez all over again but with the aid of social media.
Tonya Reaves |
A Crucial Point
Many states have taken steps to make abortion facilities put up or get out. The first woman that an abortionist kills in one of those states will become a martyr to the abortion cause in a way we haven't seen since Ms. published the crime scene photo of Geri Santoro in 1973. But it's not 1973 any more.
In 1973, it was hard to muster a groundswell of fear and outrage because after all Geri had been dead for nearly a decade and Roe vs. Wade had just supposedly put an end forever to women's gruesome abortion deaths.
Abortion rights groups, from the local NOW chapter to the International Planned Parenthood Federation already have established relationships with the mainstream news organizations. The new martyr that the abortion machine creates will become the focus of a campaign that will have all the fury and media hype that Big Abortion can muster. The result will be a well-coordinated assault that will make D-Day look like it was thrown together haphazardly by a bunch of drunken frat boys.
We also need to remember that Big Abortion will find out about the dead woman long before we will. They have connections in public health agencies that we simply don't, because they began planting them there back when Planned Parenthood was still calling itself the Birth Control League. Those connections will give them adequate lead time before allowing the story to break. Public health officials will not be neutral sources of information -- though of course they will pretend to be. They will be a key part of the orchestrated media blitz, just as the Centers for Disease Control was a key player in the media campaign when Rosie Jimenez died. The specifics of which woman Big Abortion manages to get killed, and under what specific circumstances, will be well known to the abortion lobby, and we will be playing catch-up to find out what really happened.
Look at the traction the international abortion movement is gaining in Ireland from the death of a woman who was not promptly given antibiotics during a miscarriage. It took a wild stretch of the imagination to blame that woman's death on lack of "safe and legal abortion," but that hasn't stopped the abortion machine and its media lackeys. Ireland is poised to come under the control of Big Abortion. Can you imagine what hay they can make with a death they have actually engineered and prepared for? The press releases are already drafted, templates for rally signs are awaiting a photograph, and the logistics for "spontaneous" rallies have long since been worked out and are being updated as circumstances change. We know this because we've seen how flawlessly coordinated Big Abortion has always been when a tragedy strikes.
So Now What?
I don't have all the answers, but I have a good starting point: The prolife movement already has everything in place necessary to prevent there from ever being another abortion death. We have pregnancy help centers. No woman needs to be without friends, help, and hope. The abortion machine has recently launched another assault on those who dare to stand in their way.
Our work needs to be two-pronged:
- Make sure vulnerable women are fully aware that their choices are not limited to Acme Reproductive Services or a rusty coathanger. There are thousands of prolife centers all over the country, and millions of prolife citizens, ready to lend a hand. No woman is facing any pregnancy alone unless Big Abortion is successful in cutting off her access to real help.
- Expose Big Abortion's tactics for what they are: a way to fatten abortionists' purses and give more power to the abortion lobby
Friday, August 16, 2013
#AbortionMatters: Let's Embrace Their Goals!
Here's the "Feminist Majority Foundation" page announcing the #AbortionMatters" "blog carnival."
Abortion. How festive.
Now -- let's look at what they say, and address the issues in a life-affirming way, not in the "What we need is for everybody to agree with us that abortion is the single most wonderful thing any woman can have at her disposal" light the FMF intends:
2. We do need to "encourage wider education" on abortion procedures. People need to be made aware of exactly who is being destroyed, and how, and why.
3. "A cohesive, national approach to abortion issues and decisions" would indeed lead to better health care and well-being for women. A pregnant woman facing challenges should be offered help and support, not turned over to people who will scrape her out then shove her out the door to bleed and vomit in the parking lot. Not to mention the adverse effects of abortion on women.
Of course, they add the "destigmatize" abortion. Gosh, it turns out that slaughtering your own children is still considered a shameful thing. Who woulda thunk it? We don't need to make abortion acceptable; we need to make it unthinkable. And if we keep pounding away at the three points, the things that FMF claims they want to do, we can get people to start asking why anybody would want abortions to be tolerated at all.
So let's get going! Go on and read the rules. Write and submit those blog posts! Submit them to the FMF, AND to me here! The email address is socialmedia@feminist.org. Put the links to your blog posts in the comments and I'll keep updating the list of entries that were submitted to FMF.
Let's have that national dialog, shall we?
Abortion. How festive.
Now -- let's look at what they say, and address the issues in a life-affirming way, not in the "What we need is for everybody to agree with us that abortion is the single most wonderful thing any woman can have at her disposal" light the FMF intends:
#AbortionMatters will showcase various personal essays and short policy pieces that stress the importance of a federal – and wholly national – approach to abortion. In an effort to destigmatize abortion, encourage wider education on the procedure, and normalize the conversation, we’re gathering stories to illustrate the complexity and unique experiences which shape the pro-choice movement and demand greater action. Pieces should stress / mention why a cohesive, national approach to abortion issues and decisions leads to better healthcare and well-being for women.1. I agree that there does need to be "a federal -- and wholly national -- approach to abortion." After all, the 14th Amendment specifically says that "no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process." Legal abortion creates an entire class of people who can be deprived of life without due process, and thus is clearly unconstitutional.
