One of the things that I really love about digging into some of these unusual grapes is learning how many of them are related to one another. For instance, I knew today's grape, Cayuga White, was a hybrid, but I didn't know anything about its parents or grandparents. I learned that it is the offspring of a Seyval Blanc x Schuyler crossing, which is kind of cool because I'm a little familiar with Seyval, but I didn't know anything about Schuyler. It turns out that Schuyler is itself a crossing of Zinfandel and another hybrid grape known as Ontario (which is a crossing of Winchell and Moore's Diamond). Which means that Cayuga is the offspring of Seyval Blanc, the grandchild of Zinfandel and the great-grandchild of Moore's Diamond, three very different grapes!
As with human beings, one can get into trouble expecting family members to closely resemble one another. Cayuga bears virtually no resemblance to Zinfandel, and though it can occasionally pick up some foxiness if allowed to over-ripen, it doesn't bear much resemblance to Moore's Diamond either. Interestingly, the two grapes that Cayuga is most often compared to are Riesling and Muscat, neither of which figure into its family history. Like Riesling and Muscat, Cayuga is often made into an off-dry or medium sweet wine, though it also makes interesting sparkling wines if harvested early enough. It is most heavily planted in New York state, where it covers just over 400 acres, but can also be found in the American Midwest and to a more limited extent in the northeastern US and southeastern Canada.
Cayuga was created in 1946 at the New York State Agricultural Experiment Station in Geneva, New York, by John Einset and Willard B. Robinson. It was selected from other seedlings in 1952 and was finally released in 1972 as "the first of a Finger Lakes series of wine grapes for New York." Cayuga was successful because it buds late and ripens early, which cuts off the extreme ends of the growing season. It is a heavily productive and vigorous vine that benefits from a discouraging hand in the vineyard. In fact, in 1964, a "25 variety trial" was undertaken to test the "most commercially promising American and French hybrid varieties and six new Geneva selections." The 25 selected vines were planted on three different sites in New York and various statistics were gathered about them over a period of several years. One of the statistics was total yield and Cayuga outperformed all of the other grapes in the trial in that category. It has decent disease and fungal resistance, but only moderate cold-hardiness, which has prevented it from becoming more popular with growers.
I was able to try two different wines from the Cayuga White grape. The first was a NV wine from Jewell Towne Vineyards in New Hampshire. Jewell Towne is the oldest winery in New Hampshire, though they only opened in 1994. The owner, Peter Oldak, has been growing grapes on the property since 1982, when he planted six vines on a hobbyist lark. By 1990, he was growing over 60 different varieties and decided to teach himself how to make wine. He made a few vintages for other wineries but decided to open his own winery in 1994. His debut vintage was only 40 cases which sold out in three weeks. Today, Jewell Towne produces over 7000 cases per year and is really the first name in New Hampshire wine today. I picked this wine up at a state store in Nashua for around $12. In the glass the wine was a very pale silvery lemon color that was almost water-white. The nose was moderately intense with aromas of peach, grapefruit, pineapple, pear and cheese. On the palate the wine was light bodied with medium acidity. It was medium sweet with flavors of mandarin orange, pineapple candy, pear, white peach and golden apple. It finished short and with a bit of bitterness. It was a fairly nice wine for the money, but wasn't anything too memorable.
The second wine that I tried was the 2011 Ravines "Keuka Village," which is 80% Cayuga and 20% Vignoles. Ravines is located on Keuka Lake in the Finger Lakes, but I picked this up locally at the Spirited Gourmet for around $13. In the glass the wine was a deep gold color. The nose was moderately intense with aromas of honey, green apple, pear, apricot and orange marmalade. On the palate, the wine was on the fuller side of medium with high acidity. It was off-dry with flavors of green apple, lime, honeysuckle flower, orange peel, white grapefruit and pineapple. It was bright, tart and zippy, which surprised me a little because the nose really smelled sweet and I thought this was going to be a syrupy mess. It was nice and citrusy, though, and I could definitely see why someone might want to compare this wine to a kabinett level Riesling. It was nicely aromatic and fairly well balanced, which is a pretty nice combination in a sine under $15.
A blog devoted to exploring wines made from unusual grape varieties and/or grown in unfamiliar regions all over the world. All wines are purchased by me from shops in the Boston metro area or directly from wineries that I have visited. If a reviewed bottle is a free sample, that fact is acknowledged prior to the bottle's review. I do not receive any compensation from any of the wineries, wine shops or companies that I mention on the blog.
Showing posts with label New York. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New York. Show all posts
Friday, April 12, 2013
Thursday, March 21, 2013
Vergennes - Finger Lakes, New York, USA
The recently published Wine Grapes, which I reviewed here, advertises itself as "a complete guide to 1,368 vine varieties," which is really an astonishingly high number of grapes. I've covered just over 200 on this blog and probably have another few hundred in me, but 1,368 represents a staggering amount of work, and even though I definitely have some issues with the book, I really admire and respect Jancis Robinson and her team for all the work that obviously went into the finished product. That being said, one of the first things that I did when I finally got my hands on my copy of the book was go through it to see whether the were any grapes that I had tried that the authors may have overlooked. I didn't find very many, but one that I did find was a grape I discovered when I placed an order with Arbor Hill Winery (who also made the dry Moore's Diamond I wrote about recently) in New York State called Vergennes. I had never heard of Vergennes before seeing it on Arbor Hill's website, so I quickly ordered it and have recently had an opportunity to try it.
Vergennes is thought to have originated as a chance seedling (which just means that a vine was naturally pollinated in the field and one of the resulting seeds was planted) in the garden of a William Green in Vergennes, Vermont in 1874. According to the VIVC database, one of the parents was a grape called Dracut Amber, but since the vine was naturally pollinated, the other parent is currently unknown. Arbor Hill's website claims that the grape has vinifera parentage, but most other sources seem to disagree. In the 1908 work The Grapes of New York (viewable here), U.P. Hedrick considers Vergennes to be a pure Vitis labrusca variety (and the VIVC agrees), and says: "The variety is somewhat remarkable in being probably the best shipper and the best keeper among the pure Labrusca varieties. Nearly all of the grapes which ship and keep well have more or less Vinifera blood, but if Vergennes has any foreign blood it shows it only in its keeping and shipping qualities." Hedrick describes the vine as a reliable cropper that can be prone to excessive yields, which can affect ripening times if left unchecked (excessive crops can delay ripening by up to two weeks). He also says that Vergennes wasn't very popular with growers because the vine had a tendency to sprawl, or grow wild and resist training, which made it difficult to work with in the vineyard. It is fairly cold hardy, but is also somewhat susceptible to diseases like anthracnose.
Hedrick was lukewarm on the quality of the Vergennes grape, saying "the appearance of the fruit is attractive and while the quality is not high, yet it is good; the flavor is agreeable, the flesh is tender and seeds and skin are not objectionable. Considering all of its fruit characters, Vergennes may be said to be more than an ordinary grape - much better than several better known commercial varieties." An account of Vergennes published in 1900 in the Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Eastern New York Horticultural Society is a bit more positive, stating "although the Vergennes is not a new grape, having been introduced in 1870 (sic), it is mentioned here because it is believed to be worthy of more attention from good vineyardists than it has received." The most glowing historical account of grape comes from a gentleman named William Noble, who is quoted in a catalog published in 1894 by Bushberg Vineyards and Grape Nurseries in Jefferson, Missouri (view here). It is interesting to read Noble's effusive praised dampened by the nurserymen in the excerpt below:
"Flavor not rich, but pleasant, free from hard pulp; ripening a little after Concord and possessing superior keeping qualities. As a winter grape it probably heads the list. This variety proves generally satisfactory, in some localities very desirable. General Wm. H. Noble gives the following recommendation to the Vergennes: 'for hardiness, vigor of growth, large bounteous fruitage, a fruit of richest tint of blended pink and purple bloom; for its yield of wine with the most delicate aroma; for its early maturity of wood and fruit; for its long-keeping quality, I think this the equal of any American grape.' While this is excessive praise, which we would not indorse (sic), the Vergennes is no doubt well worthy of attention. It has so far 'held its own,' and increased in popularity."
If you scan through any of these old catalogs or books on American viticulture from the early 20th Century, you'll come across a lot of entries for grapes that have more or less disappeared from cultivation over the past hundred years. Vergennes likely would have joined the ranks of many of those vines if not for John Brahm of Arbor Hill Winery. John graduated from Cornell in 1964 with a degree in Pomology and worked for Widmer Wine Cellars in Naples, New York for over 20 years. He and his wife founded Arbor Hill in 1987 and they decided to plant some "experimental" grape varieties to see how they fared. They are credited with being the first winery to produce a wine made from the Traminette grape, and are also credited with "re-introducing" the Vergennes variety as well.
I bought a bottle of the 2010 Arbor Hill Vergennes for $10.50 from the winery. I spent a little time on Google to see if I could find another Vergennes-based wine and came up blank, so this may very well be the only one in the world right now. Though the skins of the grape are pink, this is a white wine and in the glass it was a fairly light silvery lemon color. The nose was moderately intense with aromas of pear, green melon and a subtle but unmistakable note of foxy, musky grapiness. On the palate the wine was on the lighter side of medium with high acidity and touch of sweetness. There were flavors of pear and grape musk with something a little steely and minerally on the finish. If you've ever tasted a slip-skin grape like a Scuppernong and kept the skin in your mouth for awhile after you've eaten the pulp, you'd have a really good idea of what this wine tasted like. It had all the musk and flavor of a wild grape, but it lacked the sugary kick that you expect to go along with those flavors and aromas. Much like the dry Moore's Diamond from this same producer, I found this wine a bit disconcerting, odd and not really all that pleasant to drink. While I applaud the spirit of experimentation that would lead one to make dry or mostly dry wines from native American grape varieties, I'm beginning to feel like the results are showing why so many producers make sweet wines from these grapes. Some flavors just need some sugar, and these wild, musky grape flavors certainly fall into that category for me.
Vergennes is thought to have originated as a chance seedling (which just means that a vine was naturally pollinated in the field and one of the resulting seeds was planted) in the garden of a William Green in Vergennes, Vermont in 1874. According to the VIVC database, one of the parents was a grape called Dracut Amber, but since the vine was naturally pollinated, the other parent is currently unknown. Arbor Hill's website claims that the grape has vinifera parentage, but most other sources seem to disagree. In the 1908 work The Grapes of New York (viewable here), U.P. Hedrick considers Vergennes to be a pure Vitis labrusca variety (and the VIVC agrees), and says: "The variety is somewhat remarkable in being probably the best shipper and the best keeper among the pure Labrusca varieties. Nearly all of the grapes which ship and keep well have more or less Vinifera blood, but if Vergennes has any foreign blood it shows it only in its keeping and shipping qualities." Hedrick describes the vine as a reliable cropper that can be prone to excessive yields, which can affect ripening times if left unchecked (excessive crops can delay ripening by up to two weeks). He also says that Vergennes wasn't very popular with growers because the vine had a tendency to sprawl, or grow wild and resist training, which made it difficult to work with in the vineyard. It is fairly cold hardy, but is also somewhat susceptible to diseases like anthracnose.
Hedrick was lukewarm on the quality of the Vergennes grape, saying "the appearance of the fruit is attractive and while the quality is not high, yet it is good; the flavor is agreeable, the flesh is tender and seeds and skin are not objectionable. Considering all of its fruit characters, Vergennes may be said to be more than an ordinary grape - much better than several better known commercial varieties." An account of Vergennes published in 1900 in the Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Eastern New York Horticultural Society is a bit more positive, stating "although the Vergennes is not a new grape, having been introduced in 1870 (sic), it is mentioned here because it is believed to be worthy of more attention from good vineyardists than it has received." The most glowing historical account of grape comes from a gentleman named William Noble, who is quoted in a catalog published in 1894 by Bushberg Vineyards and Grape Nurseries in Jefferson, Missouri (view here). It is interesting to read Noble's effusive praised dampened by the nurserymen in the excerpt below:
"Flavor not rich, but pleasant, free from hard pulp; ripening a little after Concord and possessing superior keeping qualities. As a winter grape it probably heads the list. This variety proves generally satisfactory, in some localities very desirable. General Wm. H. Noble gives the following recommendation to the Vergennes: 'for hardiness, vigor of growth, large bounteous fruitage, a fruit of richest tint of blended pink and purple bloom; for its yield of wine with the most delicate aroma; for its early maturity of wood and fruit; for its long-keeping quality, I think this the equal of any American grape.' While this is excessive praise, which we would not indorse (sic), the Vergennes is no doubt well worthy of attention. It has so far 'held its own,' and increased in popularity."
If you scan through any of these old catalogs or books on American viticulture from the early 20th Century, you'll come across a lot of entries for grapes that have more or less disappeared from cultivation over the past hundred years. Vergennes likely would have joined the ranks of many of those vines if not for John Brahm of Arbor Hill Winery. John graduated from Cornell in 1964 with a degree in Pomology and worked for Widmer Wine Cellars in Naples, New York for over 20 years. He and his wife founded Arbor Hill in 1987 and they decided to plant some "experimental" grape varieties to see how they fared. They are credited with being the first winery to produce a wine made from the Traminette grape, and are also credited with "re-introducing" the Vergennes variety as well.
