And unto everyone who is conscious of God, He always grants a way out of unhappiness, and provides for him in a manner beyond all expectation; and for everyone who places his trust in God He alone is enough. Verily, God always attains to His purpose: and indeed, unto everything has God appointed its term and measure.
Q:65:2-3
It is highly inappropriate to cite verses like this, out of context, and without any formal education or training. But the words strike me as expressing such a truly remarkable quality, a dazzling human quality -that of trust-that I felt compelled to do so.
Last night I had a terrible dream. I was praying in an open field but I couldn't understand the language of the leader of the prayers. And the old man had a strangely elongated face (something like an old Russian icon I'm familiar with). Everyone wore tall, rounded black hats and some prayed with gnarled hands outstretched to the heavens. And the frightening thought occurred to me: what a terrible thing it must be to lose one's faith and what a gift it is that one has any....
(the dream ended on a positive note as I followed a white horse until I came to a small green gate in a wall....)
From 'Radical Hope':
After the destruction of the Crow's way of life it was difficult to comprehend anything. Did anything make sense any more? The very frame of reference had shifted. One is reminded of the ethics of the horizon, the limit, when Agamben talks about the camps. What sense can there be when one is beyond the bounds of reason-bounds that have been set by the way of life?
She laments, ' I'm living a life I don't understand'.
Plenty Coups sees in a dream the ending of the traditional way of life. But he sees something else as well: The tribe relied on what it took to be the young men's capacity to receive the world's imaginative message; it relied on the old men to say what these messages meant.
What did Plenty coups see? He saw the dissolution of the old world; he saw that he and his people were living on the edge, that a radical discontinuity in their narrative, their lives, was about to take place. In short: he had imagined the unimaginable. But to imagine is not to know. [It goes without saying that the dream is not merely a subjective experience, as the moderns would have it].
Plenty Coups is told that his people will survive, but they will only do so if they learn to listen, learn to be open; this, in effect, means a radical openness to the new, to the possibility of possibilities. By doing so they would know which month of winter they are in. This entails a suspension of the traditional ethical life, what they have always considered as the good. It is, as Kierkegaard says, the teleological suspension of the ethical in order to lead into a higher life or, as in their case, to preserve the holy.
And here is the key passage, the words that Lear infers Plenty to have spoken or thought about when understanding his dream-vision.
God-Ah-badt-dadt-deah -is good. My commitment to the genuine transcendence of God is manifest in my commitment to the goodness of the world transcending our necessarily limited attempt to understand it. My commitment to God's transcendence and goodness is manifested in my commitment to the idea that something good will emerge even if it outstrips my limited understanding of what that good is.
A commitment to good that transcends our own understanding, our own subjectivity. Such a thing is difficult in normal circumstances; in the face of tragedy and despair it requires superhuman resources and I can only imagine that such trust is , in itself, given to us (as Citizen might say, a matter of grace).
~~~~~~
"..because when these birds feel that the time has come for them to die, they sing more loudly and sweetly than they have sung in all their lives before, for joy that they are going away into the presence of the god whose servants they are. It is quite wrong for human beings to make out that the swans sing their last song as an expression of grief at their approaching end; people who say this are misled by their own fear of death, and fail to reflect that no bird sings when it is hungry or cold or distressed in any other way; not even the nightingale or swallow or hoopoe, whose songs are supposed to be a lament. In my opinion neither they nor the swans sing because they are sad. I believe that the swans, belonging as they do to Apollo, have prophetic powers and sing because they know the good things that await them in the unseen world; and they are happier on that day than they have been ever before."
I heard Lesley Chamberlain read these words on the Radio the other day and there was something wonderfully reassuring about the incantation-like quality of her voice. Of course, the notion that there can be any serenity-even if for but a brief moment- strikes our modern sensibilities as outrageous, if not impossible. And yet, and yet, might it not be that in the swan's song there is a hint of sadness, since it touches on the passing away of the life she has known? No, it is not "fear", but a lament for the erasing of her identity, her isolated self-will. Wasn't that the very quintessence of her being: to long much, to desire much? Didn't deepness reside in the yearning, in the hope?
The swan does not sing because she now knows that there is 'the good'. This she has always known, even darkly. It has always been there, it's reflection had always been here.
We find God everywhere in the world, seeing in material things the spiritual relaity which is beyond them. For the spirtual and the holy we are to look at toward all the world, not toward our isolated self-will.
--Iris Murdoch.
But she sings at the approach of the good, as a lover does at the drawing near of the beloved. She wants to die in that circle. But why lament then? I want to live I want to die. How, in a state of bewilderment, can memory still exist? How is it possible to exist like this, fading, soaring ?
But then she thinks: it has always been so! Have I not always been this dying white star, alone in this infinite dark ocean, this black sun? There were reflections. They were nothing, they were everything. I am still me, you are still you. But I look at me, think of you.
Sunday, February 24, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
"but a lament for the erasing of her identity, her isolated self-will."
you put it so beautifully - but for me this lament cannot be without fear - how could anyone face otherwise the total extinction of self? this unthinkable ... well some religions would say it is only an illusion for us to identify with this mortal being - that we are something different, the immortal self - but even if one comes to believe this, it doesn't help as long as there is no real, direct experience of this truth. and I_do_ think such an experience is very rare. a mere hope, a vague rememberance of the "Garden" can certainly help us live, but not die.
I don't know Roxana, it's hard to say anything because I haven't , despite my outward appearance and general laziness, really died :)
But is loss of identity total extinction? I guess that's the question. To say anything on this unless one has experience of it seems fake , but just to keep the conversation going...
