|
| | | | | |
| | | |
| |
| |
| |
In the Israelis' and Palestinians' long struggle for security and identity,
each side holds sharply different views on the major historical events
affecting the land that both peoples claim. This chapter covers the historic
arguments, from thousands of years ago through the 20th century. The author's statements in this chapter are based on the writings of scholars and the words of Palestinian and Israeli leaders.
| |
| |
| |
| |
Adopted by the U.N. following the June 1967 war, Resolution 242 has been accepted
by most Arab nations, Israel, the PLO, the U.S., and most of the world as the
basis for a peace agreement between Israelis and Palestinians. Despite this,
the resolution has gone nowhere -- the problem being Israelis' and
Palestinians' divergent, parallel versions of its meaning. A recent example of
this divergence is Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's op-ed in The New York Times on June 9, 2002, in which he maintains that Resolution 242 determined that Israel "was not expected
to withdraw from all the territories that its forces had entered ... in the Six-Day War." Palestinians say such a statement is outrageous because it is a totally incorrect interpretation of 242's language.
| |
| |
| |
| |
This final chapter of Parallel Realities connects the past of
Israel/Palestine to the present and the future of the conflict. It focuses on
two historical events -- the struggles of the Jews in Rome and the Muslims during the Crusades -- in an attempt to show how the past can hold hostage the present and the future in the land that two peoples consider their home.
| |
|
|
home - introduction - the negotiations - "parallel realities" - timeline - join the discussion - interviews
readings & links - historic documents - tapes & transcripts - press reaction
credits - privacy policy - FRONTLINE - wgbh - pbsi
top photograph © richard t. nowitz/corbis
web site copyright 1995-2014
WGBH educational foundation
| |
|