
Introduction to Java Programming and Data Structures: Brief Version (11th Global Edition)
11th Edition
ISBN: 9780134671710
Author: Y. Daniel Liang
Publisher: PEARSON
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 16.7, Problem 16.7.1CP
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Don't use chatgpt or any other AI
Don't use chatgpt or any other AI
Given a relation schema R = (A, B, C, D, E,G) with a set of functional dependencies
F {ABCD
BC → DE
B→ D
D→ A}.
(a) Show that R is not in BCNF using the functional dependency A → BCD.
(b) Show that AG is a superkey for R
(c) Compute a canonical cover Fc for the set of functional dependencies F. Show your work.
(d) Give a 3NF decomposition of R based on the canonical cover found in (c). Show your
work.
(e) Give a BCNF decomposition of R using F. Show your work.
Chapter 16 Solutions
Introduction to Java Programming and Data Structures: Brief Version (11th Global Edition)
Chapter 16.2, Problem 16.2.1CPChapter 16.2, Problem 16.2.2CPChapter 16.2, Problem 16.2.3CPChapter 16.2, Problem 16.2.4CPChapter 16.3, Problem 16.3.1CPChapter 16.3, Problem 16.3.2CPChapter 16.3, Problem 16.3.3CPChapter 16.4, Problem 16.4.1CPChapter 16.4, Problem 16.4.2CPChapter 16.4, Problem 16.4.3CP
Chapter 16.4, Problem 16.4.4CPChapter 16.5, Problem 16.5.1CPChapter 16.5, Problem 16.5.2CPChapter 16.5, Problem 16.5.3CPChapter 16.5, Problem 16.5.4CPChapter 16.6, Problem 16.6.1CPChapter 16.6, Problem 16.6.2CPChapter 16.6, Problem 16.6.3CPChapter 16.6, Problem 16.6.4CPChapter 16.7, Problem 16.7.1CPChapter 16.7, Problem 16.7.2CPChapter 16.7, Problem 16.7.3CPChapter 16.7, Problem 16.7.4CPChapter 16.8, Problem 16.8.1CPChapter 16.8, Problem 16.8.2CPChapter 16.8, Problem 16.8.3CPChapter 16.8, Problem 16.8.4CPChapter 16.9, Problem 16.9.1CPChapter 16.9, Problem 16.9.2CPChapter 16.9, Problem 16.9.3CPChapter 16.9, Problem 16.9.4CPChapter 16.10, Problem 16.10.1CPChapter 16.10, Problem 16.10.2CPChapter 16.10, Problem 16.10.3CPChapter 16.11, Problem 16.11.1CPChapter 16.11, Problem 16.11.2CPChapter 16.11, Problem 16.11.3CPChapter 16.12, Problem 16.12.1CPChapter 16.12, Problem 16.12.2CPChapter 16.12, Problem 16.12.3CPChapter 16.13, Problem 16.13.1CPChapter 16.13, Problem 16.13.2CPChapter 16.13, Problem 16.13.3CPChapter 16.14, Problem 16.14.1CPChapter 16.14, Problem 16.14.2CPChapter 16, Problem 16.1PEChapter 16, Problem 16.2PEChapter 16, Problem 16.3PEChapter 16, Problem 16.4PEChapter 16, Problem 16.5PEChapter 16, Problem 16.6PEChapter 16, Problem 16.7PEChapter 16, Problem 16.8PEChapter 16, Problem 16.9PEChapter 16, Problem 16.10PEChapter 16, Problem 16.11PEChapter 16, Problem 16.12PEChapter 16, Problem 16.13PEChapter 16, Problem 16.14PEChapter 16, Problem 16.15PEChapter 16, Problem 16.16PEChapter 16, Problem 16.17PEChapter 16, Problem 16.18PEChapter 16, Problem 16.19PEChapter 16, Problem 16.20PEChapter 16, Problem 16.21PEChapter 16, Problem 16.22PEChapter 16, Problem 16.25PEChapter 16, Problem 16.28PEChapter 16, Problem 16.29PEChapter 16, Problem 16.30PEChapter 16, Problem 16.31PE
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- The following entity-relationship (ER) diagram models a database that helps car deal- ers maintain records of customers and cars in their inventory. Construct a relational database schema from the ER diagram. Your set of schemas should include primary-key and foreign-key constraints and you should ensure there are no redundant schemas. has_model model modelID name vehicle has_vehicle VIN dealer_ID brand name has_available_option has_option has_dealer options options_ID specification dealer dealer ID name customer_ID owned_by customer customer ID namearrow_forwardA relation schema R = (A, B, C, D, E) with a set of functional dependencies F= {D A CAB} is decomposed into R₁ = (A, B, C) and R2 = (C, D, E). (a) Is this a lossless-join decomposition? Why or why not? (b) Is the decomposition dependency preserving? Why or why not?arrow_forwardNo chatgpt pleasearrow_forward