I think the mystics would say 'the servant remains the servant'..a stone in the fire is, from one perspective, indistiguishable from the fire, but it remains the unique stone in its presence.
But I have never understood the words, 'one must die before one dies'
The Allama has this to say, commenting on another poet's line:
‘Moses fainted away by a mere surface illumination of Reality. Thou seest the very substance of Reality with a smile!’
"Pantheistic Sufism obviously cannot favour such a view, and suggests difficulties of a philosophical nature. How can the Infinite and the finite egos mutually exclude each other? Can the finite ego, as such, retain its finitude besides the Infinite Ego? This difficulty is based on a misunderstanding of the true nature of the Infinite. True infinity does not mean infinite extension which cannot be conceived without embracing all available finite extensions. Its nature consists in intensity and not extensity; and the moment we fix our gaze on intensity, we begin to see that the finite ego must be distinct, though not isolated, from the Infinite. Extensively regarded I am absorbed by the spatio-temporal order to which I belong. Intensively regarded I consider the same spatio-temporal order as a confronting ‘other’ wholly alien to me. I am distinct from and yet intimately related to that on which I depend for my life and sustenance."
But what would it mean to have "direct experience" Roxana? We are not prophets or saints. Much of what we live by is "surface illumination". And it seems to me that people have, in the past and today, lived by this refracted light, this borrowed splendour.
Does it help people die or overcome the fear of death-ours and others- (which is another death)? I doubt it, since this is probably always with us as finite beings. But then again, I have known people who have said: "my time has come, let me die" with apparent total equanamity (but God knows best what their private thoughts were) and Gustauve Thibon writes something similar (if memory serves me correct) in 'Back to Reality'.
But if the swan or we do have this hope, then what? And if that hope is not a 'reasoned' hope or a mere expectation but a firm belief, a kind of certainty, a kind certainty, then?
But you know, today it's a beautiful spring morning and I want to think about what will help us live! Ha! Hasn't that been the answer all the time?
Take care,
b.
billoo, I know only a little about sufism, I am more familiar with hindu or buddhist philosophy and I think one could indeed draw many parallels here, at least what I (think) I understand from this quote - but I cannot venture to comment.
what is "surface illumination"? "direct experience" - yes, we are not saints, but this doesn't mean we cannot have access to the same deep realization of our essential nature - only in a different way. in zen there is a difference between a kind of short moment of enlightment, a glimpse of the real nature of things - and the long-lasting satori. however most of us have to do with some kind of vague hope, or maybe firm belief, I don't know - but in the absence of even that glimpse. of course it is a good thing to have even this - the hope, the belief... it makes things easier.
and now I have to go to sleep :-)
Well, Roxana, I don't know anything about sufism either!
Your Zen idea sounds fascinating.
Can't even imagine what satori would be like.
I thought Krishna couldn't withstand the direct presence? (that's what I remember from my limited reading of the Gita anyway.)
On glimpses..
"...[a]t one point something happened that I never could have imagined. The light of the sun shot down from the opening of the well like some kind of revelation. In that instant, I could see everything around me. The well was filled with brilliant light. A flood of light. The brightness was almost stifling...The darkness and cold were swept away in a moment, and warm, gentle sunlight enveloped my naked body. Even the pain I was feeling seemed blessed by the light of the sun...I could see the stone walls that encircled me. As long as I was able to remain in the light , I was able to forget about my fear and pain and despair. I sat in the dazzling light in blank amazement.
Then the light disappeared as suddenly as it had come. Deep darkness enveloped everything once again. The whole interval had been extremely short..the flood of sunlight had gone before I could begin to comprehend its meaning.
After the light faded, I found myself in an even deeper darkness than before. I was all but unable to move...A very long time went by, it seems. At some point I drifted into sleep. By the time I sensed the presence of something and awoke, the light was already there...Without thinking I spread open both my hands and received the sun in my palms. It was far stronger than it had been the first time. And it lasted far longer. ..In the light, tears poured out of me. I felt as if all the fluids in my body might turn into tears and come streaming from my eyes, that my body itself might melt away. If it could have happened in the bliss of this marvellous light, even death would have been no threat. .. I experienced a wonderful sense of oneness, an overwhelming sense of unity. Yes, that was it: the true meaning of life resided in that light..."
--Murakami
yes something like Murakami here... one reason I like taking pictures is that sometimes you get this glimpse at perfection, this feeling of total harmony and unity with the world. "I want a shot at redemption" - this made me laugh, well not only this :-) thank you. so I guess I should sign Al :-)
ps. no, it was Arjuna who could not face the sight of Krishna's true nature revealed.
Of course! Duh! How could I get them mixed up. Thanks for reminding me. (Rinku, I hope you're NOT reading this).
The blog has been down all day for some reason [we've already made youtube crash..I wonder if this is our fault as well:) ]
Your photos really are sublime.
Perfection, unity, harmony with the world..yes, I usually feel that way after a cinnamon roll :)
sorry, couldn't resist.
Keep well,
b.
well, I was only re-using Murakami's words :-) but I'm glad to hear about the cinnamon-roll-effect, you see, I was right to ask you the other day if you had already gotten your daily satori-intake!
Roxana, I don't know if you've seen Ikiru but there's a phrase that reminded me of your 'daily satori': " a daily special"!
Beleive it or not, but as I write these words to you I'm just polishing off one now :)
(whence the sticky fingers and the difficulty of writing anyhting coherent!)
salaams,
b.
Post a Comment