Content deleted Content added
Tom.Reding (talk | contribs) m Category:CS1 errors: deprecated parameters: migrate 1/1 |dead-url= to |url-status=; minor cleanup; WP:GenFixes on |
Citation bot (talk | contribs) Altered issue. Formatted dashes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | Category:Wikipedia articles needing clarification from April 2024 | #UCB_Category 743/818 |
||
| (22 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown) | |||
Line 2:
{{redirect|Backwashing|the water treatment process|Backwashing (water treatment)}}
{{Short description|A turbulent layer of water that washes up on the beach after an incoming wave has broken}}
[[File:Swash Lano Beach Samoa.JPG|thumb|
'''Swash''', or '''forewash''' in [[geography]], is a [[turbulence|turbulent]] layer of water that washes up on the [[beach]] after an incoming [[ocean surface wave|wave]] has broken. The swash action can move beach materials up and down the beach, which results in the cross-shore sediment exchange.<ref>{{cite book |last=Whittow |first=J. B. |year=2000 |title=The Penguin Dictionary for Physical Geography |publisher=[[Penguin Books]] |location=London}}</ref> The time-scale of swash motion varies from seconds to minutes depending on the type of beach (see Figure 1 for beach types). Greater swash generally occurs on flatter beaches.<ref name="Komar">{{cite book |last=Komar |first=P. D. |year=1998 |title=Beach Processes and Sedimentation |publisher=[[Prentice-Hall]] |location=[[Englewood Cliffs]]}}</ref> The swash motion plays the primary role in the formation of morphological features and their changes in the swash zone. The swash action also plays an important role as one of the instantaneous processes in wider coastal morphodynamics.
[[File:Beach classification.JPG|thumb|
There are two approaches that describe swash motions: (1) swash resulting from the collapse of high-frequency bores (
Where Hb is the breaker height, g is gravity, T is the incident-wave period and tan β is the beach gradient. Values εb>20 indicate dissipative conditions where swash is characterised by standing long-wave motion. Values εb<2.5 indicate reflective conditions where swash is dominated by wave bores.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Wright |first1=L.D. |last2=Short |first2=A.D. |year=1984 |title=Morphodynamic variability of surf zones and beaches: A synthesis |work=[[Marine Geology]] |issue=56 |pages=93–118}}</ref>▼
▲
==Uprush and backwash==
Swash consists of two phases: '''uprush''' (onshore flow) and '''backwash''' (offshore flow). Generally, uprush
==Swash morphology==
[[File:Swash zone and beachface morphology.JPG|thumb|
The '''swash zone''' is the upper part of the beach between backbeach and [[surf zone]], where intense erosion occurs during storms (Figure 2). The swash zone is alternately wet and dry. [[Infiltration (hydrology)]] (above the [[water table]]) and exfiltration (below the [[water table]]) take place between the swash flow and the beach groundwater table. Beachface, berm, beach step and [[beach cusp]]s are the typical morphological features associated with swash motion. [[Infiltration (hydrology)]] and [[sediment transport]] by swash motion are important factors that govern the gradient of the beachface.<ref name="Masselink & Hughes">Masselink, G. and Hughes M.G. 2003, Introduction to coastal processes and geomorphology, Hodder Arnold, London</ref>
===Beachface===
Line 24 ⟶ 26:
===Berm===
The berm is the relatively planar{{clarify|Planar? level? horizontal? |date=April 2024}} part of the swash zone where the accumulation of sediment occurs at the landward farthest of swash motion (Figure 2). The berm protects the backbeach and coastal dunes from waves but [[erosion]] can occur under high energy conditions such as storms. The berm is more easily defined on gravel beaches and there can be multiple berms at different elevations. On sandy beaches in contrast, the gradient of backbeach, berm and beachface can be similar. The height of the berm is governed by the maximum elevation of [[sediment transport]] during the uprush.<ref name="Masselink & Hughes"/> The berm height can be predicted using the equation by Takeda and Sunamura (1982)
where
{{clarify|Does grain size and density have no effect on the berm height and beachface slope?|date=April 2024}}
===Beach step===
The beach step is a submerged scarp at the base of the beachface (Figure 2). The beach steps generally comprise the coarsest material and the height can vary from several centimetres to over a metre. Beach steps form where the backwash interacts with the oncoming incident wave and generate vortex. Hughes and Cowell (1987) proposed the equation to predict the step height
<math display="block">Z_{\mathrm{step}}=\sqrt{H_{b}Tw_{s}},</math>
where
===Beach cusps===
[[File:Schematic showing beach cusp morphology.JPG|thumb|
[[File:Undertow in Nantucket.jpg|thumb|
The beach cusp is a crescent-shaped accumulation of [[sand]] or [[gravel]] surrounding a semicircular depression on a beach. They are formed by swash action and more common on gravel beaches than sand. The spacing of the cusps is related to the horizontal extent of the swash motion and can range from 10 cm to 50 m. Coarser sediments are found on the steep-gradient, seaward pointing ‘cusp horns’ (Figure 3). Currently there are two theories that provide an adequate explanation for the formation of the rhythmic beach cusps: standing [[edge
====Standing edge wave model====
The standing edge wave theory, which was introduced by Guza and Inman (1975), suggests that swash is superimposed upon the motion of standing edge waves that travel alongshore. This produces a variation in swash height along the shore and consequently results in regular patterns of [[erosion]]. The cusp embayments form at the eroding points and cusp horns occur at the edge wave nodes. The beach cusp spacing can be predicted using the sub-harmonic edge wave model
where T is incident wave period and tanβ is beach gradient.▼
▲
This model only explains the initial formation of the cusps but not the continuing growth of the cusps. The amplitude of the edge wave reduces as the cusps grow, hence it is a self-limiting process.<ref name="Masselink & Hughes"/>
Line 52 ⟶ 57:
====Self-organization model====
The [[self-organization]] theory was introduced by Werner and Fink (1993) and it suggests that [[beach cusp]]s form due to a combination of positive feedback that is operated by beach morphology and swash motion encouraging the topographic irregularity and negative feedback that discourages accretion or erosion on well-developed beach cusps. It is relatively recent that the computational resources and [[sediment transport]] formulations became available to show that the stable and rhythmic morphological features can be produced by such feedback systems.<ref name="Masselink & Hughes"/> The beach cusp spacing, based on the self-organization model, is proportional to the horizontal extent of the swash motion S using the equation
where the constant of proportionality ''f'' is ''c''. 1.5.