2. We do need to "encourage wider education" on abortion procedures. People need to be made aware of exactly who is being destroyed, and how, and why.
3. "A cohesive, national approach to abortion issues and decisions" would indeed lead to better health care and well-being for women. A pregnant woman facing challenges should be offered help and support, not turned over to people who will scrape her out then shove her out the door to bleed and vomit in the parking lot. Not to mention the adverse effects of abortion on women.
Of course, they add the "destigmatize" abortion. Gosh, it turns out that slaughtering your own children is still considered a shameful thing. Who woulda thunk it? We don't need to make abortion acceptable; we need to make it unthinkable. And if we keep pounding away at the three points, the things that FMF claims they want to do, we can get people to start asking why anybody would want abortions to be tolerated at all.
So let's get going! Go on and read the rules. Write and submit those blog posts! Submit them to the FMF, AND to me here! The email address is socialmedia@feminist.org. Put the links to your blog posts in the comments and I'll keep updating the list of entries that were submitted to FMF.
Let's have that national dialog, shall we?
Saturday, July 13, 2013
They Want Honest Advertising?
The abortion lobby keeps trying to pass legislation to correct what they see as "false advertising" by pregnancy help centers. They claim that the full weight of law needs to go into making it clear that CPCs do not do abortions, because women wanting abortions might go there by accident and be really annoyed.
I know of how to stop these attacks in a heartbeat.
The Full Disclosure to Abortion Patients Addendum..
Take the text of the anti-CPC bill and announce that prolife legislators will get 100% behind it as soon as an addendum to this effect is added:
Here's what one currently operating chain's ads would look like:
A sign posted in a clinic lobby (for a fictitious clinic based on typical inspection deficiencies) might read:
The abortion lobby would have two equally unpalatable choices:
I think it's a win-win for us and for the women of America. Why aren't we doing it?
I know of how to stop these attacks in a heartbeat.
The Full Disclosure to Abortion Patients Addendum..
Take the text of the anti-CPC bill and announce that prolife legislators will get 100% behind it as soon as an addendum to this effect is added:
1. Any facility that advertises as an abortion facility must provide complete and honest information as to the licensing status of the facility and staff. Physician's offices must clearly state that they are not licensed clinics. If a facility is not licensed by the state as a medical facility, this must be clearly stated. If anesthesia is administered, the qualifications of those administering anesthesia must be posted. The qualifications of staff overseeing recovery must be posted. The qualifications of any staff providing counseling must be posted.
2. The results of the five most recent inspections must be posted in layman's terms in a highly visible area of the waiting room. Copies of the five most recent inspection reports must be made available to prospective patients upon request. If the facility is neither licensed nor inspected, a notice must be prominently posted to that effect.
3. Notice of any disciplinary actions currently in force against any licensed staff must be clearly and prominently posted in layman's terms.
4. If a facility advertises that they provide counseling, they must also provide a breakdown as to what percent of their patients choose abortion, adoption, and parenting.
5. Information about patient deaths, along with deficiencies that led to the deaths, must be prominently posted, along with any other information a reasonable patient would want to know before making a decision about trusting her life to that facility.Of course, this will be drafted in legalese, but you get the idea.
Here's what one currently operating chain's ads would look like:
A sign posted in a clinic lobby (for a fictitious clinic based on typical inspection deficiencies) might read:
November 2012 inspection deficiencies:
* 7 instances of outdated medications
* 11 instances of sanitary deficiencies
* Re-use of disposable instruments
* No current CPR certification for 5 of 7 staff records inspected
November 2011 inspection deficiencies:You get the idea.
* 4 instances of outdated medications
* 4 instances of sanitary deficiencies
* Broken autoclave
* Re-use of disposable instruments
* No current CPR certification for 4 of 7 staff records inspected
* Crash cart missing medications
The abortion lobby would have two equally unpalatable choices:
1. Agree to the addendum and then watch the prolifers have a field day demanding that the law be enforced against specific facilities.They'd drop the whole attack on CPCs like a devout Muslim would drop a pulled-pork sandwich.
2. Fight the addendum and then watch the prolifers have a field day holding hearings showing why the addendum is necessary.
I think it's a win-win for us and for the women of America. Why aren't we doing it?
Thursday, July 11, 2013
Have a "Fan F***ing Tastic" Abortion
Life Site News has a heartwarming little piece, "Slate writer: We need happy, ‘blithe and unapologetic’ abortion stories."