I bought a bottle of the 2010 Arbor Hill Vergennes for $10.50 from the winery. I spent a little time on Google to see if I could find another Vergennes-based wine and came up blank, so this may very well be the only one in the world right now. Though the skins of the grape are pink, this is a white wine and in the glass it was a fairly light silvery lemon color. The nose was moderately intense with aromas of pear, green melon and a subtle but unmistakable note of foxy, musky grapiness. On the palate the wine was on the lighter side of medium with high acidity and touch of sweetness. There were flavors of pear and grape musk with something a little steely and minerally on the finish. If you've ever tasted a slip-skin grape like a Scuppernong and kept the skin in your mouth for awhile after you've eaten the pulp, you'd have a really good idea of what this wine tasted like. It had all the musk and flavor of a wild grape, but it lacked the sugary kick that you expect to go along with those flavors and aromas. Much like the dry Moore's Diamond from this same producer, I found this wine a bit disconcerting, odd and not really all that pleasant to drink. While I applaud the spirit of experimentation that would lead one to make dry or mostly dry wines from native American grape varieties, I'm beginning to feel like the results are showing why so many producers make sweet wines from these grapes. Some flavors just need some sugar, and these wild, musky grape flavors certainly fall into that category for me.
Labels:
Finger Lakes,
New York,
USA,
Vergennes,
White Wine
Thursday, February 7, 2013
Moore's Diamond - Cape Cod, Massachusetts and Finger Lakes, New York, USA
When I was first learning about wine, I had a lot of trouble trying to understand what the term "foxy" meant when it was applied to native American grape varieties. At that time, I had only ever had wine that was made from Vitis vinifera grapes so the use of the word "foxy" to describe wines made from non-vinifera varieties was mystifying to me. The Oxford Companion to Wine's entry on "foxy" says that foxiness is "the peculiar flavour of many wines, particularly red wines, made from American vines and American hybrids," which isn't really all that helpful. The entry goes on to state that the Concord grape is the most well known foxy-tasting grape, "reeking of something closer to animal fur than fruit, flowers, or any other aroma associated with fine wine." This seems to suggest that the term comes from the fact that the grapes and wines taste kind of like fox fur, but that may not necessarily be the case. Writing in 1908, UP Hedrick, in his Grapes of New York (which you can peruse electronically here), has the following to say about the origin of the term foxy:
"Bailey gives the following interpretation of the word "fox" and its derivatives as applied to grapes: 'The term fox-grape was evidently applied to various kinds of native grapes in the early days, although it is now restricted to the vitis labrusca of the Atlantic slope. Several explanations have been given of the origin of the name fox-grape, some supposing that it came from a belief that foxes eat the grapes, others that the odor of the grape suggests that of the fox - an opinion to which Beverly subscribed nearly two centuries ago - and still others thinking that it was suggested by some resemblance of the leaves to a fox's track. William Bartram, writing at the beginning of this century, in the Medical Repository, is pronounced in his convictions: 'The strong, rancid smell of its ripe fruit, very like the effluvia arising from the body of the fox, gave rise to the specific name of this vine, and not, as many have imagined, from its being the favourite food of the animal: for the fox (at least the American species) seldom eats grapes or other fruit if he can get animal food.' I am inclined to suggest, however, that the name may have originated from the lively foxing or intoxicating qualities of the poor wine which was made from the wild grapes. At the present day we speak of 'foxiness' when we wish to recall the musk-like flavor of the wild Vitis labrusca; but this use of the term is of later origin, and was suggested by the name of the grape."' Bailey, L. H . Evolution of our Native Fruits: 5 1898." Peter May (whose book on Pinotage I reviewed here) passed along this link which has a thorough and interesting discussion on "foxiness" as well.
All of which is interesting, but unless you know what the "effluvia arising from the body of a fox" smells like, probably isn't really all that helpful. Judging by the number of threads devoted to the topic of foxiness on many wine message boards, I wasn't alone in my confusion. Many try to describe it as a musky flavor, which is a little more helpful but is still maddeningly vague enough to not be satisfactory. Still others describe it as a kind of grapey flavor, like Welch's grape juice or grape jelly, which I've found a little bit more helpful, but not totally accurate. The scientific explanation is that there are two chemicals, methyl anthranilate and O-aminoacetophenone, that are responsible for the taste and flavor perceptions that we regard as foxy. Methyl anthranilate (C8H9NO2) is found in Concord grapes and many other fruits, but is also secreted by dog and fox musk glands and is responsible for the "sickly sweet" smell of rotting corpses. At full concentrations, its aroma is described as "grapey" and it is often used to flavor grape candies and drinks. O-aminoacetophenome is apparently another chemical with a particularly grapey aroma that is found in many native American grape varieties, but can also be found in the anal sac of the Japanese weasel (really).
Knowing all of the information above can get you part of the way to understanding what "foxiness" is, but the only real way to get a handle on what that term means is to try a foxy wine. Several years ago, still not knowing just what "foxy" meant, I found myself at Truro Vineyards in Truro, Massachusetts. My wife and I were going through a tasting of some of their wines, most of which are made from traditional Vitis vinifera varieties, when they poured me a wine from a blue bottle shaped like a lighthouse which they said was made from a grape called Moore's Diamond. When I stuck my nose in the glass, I knew immediately what "foxiness" was. I grew up in rural Georgia and my grandparents had a grape arbor in their back yard that was planted with Scuppernong grapes. Scuppernongs belong to the Vitis rotundifolia species which is also known as "muscadine" because they're very musky and have a very distinctive kind of taste which, it turns out, is what people mean when they talk about foxiness. It was a moment of great revelation as so many things suddenly became clear to me. I wasn't doing this blog at the time, but I recently came across another bottling of Truro's Diamond and decided to write a little bit about the grape.
Moore's Diamond was bred by Jacob Moore around 1870 by fertilizing a Concord vine with pollen from an Iona vine. Iona is itself a hybrid of Diana (or possibly Catawba) and an unknown Vitis vinifera vine, which makes Diamond a Vitis vinifera x labrusca hybrid. It was once very highly regarded and in 1908, UP Hedrick writes: "Diamond is surpassed in quality and beauty by few other grapes. When to its desirable fruit characters are added its earliness, hardiness, productiveness and vigor it is surpassed by no other green grape." He goes on to say: "We usually accord Niagara first place among green grapes but Diamond rivals it for the honor. The former attained high rank not only through merit but by much advertisement while Diamond has made its way by merit alone. If we consider the wants of the amateur and of the wine-maker as well as those of the commercial vineyardist, unquestionably Diamond must be accorded a high place
among the best all-around grapes." Hedrick was a fan of Diamond because he likes "the refreshing sprightliness of our native fox grapes," and feels that the introduction of some vinifera into the lineage gave Diamond a "touch of the exotic." The vine is also relatively cold hardy and carries many of the same resistances to disease as the other native American vines, but it is thin skinned and thus susceptible to many fungal diseases. Its popularity was never as high as Hedrick might have hoped, and today it is planted on less than 100 acres in New York state and in minuscule quantities across the northeastern and Midwestern United States.
Truro Vineyards way out towards the tip of Cape Cod makes a wine that they call Diamond White from the Moore's Diamond grape. This wine is non-vintage and comes in a blue tinted bottle shaped like a lighthouse. It cost me around $18 at a local wine event I recently attended. In the glass, the wine was a fairly light lemon gold color. The nose was very intense and smelled like the Platonic ideal of foxiness (meaning it was very musky and grapey). On the palate the wine was medium bodied with medium acidity and was medium sweet. There were flavors of fresh picked grapes with a little bit of white pear, sweet peach and green apple flavors. As with most wines that I try from native American grapes or hybrid grapes with predominately native American parentage, this wine tasted mostly like grape juice and very little else. It's not that most of these wines are bad, but rather that they're not very complex and many wine drinkers avoid them because they're simple and you almost always know what you're going to get. If you like sweet wines that taste like grape juice, then you're going to love this wine, but the price tag on it is pretty steep for what you're getting.
If you drink a lot of wines made from labrusca varieties or from foxy grapes, chances are that nearly all of them are sweet. I don't drink wines from these grapes habitually, but I can say that every wine that I've ever had from a foxy grape was sweet except for one. Arbor Hill in the Finger Lakes region of New York not only makes a dry wine from Moore's Diamond grapes, they age the wine in oak barrels for awhile before bottling too. They release the wine as a NV and it costs about $10.50 directly from the winery. In the glass this wine was a very pale silvery lemon color. The nose was explosively perfumed and was 100% musky grapes. On the palate the wine was medium bodied with fairly high acidity and was bone dry. There wasn't a lot of fruit to the wine, but what was there was a little musky and grapey with a little bit of vague citrus as well. It was a really weird wine with a kind of salty, tangy nuttiness to it as well. The dominant flavor was still foxy grapes, but I think that because I have such a strong association of sweetness with that foxy grape flavor, this wine just ended up coming off as weird to me. Of all the wines I've tasted for this site, this was definitely one of the most bizarre and while I'm glad that I got to try it, I don't think it's something that I'll be seeking out again anytime soon.
"Bailey gives the following interpretation of the word "fox" and its derivatives as applied to grapes: 'The term fox-grape was evidently applied to various kinds of native grapes in the early days, although it is now restricted to the vitis labrusca of the Atlantic slope. Several explanations have been given of the origin of the name fox-grape, some supposing that it came from a belief that foxes eat the grapes, others that the odor of the grape suggests that of the fox - an opinion to which Beverly subscribed nearly two centuries ago - and still others thinking that it was suggested by some resemblance of the leaves to a fox's track. William Bartram, writing at the beginning of this century, in the Medical Repository, is pronounced in his convictions: 'The strong, rancid smell of its ripe fruit, very like the effluvia arising from the body of the fox, gave rise to the specific name of this vine, and not, as many have imagined, from its being the favourite food of the animal: for the fox (at least the American species) seldom eats grapes or other fruit if he can get animal food.' I am inclined to suggest, however, that the name may have originated from the lively foxing or intoxicating qualities of the poor wine which was made from the wild grapes. At the present day we speak of 'foxiness' when we wish to recall the musk-like flavor of the wild Vitis labrusca; but this use of the term is of later origin, and was suggested by the name of the grape."' Bailey, L. H . Evolution of our Native Fruits: 5 1898." Peter May (whose book on Pinotage I reviewed here) passed along this link which has a thorough and interesting discussion on "foxiness" as well.
All of which is interesting, but unless you know what the "effluvia arising from the body of a fox" smells like, probably isn't really all that helpful. Judging by the number of threads devoted to the topic of foxiness on many wine message boards, I wasn't alone in my confusion. Many try to describe it as a musky flavor, which is a little more helpful but is still maddeningly vague enough to not be satisfactory. Still others describe it as a kind of grapey flavor, like Welch's grape juice or grape jelly, which I've found a little bit more helpful, but not totally accurate. The scientific explanation is that there are two chemicals, methyl anthranilate and O-aminoacetophenone, that are responsible for the taste and flavor perceptions that we regard as foxy. Methyl anthranilate (C8H9NO2) is found in Concord grapes and many other fruits, but is also secreted by dog and fox musk glands and is responsible for the "sickly sweet" smell of rotting corpses. At full concentrations, its aroma is described as "grapey" and it is often used to flavor grape candies and drinks. O-aminoacetophenome is apparently another chemical with a particularly grapey aroma that is found in many native American grape varieties, but can also be found in the anal sac of the Japanese weasel (really).
Knowing all of the information above can get you part of the way to understanding what "foxiness" is, but the only real way to get a handle on what that term means is to try a foxy wine. Several years ago, still not knowing just what "foxy" meant, I found myself at Truro Vineyards in Truro, Massachusetts. My wife and I were going through a tasting of some of their wines, most of which are made from traditional Vitis vinifera varieties, when they poured me a wine from a blue bottle shaped like a lighthouse which they said was made from a grape called Moore's Diamond. When I stuck my nose in the glass, I knew immediately what "foxiness" was. I grew up in rural Georgia and my grandparents had a grape arbor in their back yard that was planted with Scuppernong grapes. Scuppernongs belong to the Vitis rotundifolia species which is also known as "muscadine" because they're very musky and have a very distinctive kind of taste which, it turns out, is what people mean when they talk about foxiness. It was a moment of great revelation as so many things suddenly became clear to me. I wasn't doing this blog at the time, but I recently came across another bottling of Truro's Diamond and decided to write a little bit about the grape.
Moore's Diamond was bred by Jacob Moore around 1870 by fertilizing a Concord vine with pollen from an Iona vine. Iona is itself a hybrid of Diana (or possibly Catawba) and an unknown Vitis vinifera vine, which makes Diamond a Vitis vinifera x labrusca hybrid. It was once very highly regarded and in 1908, UP Hedrick writes: "Diamond is surpassed in quality and beauty by few other grapes. When to its desirable fruit characters are added its earliness, hardiness, productiveness and vigor it is surpassed by no other green grape." He goes on to say: "We usually accord Niagara first place among green grapes but Diamond rivals it for the honor. The former attained high rank not only through merit but by much advertisement while Diamond has made its way by merit alone. If we consider the wants of the amateur and of the wine-maker as well as those of the commercial vineyardist, unquestionably Diamond must be accorded a high place
among the best all-around grapes." Hedrick was a fan of Diamond because he likes "the refreshing sprightliness of our native fox grapes," and feels that the introduction of some vinifera into the lineage gave Diamond a "touch of the exotic." The vine is also relatively cold hardy and carries many of the same resistances to disease as the other native American vines, but it is thin skinned and thus susceptible to many fungal diseases. Its popularity was never as high as Hedrick might have hoped, and today it is planted on less than 100 acres in New York state and in minuscule quantities across the northeastern and Midwestern United States.
