Introduction to Java Programming and Data Structures, Comprehensive Version (11th Edition)
11th Edition
ISBN: 9780134670942
Author: Y. Daniel Liang
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 3.11, Problem 3.11.1CP
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Don't use chatgpt or any other AI
Don't use chatgpt or any other AI
Given a relation schema R = (A, B, C, D, E,G) with a set of functional dependencies
F {ABCD
BC → DE
B→ D
D→ A}.
(a) Show that R is not in BCNF using the functional dependency A → BCD.
(b) Show that AG is a superkey for R
(c) Compute a canonical cover Fc for the set of functional dependencies F. Show your work.
(d) Give a 3NF decomposition of R based on the canonical cover found in (c). Show your
work.
(e) Give a BCNF decomposition of R using F. Show your work.
Chapter 3 Solutions
Introduction to Java Programming and Data Structures, Comprehensive Version (11th Edition)
Chapter 3.2, Problem 3.2.1CPChapter 3.2, Problem 3.2.2CPChapter 3.2, Problem 3.2.3CPChapter 3.3, Problem 3.3.1CPChapter 3.3, Problem 3.3.2CPChapter 3.3, Problem 3.3.3CPChapter 3.4, Problem 3.4.1CPChapter 3.4, Problem 3.4.2CPChapter 3.5, Problem 3.5.1CPChapter 3.5, Problem 3.5.2CP
Chapter 3.5, Problem 3.5.3CPChapter 3.6, Problem 3.6.1CPChapter 3.6, Problem 3.6.2CPChapter 3.6, Problem 3.6.3CPChapter 3.6, Problem 3.6.4CPChapter 3.7, Problem 3.7.1CPChapter 3.7, Problem 3.7.2CPChapter 3.9, Problem 3.9.1CPChapter 3.10, Problem 3.10.1CPChapter 3.10, Problem 3.10.2CPChapter 3.10, Problem 3.10.3CPChapter 3.10, Problem 3.10.4CPChapter 3.10, Problem 3.10.5CPChapter 3.10, Problem 3.10.6CPChapter 3.10, Problem 3.10.7CPChapter 3.10, Problem 3.10.8CPChapter 3.10, Problem 3.10.9CPChapter 3.10, Problem 3.10.10CPChapter 3.10, Problem 3.10.11CPChapter 3.11, Problem 3.11.1CPChapter 3.12, Problem 3.12.1CPChapter 3.13, Problem 3.13.1CPChapter 3.13, Problem 3.13.2CPChapter 3.13, Problem 3.13.3CPChapter 3.13, Problem 3.13.4CPChapter 3.13, Problem 3.13.5CPChapter 3.14, Problem 3.14.1CPChapter 3.14, Problem 3.14.2CPChapter 3.14, Problem 3.14.3CPChapter 3.14, Problem 3.14.4CPChapter 3.15, Problem 3.15.1CPChapter 3.15, Problem 3.15.2CPChapter 3.15, Problem 3.15.3CPChapter 3.15, Problem 3.15.4CPChapter 3, Problem 3.1PEChapter 3, Problem 3.2PEChapter 3, Problem 3.3PEChapter 3, Problem 3.4PEChapter 3, Problem 3.5PEChapter 3, Problem 3.6PEChapter 3, Problem 3.7PEChapter 3, Problem 3.8PEChapter 3, Problem 3.9PEChapter 3, Problem 3.10PEChapter 3, Problem 3.11PEChapter 3, Problem 3.12PEChapter 3, Problem 3.13PEChapter 3, Problem 3.14PEChapter 3, Problem 3.15PEChapter 3, Problem 3.16PEChapter 3, Problem 3.17PEChapter 3, Problem 3.18PEChapter 3, Problem 3.19PEChapter 3, Problem 3.20PEChapter 3, Problem 3.21PEChapter 3, Problem 3.22PEChapter 3, Problem 3.23PEChapter 3, Problem 3.24PEChapter 3, Problem 3.25PEChapter 3, Problem 3.26PEChapter 3, Problem 3.27PEChapter 3, Problem 3.28PEChapter 3, Problem 3.29PEChapter 3, Problem 3.30PEChapter 3, Problem 3.31PEChapter 3, Problem 3.32PEChapter 3, Problem 3.33PEChapter 3, Problem 3.34PE
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- The following entity-relationship (ER) diagram models a database that helps car deal- ers maintain records of customers and cars in their inventory. Construct a relational database schema from the ER diagram. Your set of schemas should include primary-key and foreign-key constraints and you should ensure there are no redundant schemas. has_model model modelID name vehicle has_vehicle VIN dealer_ID brand name has_available_option has_option has_dealer options options_ID specification dealer dealer ID name customer_ID owned_by customer customer ID namearrow_forwardA relation schema R = (A, B, C, D, E) with a set of functional dependencies F= {D A CAB} is decomposed into R₁ = (A, B, C) and R2 = (C, D, E). (a) Is this a lossless-join decomposition? Why or why not? (b) Is the decomposition dependency preserving? Why or why not?arrow_forwardNo chatgpt pleasearrow_forward