Here's the Slate article: "Enough With the Grueling, Wrenching, “I Had an Abortion” Essays". The author, Jessica Grose, asserts that the way to energize, and gain momentum for, the abortion-rights movement is to trot out "blithe" abortion stories:
She quoted with great admiration an anonymous piece called “What to Expect When You’re Aborting.”:
Follow the "What to Expect When You're Aborting" link and you'll find some stuff that's not exactly gonna convert the mushy middle:
"My Happy Abortion: One Woman's Guilt-Free Story":
The author writes: "I had an abortion. I love abortions. I’m out and proud about having had an abortion and I wholeheartedly and unilaterally support everyone who has chosen to have an abortion, for whatever reason, at whatever time, along with people who are currently pondering the decision to have one, and those who will face that decision in the future."
The bulk of the piece, though, is women holding signs celebrating abortions -- even abortions they haven't had yet but seem to be almost looking forward to:
They have no shame, and won't be happy until nobody else has any shame either.
They will stop at nothing -- nothing -- to make sure abortions continue to happen. And we need to get it through our heads that they will never quit and never go away. Abortion makes them happy, and they're not about to give it up.
Here's the Slate article: "Enough With the Grueling, Wrenching, “I Had an Abortion” Essays". The author, Jessica Grose, asserts that the way to energize, and gain momentum for, the abortion-rights movement is to trot out "blithe" abortion stories:
The pro-choice side remains in a defensive crouch. We trot out the saddest stories: a woman who really wanted a baby but terminated because the baby was not going to be able to live outside the womb or a woman who can’t afford another child without tumbling into poverty. But a lot of women have abortions and don’t look back. A lot of women don’t want a baby, and they don’t care whether the fetus is viable or how much money is in their bank account. Where are their essays?Ms. Grose, those essays don't get mainstream play because they'd make most people angry and very unsympathetic. "I want the baby dead because fuck this baby." isn't going to win friends.
She quoted with great admiration an anonymous piece called “What to Expect When You’re Aborting.”:
By monday my hormones were a little wonky but in all i just felt like this parasitic creature that burrowed its way into me and fed of my energy, apetite, [sic] and joy was removed. And I had been restored.Yeah, nothing says "joy restored" quite like an abortion.
Follow the "What to Expect When You're Aborting" link and you'll find some stuff that's not exactly gonna convert the mushy middle:
I would to like to live in a place where abortion isn’t such a polarizing, seemingly life-changing event. It wasn’t for me. Not at all. I’ve been in more pain and anguish from a twisting my ankle. The pregnancy was the agony, 7 weeks of vertigo and mood swings. The abortion was a breeze.And this gem:
When the nurse took my vitals she asked me how I was feeling I said “I am fan fucking tasticcccc… ....And I got excited. This was going to be a very rare, often coveted moment of self-actualization right? Where something so atomized understands itself entirely and it begins to bond to other atoms. We could all speak the same language now.And:
Wanna talk about the question of life? Let me put it like this: the physical and psychological euphoria was so immense that moments after I stood up i felt resurrected. I felt very certain the life had indeed prevailed. My life.To round it out, Life Site linked to some other chipper, upbeat abortion places.
"My Happy Abortion: One Woman's Guilt-Free Story":
It couldn’t have been more than five minutes before one of the assistants helped me to sit up so that I could get dressed. She walked me out into the recovery area, and I unsuccessfully attempted to repress the huge grin that had developed on my face. I felt euphoric. I was so relieved to be done with all the medical business, even happier to know that I was no longer pregnant, and pleasantly surprised that I wasn’t feeling any physical pain."I Love Abortion: Implying Otherwise Accomplishes Nothing for Women’s Rights":
I felt momentarily guilty when one of the other patients in recovery asked me if I ever stopped smiling, but I quickly reminded myself that it was senseless guilt. After all, smiling is a natural reaction to happiness, and I was happy sitting there. When they released me to go home fifteen minutes later, I was gladder still.
I love abortion. I don’t accept it. I don’t view it as a necessary evil. I embrace it..... I love abortion.It Happened to Us: Abortion
The author writes: "I had an abortion. I love abortions. I’m out and proud about having had an abortion and I wholeheartedly and unilaterally support everyone who has chosen to have an abortion, for whatever reason, at whatever time, along with people who are currently pondering the decision to have one, and those who will face that decision in the future."
The bulk of the piece, though, is women holding signs celebrating abortions -- even abortions they haven't had yet but seem to be almost looking forward to:
"I've never had an abortion...but knowing I could, after being on a plane with screaming infants, makes me happy! :)"Folks, when abortion is recriminalized, we'll be dealing with these enthused individuals for whom abortion isn't seen as a tragic necessity, but as something to be outright embraced and celebrated.
"If I was pregnant TODAY, I would get an abortion. (Cats are enough, thank you.) (Less crying) (Self reliance) (Smaller poops)"
They have no shame, and won't be happy until nobody else has any shame either.
They will stop at nothing -- nothing -- to make sure abortions continue to happen. And we need to get it through our heads that they will never quit and never go away. Abortion makes them happy, and they're not about to give it up.
Thursday, July 04, 2013
Ignorance is Bliss? If You're the Abortion Lobby, YES!
