User talk:Lecen: Difference between revisions
→Your Arbitration evidence is too long: new section |
Undid revision 554971908 by HersfoldArbClerkBot (talk) sorry; moving the bot to run on my computer and it got started twice by mistake |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
{{-}} |
{{-}} |
||
== Your Arbitration evidence is too long == |
|||
Hello, Lecen. Thank you for your recent submission of evidence for the Argentine History Arbitration case. As you may be aware, the Arbitration Committee asks that users submitting evidence in cases adhere to limits regarding the length of their submissions. These limits, currently at 1000 words and 100 diffs for parties and 500 words and 50 diffs for all others, are in place to ensure that the Arbitration Committee receives only the most important information relevant to the case, and is able to determine an appropriate course of action in a reasonable amount of time. The evidence you have submitted currently exceeds at least one of these limits, and is presently at 1702 words and 0 diffs. Please try to reduce the length of your submission to fit within these limits; [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration|this guide]] may be able to provide some help in doing so. If the length of your evidence is not reduced soon, it may be refactored or removed by a human clerk within a few days. Thank you! If you have any questions or concerns regarding the case, please contact the drafting Arbitrator or case clerk (who are listed on the case pages); if you have any questions or concerns about this bot, please contact [[User talk:Hersfold|the operator]]. On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, '''''<em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:blue">Hers</em><em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:gold">fold</em>'''''[[User:HersfoldArbClerkBot|ArbClerk'''BOT''']]<sup>([[User:Hersfold/t|talk]])</sup> 23:59, 13 May 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Your Arbitration evidence is too long == |
== Your Arbitration evidence is too long == |
||
Revision as of 00:00, 14 May 2013
 Archives (Index) |
Your Arbitration evidence is too long
Hello, Lecen. Thank you for your recent submission of evidence for the Argentine History Arbitration case. As you may be aware, the Arbitration Committee asks that users submitting evidence in cases adhere to limits regarding the length of their submissions. These limits, currently at 1000 words and 100 diffs for parties and 500 words and 50 diffs for all others, are in place to ensure that the Arbitration Committee receives only the most important information relevant to the case, and is able to determine an appropriate course of action in a reasonable amount of time. The evidence you have submitted currently exceeds at least one of these limits, and is presently at 1702 words and 0 diffs. Please try to reduce the length of your submission to fit within these limits; this guide may be able to provide some help in doing so. If the length of your evidence is not reduced soon, it may be refactored or removed by a human clerk within a few days. Thank you! If you have any questions or concerns regarding the case, please contact the drafting Arbitrator or case clerk (who are listed on the case pages); if you have any questions or concerns about this bot, please contact the operator. On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, HersfoldArbClerkBOT(talk) 23:59, 13 May 2013 (UTC)