Truro Vineyards way out towards the tip of Cape Cod makes a wine that they call Diamond White from the Moore's Diamond grape. This wine is non-vintage and comes in a blue tinted bottle shaped like a lighthouse. It cost me around $18 at a local wine event I recently attended. In the glass, the wine was a fairly light lemon gold color. The nose was very intense and smelled like the Platonic ideal of foxiness (meaning it was very musky and grapey). On the palate the wine was medium bodied with medium acidity and was medium sweet. There were flavors of fresh picked grapes with a little bit of white pear, sweet peach and green apple flavors. As with most wines that I try from native American grapes or hybrid grapes with predominately native American parentage, this wine tasted mostly like grape juice and very little else. It's not that most of these wines are bad, but rather that they're not very complex and many wine drinkers avoid them because they're simple and you almost always know what you're going to get. If you like sweet wines that taste like grape juice, then you're going to love this wine, but the price tag on it is pretty steep for what you're getting.
If you drink a lot of wines made from labrusca varieties or from foxy grapes, chances are that nearly all of them are sweet. I don't drink wines from these grapes habitually, but I can say that every wine that I've ever had from a foxy grape was sweet except for one. Arbor Hill in the Finger Lakes region of New York not only makes a dry wine from Moore's Diamond grapes, they age the wine in oak barrels for awhile before bottling too. They release the wine as a NV and it costs about $10.50 directly from the winery. In the glass this wine was a very pale silvery lemon color. The nose was explosively perfumed and was 100% musky grapes. On the palate the wine was medium bodied with fairly high acidity and was bone dry. There wasn't a lot of fruit to the wine, but what was there was a little musky and grapey with a little bit of vague citrus as well. It was a really weird wine with a kind of salty, tangy nuttiness to it as well. The dominant flavor was still foxy grapes, but I think that because I have such a strong association of sweetness with that foxy grape flavor, this wine just ended up coming off as weird to me. Of all the wines I've tasted for this site, this was definitely one of the most bizarre and while I'm glad that I got to try it, I don't think it's something that I'll be seeking out again anytime soon.
Thursday, January 3, 2013
Traminette - Finger Lakes, New York, USA
Hello and welcome to Fringe Wine's first post of 2013. I hope everyone had a wonderful holiday season and is having a happy young new year! I figured I'd ease back into the blogging game by taking a look at a grape I came across during my trip to the Finger Lakes region of New York a few years back. That trip turned out to be a fertile one, as this is the 15th post I've written about some wine I picked up while I was out there. It is, unfortunately, also the last for awhile. I still have many wines from that trip in my cellar, but for the most part, they're probably a bit too mainstream for this site. I do hope to re-visit the region in the not-too-distant future, and hopefully I can find a few more unusual and interesting things then. In the meantime, I still have many interesting grapes and wines to share with you in the coming year, so let's go ahead and get started!
Traminette is a hybrid grape with a lot of different grape species in its pedigree. Its parents are Gewürztraminer, which isn't too complicated, and Joannes Seyve 23.416, which is where things get crazy on a couple of different fronts. Let's start with the grape itself: Joannes Seyve 23.416 is a cross of Bertille Seyve 4825 and Chancellor. Bertille Seyve 4825 is not itself important as a commercial grape, but it has been somewhat important for grape breeders, and you can get a sense for how complicated its pedigree is from this chart, which is from Robinson, Harding & Vouillamoz's Wine Grapes (and which is freely available on their website due to printing issues with the book). As you can see, Bertille Seyve 4825 (left side of the page, about half way down) has a lot of grapes in its family tree, and those grapes are from several different Vitis species, such as riparia, labrusca, aestivalis, lincecumii, rupestris, cinerea and vinifera which means that not only is Bertille Seyve 4825 itself a very complex hybrid, its offspring and its offspring's offspring are as well.
You may have also noted that we've been using two different human names for some of these crosses and these two names have a surname in common. Joannes Seyve (1900-1966) was a French biochemist who also apparently bred grapes, as did many other members of his family. Joannes's best known creation is Chambourcin, which we looked at not too long ago. His father and brother were both named Bertille Seyve and both also bred grapes, though the father was more accomplished than the son. Bertille Seyve Sr. worked closely with his own father-in-law Victor Villard, who was also a noted and successful grape breeder. Seyve and Villard were essentially carrying on the work of Albert Seibel (who created Verdelet and Chancellor among many others) and all of the Seyve family members used Seibel crossings liberally in their own works. The most successful Seyve-Villard crossing is Seyval Blanc, which you can read more about here.
Traminette, though, is not a Seibel or a Seyve crossing and only belongs to that group known as the French hybrids by virtue of its parentage. You see, Traminette was created at the University of Illinois by Herb Barrett in 1965 in an effort to create large clustered table grapes with the characteristic spicy tang of Gewürztraminer. Barrett sent the seeds from his crossing to Cornell's grape breeding program in 1968. The seed was planted and fruit was first observed in 1971. The vine was selected and propagated starting in 1974 under the lovely name NY65.533.13. The vine's roots are phylloxera resistant, so grafting is unnecessary. It is moderately winter hardy, but much more hardy than Gewürztraminer, and when it does suffer damage from cold conditions, it is typically the trunk rather than the buds which are harmed (which is not really a good thing since severe enough trunk damage can kill the entire vine).
The vine typically ripens in the first half of October in New York state. Traminette's acidity level stays relatively high for a short while during the ripening process, and its acidity is generally higher than its parent Gewürztraminer. It lacks the unwelcome foxy aromas and flavors of many hybrid grapes while also maintaining some of the characteristic floral and spice notes of Gewürztraminer, though the grape purportedly does not have the bitterness that turns so many people off to its parent. These flavor characteristics can be enhanced with prolonged skin contact (12 to 48 hours) at fairly low temperatures (40 -50 degrees Fahrenheit) prior to fermentation. The berries and leaves are moderately resistant to a variety of mildews, though the leaves are susceptible to downy mildew. In 1996, the New York State Agricultural Experiment Station officially named the grape Traminette, making it the fifth grape named by that group.*
I was able to try two different wines made from the Traminette grape. The first was the 2009 Fulkerson Traminette from the Finger Lakes region of New York, which I picked up at the winery for around $12. In the glass, the wine was a medium lemon gold color. The nose was moderately intense with grapefruit, lychee and peach aromas along with something vaguely floral as well. On the palate the wine was on the fuller side of medium with low acidity. It was sweet with flavors of peach, mandarin orange, lychee, rose water and pink grapefruit. The low acid was a problem for me, as the sugar in the wine tasted clumsy and off-balance without it. It was also a little bitter and soapy as well, which I really don't have an explanation for. I'm generally a fan of Gewürztraminer, and this wine had a lot of Gewürz character to it, but it really picked up a lot of the bad things Gewürz brings to the table without enough of the good. It was probably the best of the four Fulkerson wines that I picked up (Vincent, Dornfelder and Lakemont/Himrod) and it is a decent wine for the money, but it's not something that I would find myself consistently reaching for.
The second wine that I tried was the 2009 McGregor Vineyards Traminette from the Finger Lakes, which I picked up in their tasting room for around $16. In the glass the wine was a fairly light silvery lemon color. The nose was moderately intense with grapefruit, baking spice, lychee, and pear aromas with something vaguely floral as well. On the palate the wine was medium bodied with fairly high acidity. It was maybe a little sweeter than off-dry with flavors of lime, pink grapefruit, lychee, green apple and honeysuckle flower. This wine was almost searingly tart and had acid to burn. I generally prefer my wines to be more like this, but I found myself wishing that I had something in between these two examples, as that's where I thought the real balance probably was. Overall, I thought they both kind of tasted like more restrained versions of Gewürztraminer, so if the powerful floral and spice characteristics of that grape are too much for you, then Traminette may be worth a shot. I personally love the rich heady perfume of Gewürztraminer and don't think that these wines are really a fair substitute for wines made from that grape, but they're interesting and characterful in their own right and are priced much lower than their European counterparts.
*I have heavily leaned on their press release for much of the information in this post. The release can be read in full here.
Traminette is a hybrid grape with a lot of different grape species in its pedigree. Its parents are Gewürztraminer, which isn't too complicated, and Joannes Seyve 23.416, which is where things get crazy on a couple of different fronts. Let's start with the grape itself: Joannes Seyve 23.416 is a cross of Bertille Seyve 4825 and Chancellor. Bertille Seyve 4825 is not itself important as a commercial grape, but it has been somewhat important for grape breeders, and you can get a sense for how complicated its pedigree is from this chart, which is from Robinson, Harding & Vouillamoz's Wine Grapes (and which is freely available on their website due to printing issues with the book). As you can see, Bertille Seyve 4825 (left side of the page, about half way down) has a lot of grapes in its family tree, and those grapes are from several different Vitis species, such as riparia, labrusca, aestivalis, lincecumii, rupestris, cinerea and vinifera which means that not only is Bertille Seyve 4825 itself a very complex hybrid, its offspring and its offspring's offspring are as well.
You may have also noted that we've been using two different human names for some of these crosses and these two names have a surname in common. Joannes Seyve (1900-1966) was a French biochemist who also apparently bred grapes, as did many other members of his family. Joannes's best known creation is Chambourcin, which we looked at not too long ago. His father and brother were both named Bertille Seyve and both also bred grapes, though the father was more accomplished than the son. Bertille Seyve Sr. worked closely with his own father-in-law Victor Villard, who was also a noted and successful grape breeder. Seyve and Villard were essentially carrying on the work of Albert Seibel (who created Verdelet and Chancellor among many others) and all of the Seyve family members used Seibel crossings liberally in their own works. The most successful Seyve-Villard crossing is Seyval Blanc, which you can read more about here.
Traminette, though, is not a Seibel or a Seyve crossing and only belongs to that group known as the French hybrids by virtue of its parentage. You see, Traminette was created at the University of Illinois by Herb Barrett in 1965 in an effort to create large clustered table grapes with the characteristic spicy tang of Gewürztraminer. Barrett sent the seeds from his crossing to Cornell's grape breeding program in 1968. The seed was planted and fruit was first observed in 1971. The vine was selected and propagated starting in 1974 under the lovely name NY65.533.13. The vine's roots are phylloxera resistant, so grafting is unnecessary. It is moderately winter hardy, but much more hardy than Gewürztraminer, and when it does suffer damage from cold conditions, it is typically the trunk rather than the buds which are harmed (which is not really a good thing since severe enough trunk damage can kill the entire vine).
The vine typically ripens in the first half of October in New York state. Traminette's acidity level stays relatively high for a short while during the ripening process, and its acidity is generally higher than its parent Gewürztraminer. It lacks the unwelcome foxy aromas and flavors of many hybrid grapes while also maintaining some of the characteristic floral and spice notes of Gewürztraminer, though the grape purportedly does not have the bitterness that turns so many people off to its parent. These flavor characteristics can be enhanced with prolonged skin contact (12 to 48 hours) at fairly low temperatures (40 -50 degrees Fahrenheit) prior to fermentation. The berries and leaves are moderately resistant to a variety of mildews, though the leaves are susceptible to downy mildew. In 1996, the New York State Agricultural Experiment Station officially named the grape Traminette, making it the fifth grape named by that group.*
I was able to try two different wines made from the Traminette grape. The first was the 2009 Fulkerson Traminette from the Finger Lakes region of New York, which I picked up at the winery for around $12. In the glass, the wine was a medium lemon gold color. The nose was moderately intense with grapefruit, lychee and peach aromas along with something vaguely floral as well. On the palate the wine was on the fuller side of medium with low acidity. It was sweet with flavors of peach, mandarin orange, lychee, rose water and pink grapefruit. The low acid was a problem for me, as the sugar in the wine tasted clumsy and off-balance without it. It was also a little bitter and soapy as well, which I really don't have an explanation for. I'm generally a fan of Gewürztraminer, and this wine had a lot of Gewürz character to it, but it really picked up a lot of the bad things Gewürz brings to the table without enough of the good. It was probably the best of the four Fulkerson wines that I picked up (Vincent, Dornfelder and Lakemont/Himrod) and it is a decent wine for the money, but it's not something that I would find myself consistently reaching for.
The second wine that I tried was the 2009 McGregor Vineyards Traminette from the Finger Lakes, which I picked up in their tasting room for around $16. In the glass the wine was a fairly light silvery lemon color. The nose was moderately intense with grapefruit, baking spice, lychee, and pear aromas with something vaguely floral as well. On the palate the wine was medium bodied with fairly high acidity. It was maybe a little sweeter than off-dry with flavors of lime, pink grapefruit, lychee, green apple and honeysuckle flower. This wine was almost searingly tart and had acid to burn. I generally prefer my wines to be more like this, but I found myself wishing that I had something in between these two examples, as that's where I thought the real balance probably was. Overall, I thought they both kind of tasted like more restrained versions of Gewürztraminer, so if the powerful floral and spice characteristics of that grape are too much for you, then Traminette may be worth a shot. I personally love the rich heady perfume of Gewürztraminer and don't think that these wines are really a fair substitute for wines made from that grape, but they're interesting and characterful in their own right and are priced much lower than their European counterparts.
*I have heavily leaned on their press release for much of the information in this post. The release can be read in full here.