Austin, TX has become a living display case for the core of the abortion-rights movement. It's hard to stomach the sight of so many people turning out to express such enthusiasm for dismembering pain-capable viable unborn babies. But that's not really what they're there for. They're there to be part of the In Crowd. The disrespect, the shouting, the smugness, and the unquestioning enthusiasm for all things abortionish is just part of the package. It's a style.
That level of enthusiasm for abortion requires careful coaching in willful ignorance. And such ignorance does not come easy.
Among YouTube's more vaulable offerings is a video that Planned Parenthood struggled to get taken down. One view will tell you why:
One YouTube viewer comments:
Here's where we get to the real point: These kids are members of "Advocates for Choice", a Planned Parenthood college outreach. Those kids, who "didn't make much sense", were trained and "educated" by Planned Parenthood. This video shows us very clearly what the best "educated" and "trained" youth come away from Planned Parenthood with: not only staggering ignorance, but blithe and militant over-confidence in their misinformation and ignorance.
It took a lot of work to make those kids that stupid. I'm betting that most of the gang of rabble being rabble-roused in Austin right now were also the craftsmanship of the kind of training that Planned Parenthood provides.
Listen to the highly-trained and carefully-coached college students again. Immersion in abortion-rights training has taught them:
That every woman "sheds a fertilized egg every month." (WTF?)
That an unborn baby's heart doesn't start beating until 24 weeks.
That science and evidence are irrelevant -- that, in fact, science and evidence are mere "opinion".
That there is no scientific way to determine if something is alive. (What's the point of having death certificates if there's no way of determining if the person is alive or dead? And yeah, your goldfish has gone belly-up, but that's not proof that there is or is not life there. And NASA is wasting TONS of money looking for life on Mars, since there is, according to Planned Parenthood, no scientific way to detect life.)
That there is no distinction between viruses and zygotes. (Which would mean that if you have a cold, your pregnancy test will come up positive.)
How do we see this promotion of ignorance in other contexts? Let's go to a completely other state, in a completely other context:
So the "education" Planned Parenthood provides a prospective abortion patient includes the following "facts":
A 6 - 8 week embryo has "no legs, no arms, no head, no brain, no heart."
That at 6 - 8 weeks "there's nothing developed at all."
Let's go ahead and assume that the patient is at the 6-week end of this window. I've blogged already about 6-week embryos. MayoClinic.com notes these developmental milestones:
All this is pretty remarkable in an embryo that's "nothing developed" and has "no legs, no arms, no head, no brain, no heart."
The ignorance displayed in the Colorado video isn't some flukey thing. The ignorance displayed in that video is something the abortion lobby deliberately plants, nourishes, and cultivates. Such ignorance is vital in order to convince otherwise decent, caring people that they should take a strong pro-choice stand. It's that kind of ignorance that is necessary to maintain the dog-and-pony show going on right now in Austin.
It would be downright laughable were the stakes not so tragic.
That level of enthusiasm for abortion requires careful coaching in willful ignorance. And such ignorance does not come easy.
Among YouTube's more vaulable offerings is a video that Planned Parenthood struggled to get taken down. One view will tell you why:
One YouTube viewer comments:
And relating to the video; these kids didn't make much sense, but how about you interview people actually in charge of Planned Parenthood instead of using a few unprepared comments by some undereducated undergrads at an obscure college to analyze the intentions of Planned Parenthood?Yeah, those kids are pretty ignorant. How did they get to be that dumb? Were they dropped on their heads as babies? Did they eat a lot of paint chips? Are they all recovering from acute alcohol poisoning? No. There's no organic brain dysfunction to explain this level of idiocy. These are all college students, fairly bright to start with. So what happened to make a bunch of bright kids into such laughable morons?
Here's where we get to the real point: These kids are members of "Advocates for Choice", a Planned Parenthood college outreach. Those kids, who "didn't make much sense", were trained and "educated" by Planned Parenthood. This video shows us very clearly what the best "educated" and "trained" youth come away from Planned Parenthood with: not only staggering ignorance, but blithe and militant over-confidence in their misinformation and ignorance.
It took a lot of work to make those kids that stupid. I'm betting that most of the gang of rabble being rabble-roused in Austin right now were also the craftsmanship of the kind of training that Planned Parenthood provides.
Listen to the highly-trained and carefully-coached college students again. Immersion in abortion-rights training has taught them:
How do we see this promotion of ignorance in other contexts? Let's go to a completely other state, in a completely other context:
So the "education" Planned Parenthood provides a prospective abortion patient includes the following "facts":
Let's go ahead and assume that the patient is at the 6-week end of this window. I've blogged already about 6-week embryos. MayoClinic.com notes these developmental milestones:
Just four weeks after conception [6 weeks LMP, the way pregnancy is calculated], .... your baby's heart is beating with a regular rhythm.