- Please help draw alu diagraarrow_forward1. Level the resources (R) for the following network. Show exactly which activity is being moved at each cycle and how many days it is being moved. Show all cycles required to utilize the free float and the back float. B H 3 3 L 2 0-0-0 A C F G K N P Q T 0 3 2 2 1 2-2-2 7R 8R 4R 6R 4R 2R 5R 4R D 1 2R 2 M 000 4R 2 4R 1 2 3 4 B5 B BE B 5 5 7 D 2003 C NO C MBSCM В H 5 2 F 7 7 8 SH2F80 5 Н Н 6 7 7L3G4+ 6H2G4 J 4 4 14 8 L K 00 36 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 P 2 Z+ N N 4 4 Z t 2334 4 Σ + M M 4 +arrow_forward2. Perform resource allocation for the following project. Resource limits are 6 labors and 2 helpers. Legend: Activity Dur Resources G H 2 3 2L 1H 2L OH A 1 3L 1H + B D F J K 3 4 6 2 4 4L 2H 3L OH 4L 1H 2L 2H 4L 2H C E 2 2 I 1 2L 1H 3L 1H 5L 1Harrow_forward
- Need Java method please. Thank you.arrow_forwardNeed Java method please. Thank you.arrow_forward3. Write two nested loops to generate the following output. (Note: There is one space between each number, and any extra line shown is intentional.) 12 10 8 6 18 15 12 24 20 30 2 3 3 6 48 12 5 10 15 20 6 12 18 24 30arrow_forward
- Write in verilog coding languagearrow_forwardQ4. Consider the following two design alternatives. Walmart Walmart Store locartion 1 * capacity - Associate Name 1 id position Design Alternative "A" Store locartion 1 capacity Associate Name 1 * id position Design Alternative "B" a) Explain the semantic differences between the two designs, if any. b) Explain the differences in how each design alternative may be implemented in Java. c) which design alternative may require more storage requirement in your opinion, and why?arrow_forwardDesign a schematic for a compartmental model that includes compartments, flows, and parameters with their respective units, using Figure 1 as a guide. For each flow, determine whether it is best represented by a first-order transfer, a Michaelis-Menten saturable process, or a different method.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
COMPREHENSIVE MICROSOFT OFFICE 365 EXCEComputer ScienceISBN:9780357392676Author:FREUND, StevenPublisher:CENGAGE LNp Ms Office 365/Excel 2016 I NtermedComputer ScienceISBN:9781337508841Author:CareyPublisher:Cengage
Systems ArchitectureComputer ScienceISBN:9781305080195Author:Stephen D. BurdPublisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Information Systems (MindTap Course...Computer ScienceISBN:9781305971776Author:Ralph Stair, George ReynoldsPublisher:Cengage Learning
Operations Research : Applications and AlgorithmsComputer ScienceISBN:9780534380588Author:Wayne L. WinstonPublisher:Brooks Cole
COMPREHENSIVE MICROSOFT OFFICE 365 EXCE
Computer Science
ISBN:9780357392676
Author:FREUND, Steven
Publisher:CENGAGE L
Np Ms Office 365/Excel 2016 I Ntermed
Computer Science
ISBN:9781337508841
Author:Carey
Publisher:Cengage
Systems Architecture
Computer Science
ISBN:9781305080195
Author:Stephen D. Burd
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Information Systems (MindTap Course...
Computer Science
ISBN:9781305971776
Author:Ralph Stair, George Reynolds
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Operations Research : Applications and Algorithms
Computer Science
ISBN:9780534380588
Author:Wayne L. Winston
Publisher:Brooks Cole