Friday, December 7, 2012
Vidal Blanc - Massachusetts and Finger Lakes, New York, USA
Vidal Blanc is either a grape you've never heard of or a grape that you can't get away from, depending on where you live and, to some extent, how you shop. Here in the cold northeastern United States, Vidal is seemingly everywhere, but only if you go to the local wineries to sample their wares. It is still difficult to find on store shelves in the Boston area, and if you do run across one in your local shop, chances are it's a Canadian ice wine. I've made many visits to most of the wineries in Massachusetts and to many others throughout New England, though, and I came across so many Vidal Blanc based wines that, for awhile, I thought that perhaps Vidal Blanc wasn't really a fringe grape. I was surprised, though, when I saw some of the planting statistics for the grape. Canada certainly leads the way in Vidal plantings at nearly 2,000 acres, much of which is ultimately used to make ice wine, but I was shocked to learn that Virginia actually leads the way in US plantings of Vidal at 150 acres,* followed closely by Michigan (145 acres) and Missouri (118 acres) before dropping off precipitously to 35 acres in Indiana and 32 in Illinois. Clearly the vine isn't quite as ubiquitous as it seemed to me, so I decided to write about the Vidal Blanc grape itself and a few local wines that I've come across recently.
Vidal Blanc was created in 1930 by Jean-Louis Vidal, a French grape breeder who was trying to create new grapes for Cognac production. Jean-Louis created Vidal Blanc by crossing Ugni Blanc (aka Trebbiano Toscano, one the grapes still most commonly used to make Cognac) with Rayon d'Or, which is itself a hybrid created by our old friend Albert Seibel by crossing two other Seibel hybrid grapes together (Seibel 405 & 2007, for those filling out your pedigree charts at home). Jean-Louis Vidal created several thousand different grapes throughout his career, but Vidal Blanc has definitely been the most successful and is easily the most widely cultivated grape bred by him. Even though the grape was created in France by a French breeder, it is virtually non-existent there today.
Vidal Blanc came to the New World, or at least to Canada, in 1945, when a man named Adhémar de Chaunac imported 35 French hybrids (one of which was Vidal Blanc) and four vinifera varieties into Canada. De Chaunac was the technical director at TG Bright winery in Niagara Falls, and he was looking for new grapes to grow at his winery other than the foxy native American varieties that had been widely used to that point in Canadian wine history. Most plantings with vinifera varieties had not gone well, as they were generally unable to tolerate the harsh Canadian winters, so De Chaunac was hoping to find some cold hardy varieties in this group that could withstand the difficult climate and still make European-style wines. Test plots were planted and wine making trials began and by the 1960's, the hybrid grapes that showed the most potential were gaining ground in the Canadian planting statistics. Maréchal Foch, Seyval Blanc, Verdelet, De Chaunac and Vidal Blanc were the most popular, and many of those grapes are still somewhat widely planted throughout Canada.
Vidal Blanc is perhaps best known for the ice wines created from it in many parts of Canada and the northeastern United States. As mentioned in my post on an ice wine made from Cabernet Sauvignon in Canada, true ice wines are made from grapes that are left on the vine well after the regular harvest and allowed to freeze there. The frozen grapes are harvested in the dead of night (to prevent their thawing) and are pressed while still frozen. What happens when a grape freezes is that much of the water in the grape turns to ice, but most of the sugar doesn't freeze, so when you press the frozen grapes, the solid ice stays behind, but a concentrated, sugary syrup comes out. This syrup is then partially fermented, since it is impossible to convert all of that sugar into alcohol, and the result is a rich, lusciously sweet wine.
It may seem like a simple thing to just leave some grapes on the vine and harvest the frozen juice, but not all grapes are suited to making good ice wine. First of all, the grapes need to stay on the vine a very long time, and as grapes hang on the vine and ripen, they tend to lose their acidity. Acidity is key in sweet wines, though, since without it, wines just taste syrupy and cloyingly sweet. Secondly, the longer grapes hang on the vine, the greater the chance that they can be damaged either by diseases such as molds or mildews, by insects or birds, or just from the wind and weather. Thick grape skins help protect grapes while they are waiting for the first freeze to arrive, so while thin-skinned varieties like Semillon are valued for the production of botrytised sweet wines (since their thin skins allow the botrytis to more easily infect the grapes), thick skinned varieties are preferred for the production of ice wines. Vidal Blanc happens to have thick skins and relatively high acidity, which makes it an ideal grape for ice wine production.
When I visited the Finger Lakes region of New York a year or so ago, I picked up a bottle of the 2009 Vidal Ice from Standing Stone Vineyards for about $25 for a half bottle. This is not a true ice wine, since the grapes were picked and then later frozen before ultimately being pressed. In the glass it was a light tawny gold color. The nose was fairly intense with aromas of honey, dried apricot, quince, baked apple and pineapple. On the palate the wine was on the fuller side of medium with fairly high acidity. It was lusciously sweet with flavors of honey, apricot, baked pineapple, and orange creme with a bright, zippy vein of tart green apple running through it. It was dense and rich, but it was also lively and snappy thanks to the fresh acidity. I found it really well balanced and enjoyed it an awful lot. I've bought Vidal Blanc based ice wines from Canada before and have paid almost $100 for half bottles of some of them, so at only $25 per half bottle, this is a tremendous value.
In his Wines of Canada (which I've used extensively throughout this post), John Schreiner gives the following quote about Vidal Blanc from the CEO of the Canadian wine powerhouse Vincor, Donald Triggs: "Vidal is in that magical area of not making a really great table wine but a phenomenal Icewine." While Canada tends to focus on making ice wine from their Vidal grapes, most American producers make dry table wines from theirs, and I was able to pick up a few local examples recently and test whether Triggs' assessment of its potential as a table wine grape was accurate or not.
The first bottle that I tried was the 2010 Vidal Blanc from Running Brook Vineyards in North Darthmouth, Massachusetts, which set me back about $13. Running Brook was founded by Pedro Teixeira and Manuel Morais, both of whom spent much of their separate childhoods in the Azores islands of Portugal. Manuel started his first vineyard in 1975 and was one of the first people to grow grapes commercially in New England. Pedro was actually his dentist and the two quickly realized that they both shared a passion for the vine and wine and decided to go into business together. They opened Running Brook Vineyards in 1998, according to their website, though their labels say "Est. 2000."
In the glass, this wine was a medium lemon gold color. The nose was moderately intense with pear, banana, grapefruit and honeysuckle flower aromas. On the palate the wine was on the fuller side of medium with medium acidity. It was medium sweet with flavors of honeyed pink grapefruit, poached pear, candied pineapple and coconut. The image that sprang to mind while drinking this wine was a Dole fruit cup, meaning it was fruity and sweet with a variety of flavors going on, but was still kind of flat and ultimately not that exciting. Fans of simple, sweet white wines will find a lot to like here, especially for the price, but it's not really my thing.
The second wine that I tried was the 2009 Travessia Vidal Blanc, which I picked up for about $10 (not at the winery, but rather at the Bin Ends discount store in Braintree...the 2011 Vidal Blanc seems to cost about $15 at the winery itself). Travessia is an "urban winery" located in downtown New Bedford, Massachusetts, which is owned by Marco Montez, who also makes all the wine. Marco doesn't own any vineyards, but rather he buys most of his grapes from Running Brook and from Westport Rivers in Massachusetts. He does make wine from California and from Washington St. grapes, but he insists that his wines labeled as being from Massachusetts are made with 100% Massachusetts fruit.
In the glass, this wine was a medium lemon gold color. The nose was reserved with reserved aromas of honey, pineapple and peach. On the palate, the wine was medium bodied with high acidity. It tasted off-dry with flavors of green apple, under-ripe pineapple and lime with just a touch of peachiness. It was somewhat tart with sharp acidity, but I found that I preferred this to the flatter Running Brook wine. Both were somewhat Riesling-like, but the Running Brook was definitely broader and more generous, while the Travessia was leaner, sharper and more austere. To some extent, this could be a vintage issue, since 2010 was very hot in Massachusetts, and many wineries found themselves with very ripe grapes. 2009 was a more typical, cooler year, so the grapes probably weren't quite as ripe as in 2010, and as a result, the acidity is a bit higher and the fruits aren't quite as generous. Whatever the reason, this wine is a great value at only $10, and would still be a good value at $15 as well.
*These statistics are taken from Wine Grapes, which indicates that New York has substantial plantings, but gives no acreage for them. I haven't been able to find any specific numbers for New York myself, since most sources online only list the top 5 or so hybrid grapes grown in New York, and Vidal apparently doesn't crack that list. Further, New York seems to measure things in terms of tons of grapes processed rather than acres under vine, so even if I could find a number for Vidal, I'm not sure how enlightening it would actually be.
Vidal Blanc was created in 1930 by Jean-Louis Vidal, a French grape breeder who was trying to create new grapes for Cognac production. Jean-Louis created Vidal Blanc by crossing Ugni Blanc (aka Trebbiano Toscano, one the grapes still most commonly used to make Cognac) with Rayon d'Or, which is itself a hybrid created by our old friend Albert Seibel by crossing two other Seibel hybrid grapes together (Seibel 405 & 2007, for those filling out your pedigree charts at home). Jean-Louis Vidal created several thousand different grapes throughout his career, but Vidal Blanc has definitely been the most successful and is easily the most widely cultivated grape bred by him. Even though the grape was created in France by a French breeder, it is virtually non-existent there today.
Vidal Blanc came to the New World, or at least to Canada, in 1945, when a man named Adhémar de Chaunac imported 35 French hybrids (one of which was Vidal Blanc) and four vinifera varieties into Canada. De Chaunac was the technical director at TG Bright winery in Niagara Falls, and he was looking for new grapes to grow at his winery other than the foxy native American varieties that had been widely used to that point in Canadian wine history. Most plantings with vinifera varieties had not gone well, as they were generally unable to tolerate the harsh Canadian winters, so De Chaunac was hoping to find some cold hardy varieties in this group that could withstand the difficult climate and still make European-style wines. Test plots were planted and wine making trials began and by the 1960's, the hybrid grapes that showed the most potential were gaining ground in the Canadian planting statistics. Maréchal Foch, Seyval Blanc, Verdelet, De Chaunac and Vidal Blanc were the most popular, and many of those grapes are still somewhat widely planted throughout Canada.
Vidal Blanc is perhaps best known for the ice wines created from it in many parts of Canada and the northeastern United States. As mentioned in my post on an ice wine made from Cabernet Sauvignon in Canada, true ice wines are made from grapes that are left on the vine well after the regular harvest and allowed to freeze there. The frozen grapes are harvested in the dead of night (to prevent their thawing) and are pressed while still frozen. What happens when a grape freezes is that much of the water in the grape turns to ice, but most of the sugar doesn't freeze, so when you press the frozen grapes, the solid ice stays behind, but a concentrated, sugary syrup comes out. This syrup is then partially fermented, since it is impossible to convert all of that sugar into alcohol, and the result is a rich, lusciously sweet wine.
It may seem like a simple thing to just leave some grapes on the vine and harvest the frozen juice, but not all grapes are suited to making good ice wine. First of all, the grapes need to stay on the vine a very long time, and as grapes hang on the vine and ripen, they tend to lose their acidity. Acidity is key in sweet wines, though, since without it, wines just taste syrupy and cloyingly sweet. Secondly, the longer grapes hang on the vine, the greater the chance that they can be damaged either by diseases such as molds or mildews, by insects or birds, or just from the wind and weather. Thick grape skins help protect grapes while they are waiting for the first freeze to arrive, so while thin-skinned varieties like Semillon are valued for the production of botrytised sweet wines (since their thin skins allow the botrytis to more easily infect the grapes), thick skinned varieties are preferred for the production of ice wines. Vidal Blanc happens to have thick skins and relatively high acidity, which makes it an ideal grape for ice wine production.
When I visited the Finger Lakes region of New York a year or so ago, I picked up a bottle of the 2009 Vidal Ice from Standing Stone Vineyards for about $25 for a half bottle. This is not a true ice wine, since the grapes were picked and then later frozen before ultimately being pressed. In the glass it was a light tawny gold color. The nose was fairly intense with aromas of honey, dried apricot, quince, baked apple and pineapple. On the palate the wine was on the fuller side of medium with fairly high acidity. It was lusciously sweet with flavors of honey, apricot, baked pineapple, and orange creme with a bright, zippy vein of tart green apple running through it. It was dense and rich, but it was also lively and snappy thanks to the fresh acidity. I found it really well balanced and enjoyed it an awful lot. I've bought Vidal Blanc based ice wines from Canada before and have paid almost $100 for half bottles of some of them, so at only $25 per half bottle, this is a tremendous value.
In his Wines of Canada (which I've used extensively throughout this post), John Schreiner gives the following quote about Vidal Blanc from the CEO of the Canadian wine powerhouse Vincor, Donald Triggs: "Vidal is in that magical area of not making a really great table wine but a phenomenal Icewine." While Canada tends to focus on making ice wine from their Vidal grapes, most American producers make dry table wines from theirs, and I was able to pick up a few local examples recently and test whether Triggs' assessment of its potential as a table wine grape was accurate or not.
The first bottle that I tried was the 2010 Vidal Blanc from Running Brook Vineyards in North Darthmouth, Massachusetts, which set me back about $13. Running Brook was founded by Pedro Teixeira and Manuel Morais, both of whom spent much of their separate childhoods in the Azores islands of Portugal. Manuel started his first vineyard in 1975 and was one of the first people to grow grapes commercially in New England. Pedro was actually his dentist and the two quickly realized that they both shared a passion for the vine and wine and decided to go into business together. They opened Running Brook Vineyards in 1998, according to their website, though their labels say "Est. 2000."
In the glass, this wine was a medium lemon gold color. The nose was moderately intense with pear, banana, grapefruit and honeysuckle flower aromas. On the palate the wine was on the fuller side of medium with medium acidity. It was medium sweet with flavors of honeyed pink grapefruit, poached pear, candied pineapple and coconut. The image that sprang to mind while drinking this wine was a Dole fruit cup, meaning it was fruity and sweet with a variety of flavors going on, but was still kind of flat and ultimately not that exciting. Fans of simple, sweet white wines will find a lot to like here, especially for the price, but it's not really my thing.