Basic facial features will begin to appear, including an opening for the mouth and passageways that will make up the inner ear. The digestive and respiratory systems begin to form as well.
The ignorance displayed in the Colorado video isn't some flukey thing. The ignorance displayed in that video is something the abortion lobby deliberately plants, nourishes, and cultivates. Such ignorance is vital in order to convince otherwise decent, caring people that they should take a strong pro-choice stand. It's that kind of ignorance that is necessary to maintain the dog-and-pony show going on right now in Austin.
It would be downright laughable were the stakes not so tragic.
Sunday, June 23, 2013
Anti-CPC Tweetfest. Let's get TRUTH out there!
My Drop in the Ocean has posted #ExposeCPC Tweetfest – You Can Do It!
MDitO has plenty of suggestions, and I added scads in the comments. Visit that page in case others have posted more. In the mean time, their suggestions:
#ExposeCPC for giving FREE ultrasounds
#ExposeCPC who empower women to choose life by giving them pre and post natal resources
#ExposeCPC for giving out more free pregnancy tests than @PPact
#ExposeCPC They mentor women through pregnancy, take them to Dr apts, and give them clothes & diapers 4 free. @PPact charges u 4 everything
#ExposeCPC They tell women the truth about abortion and @PPact
#exposeCPC Warning: Unlike Federally Funded Planned Parenthood, Crisis Pregnancy Centers were not founded by KKK member Margaret Sanger.
My suggestions:
#ExposeCPC Unlike #abortion clinics, CPC never let #Gosnell start abortions in their clinic & finish in his filthy mill.
http://kermitgosnellcrimes.wikispaces.com/Baby+Boy+A
#ExposeCP Unlike #prochoice,
they didn’t invent assembly-line #abortion and treat women like cattle #prochoice
http://abortiondocs.org/clinic/abortionist/18/edward-c-fast-eddie-allred/
#ExposeCP Unlike #prochoice, they don’t run string of places that have killed at least 16 women. #abortion
http://abortiondocs.org/clinic/abortionist/18/edward-c-fast-eddie-allred/
#ExposeCP Unlike #abortion clinics, they don’t send women 2doctors w/extensive history of malpractice #prochoice http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Ali-Azima-License-Suspension-Jan-15-1985.pdf
#ExposeCP Unlike #abortion clinics, they don’t refer women to doctors who get their licenses suspended. #prochoice http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Christopher-Dotson-License-Revocation-and-Probation-CA-2000.pdf
#ExposeCP Unlike #abortion clinics,
they don’t refer women to quacks who injure them. #prochoice
http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Epstein-5-year-License-Suspension-NY.pdf
#ExposeCP Unlike #abortion clinics,
they don’t abandon patients to die #prochoice
http://abortiondocs.org/clinic/abortionist/220/william-g-fitzhugh/
#ExposeCP Unlike #abortion clinics, they don’t have docs who get license suspended 4drug trafficking #prochoice
http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Gluck-David-Alan-NY-Office-of-Professional-Discipline-11-06-1992.pdf
#ExposeCPC
They don’t injure patients and cause them to need a hysterectomy. #abortion #prochoice
http://abortiondocs.org/clinic/abortionist/276/thomas-h-gresinger/
#ExposeCPC
They don’t proudly teach #abortion docs how to stab ¾ born babies in the base of the skull. #prochoice
http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/NAFpaper091392.pdf
#ExposeCPC
They totally fail to sexually abuse patients #abortion #prochoice
http://abortiondocs.org/clinic/abortionist/344/vikram-kaji/
#ExposeCPC
They don’t browbeat teen 2continuing #abortion after changing mind, cause baby 2die of prematurity
http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Nicholette.pdf
#ExposeCPC
They don’t load hemorrhaging patient into staff car, cause her to bleed to death #abortion #prochoice
http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Davis-Death.pdf
#ExposeCPC
They don’t perform illegal 3rd-tri #abortion on teen, causing her death. #prochoice
http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Davis-Death.pdf
#ExposeCPC
Unlike #abortion clinic, they don’t discharge injured patient 2look after herself & end up hospitalized.
