To my sis's question in the tagboard 'how many rare days you have?', the answer is 'a handful, consider the fact that we have 14 weeks in this sem and a bulk of them was spent staying back in lab.' HOWEVER, the situation seems to be changing for good, as we have devised a new system of doing things so we get rest days at times like today =)
A post that was due last saturday, after the intra-uni debate:
Debate and I
I have surprised myself in my persistence in pursuing debate. From sem 3 up to now, despite the fact...
...that the debate mettings stretch till 10 p.m. at night,
...that I can't seem to 'upgrade' myself to be a better debator,
...that I am not doing superbly well in my studies,
I will still set aside time (unless academic matters really don't allow me to) to attend those debate meetings.
Speaking up and debating well are entirely two different matters. The former merely involves channeling one's thought on certain matters, which I do at ease. The latter requires critical thinking, good presentation skills, and being up-to-date with current issues.
While some friends of mine may be quick to point up that I have good presentation skills (thanks for the flattery hehe), it is only true to the extent of presenting topics that I have sufficient knowledge. In debate, you have to debate on motions that you may not fully understand (i.e. Russia-Georgia war, Oil price hike) or take a stance which you do not agree with outside a debate (i.e. legalise pornography). Also, it is how you say some points that matters, and that is a skill that comes with experience.
I have long conceded that I have lack of talent in debate. Yes, talent is important; talent is why some people are good in dancing, while some are good in sports. Hard work is still important, but talent serves as a launching point for you to achieve greater heights. It is thus crucial for each of us to recognise our talent and develop it further.
So why do I find myself debating till now? It is because it is in debate that I find myself discussing current issues from different perspectives. Debate is also a 'propelling force' for me to read up on current issues, something which I will probably have overlooked amidst heavy academic workload if I had not joined debate club. I really do enjoy watching how other good debators carry the point across =)
For the intra-uni debate, my goal was to debate as well as I could. This time round, there were only 8 teams. I had had trouble looking for a debate partner (Goodness!! you would have thought in more than 300 students, you will get a debator easily) ; I only confirmed my partner 3 days before the match, and we both only debated as a team for once.
There were 3 preliminary rounds of British Parliamentary style debate,with the motions as listed below. (There may be some jargons to non-debator)
This house believes that substance abusers should not be denied the rights to organ transplants.Our position: Opening Opposition
The points we were pushing for: Human rights, Role of the medical profession, Impact to the society
Our Ranking: 3rd
This house believes that bloggers should not be subjected to the same standards as the mass media.Our Position: Closing Opposition
Our extension: Blogs as alternative channel for a more balanced media
(Our opening opposition defined the motion differently from the opening government, hence the debate was quite messy, and it was deemed a 'below average' debate by the adjudicator)
Our Ranking: 1st (lols!)
This house believes that the Olympics was bad for China.Our Position: Closing Government
Our extension: Infrastructure being white elephants (Birds' Nest, Water cube etc. require high maintenance cost, and most host countries like Athens are still recovering from their debts)
Our Ranking: 4th (last. Our opponents were really good.)
Comment: If I had been in the other room (With not-so-powerful debators), I might have been able to get into finals, which I knew I would get last but being in the finals is something hehe. This is all part and parcels of a game, whereby opponents matching can make or break a game.
Finals: This house would cross over.I did anticipate this motion (didn't have the foresight to know that it would be a finals motion though). I even had newspaper cutting in my matter file hehe.
I have the feeling of satisfaction because had I been the opening gov (who initially had no idea what the motion was about), I would have defined it as allowing MPs to cross over, with the criteria that an election be held right after that.
Of course, opening gov could have defined the motion differently, as another debator pointed out, it could be 'this house in USA would allow the people in Mexico to cross over the border (i.e. allowing immigration) to increase the labour force.
Overall, I am quite satisfied with my performance, as I know some things cannot be achieved overnight (i.e. how some points I made lack elaboration and impact). Also, this time round, I led a junior in debate (a new change for me), as previously kk was more of the leader in our team.
My partner and I ended up as 5th or 6th (we tied with another team on points, but we do not know our speaker's scores). our of 8 teams. Batch wise, I think we contributed to 4th or 5th place for our team pharm B.
And most likely, there goes my final debate in uni. I would love to join the national health science debate again this year end, but I think we have a lot more better debators. We shall see how then.