The second wine that I tried was the 2009 Travessia Vidal Blanc, which I picked up for about $10 (not at the winery, but rather at the Bin Ends discount store in Braintree...the 2011 Vidal Blanc seems to cost about $15 at the winery itself). Travessia is an "urban winery" located in downtown New Bedford, Massachusetts, which is owned by Marco Montez, who also makes all the wine. Marco doesn't own any vineyards, but rather he buys most of his grapes from Running Brook and from Westport Rivers in Massachusetts. He does make wine from California and from Washington St. grapes, but he insists that his wines labeled as being from Massachusetts are made with 100% Massachusetts fruit.
In the glass, this wine was a medium lemon gold color. The nose was reserved with reserved aromas of honey, pineapple and peach. On the palate, the wine was medium bodied with high acidity. It tasted off-dry with flavors of green apple, under-ripe pineapple and lime with just a touch of peachiness. It was somewhat tart with sharp acidity, but I found that I preferred this to the flatter Running Brook wine. Both were somewhat Riesling-like, but the Running Brook was definitely broader and more generous, while the Travessia was leaner, sharper and more austere. To some extent, this could be a vintage issue, since 2010 was very hot in Massachusetts, and many wineries found themselves with very ripe grapes. 2009 was a more typical, cooler year, so the grapes probably weren't quite as ripe as in 2010, and as a result, the acidity is a bit higher and the fruits aren't quite as generous. Whatever the reason, this wine is a great value at only $10, and would still be a good value at $15 as well.
*These statistics are taken from Wine Grapes, which indicates that New York has substantial plantings, but gives no acreage for them. I haven't been able to find any specific numbers for New York myself, since most sources online only list the top 5 or so hybrid grapes grown in New York, and Vidal apparently doesn't crack that list. Further, New York seems to measure things in terms of tons of grapes processed rather than acres under vine, so even if I could find a number for Vidal, I'm not sure how enlightening it would actually be.
Wednesday, July 25, 2012
Weird Blend Wednesday - Channing Daughters "Meditazione," Long Island, NY, USA
After a very long hiatus, we're back with another installment of Weird Blend Wednesday! Today I'd like to take a look at a wine that has a lot of interesting weird stuff going for it. Not only are the grapes a little bit unusual, but the region and the style of this wine are a little out of the ordinary as well.
Channing Daughters winery is located on the south fork of Long Island, which the wealthier among you may know as the Hamptons. For those unfamiliar with the geography of Long Island, the end of the island that is farthest away from New York City (and which is accessible via a short ferry ride from New London, Connecticut) is forked at the end (see a map here). The north fork has historically been dominated by farmland, but over the past few decades, many people have started growing grapes and opening up wineries. There are a few dozen wineries now on the north fork of Long Island making wines of varying quality levels from grapes like Cabernet Franc, Merlot and Chardonnay, among others. The south fork has generally been a resort area for wealthy New Yorkers to keep a summer home, but there are just a handful of wineries, like Channing Daughters, that are located on the south fork of Long Island.
Though they're located on the south fork of the island, Channing Daughters sources grapes from all over the eastern end of Long Island, and they bottle wines from each of its three designated AVAs (North Fork, Hamptons, and Long Island). The winery owns plots on both forks and also sources grapes from particular growers all over the island to make their wines, which are as varied and eclectic as I think I've ever seen from a single producer. They have single vineyard wines and multi-vineyard blends, varietal wines and multi-grape blends, wines made from natural yeasts as well as wines made with cultivated yeasts, wines that are fined and filtered and wines that aren't, wines aged in any and every kind of oak barrel as well as wines done in 100% stainless steel. The winery produces about 7000 cases of wine per year which is divided between twenty six different bottlings.
The wine that I picked up from them was their 2007 Meditazione, which is a wine made in the style of the "vino de meditazione" of the Friulia region of Italy. This bottle was a blend of 35% Tocai Friulano, 35% Sauvignon Blanc, 13% Muscat Ottonel, 12% Pinot Grigio and 5% Pinot Bianco. Channing Daughters has been making this wine for six years (the 2007 is actually the fourth vintage), and the particulars of it change from year to year. The 2008, for example, was 27% Sauvignon Blanc, 27% Chardonnay, 16% Tocai Friulano, 16% Muscat Ottonel and 14% Pinot Grigio, while the 2009 is 27% Sauvignon Blanc, 6% Chardonnay, 1% Malvasia, 38% Muscat Ottonel, 26% Pinot Bianco and 2% Pinot Grigio. The wine is made in an orange wine style, meaning that the juice is left in contact with the skins for some time after crushing, but even the timing of this varies from year to year. I'm not sure how much time the 2007 spent on the skins, but the 2008 spent 10 days while the 2009 spent 30 days. The wine is typically aged for about 18 months in Slovenian oak prior to bottling. It has been called the greatest white wine in America by at least one prominent sommelier and inspired this comic and post from the always excellent wakawakawinereviews.
I picked up my bottle of the 2007 Meditazione from my friends at the Spirited Gourmet for about $30. In the glass the wine was a deep orange-bronze color. The nose was intensely aromatic with peach, orange blossom, honeysuckle, pineapple and lime notes. It had a heady, gorgeous perfume that made it difficult to move on to the step of actually tasting the wine. On the palate the wine was on the fuller side of medium with medium acidity and little bit of tannic grip. I made the mistake of storing this bottle in the refrigerator and initially tried to taste it when it was very cold. In this condition, it was no fun at all to drink, but once I let it come down to room temperature, the palate blossomed with rich apricot, honey and orange peel flavors along with some toasted nuts, flower petals, and sawdust. There was a kind of savory salinity to the wine as well. I wasn't blown away by this at first sip, but by the time I finished the bottle, I was moony-eyed in love with it. I was able to pick up another bottle and drank it recently with some of the guys from the Wine Bottega, and my impressions were pretty similar. This is an amazing, mind-blowing, incredible wine that is worth not only the $30 that I paid for these bottles, but easily worth the $40 that the new vintage is commanding from the winery. I don't know if it's the best wine made in America, but it's definitely one of the most interesting. I'm hoping to drop down to the winery in the next few months and try some of their other wines and chat with the winemaker a bit, so stay tuned for more about these guys and the amazing things that they're doing.
Channing Daughters winery is located on the south fork of Long Island, which the wealthier among you may know as the Hamptons. For those unfamiliar with the geography of Long Island, the end of the island that is farthest away from New York City (and which is accessible via a short ferry ride from New London, Connecticut) is forked at the end (see a map here). The north fork has historically been dominated by farmland, but over the past few decades, many people have started growing grapes and opening up wineries. There are a few dozen wineries now on the north fork of Long Island making wines of varying quality levels from grapes like Cabernet Franc, Merlot and Chardonnay, among others. The south fork has generally been a resort area for wealthy New Yorkers to keep a summer home, but there are just a handful of wineries, like Channing Daughters, that are located on the south fork of Long Island.
Though they're located on the south fork of the island, Channing Daughters sources grapes from all over the eastern end of Long Island, and they bottle wines from each of its three designated AVAs (North Fork, Hamptons, and Long Island). The winery owns plots on both forks and also sources grapes from particular growers all over the island to make their wines, which are as varied and eclectic as I think I've ever seen from a single producer. They have single vineyard wines and multi-vineyard blends, varietal wines and multi-grape blends, wines made from natural yeasts as well as wines made with cultivated yeasts, wines that are fined and filtered and wines that aren't, wines aged in any and every kind of oak barrel as well as wines done in 100% stainless steel. The winery produces about 7000 cases of wine per year which is divided between twenty six different bottlings.
The wine that I picked up from them was their 2007 Meditazione, which is a wine made in the style of the "vino de meditazione" of the Friulia region of Italy. This bottle was a blend of 35% Tocai Friulano, 35% Sauvignon Blanc, 13% Muscat Ottonel, 12% Pinot Grigio and 5% Pinot Bianco. Channing Daughters has been making this wine for six years (the 2007 is actually the fourth vintage), and the particulars of it change from year to year. The 2008, for example, was 27% Sauvignon Blanc, 27% Chardonnay, 16% Tocai Friulano, 16% Muscat Ottonel and 14% Pinot Grigio, while the 2009 is 27% Sauvignon Blanc, 6% Chardonnay, 1% Malvasia, 38% Muscat Ottonel, 26% Pinot Bianco and 2% Pinot Grigio. The wine is made in an orange wine style, meaning that the juice is left in contact with the skins for some time after crushing, but even the timing of this varies from year to year. I'm not sure how much time the 2007 spent on the skins, but the 2008 spent 10 days while the 2009 spent 30 days. The wine is typically aged for about 18 months in Slovenian oak prior to bottling. It has been called the greatest white wine in America by at least one prominent sommelier and inspired this comic and post from the always excellent wakawakawinereviews.
I picked up my bottle of the 2007 Meditazione from my friends at the Spirited Gourmet for about $30. In the glass the wine was a deep orange-bronze color. The nose was intensely aromatic with peach, orange blossom, honeysuckle, pineapple and lime notes. It had a heady, gorgeous perfume that made it difficult to move on to the step of actually tasting the wine. On the palate the wine was on the fuller side of medium with medium acidity and little bit of tannic grip. I made the mistake of storing this bottle in the refrigerator and initially tried to taste it when it was very cold. In this condition, it was no fun at all to drink, but once I let it come down to room temperature, the palate blossomed with rich apricot, honey and orange peel flavors along with some toasted nuts, flower petals, and sawdust. There was a kind of savory salinity to the wine as well. I wasn't blown away by this at first sip, but by the time I finished the bottle, I was moony-eyed in love with it. I was able to pick up another bottle and drank it recently with some of the guys from the Wine Bottega, and my impressions were pretty similar. This is an amazing, mind-blowing, incredible wine that is worth not only the $30 that I paid for these bottles, but easily worth the $40 that the new vintage is commanding from the winery. I don't know if it's the best wine made in America, but it's definitely one of the most interesting. I'm hoping to drop down to the winery in the next few months and try some of their other wines and chat with the winemaker a bit, so stay tuned for more about these guys and the amazing things that they're doing.
Wednesday, June 27, 2012
Vignoles - Finger Lakes, New York, USA
Generally speaking, establishing the pedigree of man-made crossings and hybrids is a pretty simple task. The people who create these new grapes are typically working in a research laboratory environment and they tend to keep detailed notes and logs about their efforts. Even those grape breeders who are working outside the confines of a university (like our old friend Elmer Swenson) tend to keep written records of their experiments and to meticulously track the pedigree of each grape that they create. Pedigree reconstruction for these grapes is supposed to be an easy thing because we don't have to try and reconstruct a process of nature. A person was not only there for the birth of a new grape, but was directly responsible for putting both of its parents together.
Despite this, it does occasionally happen that the parentage of a man-made grape comes into dispute. A few months back we took a look at the Emerald Riesling grape, which was created by the legendary Dr. Harold Olmo at UC Davis in 1948. Olmo's own paper announcing the release of the grape lists the grape's parentage as Muscadelle of California and White Riesling, but the Oxford Companion to Wine online edition lists the parentage as Muscadelle and Grenache. As mentioned in my post on Emerald Riesling, the OCW declined to provide any additional details about their claim, other than to assert that the parentage given by Olmo was incorrect. They promise that their new book on wine grapes, which will be published later this year, will provide more details and we'll just have to wait and shell out the $125 to read all about it then.
Part of the pitch for this new book from the OCW publishing crew is that they brought a grape geneticist on board who not only reviewed and incorporated some of the most up-to-date literature on grape DNA analysis, but also conducted a number of analyses himself explicitly for inclusion in this particular book. My guess is that whatever new parentage they've uncovered for Emerald Riesling is the result of this private research. I'm very interested to read their take in this new book and hope that these results turn out to be more viable than their assertion that Hondarrabi Zuri and Noah are the same grape.
I personally find it unlikely that Harold Olmo would be mistaken about the parentage of a grape that he created, but if he was (**UPDATE** he was), it turns out that this wouldn't be the first time that something like this has happened. The subject of today's post, the Vignoles grape, was created in France by a private breeder named J.F. Ravat around 1930. The grape was known as Ravat 51 until 1970 when the Finger Lakes Wine Growers Aassociation renamed it Vignoles. The parentage of Vignoles was reported as Seibel 6905 (also sometimes known as Subereux) and Pinot de Corton. This parentage is given in a number of different sources (Iowa St., Wikipedia, the OCW, the VIVC and the National Grape Registry, among others) with a few minor variations. First, it turns out that there isn't any grape known as Pinot de Corton, so some assume that Pinot de Corton refers to a clone of Pinot Noir from the Corton region of Burgundy and thus report Pinot Noir as a parent rather than Pinot de Corton. Additionally, Wikipedia reports the other parent as Seibel 8665 rather than Seibel 6905 (which is almost certainly a mistake), while the OCW simply says that the other parent is Seibel (which, as far as I know, is not a name given to any individual grape, but is rather used generally to refer to the thousands of various grapes that Albert Seibel created during his career).
The problem, it turns out, is that neither Seibel 6905 nor Pinot Noir are actually the parents of Vignoles. In a study published in 2008 (see citation 1 below), a research team from UC Davis and Cornell University examined a number of hybrid grapes that are commonly used by the Cornell breeding program to see whether their purported parentages were accurate. Of the 24 grapes that they examined, the given parentage was confirmed for 20. Two of the others were the result of a vague description and one other had Gamay reported as a parent but was actually the offspring of Pinot Noir. Vignoles was the 24th grape, and the team was able to conclusively rule out both Pinot Noir and Seibel 6905 as parents. Unfortunately they were not able to identify the actual parents of Vignoles, so that bit of its history remains a mystery. The research group tested two other samples of Vignoles to be sure that they didn't have an anomalous grape and both of those samples came back identical to the first sample. They offer as a possible explanation that perhaps what is known in the US isn't actually Ravat 51, but it's hard to know how at this point how that might be tested.