http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Kim-VA-1218198.pdf
#ExposeCPC
They don’t injure patients then cause their deaths by failure to resuscitate. #prochoice #abortion
http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Kim-VA-Board-Charges-01112005.pdf
#ExposeCPC
They don’t promise safety, then fail 2resuscitate teen, cause vegetative state. #abortion #prochoice
http://abortiondocs.org/clinic/abortionist/383/ronald-edward-kuseski/
#ExposeCPC
They don’t perform medical procedures (especially not #abortion) w/o patient consent. #prochoice
http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Legal-Liability-for-Abortion-Jan-Feb-1996.pdf
#ExposeCPC
They don’t employ doctors who tie their wife down and force an #abortion. #prochoice
http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Bond-Set-for-Doctor-Accused-of-Wifes-Forced-Abortion.jpg
#ExposeCPC
They don’t massively overdose 13-year-old girl and let her die from lack of proper resuscitation
http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Adams-v.-FPAMG-Abortion-Death-Lichtenberg.pdf
#ExposeCPC
They don’t kill patients by causing dangerous injury, trying 2treat complications in outpatient setting
http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Maria-Rodriguez-v.-FPA20120118142933.pdf
#ExposeCPC They don’t kill their clients. #prochoice #abortion http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Nakia-Jorden-v.-FPA20120118143120.pdf
#ExposeCPC
They don’t commit Medicaid fraud. #abortion #prochoice
http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Joseph-Marmet-License-Suspension-1987.pdf
#ExposeCPC
They don’t let non-physicians practice medicine, causing severe injury 2baby and trauma 2mother
http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Complaint-CH-v-Pendergraft-36.7-Million-Judgement.pdf
#ExposeCPC
They don’t cause critical injures to women then take them to the hospital in a private car. #prochoice
http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/RileySuspension-MD.pdf
#ExposeCPC
They don’t work with doctors who have appalling history of malpractice. #abortion #prochoice
http://abortiondocs.org/clinic/abortionist/562/nicola-i-riley/
#ExposeCPC
They don’t misdiagnose patients, perform the wrong procedure, then send them home to die #prochoice
http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Alan-Ross-License-Suspension-Dec-28-1993.pdf
#ExposeCPC
They don’t run interstate networks of appalling quackery. #abortion #prochoice
http://abortiondocs.org/clinic/abortionist/759/steven-chase-brigham/
#ExposeCPC
They don’t let clients go into shock from blood loss. #abortion #prochoice
http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/newyorkrevocation-brigham.pdf
#ExposeCPC
They don’t leave clients with torn bowels and needing a colostomy #abortion #prochoice
http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/newyorkrevocation-brigham.pdf
#ExposeCPC
They don’t commit life-threatening quackery on patients, load them into cars 4transport 2hospital
http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Brigham.-complaint-and-exhibit-list-.pdf
MDitO has plenty of suggestions, and I added scads in the comments. Visit that page in case others have posted more. In the mean time, their suggestions:
#ExposeCPC for giving FREE ultrasounds
#ExposeCPC who empower women to choose life by giving them pre and post natal resources
#ExposeCPC for giving out more free pregnancy tests than @PPact
#ExposeCPC They mentor women through pregnancy, take them to Dr apts, and give them clothes & diapers 4 free. @PPact charges u 4 everything
#ExposeCPC They tell women the truth about abortion and @PPact
#exposeCPC Warning: Unlike Federally Funded Planned Parenthood, Crisis Pregnancy Centers were not founded by KKK member Margaret Sanger.
My suggestions:
#ExposeCPC Unlike #abortion clinics, CPC never let #Gosnell start abortions in their clinic & finish in his filthy mill.
http://kermitgosnellcrimes.wikispaces.com/Baby+Boy+A
#ExposeCP Unlike #prochoice,
they didn’t invent assembly-line #abortion and treat women like cattle #prochoice
http://abortiondocs.org/clinic/abortionist/18/edward-c-fast-eddie-allred/
#ExposeCP Unlike #prochoice, they don’t run string of places that have killed at least 16 women. #abortion
http://abortiondocs.org/clinic/abortionist/18/edward-c-fast-eddie-allred/
#ExposeCP Unlike #abortion clinics, they don’t send women 2doctors w/extensive history of malpractice #prochoice http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Ali-Azima-License-Suspension-Jan-15-1985.pdf
#ExposeCP Unlike #abortion clinics, they don’t refer women to doctors who get their licenses suspended. #prochoice http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Christopher-Dotson-License-Revocation-and-Probation-CA-2000.pdf
#ExposeCP Unlike #abortion clinics,
they don’t refer women to quacks who injure them. #prochoice
http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Epstein-5-year-License-Suspension-NY.pdf
#ExposeCP Unlike #abortion clinics,
they don’t abandon patients to die #prochoice
http://abortiondocs.org/clinic/abortionist/220/william-g-fitzhugh/
#ExposeCP Unlike #abortion clinics, they don’t have docs who get license suspended 4drug trafficking #prochoice
http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Gluck-David-Alan-NY-Office-of-Professional-Discipline-11-06-1992.pdf
#ExposeCPC
They don’t injure patients and cause them to need a hysterectomy. #abortion #prochoice
http://abortiondocs.org/clinic/abortionist/276/thomas-h-gresinger/
#ExposeCPC
They don’t proudly teach #abortion docs how to stab ¾ born babies in the base of the skull. #prochoice
http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/NAFpaper091392.pdf
#ExposeCPC
They totally fail to sexually abuse patients #abortion #prochoice
http://abortiondocs.org/clinic/abortionist/344/vikram-kaji/
#ExposeCPC
They don’t browbeat teen 2continuing #abortion after changing mind, cause baby 2die of prematurity
http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Nicholette.pdf
#ExposeCPC
They don’t load hemorrhaging patient into staff car, cause her to bleed to death #abortion #prochoice
http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Davis-Death.pdf
#ExposeCPC
They don’t perform illegal 3rd-tri #abortion on teen, causing her death. #prochoice
http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Davis-Death.pdf
#ExposeCPC
Unlike #abortion clinic, they don’t discharge injured patient 2look after herself & end up hospitalized.
