|
353 | Feedback on draft additional repertoire for Amendment 2 (PDAM) to ISO/IEC 10646:2017 (5th edition) | Closing Date: 2017.07.24 |
Status: | Closed | |
Originator: | UTC | |
Informal Discussion: | Unicode Mail List (Join) | |
Formal Feedback: | Contact Form | |
Resolution: | The feedback received was reviewed by the UTC. Document L2/17-288 records recommendations for disposition of comments. | |
Description of Issue:
The Unicode Technical Committee is soliciting feedback on pending additions
to the draft repertoire of characters, to help discover any errors in
character names, incorrect glyphs, or other problems. There is a short
window of opportunity to review and comment on the repertoire additions
noted below.
The following additional repertoire from ISO/IEC 10646:2017 (5th Edition, Amendment 2), which is in its PDAM stage, is under review. Of special note is the Georgian Extended block, which includes the special uppercase letters of the modern Georgian secular alphabet. This set of characters may be fast-tracked, so reviewers are encouraged to check them carefully.See the associated repertoire in Draft additional repertoire for Amendment 2 (PDAM) to ISO/IEC 10646:2017 (5th edition).
The Unicode Standard is developed in synchrony with ISO/IEC 10646.
After ISO balloting is completed on any repertoire additions, no further
changes or corrections will be possible. (See the FAQ Standards
Developing Organizations for additional information on the stages in ISO
standards development.) Advance feedback on these repertoire additions will
help inform the UTC discussions about its own contribution to the ISO
balloting process.
Documents referenced in the draft repertoire with numbers such as
L2/15-156 are available in the UTC
Document Registry.
How to Provide Feedback: For information about how to discuss this Public Review Issue and how to supply formal feedback, please see the feedback and discussion instructions. The accumulated feedback received so far on this issue is shown below, or you can look at a full page view. Feedback is reviewed by the relevant committee according to their meeting schedule.