Vignoles was introduced into the US in 1949 and was given the catchy moniker P17857 (or sometimes 181481). As mentioned above, it was renamed in 1970 by the Finger Lakes Wine Growers Aassociation, though I'm not sure what led them to choose the name Vignoles. The grape buds late, which helps it avoid early spring frosts, and has small berries with thick skins. Despite that, the berries are not only prone to cracking, but are also very susceptible to botrytis cinerea infection in both its good and its bad forms. It is naturally high in sugar and acid and as a result many wines made from it are either made in an off-dry style or as a late-harvest style dessert wine. It is moderately cold hardy which has made it popular in cooler climates like the Finger Lakes region of New York.
During my vacation to that area last year, I picked up three different wines made from Vignoles, all from the same producer but each in a different style. The first wine was the standard table wine offering from Anthony Road on Seneca Lake. I picked this up for about $13 from the winery and tasted it at our beautiful cabin on the lake (seen in the background of the picture at right). In the glass this wine was a medium gold color. The nose was moderately intense with white peach, grapefruit peel and pear fruit along with a touch of something vaguely floral. On the palate the wine was medium bodied with fairly high acidity and was off-dry. There were flavors of honey, white peaches, grapefruit peel, and pineapple. There was a touch of something bitter on the finish that was a little disconcerting, but overall this was a very nice wine, especially for the money. It is somewhat Riesling-like in its balance of sweetness and acidity, but isn't quite as graceful as some of the best Rieslings.
The second wine that I tried was Anthony Road's "Sweet Dream," which is a late-harvest dessert style wine made from Vignoles grapes. This wine was from the 2007 vintage and set me back about $16 for a half-bottle. In the glass the wine was a fairly light amber-gold color. The nose was pretty intense and pungent with pineapple, ripe peach, baked apple and orange marmalade fruits along with something that I couldn't quite identify but which smelled kind of like kerosene or like an old camping lantern. On the palate the wine was full bodied with fairly high acidity. It was very sweet (16.2% residual sugar) and had flavors of pineapple, honey, orange marmalade and orange peel. This wine finished with the same kind of bitterness that the table wine had, but it was more pronounced here. Overall the wine was OK, but that assessment may have something to do with the fact that I drank it the day after the next wine that I'll be writing about, which is a wine that it had no hopes of being able to compete with.
The final wine that I tried was the 2008 "Martini-Reinhardt Selection" Vignoles Trockenbeeren, which I picked up from the winery for $75 for a half bottle. If that price sounds extravagant, well, it kind of is. This wine is made from grapes infected with noble rot, botrytis cinerea, which, as mentioned above, Vignoles is particularly susceptible to. It is extraordinarily rare for grapes to be infected with noble rot in the Finger Lakes region, but in 2008, the conditions lined up just right for some of the Vignoles and Riesling vines at Anthony Road to fall victim to the fungus. The winemaker at Anthony Road recognized what was going on and decided to make a sweet wine in the style of the great Trockenbeerenauslese wines of Germany or the Sauternes wines of France. These wines are typically very expensive because you get very little juice from the desiccated grapes (in Sauternes it is said that an entire vine yields a single glass of wine) and because the grapes have to be monitored daily and hand picked cluster by cluster and sometimes berry by berry in order to ensure that the best grapes are being used. It's a labor-intensive process that requires an experienced eye and a lot of extra time.
In the glass this wine was a medium amber gold color. The nose was fairly intense with aromas of marmalade, honey and stone fruit along with the same very pungent, almost kerosene like smell. It was much stronger in this wine than in the other and may have been a by-product of the botrytis fungus itself (some of the berries for the prior wine may have picked up a little botrytis on the vine but not enough to make a wine in this particular style). On the palate the wine was full bodied with high acidity. It was lusciously sweet, clocking in at a whopping 26.5% residual sugar. There were flavors of ripe peaches, orange marmalade, honey, green apple and lime curd. In a word, this wine was extraordinary. It was impeccably balanced with an amazing tension between the electric acidity and the rich, dense, explosively sweet fruit flavors. It is well worth every penny of its steep price tag and if there's a better wine on earth made from Vignoles grapes, I'd be extremely surprised.
WORKS CITED
1. Bautista, J., Dangl, G.S., Yang, J., Reisch, B., & Stover, E. 2008. "Use of Genetic Markers to Assess Pedigrees of Grape Cultivars and Breeding Program Selections." American Journal of Enology and Viticulture. 59(3). pp 248-254.
Despite this, it does occasionally happen that the parentage of a man-made grape comes into dispute. A few months back we took a look at the Emerald Riesling grape, which was created by the legendary Dr. Harold Olmo at UC Davis in 1948. Olmo's own paper announcing the release of the grape lists the grape's parentage as Muscadelle of California and White Riesling, but the Oxford Companion to Wine online edition lists the parentage as Muscadelle and Grenache. As mentioned in my post on Emerald Riesling, the OCW declined to provide any additional details about their claim, other than to assert that the parentage given by Olmo was incorrect. They promise that their new book on wine grapes, which will be published later this year, will provide more details and we'll just have to wait and shell out the $125 to read all about it then.
Part of the pitch for this new book from the OCW publishing crew is that they brought a grape geneticist on board who not only reviewed and incorporated some of the most up-to-date literature on grape DNA analysis, but also conducted a number of analyses himself explicitly for inclusion in this particular book. My guess is that whatever new parentage they've uncovered for Emerald Riesling is the result of this private research. I'm very interested to read their take in this new book and hope that these results turn out to be more viable than their assertion that Hondarrabi Zuri and Noah are the same grape.
I personally find it unlikely that Harold Olmo would be mistaken about the parentage of a grape that he created, but if he was (**UPDATE** he was), it turns out that this wouldn't be the first time that something like this has happened. The subject of today's post, the Vignoles grape, was created in France by a private breeder named J.F. Ravat around 1930. The grape was known as Ravat 51 until 1970 when the Finger Lakes Wine Growers Aassociation renamed it Vignoles. The parentage of Vignoles was reported as Seibel 6905 (also sometimes known as Subereux) and Pinot de Corton. This parentage is given in a number of different sources (Iowa St., Wikipedia, the OCW, the VIVC and the National Grape Registry, among others) with a few minor variations. First, it turns out that there isn't any grape known as Pinot de Corton, so some assume that Pinot de Corton refers to a clone of Pinot Noir from the Corton region of Burgundy and thus report Pinot Noir as a parent rather than Pinot de Corton. Additionally, Wikipedia reports the other parent as Seibel 8665 rather than Seibel 6905 (which is almost certainly a mistake), while the OCW simply says that the other parent is Seibel (which, as far as I know, is not a name given to any individual grape, but is rather used generally to refer to the thousands of various grapes that Albert Seibel created during his career).
The problem, it turns out, is that neither Seibel 6905 nor Pinot Noir are actually the parents of Vignoles. In a study published in 2008 (see citation 1 below), a research team from UC Davis and Cornell University examined a number of hybrid grapes that are commonly used by the Cornell breeding program to see whether their purported parentages were accurate. Of the 24 grapes that they examined, the given parentage was confirmed for 20. Two of the others were the result of a vague description and one other had Gamay reported as a parent but was actually the offspring of Pinot Noir. Vignoles was the 24th grape, and the team was able to conclusively rule out both Pinot Noir and Seibel 6905 as parents. Unfortunately they were not able to identify the actual parents of Vignoles, so that bit of its history remains a mystery. The research group tested two other samples of Vignoles to be sure that they didn't have an anomalous grape and both of those samples came back identical to the first sample. They offer as a possible explanation that perhaps what is known in the US isn't actually Ravat 51, but it's hard to know how at this point how that might be tested.
Vignoles was introduced into the US in 1949 and was given the catchy moniker P17857 (or sometimes 181481). As mentioned above, it was renamed in 1970 by the Finger Lakes Wine Growers Aassociation, though I'm not sure what led them to choose the name Vignoles. The grape buds late, which helps it avoid early spring frosts, and has small berries with thick skins. Despite that, the berries are not only prone to cracking, but are also very susceptible to botrytis cinerea infection in both its good and its bad forms. It is naturally high in sugar and acid and as a result many wines made from it are either made in an off-dry style or as a late-harvest style dessert wine. It is moderately cold hardy which has made it popular in cooler climates like the Finger Lakes region of New York.
During my vacation to that area last year, I picked up three different wines made from Vignoles, all from the same producer but each in a different style. The first wine was the standard table wine offering from Anthony Road on Seneca Lake. I picked this up for about $13 from the winery and tasted it at our beautiful cabin on the lake (seen in the background of the picture at right). In the glass this wine was a medium gold color. The nose was moderately intense with white peach, grapefruit peel and pear fruit along with a touch of something vaguely floral. On the palate the wine was medium bodied with fairly high acidity and was off-dry. There were flavors of honey, white peaches, grapefruit peel, and pineapple. There was a touch of something bitter on the finish that was a little disconcerting, but overall this was a very nice wine, especially for the money. It is somewhat Riesling-like in its balance of sweetness and acidity, but isn't quite as graceful as some of the best Rieslings.
The second wine that I tried was Anthony Road's "Sweet Dream," which is a late-harvest dessert style wine made from Vignoles grapes. This wine was from the 2007 vintage and set me back about $16 for a half-bottle. In the glass the wine was a fairly light amber-gold color. The nose was pretty intense and pungent with pineapple, ripe peach, baked apple and orange marmalade fruits along with something that I couldn't quite identify but which smelled kind of like kerosene or like an old camping lantern. On the palate the wine was full bodied with fairly high acidity. It was very sweet (16.2% residual sugar) and had flavors of pineapple, honey, orange marmalade and orange peel. This wine finished with the same kind of bitterness that the table wine had, but it was more pronounced here. Overall the wine was OK, but that assessment may have something to do with the fact that I drank it the day after the next wine that I'll be writing about, which is a wine that it had no hopes of being able to compete with.
The final wine that I tried was the 2008 "Martini-Reinhardt Selection" Vignoles Trockenbeeren, which I picked up from the winery for $75 for a half bottle. If that price sounds extravagant, well, it kind of is. This wine is made from grapes infected with noble rot, botrytis cinerea, which, as mentioned above, Vignoles is particularly susceptible to. It is extraordinarily rare for grapes to be infected with noble rot in the Finger Lakes region, but in 2008, the conditions lined up just right for some of the Vignoles and Riesling vines at Anthony Road to fall victim to the fungus. The winemaker at Anthony Road recognized what was going on and decided to make a sweet wine in the style of the great Trockenbeerenauslese wines of Germany or the Sauternes wines of France. These wines are typically very expensive because you get very little juice from the desiccated grapes (in Sauternes it is said that an entire vine yields a single glass of wine) and because the grapes have to be monitored daily and hand picked cluster by cluster and sometimes berry by berry in order to ensure that the best grapes are being used. It's a labor-intensive process that requires an experienced eye and a lot of extra time.
In the glass this wine was a medium amber gold color. The nose was fairly intense with aromas of marmalade, honey and stone fruit along with the same very pungent, almost kerosene like smell. It was much stronger in this wine than in the other and may have been a by-product of the botrytis fungus itself (some of the berries for the prior wine may have picked up a little botrytis on the vine but not enough to make a wine in this particular style). On the palate the wine was full bodied with high acidity. It was lusciously sweet, clocking in at a whopping 26.5% residual sugar. There were flavors of ripe peaches, orange marmalade, honey, green apple and lime curd. In a word, this wine was extraordinary. It was impeccably balanced with an amazing tension between the electric acidity and the rich, dense, explosively sweet fruit flavors. It is well worth every penny of its steep price tag and if there's a better wine on earth made from Vignoles grapes, I'd be extremely surprised.
WORKS CITED
1. Bautista, J., Dangl, G.S., Yang, J., Reisch, B., & Stover, E. 2008. "Use of Genetic Markers to Assess Pedigrees of Grape Cultivars and Breeding Program Selections." American Journal of Enology and Viticulture. 59(3). pp 248-254.
Friday, March 30, 2012
Verdelet - Finger Lakes, New York, USA
Entering words blindly into Google image search isn't always a wise idea. There isn't usually a lot of overlap between grape names and tawdry photos, but I do occasionally get some racy results. Other times, I find out that there's a weird kind of synonymy between the grape I happen to be researching and some random thing in the world. Today, for example, I found out that there is apparently a character named Verdelet in a video game called Drakengard who "is a pious man who is always careful of his words and of doing the right thing, but places himself first should the situation becomes dire." Sure, I could eliminate these kinds of results by always including the word "grape" in my searches, but sometimes those wrong results can shed some interesting light on how a grape may have gotten its name, like with the Trousseau grape. Most of the time, though, those wrong turns just end up at dead ends like the pious, self-interested Verdelet of Drakengard who, I think we can safely assume, has nothing to do with today's grape.