http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Kim-VA-1218198.pdf
#ExposeCPC
They don’t injure patients then cause their deaths by failure to resuscitate. #prochoice #abortion
http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Kim-VA-Board-Charges-01112005.pdf
#ExposeCPC
They don’t promise safety, then fail 2resuscitate teen, cause vegetative state. #abortion #prochoice
http://abortiondocs.org/clinic/abortionist/383/ronald-edward-kuseski/
#ExposeCPC
They don’t perform medical procedures (especially not #abortion) w/o patient consent. #prochoice
http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Legal-Liability-for-Abortion-Jan-Feb-1996.pdf
#ExposeCPC
They don’t employ doctors who tie their wife down and force an #abortion. #prochoice
http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Bond-Set-for-Doctor-Accused-of-Wifes-Forced-Abortion.jpg
#ExposeCPC
They don’t massively overdose 13-year-old girl and let her die from lack of proper resuscitation
http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Adams-v.-FPAMG-Abortion-Death-Lichtenberg.pdf
#ExposeCPC
They don’t kill patients by causing dangerous injury, trying 2treat complications in outpatient setting
http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Maria-Rodriguez-v.-FPA20120118142933.pdf
#ExposeCPC They don’t kill their clients. #prochoice #abortion http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Nakia-Jorden-v.-FPA20120118143120.pdf
#ExposeCPC
They don’t commit Medicaid fraud. #abortion #prochoice
http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Joseph-Marmet-License-Suspension-1987.pdf
#ExposeCPC
They don’t let non-physicians practice medicine, causing severe injury 2baby and trauma 2mother
http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Complaint-CH-v-Pendergraft-36.7-Million-Judgement.pdf
#ExposeCPC
They don’t cause critical injures to women then take them to the hospital in a private car. #prochoice
http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/RileySuspension-MD.pdf
#ExposeCPC
They don’t work with doctors who have appalling history of malpractice. #abortion #prochoice
http://abortiondocs.org/clinic/abortionist/562/nicola-i-riley/
#ExposeCPC
They don’t misdiagnose patients, perform the wrong procedure, then send them home to die #prochoice
http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Alan-Ross-License-Suspension-Dec-28-1993.pdf
#ExposeCPC
They don’t run interstate networks of appalling quackery. #abortion #prochoice
http://abortiondocs.org/clinic/abortionist/759/steven-chase-brigham/
#ExposeCPC
They don’t let clients go into shock from blood loss. #abortion #prochoice
http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/newyorkrevocation-brigham.pdf
#ExposeCPC
They don’t leave clients with torn bowels and needing a colostomy #abortion #prochoice
http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/newyorkrevocation-brigham.pdf
#ExposeCPC
They don’t commit life-threatening quackery on patients, load them into cars 4transport 2hospital
http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Brigham.-complaint-and-exhibit-list-.pdf
And my personal favorite:
#ExposeCPC
Because it’s better to be killed by abortionists than annoyed by prolifers. #prochoice #abortion
http://cemeteryofchoice.wikispaces.com/Safe+and+Legal+Abortion+Deaths
Because it’s better to be killed by abortionists than annoyed by prolifers. #prochoice #abortion
http://cemeteryofchoice.wikispaces.com/Safe+and+Legal+Abortion+Deaths
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Unlike #abortion clinics, they totally fail to kill women. #prochoice
http://cemeteryofchoice.wikispaces.com/Safe+and+Legal+Abortion+Deaths
#ExposeCPC
Unlike #abortion clinics, they don’t tear up women’s internal organs & let them bleed 2death.#prochoice
http://cemeteryofchoice.wikispaces.com/Mickey+Apodaca
#ExposeCPC
Unlike #abortion clinics, they don’t allow untrained people 2administer general anesthesia. #prochoice
http://realchoice.0catch.com/docs/Rotem.pdf
#ExposeCPC
Unlike #abortion clinics, they don’t dope up 13-year-old girls,let them die. #prochoice
http://www.state.il.us/court/opinions/appellatecourt/2000/1stdistrict/june/html/1982583.htm
#ExposeCPC
Unlike #abortion clinics, they don’t give women contraindicated drugs and let them die. #prochoice
http://cemeteryofchoice.wikispaces.com/Diane+Boyd
#ExposeCPC Unlike #abortion clinics, they don’t hire woman-killing quacks. #prochoice http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2010/01/doctors-license-jeopardy-death-abortion-patient-san-gabriel.html
#ExposeCPC
Unlike #abortion clinics, they don’t dope women to death. #prochoice
http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2010-09-08/health/bs-hs-abortion-doctors-20100908_1_medical-licenses-meperidine-physicians-board
#ExposeCPC
Unlike #abortion clinics,they don’t shove fetal parts N2 holes in wombs&send them home2die. #prochoice
http://cemeteryofchoice.wikispaces.com/Barbaralee+Davis
#ExposeCPC Unlike #abortion clinics, they don’t tear up women’s bowels&wombs&shove them out door 2die. #prochoice http://cemeteryofchoice.wikispaces.com/Sharon+Hamptlon
#ExposeCPC
Unlike #abortion clinic, they don’t cancel ambulance, let patient bleed out. #prochoice
http://cemeteryofchoice.wikispaces.com/Angela+Hall
#ExposeCPC
Unlike #abortion clinics,they don’t dope women up ’til they stop breathing,fail 2resuscitate. #prochoice
http://abortiondocs.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Melissa-Heim_Wrongful-Death-lawsuit_03-L-694-Cook-County.pdf
#ExposeCPC
Unlike #abortion clinics, they don’t injure women, fail 2call ambulance in time to save them. #prochoice
http://prolifeaction.org/docs/Leho.pdf
#ExposeCPC
Unlike #abortion clinics,CPCsdon’t send women home2die of infection due2fetal parts left in their wombs.
