Find out the productivity of both the companies and determine the company with higher productivity. Concept Introduction: The production contribution of the total labor is represented by Labor Productivity.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 2, Problem 22P

A

Summary Introduction

Interpretation: Find out the productivity of both the companies and determine the company with higher productivity.

Concept Introduction: The production contribution of the total labor is represented by Labor Productivity.

A

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 22P

Through the calculations, we can infer that the productivity of the company A is 2.08 miles per hour, and that of the company B is 2.4 miles per hour. Hence, we can conclude that the Company B is higher productive of the two.

Explanation of Solution

Given Information: The ratio that relates output with the combined set of inputs involved is called as Multifactor Productivity.

Productivity of the companyA can be calculated using the below formula:

Productivity = Number of miles repavedNumber of workers × Number of Days=50 miles × 2 lane road6 emplotees × 8 days=100 miles48 labor hours=2.08 miles per hour

Thus, the productivity of the labor can be calculated as 17 poles per hour.

Productivity of the company B can be calculated using the below formula:

Productivity = Number of miles repavedNumber of workers × Number of Days=30 miles × 4 lane road5 emplotees × 10 days=120 miles50 labor hours=2.4 miles per hour

Thus, the productivity of the labor can be calculated as 2.4 miles per hour.

By observing the above derived results, we can see that the company B is more productive than the company A.

B

Summary Introduction

Interpretation: Find out the productivity of both the companies and determine the company with higher productivity, with the new assumptions.

Concept Introduction: The production contribution of the total labor is represented by Labor Productivity.

B

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 22P

Through the calculations, we can see that the labor productivity of the company A is more than that of the company B.

Explanation of Solution

Productivity of the labor can be calculated using the below formula:

Total Labor Cost for company A = Labor cost per hour × Total Labor Hours=$15×(6 employees×8 days×8 hours)=$15×384 hours=$5,760

Thus, the total labor cost is $5,760.

With the derived labor cost for company A, Multifactor productivity can be computed,

Multifactor Productivity = ProductionLabor Cost + Material Cost=50 miles × 2 lane road$5,760+$7000+$12000=100 miles$24,760=0.004039 miles per dollar

Now, we shall look at the labor productivity of the company B:

Total Labor Cost of Company B = Labor Cost per hour × Total Labor Hours=$15×(5 employees×10 days×8 hours)=$15×400 hours=$6,000

With the derived labor cost for company B, Multifactor productivity can be computed,

Multifactor Productivity = ProductionLabor Cost + Material Cost=30 miles × 4 lane road$6,000+$9000+$15000=120 miles$30,000=0.004 miles per dollar

Thus, the company A is more productive than the company B.

C

Summary Introduction

Interpretation: Find out the productivity of both the companies and determine the company with higher productivity, with the new assumptions.

Concept Introduction: The production contribution of the total labor is represented by Labor Productivity.

C

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 22P

Through the calculations, we can see that the labor productivity of the company B is more than that of the company A.

Explanation of Solution

Productivity of the labor can be calculated using the below formula:

Total Labor Cost for company A = Labor cost per hour × Total Labor Hours=$35×(6 employees×8 days×8 hours)=$35×384 hours=$13,440

Thus, the total labor cost is $13,440.

With the derived labor cost for company A, Multifactor productivity can be computed,

Multifactor Productivity = ProductionLabor Cost + Material Cost=50 miles × 2 lane road$13,440+$7000+$12000=100 miles$32,440=0.003083 miles per dollar

Now, we shall look at the labor productivity of the company B:

Total Labor Cost of Company B = Labor Cost per hour × Total Labor Hours=$35×(5 employees×10 days×8 hours)=$35×400 hours=$14,000

With the derived labor cost for company B, Multifactor productivity can be computed,

Multifactor Productivity = ProductionLabor Cost + Material Cost=30 miles × 4 lane road$14,000+$9000+$15000=120 miles$38,000=0.003158 miles per dollar

Thus, the company B is more productive than the company A.

D

Summary Introduction

Interpretation: Provide a conclusion with regard to the differences in the productivity with the changes in the labor costs.

Concept Introduction: The production contribution of the total labor is represented by Labor Productivity.

D

Expert Solution

Answer to Problem 22P

From the point of view of person X, the deriving differ.

Explanation of Solution

In spite of the productivity stays higher for company B, the equipment and material costs are higher. On the other hand, when the labor cost is $15 per hour, Company A is more productive. At a labor cost of $35 per hour, company B is more productive.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

1. Strategic Predispositions of MNEsChapter 8 outlines four strategic predispositions—ethnocentric, polycentric, regiocentric, and geocentric. a. Define each orientation and explain how it shapes an MNE’s approach to market entry, integration, and control. b. Provide a real or hypothetical example of a firm (e.g., IKEA, Samsung) for each orientation, justifying why that orientation fits based on its structure and policies. c. Evaluate the potential benefits and downsides of each orientation for international competitiveness and global performance. 2. External and Internal Analysis in Strategy FormulationChapter 8 emphasizes the importance of external environmental assessment (macro and industry-level forces) and internal resource evaluation when crafting a multinational strategy. a. Describe key elements of external assessment (e.g., market size, political risk, competition) and internal evaluation (e.g., firm capabilities, value-chain strengths). b. Choose an MNE (real or…

1. Structural Arrangements for Global Integration vs Local ResponsivenessChapter 9 explains how MNEs structure their organizations to balance global efficiency and local responsiveness. a. Describe the main organizational structures covered (e.g., international division, global product division, geographic/regional division, matrix, transnational). b. Choose one global MNE (real or hypothetical) and argue which structure (or hybrid) best suits its strategy—taking into account industry, scale, and diversity of markets. c. Discuss two key challenges this MNE might face under that structure (e.g., coordination complexity, role ambiguity), and recommend how to address them. 2. Control Mechanisms & Coordination in MNEsEffective international organization also relies on control systems and coordination processes. a. Define and contrast different control mechanisms (e.g., output controls, process controls, cultural/values-based controls) as presented in the chapter. b. Provide…

3. Overcoming Negotiation Challenges:Describe two common challenges negotiators face during the planning phase. How can these challenges be anticipated and effectively addressed? 4. Strategic Planning in Practice:Think of a past negotiation experience (real or hypothetical). How would applying the principles of strategic negotiation planning from this chapter have improved the outcome? 5. Chapter Summary Reflection:Summarize the major insights from Chapter 4. How does strategic planning enhance a negotiator’s ability to stay focused and adaptable during complex negotiations?

Answer 2