Today's grape is Verdelet and it is a hybrid grape that was created by the great French hybridist (hybridizer? hybridder?) Albert Seibel, who we've mentioned in passing in a few posts around here but who we've never really taken a good, detailed look at. Seibel lived from 1844 - 1936 and was a physician by trade. Those of you who are up on your vinous history will note that Seibel was a young man through the heart of the Phylloxera epidemic, which really started to become a noticeable problem in France around the 1860's. Once it became known that native American vines were the source of the louse and, further, that the native American vines seemed to be immune to it, one of the proposed solutions to the scourge was to create hybrid grapes by crossing native European vines and native American vines. This solution was successful, but was not ultimately the answer to the problem since the resulting hybrid vines were unable to produce wines that were qualitatively similar to the native European vines. But just because it wasn't the ultimate solution doesn't mean that it wasn't a viable (and profitable) solution in the short term, and Seibel ended up creating a company that was focused on developing new hybrid grape varieties.
Seibel and his group ultimately created over 16,000 different hybrid grapes and had as many as 500 of those available for commercial cultivation at one point. While nowhere near that many are still cultivated today, it is shocking how many are still planted and made into wine. One might wonder why anybody would bother with these vines since the Phylloxera louse has been rendered virtually obsolete by the technique of grafting European vines onto native American rootstocks. The answer is that many of the hybrids created are also tolerant of more extreme climactic conditions, especially cold conditions, such as those found in the northeastern or mid-western United States or in the UK. Further, they tend to be quite disease resistant and also tend to yield generously. For climactic regions that are too harsh for the cultivation of vinifera species, the French hybrids that Seibel and others like him created are a good second choice. Even though the wines made from them aren't as interesting or complex as wines made from vinifera grapes, they are much better than the foxy, ultra-sweet wines made from native American grapes.
When I visited the Finger Lakes region of New York recently, I came across a wide variety of hybrid grapes, many of which were created by Seibel. Verdelet, also known as Seibel 9110, is certainly one of them, but Chancellor, Chelois, De Chaunac and Vignoles were also well represented. Grapes like Aurore, Rougeon, and Rosette are also relatively well represented in other parts of the US, Canada and the UK, while the Plantet grape still covers quite a bit of ground in the Loire Valley in France. Verdelet is one of the less common Seibel grapes, and as a result, specific information about it is limited. As you can see from the picture above, the grapes are nearly clear when ripe with little green pigmentation their skins. Most nurseries that offer the vine for sale indicate that it is mostly used as a table grape, and a very productive one at that. In a book on wines from British Columbia in Canada, the author gives an anecdote about a producer who obtained 120 tons of fruit from only 6 acres of land planted to Verdelet. Acreage devoted to the grape is declining pretty much everywhere, though it is apparently still fairly popular in Texas.
While in the Finger Lakes, I only came across a single wine made from the Verdelet grape. It was made by Bully Hill Vineyards, who we've had some dealings with before around here, and it was a NV wine that I picked up for about $8 in their tasting room. In the glass, this wine was a medium lemon gold color. The nose was moderately intense with aromas of pear, ripe apple, grapefruit and a bit of peachy stone-fruit. On the palate the wine was on the lighter side of medium with high acidity. The label says the wine is dry but I found it to be just off-dry. There were flavors of lime citrus, peach and grapefruit that were tart and zippy. It wasn't a particularly complex wine, but the flavors were bright with a nice intensity. It reminded me a little bit of Riesling, though without the depth and concentration that good Rieslings can have. Overall, I was very pleased with this wine, especially at only $8, and would be eager to try it again the next time I find myself in the area. It was definitely the best thing that I tried from Bully Hill, though that isn't exactly saying a lot. Bully Hill makes a ton of different wines (I mean a ton) and I tried only a few while I was there (for the reasons why, see this post on the St. Croix grape). For the most part, the quality of wines made here isn't that great, but this wine and the Chardonel I wrote about last week were were pleasantly surprising. The Verdelet isn't listed on their webpage, for some reason, so I don't know what kind of availability they usually have, but if you happen across it, it's definitely worth a try.
Today's grape is Verdelet and it is a hybrid grape that was created by the great French hybridist (hybridizer? hybridder?) Albert Seibel, who we've mentioned in passing in a few posts around here but who we've never really taken a good, detailed look at. Seibel lived from 1844 - 1936 and was a physician by trade. Those of you who are up on your vinous history will note that Seibel was a young man through the heart of the Phylloxera epidemic, which really started to become a noticeable problem in France around the 1860's. Once it became known that native American vines were the source of the louse and, further, that the native American vines seemed to be immune to it, one of the proposed solutions to the scourge was to create hybrid grapes by crossing native European vines and native American vines. This solution was successful, but was not ultimately the answer to the problem since the resulting hybrid vines were unable to produce wines that were qualitatively similar to the native European vines. But just because it wasn't the ultimate solution doesn't mean that it wasn't a viable (and profitable) solution in the short term, and Seibel ended up creating a company that was focused on developing new hybrid grape varieties.
Seibel and his group ultimately created over 16,000 different hybrid grapes and had as many as 500 of those available for commercial cultivation at one point. While nowhere near that many are still cultivated today, it is shocking how many are still planted and made into wine. One might wonder why anybody would bother with these vines since the Phylloxera louse has been rendered virtually obsolete by the technique of grafting European vines onto native American rootstocks. The answer is that many of the hybrids created are also tolerant of more extreme climactic conditions, especially cold conditions, such as those found in the northeastern or mid-western United States or in the UK. Further, they tend to be quite disease resistant and also tend to yield generously. For climactic regions that are too harsh for the cultivation of vinifera species, the French hybrids that Seibel and others like him created are a good second choice. Even though the wines made from them aren't as interesting or complex as wines made from vinifera grapes, they are much better than the foxy, ultra-sweet wines made from native American grapes.
When I visited the Finger Lakes region of New York recently, I came across a wide variety of hybrid grapes, many of which were created by Seibel. Verdelet, also known as Seibel 9110, is certainly one of them, but Chancellor, Chelois, De Chaunac and Vignoles were also well represented. Grapes like Aurore, Rougeon, and Rosette are also relatively well represented in other parts of the US, Canada and the UK, while the Plantet grape still covers quite a bit of ground in the Loire Valley in France. Verdelet is one of the less common Seibel grapes, and as a result, specific information about it is limited. As you can see from the picture above, the grapes are nearly clear when ripe with little green pigmentation their skins. Most nurseries that offer the vine for sale indicate that it is mostly used as a table grape, and a very productive one at that. In a book on wines from British Columbia in Canada, the author gives an anecdote about a producer who obtained 120 tons of fruit from only 6 acres of land planted to Verdelet. Acreage devoted to the grape is declining pretty much everywhere, though it is apparently still fairly popular in Texas.
While in the Finger Lakes, I only came across a single wine made from the Verdelet grape. It was made by Bully Hill Vineyards, who we've had some dealings with before around here, and it was a NV wine that I picked up for about $8 in their tasting room. In the glass, this wine was a medium lemon gold color. The nose was moderately intense with aromas of pear, ripe apple, grapefruit and a bit of peachy stone-fruit. On the palate the wine was on the lighter side of medium with high acidity. The label says the wine is dry but I found it to be just off-dry. There were flavors of lime citrus, peach and grapefruit that were tart and zippy. It wasn't a particularly complex wine, but the flavors were bright with a nice intensity. It reminded me a little bit of Riesling, though without the depth and concentration that good Rieslings can have. Overall, I was very pleased with this wine, especially at only $8, and would be eager to try it again the next time I find myself in the area. It was definitely the best thing that I tried from Bully Hill, though that isn't exactly saying a lot. Bully Hill makes a ton of different wines (I mean a ton) and I tried only a few while I was there (for the reasons why, see this post on the St. Croix grape). For the most part, the quality of wines made here isn't that great, but this wine and the Chardonel I wrote about last week were were pleasantly surprising. The Verdelet isn't listed on their webpage, for some reason, so I don't know what kind of availability they usually have, but if you happen across it, it's definitely worth a try.
Friday, March 23, 2012
Chardonel - Finger Lakes, New York
Researching hybrid grapes can be brutally and mind-numbingly boring sometimes. There are the occasional interesting cases of older grapes like Delaware, but the closer you get to the present day, the less interesting the back-stories for these grapes tend to be. Generally speaking, these hybrids have been created in a laboratory setting in order to meet a specific need, such as cold-hardiness or disease resistance, and their status as engineered products puts off a lot of people who are seduced by the romance of nature in grapes and wine. Most of the information that is published about these grapes reflects this utilitarian functionality and is aimed more for growers and for researchers than for consumers. It tends to be loaded with descriptions about the vine's temperature preferences, disease resistance and susceptibilities, yields, and more physical description of each part of the plant than you would ever want to know. There are few places to try and get a good narrative foothold since there's rarely any kind of mysterious back story or human angle in the grape's creation. Sure, the grapes are ultimately made by people (scientists are people after all), but the creation stories for these grapes almost never focus on them, opting for information about their pedigree and behavior in the field instead, which ultimately ends up coming across as sterile and dull. They're basically plant catalogs whose function is to convey a certain kind of information as simply and efficiently as possible.
This certainly isn't the case for all hybrids and crossings. Some of the older hybrids and crossings are interesting because there is a distinct human element present in their story. Grapes like St. Croix, for instance, which was created by an amateur in Wisconsin in his own back yard. Or grapes that were created by people like Harold Olmo or Albert Seibel who were prolific in their efforts and were extraordinarily successful in creating a large number of grapes that are still somewhat widely cultivated today. I like to think of these guys as mad scientists in flickering rooms cluttered with arcane equipment who are hell bent on unleashing their huge armies of Frankengrapes upon the world. People like that are out of date now, though, as most grapes are created by teams of scientists at breeding institutions who are fortunate if any of their creations are ever made available for public use. In the case of the Chardonel grape, the published paper announcing the grape's release has eleven authors on it, which should give you some sense of the collaborative effort required for its creation. One man who creates a dozen grapes is interesting but a dozen people who create one grape is a different story altogether.
But Chardonel was created and it is available for commercial propagation. Since I was able to track down a bottle of it, I'm going to tell you the most interesting things that I've been able to find out about it. Chardonel was created at Cornell's New York State Agricultural Experiment Station in Geneva, NY, in 1953 from a crossing of Seyval Blanc and Chardonnay. Seyval Blanc is itself a hybrid which is grown mainly in cooler climate regions like the Finger Lakes in New York and, surprisingly, in England. The full pedigree for Chardonel can be seen here and it's an interesting view of just how grueling it can be to create a viable hybrid. If you just stopped the family tree at Chardonel's parents, it would look like a fairly simple project, but as you go deeper and look at the family tree for Seyval Blanc, it gets dizzying in a hurry. All of those fields that are simply letters and numbers are other hybrid grapes created by other hybridizers which were never deemed good enough for commercial release and thus never named. The letters represent the hybridizers last names (S = Seibel, for example) and the numbers correspond to whatever numbering convention each hybridizer used to catalog his own creations.
Though the Seyval x Chardonnay crossing responsible for Chardonel happened in 1953, the fruit was not observed until 1958 and the vine wasn't chosen for experimental propagation until 1960. The grape wasn't released to the public until 1990, though, for reasons we'll get to momentarily. I mentioned above that the paper announcing Chardonel's release had 11 authors and implied that they were all involved in the grape's creation, but the fact of the matter is that the very long time between the grape's creation and its release makes it difficult to say for sure who was involved and in what capacity. The VIVC and this page at Iowa State University lists the grape's creators as Reisch, Pool and Einset. Reisch and Pool are the lead authors of the announcement paper, but Einset is only mentioned in the acknowledgements. I'm not sure who the other 9 people given an author credit in the paper are or what their role actually was.
Like most grapes created at the New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Chardonel was bred specifically to be able to handle cold conditions. Seyval Blanc is noted for its winter hardiness and the hybridizers were hoping that they could create something as hardy as Seyval with the flavor characteristics of Chardonnay. And to some extent, they were successful. Chardonel has much better winter hardiness than Chardonnay and is rated as hardier than Seyval in Michigan but as slightly less hardy in most other places. It does ripen late, though, which is a problem for cooler areas with short growing seasons like New York. Wines made from the Chardonel grape are generally regarded as preferable to those made from Seyval, and wines made from grapes grown in warmer areas like Missouri and Arkansas are considered superior to those of New York. The reason that the grape wasn't released for 30 years is that the fields tests being done in New York weren't promising enough to warrant release. Some vines were planted experimentally in Michigan and Arkansas, though, and the results from those vines were so encouraging that the grape was finally named (it had been known as New York 45010 at first and then as GW9 prior to 1990) and released.
I was able to find a bottle of Chardonel at Bully Hill Vineyards on my trip to the Finger Lakes region of New York a few months back. I've previously written about my experience at the winery and interested readers can find that information here. Bully Hill is weird about their vintages and this wine isn't labeled with one. It cost me about $8 in their tasting room. In the glass the wine was a medium lemon gold color. The nose was very reserved with a whiff of pear if I used my imagination, but overall it was a total blank. On the palate the wine was medium bodied with fairly high acidity. It is one of the few dry offerings that Bully Hill has. There were zippy lemon and lime citrus flavors with some green apple and citrus peel with a touch of green melon on the finish. The wine was bright, lively and interesting, which was much more than I was really expecting. The label on this wine honestly put me off of it for a long time and I kept looking at it in my cellar and dreading the thought of opening and drinking it, but I found it very nice. I would gladly pay $8 for this again and am now very curious about these superior wines being made from Chardonel elsewhere in the US.