- Please help draw alu diagraarrow_forward1. Level the resources (R) for the following network. Show exactly which activity is being moved at each cycle and how many days it is being moved. Show all cycles required to utilize the free float and the back float. B H 3 3 L 2 0-0-0 A C F G K N P Q T 0 3 2 2 1 2-2-2 7R 8R 4R 6R 4R 2R 5R 4R D 1 2R 2 M 000 4R 2 4R 1 2 3 4 B5 B BE B 5 5 7 D 2003 C NO C MBSCM В H 5 2 F 7 7 8 SH2F80 5 Н Н 6 7 7L3G4+ 6H2G4 J 4 4 14 8 L K 00 36 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 P 2 Z+ N N 4 4 Z t 2334 4 Σ + M M 4 +arrow_forward2. Perform resource allocation for the following project. Resource limits are 6 labors and 2 helpers. Legend: Activity Dur Resources G H 2 3 2L 1H 2L OH A 1 3L 1H + B D F J K 3 4 6 2 4 4L 2H 3L OH 4L 1H 2L 2H 4L 2H C E 2 2 I 1 2L 1H 3L 1H 5L 1Harrow_forward
- Need Java method please. Thank you.arrow_forwardNeed Java method please. Thank you.arrow_forward3. Write two nested loops to generate the following output. (Note: There is one space between each number, and any extra line shown is intentional.) 12 10 8 6 18 15 12 24 20 30 2 3 3 6 48 12 5 10 15 20 6 12 18 24 30arrow_forward
- Write in verilog coding languagearrow_forwardQ4. Consider the following two design alternatives. Walmart Walmart Store locartion 1 * capacity - Associate Name 1 id position Design Alternative "A" Store locartion 1 capacity Associate Name 1 * id position Design Alternative "B" a) Explain the semantic differences between the two designs, if any. b) Explain the differences in how each design alternative may be implemented in Java. c) which design alternative may require more storage requirement in your opinion, and why?arrow_forwardDesign a schematic for a compartmental model that includes compartments, flows, and parameters with their respective units, using Figure 1 as a guide. For each flow, determine whether it is best represented by a first-order transfer, a Michaelis-Menten saturable process, or a different method.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Np Ms Office 365/Excel 2016 I NtermedComputer ScienceISBN:9781337508841Author:CareyPublisher:Cengage
EBK JAVA PROGRAMMINGComputer ScienceISBN:9781305480537Author:FARRELLPublisher:CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT
EBK JAVA PROGRAMMINGComputer ScienceISBN:9781337671385Author:FARRELLPublisher:CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT
New Perspectives on HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScriptComputer ScienceISBN:9781305503922Author:Patrick M. CareyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Programming with Microsoft Visual Basic 2017Computer ScienceISBN:9781337102124Author:Diane ZakPublisher:Cengage Learning
Np Ms Office 365/Excel 2016 I Ntermed
Computer Science
ISBN:9781337508841
Author:Carey
Publisher:Cengage

EBK JAVA PROGRAMMING
Computer Science
ISBN:9781305480537
Author:FARRELL
Publisher:CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT

EBK JAVA PROGRAMMING
Computer Science
ISBN:9781337671385
Author:FARRELL
Publisher:CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT

New Perspectives on HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript
Computer Science
ISBN:9781305503922
Author:Patrick M. Carey
Publisher:Cengage Learning

Programming with Microsoft Visual Basic 2017
Computer Science
ISBN:9781337102124
Author:Diane Zak
Publisher:Cengage Learning