Wednesday, March 16, 2005

Kudos to The Two Percent Company.

After 10 years of talking about it, last year a colleague and I finally put together a course on critical thinking. (For marketing reasons we call it something else.) We cover the scientific method, pseudoscience, fraud, self-deception, and so forth. Each topic is presented in the context of something fun, like ESP, talking to the dead, quackery, or alien abductions. It is a great course, and the most fun I've ever had standing in front of a classroom.

One reason I felt strongly enough about this material to spend a full summer putting the course together is the crap I see on television every night. (I watch a lot of television, and therefore I am a connoisseur of crap.) Channels that implicitly endorse an educational mission, like The Learning Channel (ha!) or the History Channel, routinely broadcast crap programs like Pet Psychic or In Search of History: Ancient Aliens. My undergraduates are justifiably confused about the distinction between real, pseudo and junk science; the television bombards them with vast quantities of crap ``information" and leaves them to sort fact from crap fiction. This confusion shows up in my statistics classes too.

The first day of Critical Thinking is devoted to remedial reality checks. No, there is no scientific evidence that ESP exists. No, the lie detector does not reliably distinguish between liars and truth-tellers. My students are always astonished at these revelations, and many of them don't believe me, at least at first.

I am thoroughly disgusted by NBC's Medium. Not wanting to make the effort of writing NBC to complain, I instead affirm how stupid the program is to large groups of undergraduates at every opportunity. Will this be as effective in getting it off the air as writing angry letters to NBC executives would be? I don't know. But I feel much better now that the folks at The Two Percent Company have picked up some of my slack with their Allison DuBois week. Well done, folks, and thank you. I plan to make this rant required reading for my students.

And for those of you who think there's nothing wrong with a little light entertainment, imagine that you could be the defendant in this case, or a passenger on this flight, and then get back to me.

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

How did you find the 2% Company? Excellent find.

Brett Havekost said...

But professor, if you teach the next generation how to think critically, who's going to carry on the ponzi scheme that is life?

Anonymous said...

Thanks for the compliment! We're glad you liked the posts. We're also glad to hear that you teach a class like the one you outline above. We also got word about another class in skepticism, and we mentioned both in a recent post.

We're glad to hear that you're out there fighting the good fight. As you say, with all of the media validation of paranormal nonsense, it is certainly an uphill battle.

Thanks again,
Tom (on behalf of the Two Percent Company).

AJSomerset said...

It's a sad day when you see a course specifically on critical thinking.

The existence of the course simply confirms what should already be obvious: that earning a B.A. does not require that you actually learn to think.

Nope. Don't explain things - just give me the formulas!

Angry Professor said...

But wonderdog, learning to think has to begin somewhere, right? Isn't part of the problem that nowhere in the present curriculum can a student learn how to distinguish good thinking from bad thinking? Thinking is hard, and thinking critically doesn't come naturally. It is a shame (and I guess this is part of your point) that college instructors do not routinely force their students to think critically. But there are some topics covered in my course that wouldn't be covered elsewhere in any curriculum. For example, we spend one day talking about peer review, and ways that nonexperts can evaluate the quality of a scientific journal.

So even though courses like mine exist, I don't necessarily see that as a condemnation of our educational system. That we have to argue with students about crap like ESP and talking to the dead, well, that's a little sad, yes.

AJSomerset said...

Yes, learning to think must begin somewhere. I'm not really condemning the idea of courses on critical thinking. Actually, I think we should have those courses in high school. I'm just lamenting the bs I encounter daily.

Maybe profs allow students to get away with sloppy thinking. Maybe students just think of school as a series of hoops to be jumped through on the way to a diploma, and discard it all when they graduate. Maybe it's not the education system at all, and people are just lazy. I dunno....

Angry Professor said...

Martin Luther King, Jr. said a lot of things that I really like. One of his best quotes is, "Rarely do we find men who willingly engage in hard, solid thinking. There is an almost universal quest for easy answers and half-baked solutions. Nothing pains some people more than having to think."

As I tell my students, thinking is hard. Thinking well is not something human brains are naturally good at. If we could get more people to recognize that they are mentally lazy, that would be a great improvement. Even if the thinking doesn't improve, maybe they wouldn't be so certain of the beliefs that are so terribly terribly wrong.

Anonymous said...

I applaud you for instilling one of my favorite quotes from Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. in all who will listen and embrace it. I bought the postcard with this saying on it during my visit several years ago to the King Center in Atlanta. I've framed it and display it proudly

Sarah Jane said...

Dear Angry Professor,

I was wondering if you knew of any other institutions that offer a "Critical Thinking" or "Skepticism" class like the one you offer/offered. Also, if you have time, could you please post some of the buzzwords used instead of "critical thinking"/"skepticism" so that I can identify similar classes myself. It seems like the class would be incredibly informative and useful.

Thank you for your time,
SJ

Dr. D. said...

Thank you for this wonderful blog which I just discovered.
I also include material on "science vs. pseudoscience" when teaching an introductory course for non-science majors.

Interviews with a large number of students show that these experiences significantly changed their attitudes about science, who can do it, and when critical thinking is useful.

Apparently practice is useful!

A science education researcher and I are writing up the results. Anyone is welcome to use my materials, which are at
http://casa.colorado.edu/~dduncan/pseudoscience/