This certainly isn't the case for all hybrids and crossings. Some of the older hybrids and crossings are interesting because there is a distinct human element present in their story. Grapes like St. Croix, for instance, which was created by an amateur in Wisconsin in his own back yard. Or grapes that were created by people like Harold Olmo or Albert Seibel who were prolific in their efforts and were extraordinarily successful in creating a large number of grapes that are still somewhat widely cultivated today. I like to think of these guys as mad scientists in flickering rooms cluttered with arcane equipment who are hell bent on unleashing their huge armies of Frankengrapes upon the world. People like that are out of date now, though, as most grapes are created by teams of scientists at breeding institutions who are fortunate if any of their creations are ever made available for public use. In the case of the Chardonel grape, the published paper announcing the grape's release has eleven authors on it, which should give you some sense of the collaborative effort required for its creation. One man who creates a dozen grapes is interesting but a dozen people who create one grape is a different story altogether.
But Chardonel was created and it is available for commercial propagation. Since I was able to track down a bottle of it, I'm going to tell you the most interesting things that I've been able to find out about it. Chardonel was created at Cornell's New York State Agricultural Experiment Station in Geneva, NY, in 1953 from a crossing of Seyval Blanc and Chardonnay. Seyval Blanc is itself a hybrid which is grown mainly in cooler climate regions like the Finger Lakes in New York and, surprisingly, in England. The full pedigree for Chardonel can be seen here and it's an interesting view of just how grueling it can be to create a viable hybrid. If you just stopped the family tree at Chardonel's parents, it would look like a fairly simple project, but as you go deeper and look at the family tree for Seyval Blanc, it gets dizzying in a hurry. All of those fields that are simply letters and numbers are other hybrid grapes created by other hybridizers which were never deemed good enough for commercial release and thus never named. The letters represent the hybridizers last names (S = Seibel, for example) and the numbers correspond to whatever numbering convention each hybridizer used to catalog his own creations.
Though the Seyval x Chardonnay crossing responsible for Chardonel happened in 1953, the fruit was not observed until 1958 and the vine wasn't chosen for experimental propagation until 1960. The grape wasn't released to the public until 1990, though, for reasons we'll get to momentarily. I mentioned above that the paper announcing Chardonel's release had 11 authors and implied that they were all involved in the grape's creation, but the fact of the matter is that the very long time between the grape's creation and its release makes it difficult to say for sure who was involved and in what capacity. The VIVC and this page at Iowa State University lists the grape's creators as Reisch, Pool and Einset. Reisch and Pool are the lead authors of the announcement paper, but Einset is only mentioned in the acknowledgements. I'm not sure who the other 9 people given an author credit in the paper are or what their role actually was.
Like most grapes created at the New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Chardonel was bred specifically to be able to handle cold conditions. Seyval Blanc is noted for its winter hardiness and the hybridizers were hoping that they could create something as hardy as Seyval with the flavor characteristics of Chardonnay. And to some extent, they were successful. Chardonel has much better winter hardiness than Chardonnay and is rated as hardier than Seyval in Michigan but as slightly less hardy in most other places. It does ripen late, though, which is a problem for cooler areas with short growing seasons like New York. Wines made from the Chardonel grape are generally regarded as preferable to those made from Seyval, and wines made from grapes grown in warmer areas like Missouri and Arkansas are considered superior to those of New York. The reason that the grape wasn't released for 30 years is that the fields tests being done in New York weren't promising enough to warrant release. Some vines were planted experimentally in Michigan and Arkansas, though, and the results from those vines were so encouraging that the grape was finally named (it had been known as New York 45010 at first and then as GW9 prior to 1990) and released.
I was able to find a bottle of Chardonel at Bully Hill Vineyards on my trip to the Finger Lakes region of New York a few months back. I've previously written about my experience at the winery and interested readers can find that information here. Bully Hill is weird about their vintages and this wine isn't labeled with one. It cost me about $8 in their tasting room. In the glass the wine was a medium lemon gold color. The nose was very reserved with a whiff of pear if I used my imagination, but overall it was a total blank. On the palate the wine was medium bodied with fairly high acidity. It is one of the few dry offerings that Bully Hill has. There were zippy lemon and lime citrus flavors with some green apple and citrus peel with a touch of green melon on the finish. The wine was bright, lively and interesting, which was much more than I was really expecting. The label on this wine honestly put me off of it for a long time and I kept looking at it in my cellar and dreading the thought of opening and drinking it, but I found it very nice. I would gladly pay $8 for this again and am now very curious about these superior wines being made from Chardonel elsewhere in the US.
Monday, March 5, 2012
Delaware - Finger Lakes, New York, USA
I'm betting that if I asked you where the Delaware grape is from, and if I forced you to hazard a guess, you'd probably say the state of Delaware. There's a pretty good chance that some of you who have heard of the grape before have just assumed that it's named for the US state (which is itself named for Thomas West, 3rd Baron De La Warr) and not given it a second thought. That's certainly the conclusion that I naturally jumped to the first time I read about it, and it makes a certain kind of intuitive sense. Ah, but our intuitions can be dangerous things that often lead us down the road of misinformation, and in this case, would definitely lead us astray if we relied only on them. No, the Delaware grape is not named for the state of Delaware, but rather for the town of Delaware, located in the state of Ohio.
Why Delaware, Ohio? Because that's where the grape is from, you might guess. But, no, the Delaware grape is thought to have originated from the garden of one Paul Provost in Frenchtown, New Jersey. The story goes that in the early 1800's, a Mr. Warford brought the grapes from New Jersey to Ohio and planted them in his own garden. At some point, a Mr. Heath also got his hands on cuttings of the grape and both farmers were growing it in 1849 when Abram Thompson, who was editor of the local newspaper in Delaware, Ohio, became aware of it and decided to try to figure out what it was and where it came from. In 1851 he brought the grape to the attention of the Ohio Pomological Society whose investigations into the grape's origins led them back to Provost's farm, but Provost had passed away in the interim, taking the story of how he acquired the grape with him. Some claimed that it was brought over by one of Provost's brothers who was living in Italy, which caused the grape to be known as the "Italian wine grape" for awhile. Others believed the grape came from a German who had spent some time with John Hare Powell in Philadelphia who was an agriculturist as well as a state senator. Some believed that the German had brought the grape with him from Germany while others believed he picked it up from Powell on his travels. At the end of the day, though, none of the theories had any evidence to support them, and Occam's Razor ultimately came into effect. If we can trace the grape back to Provost's farm and no further, it stands to reason that it originated there as a spontaneous field crossing that was grown from seed.
When Thompson first came across the grape, it was generally referred to either as Powell or Heath by the locals. Thompson sent some of the grapes to AJ Downing, editor of The Horticulturist magazine, who dubbed it Delaware since the samples he received were from the town of Delaware, Ohio. The grape was added to the American Pomological Society's grape list as a "new variety which promises well." Two years later it was included in their list of recommended varieties. The grape was a sensation and was the subject of several articles in the horticultural journals of the time which delighted in debates over its origins and its parentage. People were so pleased with the quality of wine made from the grape that many thought it must be a 100% vinifera plant at first, but this theory was quickly abandoned. Pierre-Marie-Alexis Millardet, one of the leading French horticulturists of the time, believed that the grape was likely a hybrid with vinifera, labrusca, cinerea, and aestivalis in its background. TV Munson, the Texas horitculturist and grape breeder, believed that it was a hybrid of labrusca and bourquiniana grapes with a bit of vinifera thrown in as well. He further believed that one of the parents was likely a grape called Elsingburgh which was from an area not far from Frenchtown, NJ. Today, the VIVC indicates that Delaware was likely the result of a vinifera vine crossed with a labrusca x aestivalis hybrid, but no specific grape names are given.
All of the information above is from The Grapes of New York published in 1908 (which you can read in its entirety here). The section on Delaware begins:
"Delaware is the American grape par excellence. Its introduction raised the standard of quality in our viticulture to that of the Old World, for there is no variety of Vitis vinifera more richly or more delicately flavored or with a more agreeable aroma than the Delaware. This variety is rightly used wherever American grapes are grown as the standard whereby to gauge the quality of other grapes."
Why Delaware, Ohio? Because that's where the grape is from, you might guess. But, no, the Delaware grape is thought to have originated from the garden of one Paul Provost in Frenchtown, New Jersey. The story goes that in the early 1800's, a Mr. Warford brought the grapes from New Jersey to Ohio and planted them in his own garden. At some point, a Mr. Heath also got his hands on cuttings of the grape and both farmers were growing it in 1849 when Abram Thompson, who was editor of the local newspaper in Delaware, Ohio, became aware of it and decided to try to figure out what it was and where it came from. In 1851 he brought the grape to the attention of the Ohio Pomological Society whose investigations into the grape's origins led them back to Provost's farm, but Provost had passed away in the interim, taking the story of how he acquired the grape with him. Some claimed that it was brought over by one of Provost's brothers who was living in Italy, which caused the grape to be known as the "Italian wine grape" for awhile. Others believed the grape came from a German who had spent some time with John Hare Powell in Philadelphia who was an agriculturist as well as a state senator. Some believed that the German had brought the grape with him from Germany while others believed he picked it up from Powell on his travels. At the end of the day, though, none of the theories had any evidence to support them, and Occam's Razor ultimately came into effect. If we can trace the grape back to Provost's farm and no further, it stands to reason that it originated there as a spontaneous field crossing that was grown from seed.
When Thompson first came across the grape, it was generally referred to either as Powell or Heath by the locals. Thompson sent some of the grapes to AJ Downing, editor of The Horticulturist magazine, who dubbed it Delaware since the samples he received were from the town of Delaware, Ohio. The grape was added to the American Pomological Society's grape list as a "new variety which promises well." Two years later it was included in their list of recommended varieties. The grape was a sensation and was the subject of several articles in the horticultural journals of the time which delighted in debates over its origins and its parentage. People were so pleased with the quality of wine made from the grape that many thought it must be a 100% vinifera plant at first, but this theory was quickly abandoned. Pierre-Marie-Alexis Millardet, one of the leading French horticulturists of the time, believed that the grape was likely a hybrid with vinifera, labrusca, cinerea, and aestivalis in its background. TV Munson, the Texas horitculturist and grape breeder, believed that it was a hybrid of labrusca and bourquiniana grapes with a bit of vinifera thrown in as well. He further believed that one of the parents was likely a grape called Elsingburgh which was from an area not far from Frenchtown, NJ. Today, the VIVC indicates that Delaware was likely the result of a vinifera vine crossed with a labrusca x aestivalis hybrid, but no specific grape names are given.
All of the information above is from The Grapes of New York published in 1908 (which you can read in its entirety here). The section on Delaware begins:
"Delaware is the American grape par excellence. Its introduction raised the standard of quality in our viticulture to that of the Old World, for there is no variety of Vitis vinifera more richly or more delicately flavored or with a more agreeable aroma than the Delaware. This variety is rightly used wherever American grapes are grown as the standard whereby to gauge the quality of other grapes."
The grape was prized for its "constitution which enables it to withstand climatic conditions to which all but the most hardy varieties will succumb, and so elastic as to adapt it to many soils and conditions, and to bear under most situations an abundant crop." It was considered second only to the Concord grape in terms of its quality as a grape for home gardeners, as a table grape and as a wine grape. Today, though, Delaware is not held in nearly such high esteem (though it is called "one of the highest quality American varieties for white wine" in an Iowa State horticulture program publication, which is a bit like being called the most beautiful pig at the slaughterhouse). It is very cold hardy but is also susceptible to a large number of diseases that make it less desirable than some of the newer hybrids. It is still grown in the Midwest and in some of the cooler regions of New York and used to make wine there, though it is probably most popular in Japan where it is used as a table grape.
During my trip to the Finger Lakes region of New York a few months back I was able to pick up two bottles made from the Delaware grape from the same producer but in two different styles. The first wine was the 2009 "Long Stem Pink," a semi-sweet rosé from Lakewood Vineyards on Seneca Lake which set me back about $8 at the winery. The Delaware grape has pink skins, as you can see from the photo above, which can impart a pinkish hue to the wine if left in contact with the juice for a short time after pressing. In the glass, the wine was an orangey salmon pink kind of color. The nose was moderately aromatic with a simple, one-note grapey kind of aroma. On the palate the wine was on the fuller side of medium with medium acidity and a sweetness level somewhere north of off-dry but not quite medium sweet. There were flavors of candied apples, strawberries and wild grapes. There was a slight bitter edge to it on the finish, but overall it was simple, sweet and fruity which is generally all these kinds of wines aspire to be. I drank this with a cheddar and chipotle sauced pasta with sausage and broccoli and it performed admirably against the spice and fat of the dish. If you like sweet table wines with those grapey, "foxy" aromas and flavors, you'll like this a lot, probably, but if you despise and revile those kinds of wines on principle you're probably better off giving this one a pass.
The second wine that I tried was the 2008 "Glaciovinum" from Lakewood Vineyards, which is an ice wine made from Delaware grapes. It comes in half bottles (375 mL) and costs about $16 at the winery. In the glass the wine was a fairly deep gold color. The nose was very aromatic with honey and grapefruit that turns towards those characteristic grapey notes as the wine warms up. On the palate the wine was medium bodied with fairly high acidity and a very high sweetness level. There were flavors of honey, ripe grapefruit, apple pie and mandarin oranges when I served the wine right out of the refrigerator. As the wine warmed up a bit, the grapey labrusca flavors showed up though they never really took over. Temperature was the key as the second glass I poured myself from the open bottle right out of the fridge showed the same kind of progression. I was pretty impressed with this wine overall. I thought it was fairly well balanced and had enough going on to keep me interested in it. The price is what ultimately enticed me into buying a bottle for myself as it can be very difficult to find ice wines for less than $20. While I probably wouldn't buy the rosé again, I would definitely give this wine another try if I ran across it somewhere for around this price. I think this wine's labrusca flavors are muted enough that even seasoned labrusca haters might find something to like here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)