User talk:122.54.93.104

Warning

Please stop your campaign against User:Dust1235. We know your opinin, you know that no action will be taken. Unless anything new happens, that's the way it will stay. Fram (talk) 12:36, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please also stop your tagging a work which has legitimate reason for being introduced into Wikipedia Ajory72 (talk) 04:06, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reporting vandalism

Please note that WP:AIV is only for reporting obvious and current cases of vandalism or spamming - it is not for reporting sockpuppets, content dispute etc. — Tivedshambo _(t/c) 05:23, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I do not know where to report sockpuppets. 122.54.93.104 (talk) 05:30, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relevent links are given at the top of WP:AIV. Please ensure you have sufficient evidence. — Tivedshambo _(t/c) 05:26, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great. I can't report the sockpuppet I know. 122.54.93.104 (talk) 05:30, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

What you are doing is bordering on disruptive. Please stop or else you will be blocked. 2 edits a month ago (one of which was deleted) is not grounds for someone to be blocked. Period. Move on. --Woohookitty^Woohoo! 00:48, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. 122.54.93.104 (talk) 01:21, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review of Template:Seconds From Disaster

I have closed your deletion review request for Template:Seconds From Disaster at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2008 May 25. This matter was discussed less than 2 weeks ago at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2008 May 13 and there was unanimous endorsement of the original deletion. Your review request has offered no reason why the deletion should be reconsidered that was not raised at the previous review. --Stormie (talk) 12:14, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Autoblock

{{122.54.93.104|Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Sgt Pikachu5". The reason given for Sgt Pikachu5's block is: "Abusing multiple accounts: User:Togepi 987".|Tiptoety|933577}}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

122.54.93.104 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

MY second account is'nt used for block evasion. It's a restart

Decline reason:

You were asked to follow the instructions in order to gain our trust and a second chance. You do not get to "restart" whenever you feel like it because this is not a game but a community focused on building an encyclopedia. -- Netsnipe ► 04:04, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

122.54.93.104 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The second account above made many good edits and almost no bad edits. Over time, I could improve and change my ways, and improve many articles. Okay, my first account was blocked for disruption (specifically marking some userpages with the {{retirement}} and vandalize some pages), while the second was blocked because it was identified as block evasion. Neither this IP nor the second account marked plenty of user pages with {{retirement}} template. I wont do any of those things ever again, as long as you unblock both this IP address and the second account. I'm just a newbie, I still have to learn more about Wikipedia's policies, but I do obey them.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=The second account above made many good edits and almost no bad edits. Over time, I could improve and change my ways, and improve many articles. Okay, my first account was blocked for disruption (specifically marking some userpages with the {{retirement}} and vandalize some pages), while the second was blocked because it was identified as block evasion. Neither this IP nor the second account marked plenty of user pages with {{retirement}} template. I wont do any of those things ever again, as long as you unblock both this IP address and the second account. I'm just a newbie, I still have to learn more about Wikipedia's policies, but I do obey them. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=The second account above made many good edits and almost no bad edits. Over time, I could improve and change my ways, and improve many articles. Okay, my first account was blocked for disruption (specifically marking some userpages with the {{retirement}} and vandalize some pages), while the second was blocked because it was identified as block evasion. Neither this IP nor the second account marked plenty of user pages with {{retirement}} template. I wont do any of those things ever again, as long as you unblock both this IP address and the second account. I'm just a newbie, I still have to learn more about Wikipedia's policies, but I do obey them. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=The second account above made many good edits and almost no bad edits. Over time, I could improve and change my ways, and improve many articles. Okay, my first account was blocked for disruption (specifically marking some userpages with the {{retirement}} and vandalize some pages), while the second was blocked because it was identified as block evasion. Neither this IP nor the second account marked plenty of user pages with {{retirement}} template. I wont do any of those things ever again, as long as you unblock both this IP address and the second account. I'm just a newbie, I still have to learn more about Wikipedia's policies, but I do obey them. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.