Jump to content

User talk:Cyrillic

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ta bu shi da yu (talk | contribs) at 03:20, 16 November 2007 (→‎Wikipedia:Facebook about to be deleted: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome to Cyrillic Talk

Greetings everyone, feel free to voice your opinions and suggestions

Mills Observatory

Cyril, Happy to help tidy things up! Happy trails! Schmiteye 02:44, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your NPWatcher Application

Dear Cyrillic,

Thank you for applying for NPWatcher! You've been approved to use it. Before you run the program, please check the changelog on the application page to see if there is a newer release (or just add the main page (here) to your watchlist). Report any bugs or feature suggestion here. If you need help, feel free to contact me or join NPWatcher.

Snowolf (talk) CON COI - 23:21, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You!

Thanks for the Barnstar!!!! FireSpike 23:41, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

You are welcome, and you deserve it.--Cyril Thomas 23:45, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{Criminology-stub}}

Hi - I see you have recently created a new stub type. As it states at Wikipedia:Stub, at the top of most stub categories, and in many other places on Wikipedia, it is recommended that new stub types are proposed prior to creation at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, in order to check whether the new stub type is already covered by existing stub types, whether it is named according to stub naming guidelines, whether it reaches the standard threshold for creation of a new stub type, and whether it crosses existing stub type hierarchies. Your new stub type is currently listed at WP:WSS/D - please feel free to make any comments there as to any rationale for this stub type. And please, in future, consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...wha? 01:49, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Dear Grutness, thank you so much, I have posted a reply in your user page. --Cyril Thomas 12:36, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cyril - you wrote:Thanks for the criminology-stub comments. I think the parent category should stay as it is, criminology is definitely fit to an umbrella term for many categories, still, it's better to seperate forensic science and medicine from the criminology category.
Certainly it should stay in some of the parent categories it has, but one or two of them seem a little odd - I'm not sure why it should have been in a biography stub category, for instance 9the other way round may have made more sense). On the whole, though, it looks like the stub is acceptable and, if anything, it may be the earlier forensics stub category that needs to be looked at, since it hasn't really grown to the size where it would be very useful for editors. BTW, thanks for accepting my comments about the stub type so well - a lot of editors grumble very loudly when stub types they've created are questioned! Grutness...wha? 23:42, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Usurpations

I have denied the usurpation as the matter has not been discussed by the community. There are many issues that need to be discussed such as legal and technical. Other issues include a maximum number of edits, the time duration, and the legal impact of the forced attribution change. =Nichalp «Talk»= 16:43, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This needs to be put up on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy), with a CC link on WP:BN and the talk page of WP:CHU/U. Since the topic is going to be contentious, it would be advisable to create a new page/subpage somewhere. Regards, =Nichalp «Talk»= 04:53, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
PS What happened to Marayur for FA? =Nichalp «Talk»= 04:53, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

Thanks for the barnstar! Mikieminnow 22:37, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Breaking Benjamin

Hi Cyril,

Thanks for your note. I'm afraid that I'm not seeing the same problems that you are on Breaking Benjamin. After my unprotection, there have been only three edits; of those three, two were part of an edit and subsequent self-revert. Perhaps you were thinking of a different, but related, page? — TKD::Talk 02:50, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Posted a reply on your userpage. Thanks.--Cyril Thomas 16:53, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Usually, when an anonymous user makes an edit and quickly reverts himself/herself, I don't make a big deal out of it unless it's accompanied by other troublesome edits; the user was probably experimenting. I don't know why you would have gotten any errors when editing; perhaps there was a database hiccup or the server was busy at that moment. — TKD::Talk 06:38, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Revert and Speedy Deletion

Dear Cyril,

I have checked my contributions and I can't find any mention of the revert. Are you sure it was me? I did warn the creator, but not on that page.

CarrotMan 17:22, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Posted a reply on your user page.--Cyril Thomas 17:29, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Cyril,
Ah, I get it now! I did know that the vandal was also the creator, but I had trouble finding the right template. Thank you for your kind comments, nice to meet you too.
CarrotMan 17:36, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Three translation requests

Hello! I have a request for translation entry help on Wiktionary. Could you add the Malayalam translations for the following pages?