http://cemeteryofchoice.wikispaces.com/Michelle+Madden
#ExposeCPC
Unlike #abortion clinics, they don’t injure women,send them home 2bleed 2death in front of their kids.
http://cemeteryofchoice.wikispaces.com/Sandra+Milton
#ExposeCPC
Unlike #abortion clinics, they don’t allow amateurs to dope women up and let them die. #prochoice
http://cemeteryofchoice.wikispaces.com/Karnamaya+Mongar
#ExposeCPC
Unlike #prochoice, they don’t run dens of quackery where multiple women die. #abortion
http://cemeteryofchoice.wikispaces.com/Ruth+Montero
#ExposeCPC
Unlike #abortion clinics, they don’t poke holes in women’s internal organs, shove them out door 2die.
http://www.apnewsarchive.com/1987/Officials-Recommend-Criminal-Charges-against-Abortion-Doctor/id-348cc398b5cf31e5886a2cb6500eb722
#ExposeCPC
Unlike #abortion clinics, they don’t mangle women to death in filthy room. #prochoice
http://cemeteryofchoice.wikispaces.com/Guadalupe+Negron
#ExposeCPC Unlike #abortion clinics, they never do dangerous procedure, injure woman, do zip while she bleeds2death. http://abortionsafety.com/doc/15074_Revocation_of_License_2012.pdf
#ExposeCPC
Unlike #abortion clinics, they don’t hire quacks that kill one woman after the other. #prochoice
http://cemeteryofchoice.wikispaces.com/Shirley+Payne
#ExposeCPC
Unlike #abortion clinic, never left anesthetized teen unattended 2choke on vomit,lapse into fatal coma.
http://cemeteryofchoice.wikispaces.com/Dawn+Ravenell
#ExposeCPC
Unlike #PlannedParenthood,CPC never left bleeding pt. 2languish 4hours,getting 2hospital 2late2save her.
http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2012/07/24/documents-shed-light-on-womans-death-after-abortion/
#ExposeCPC Unlike #abortion clinics, CPC never lacerate women’s insides,fail 2treat properly, let her bleed 2death.
http://prolifeaction.org/docs/Rodriguez.pdf
#ExposeCPC
Unlike #abortion clinic, CPC never botched resuscitation, let woman die. #prochoice
http://cemeteryofchoice.wikispaces.com/Antonesha+Ross
#ExposeCPC
Unlike #abortion clinic, CPC never did fatal 3rd tri on underage girl at behest of abuser’s sister.
http://cemeteryofchoice.wikispaces.com/Tamiia+Russell
#ExposeCPC
Unlike #abortion clinics, they don’t run dangerous facilities or kill women. #prochoice
http://www.mbp.state.md.us/BPQAPP/orders/d3089005.293.pdf
#ExposeCPC
Unlike #abortion clinics, they don’t have untrained staff do general anesthesia, causing patient death.
http://cemeteryofchoice.wikispaces.com/Laura+Hope+Smith
#ExposeCPC
Unlike #abortion clinics, they don’t injure women then refuse to treat them, let them bleed to death.
http://cemeteryofchoice.wikispaces.com/Jennifer+Suddeth
#ExposeCPC
Unlike #abortion clinics, CPC don’t misdiagnose, give wrong meds, tell not 2go 2ER4 help, &let them die.
http://www.chattanoogan.com/2002/8/14/25209/15-Million-Lawsuit-Filed-In-Case-Of.aspx
#ExposeCPC
Unlike #abortion clinics, they don’t dope women 2death, or run facilities causing at least 16 pt.deaths.
http://cemeteryofchoice.wikispaces.com/Ta+Tanisha+Wesson