Okay, I haven't posted in a year. Here's a little worksheet of common patterns that are often used by modern improvisers. John Coltrane was probably the first to make notable use of these kinds of patterns, which he did on the record "Giant Steps".
I took the basic patterns and explored the possibilities for reordering the notes and for octave displacement.
There are 24 different ways to order four notes, these are all listed for each type.
If you add in octave displacement of various notes, you end up a lot more variations. I just did the first example from each chord type . . . you can work out the rest.
You can use these starting on different chord degrees, the first page lists some possibilities:
• Use the major pattern from the root or 5th of a maj7 chord, or from the 3rd or 7th of a min7 chord
• Use the minor pattern from the 3rd or 6th of a maj7 chord, or from the root or 5th of a min7 chord
There are other possibilities for half-diminished, diminished, or dominant chords:
Dominant: Major from root or 6th, dim. from 3rd, minor from 5th
Diminished: Dim. from root, b3, b5, or 6 (bb7)
Half-diminished (min7b5): Dim. from root, minor from b3 or 4, aug. from b5, major from 7.
By altering these, you can get a bunch of patterns that are useful over dominant and diminished.
You can also substitute and extend these, for example:
• Playing the patterns for Db7 will give you altered sounds when applied to G7
• Playing the patterns for Em7 will give you Lydian sounds when applied to Cmaj7
• The patterns for min7b5 work for a min6 chord a m3rd up (use Amin7b5 for Cmin6)
Which brings up another idea, these patterns are all a triad with one added note, a useful concept. Could be another post to come . . .
PDF here
Showing posts with label patterns. Show all posts
Showing posts with label patterns. Show all posts
Wednesday, March 21, 2012
Tuesday, November 17, 2009
"Zhivago" lick, Part 2
In the previous post, I put up a transcription of a signature line from Kurt Rosenwinkel's solo on "Zhivago" from The Next Step. The line is basically planing a particular arpeggio diatonically, but modifying it to match the underlying chord progression.
To get a better grasp on the device, I took it out of the context of the chord progression and planed the arpeggio diatonically through the major scale. This would also work on any mode of the major scale (dorian, phrygian, lydian, mixolydian, aeolian, locrian), since they all have the same chords.
This could work well in a modal tune like "Milestones", which is a long dorian vamp followed by an aeolian bridge.
The arpeggio is 1-5-7-10-13-14 (10-13-14 being 3-6-7, but up an octave). Rosenwinkel plays them alternating between the ascending and descending version. This works out two ways, depending on whether you start ascending or descending.
Since this is an arpeggio, there are many ways to modify it and come up with different results. Here are two obvious ones: omitting the root of each arpeggio (which gives you a five-note pattern, creating rhythmically interesting results), and omitting both the root and fifth of each arpeggio (which creates a quartal sound with an interesting ambiguity).
To get a better grasp on the device, I took it out of the context of the chord progression and planed the arpeggio diatonically through the major scale. This would also work on any mode of the major scale (dorian, phrygian, lydian, mixolydian, aeolian, locrian), since they all have the same chords.
This could work well in a modal tune like "Milestones", which is a long dorian vamp followed by an aeolian bridge.
The arpeggio is 1-5-7-10-13-14 (10-13-14 being 3-6-7, but up an octave). Rosenwinkel plays them alternating between the ascending and descending version. This works out two ways, depending on whether you start ascending or descending.
Since this is an arpeggio, there are many ways to modify it and come up with different results. Here are two obvious ones: omitting the root of each arpeggio (which gives you a five-note pattern, creating rhythmically interesting results), and omitting both the root and fifth of each arpeggio (which creates a quartal sound with an interesting ambiguity).
All of these can be played with different rhythmic permutations.
The 5-note pattern is creates interesting cross-rhythms when played as 8th notes or triplets.
The 4-note pattern is more interesting as triplets.
Any triplet pattern can be played with accents on the 8th-note triplet or on the quarter note triplet. Especially on the original 6-note pattern, I like to mix up the two kinds of triplet accents.
Labels:
arpeggio,
diatonic planing,
Kurt Rosenwinkel,
patterns,
Zhivago
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)