Please note that both "parrot" and "listen" have multiple definitions and multiple translations sections. Thanks for any help you can provide! --EncycloPetey 00:08, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have the same problem when I want to add words in Ancient Greek. The best option I have found is to copy and paste each letter from a page that lists them. For Malayalam, there is a Wikipedia article on Malayalam script, though I don't know whether it contains all the charatcers or not. My own browser isn't even set up to display Malayalam. --EncycloPetey 23:40, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Levi Dowling

LOL, glad to know I'm not the only one who keeps forgetting the preview button! I'll get rid of the tag ;-) --Speed Air Man 10:38, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Thank you :) --Cyril Thomas 10:38, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Protection for George VI of the United Kingdom page?

Hmm well it has been attracting a lot of vandals, you're right.. they've all been blocked but I dare say they'll be back with new accounts. I have to leave Wikipedia for a while now, but keep your eye on the article and if any more vandalism appears then yeah it might be an idea. LibLord 16:22, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I was aware of that haha! LibLord 19:38, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hii Cyrillica!

Just out of curiosity how does one become an admin and are there other positions of responsibility on wikipedia that come before administrator? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by HolyChristianWarrior (talk • contribs) 19:32, 2 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Reply

Dear HolyChristianWarrior, You can start reading this section Becoming an administrator, a clean record of constructive contributions and vandalism-free record is also essential. Thanks for the post. (See the reply in your talk page too...) --Cyril Thomas 00:58, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ya I know I was accused of vandalising the Corcoran page (which i was not),but I wasn't I was contributing to the article and the other editor started an edit war, and also he pasted a vandal warning on to mytalk page.Odran Corcoran 16:00, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Paul Wilkinson.jpg

You list the image as GFDL-self, but it appears to be the same image as used on his official profile, so it seems to be a work of a staffer. Care to clarify? Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 05:32, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Dear Night Gyr, I am a student at the University of Dundee and Paul Wilkinson is the Professor at St. Andrews, the parental University. Paul Wilkinson is also occasionally presents lectures at our University, and I have full rights to the picture and Paul Wilkinson himself grant me permission to use the photo as suitable. Thanks, --Cyril Thomas 03:22, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CVU status

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F. Thank you. Delivered on behalf of user:xaosflux 01:25, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cprg-stub

I've nominated this template for deletion at WP:SFD. Cheers. --MZMcBride 16:55, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

I have posted a reply on your userpage. Thank you.--Cyril Thomas 23:21, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Paul Wilkinson.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Paul Wilkinson.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. cholmes75 (chit chat) 18:13, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

I got the picture from Paul Wilkinson himself, he sent it through his secretary Gillian, if you personally email me, I will give you Paul Wilkinson's telephone number at St. Andrews, Center for the Study of Terrorism and Political Violence, you can contact him or his secretary directly to inquire about the image given to Cyril Thomas to upload in Wikipedia. --Cyril Thomas 12:34, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Your user page

Thanks for clarifying. I reverted and warned to be safe, but I looked later at the IP's contributions and thought that it might have been legitimate. — TKD::Talk 13:25, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

No problem at all, in fact I am grateful for your edit, as it will make me remember to log in next time and I feel more protected LOL. Thanks TKD... --Cyril Thomas 13:47, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Trialskokiewiki.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Trialskokiewiki.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:15, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Asterixandhotdog.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Asterixandhotdog.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 14:12, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Asterixandsuperclone.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Asterixandsuperclone.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 14:14, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Asterixandtoon.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Asterixandtoon.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 14:15, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Frankcollin.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Frankcollin.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:26, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Frankskokiwiki.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Frankskokiwiki.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:49, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Obelixandnagma.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Obelixandnagma.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:25, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Juliuscaesar-ast-wiki.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Juliuscaesar-ast-wiki.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:50, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Golemwiki1920.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Golemwiki1920.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:51, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Facebook about to be deleted

Hi, as one of the people with a picture on Wikipedia:Facebook, figured you might be interested in knowing that it is up for deletion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Images of Wikipedians (2nd nomination). - Ta bu shi da yu 03:20, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cyrillic&oldid=171814949"