Line 68 ⟶ 75:
The swash zone is highly dynamic, accessible and susceptible to human activities. This zone can be very close to developed properties. It is said that at least 100 million people on the globe live within one meter of [[mean sea level]].<ref>Zhang, K., Douglas, B.C. and Leatherman, S.P. 2004, "Global warming and coastal erosion". Climatic Change, 64, pp.41-58</ref> Understanding the swash zone processes and wise management is vital for coastal communities which can be affected by [[coastal hazards]], such as erosion and [[storm surge]]. It is important to note that the swash zone processes cannot be considered in isolation as it is strongly linked with the surf zone processes. Many other factors, including human activities and climate change, can also influence the morphodynamics in the swash zone. Understanding the wider morphodynamics is essential in successful coastal management.
Construction of [[sea wall]]s has been a common tool to protect developed property, such as roads and buildings, from [[coastal erosion]] and recession. However, more often than not, protecting the property by building a [[seawall]] does not achieve the retention of the beach. Building an impermeable structure such as a [[seawall]] within the swash zone can interfere with the morphodynamics system in the swash zone. Building a [[seawall]] can raise the [[water table]], increase wave reflection and intensify turbulence against the wall. This ultimately results in erosion of the adjacent beach or failure of the structure.<ref>Rae, E. 2010, "Coastal Erosion and Deposition" in Encyclopedia of Geography. Sage publications, 21 March 2011, <{{cite web |url=http://www.sage-ereference.com/geography/Article_n185.html |title=
Understanding the [[sediment transport]] system in the swash zone is also vital for [[beach nourishment]] projects. Swash plays a significant role in transportation and distribution of the sand that is added to the beach. There have been failures in the past due to inadequate understanding.<ref name="Bird"/> Understanding and prediction of the sediment movements, both in the swash and surf zone, is vital for the nourishment project to succeed.
Line 77 ⟶ 84:
==Research==
It is said that conduct of morphology research and field measurements in the swash zone is challenging since it is a shallow and aerated environment with rapid and unsteady swash flows.<ref name="M&P"/><ref name="Blenkinsopp">Blenkinsopp, C.E., Turner, I.L., Masselink, G., Russell, P.E. 2011, "Swash zone sediment fluxes: Field observations". Coastal Engineering, 58, pp.28-44</ref> Despite the accessibility to the swash zone and the capability to take measurements with high resolution compared to the other parts of the nearshore zone, irregularity of the data has been an impediment for analysis as well as critical comparisons between theory and observation.<ref name="M&P"/> Various and unique methods have been used for field measurements in the swash zone. For wave run-up measurements, for example, Guza and Thornton (1981, 1982) used an 80m long dual-resistance wire stretched across the beach profile and held about 3 cm above the sand by non-conducting supports. Holman and Sallenger (1985) conducted run-up investigation by taking videos of the swash to digitise the positions of the waterline over time. Many of the studies involved engineering structures, including [[seawalls]], [[jetties]] and [[breakwaters]], to establish design criteria that protect the structures from overtopping by extreme run-ups.<ref name="Komar"/> Since the 1990s, swash hydrodynamics have been more actively investigated by coastal researchers, such as Hughes M.G., Masselink J. and Puleo J.A., contributing to the better understanding of the morphodynamics in the swash zone including turbulence, flow velocities, interaction with the beach groundwater table, and [[sediment transport]]. However, the gaps in understanding still remain in swash research including turbulence, sheet flow, bedload sediment transport and hydrodynamics on ultra-dissipative beaches.<ref name="M&P"/>
==See also==
{{Div col|small=yes}}
*[[Beach cusp]]
*[[Beach nourishment]]
Line 88 ⟶ 93:
*[[Sea wall]]
*[[Sediment transport]]
{{Div col end}}
==References==
| |||