Talk:Superadobe: Difference between revisions
some architects? |
Cleanup |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
in the section on critique, it says that some architects view super adobe as regressive, but there is only evidence given for one singular architect having given this critique. |
in the section on critique, it says that some architects view super adobe as regressive, but there is only evidence given for one singular architect having given this critique. |
||
==Cleanup tag== |
|||
I tagged this article as being in need of cleanup. Parts of the article are written in the second-person, and give instructions to the reader. [[WP:NOT|Wikipedia is not a how-to guide]]. |
|||
In places, the tone of the article seems to advocate in favor of this technique. I removed a few problematic statements (E.g. "Unfortunately the government removed the houses...") as promoting a point-of-view, but problems remain. The aritcle should be re-written to have a neutral, encyclopedic tone. |
|||
I left in place the tag asking for in-line citations. I note that this tag has been on the article for one year now, but most sections still do not have in-line citations. This makes it difficult for the reader to tell which statements here are backed up by sources, and which statements are not. [[User:Johntex|'''Johntex''']]\<sup>[[User_talk:Johntex|talk]]</sup> 16:28, 12 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 16:28, 12 February 2010
some architects?
in the section on critique, it says that some architects view super adobe as regressive, but there is only evidence given for one singular architect having given this critique.
Cleanup tag
I tagged this article as being in need of cleanup. Parts of the article are written in the second-person, and give instructions to the reader. Wikipedia is not a how-to guide.
In places, the tone of the article seems to advocate in favor of this technique. I removed a few problematic statements (E.g. "Unfortunately the government removed the houses...") as promoting a point-of-view, but problems remain. The aritcle should be re-written to have a neutral, encyclopedic tone.
I left in place the tag asking for in-line citations. I note that this tag has been on the article for one year now, but most sections still do not have in-line citations. This makes it difficult for the reader to tell which statements here are backed up by sources, and which statements are not. Johntex\talk 16:28, 12 February 2010 (UTC)