1 |
|
---|
2 | /*
|
---|
3 | *@@sourcefile xwpsecty.h:
|
---|
4 | * public declarations which are shared between the various ring-3
|
---|
5 | * parts of XWorkplace Security (XWPSec).
|
---|
6 | *
|
---|
7 | * XWPSec consists of the following modules:
|
---|
8 | *
|
---|
9 | * 1) XWPSHELL.EXE, which is to be installed through RUNWORKPLACE
|
---|
10 | * in CONFIG.SYS and functions as both a WPS starter and a
|
---|
11 | * daemon for managing the security driver;
|
---|
12 | *
|
---|
13 | * 2) XWPSEC32.SYS, which is a ring-0 driver performing
|
---|
14 | * authentification for OS/2 APIs like DosOpen, DosMove etc.
|
---|
15 | * through SES callouts.
|
---|
16 | *
|
---|
17 | * Note that Security Enabling Services (SES) is NOT used
|
---|
18 | * for user logon and authentication. In other words, this
|
---|
19 | * program serves neither as an SES System Logon Authority
|
---|
20 | * (SLA) nor a User Identification Authority (UIA). I have
|
---|
21 | * found SES Logon Shell Services (LSS) too buggy to be useful,
|
---|
22 | * but maybe I was too dumb to find out how to use them. But
|
---|
23 | * then again, these APIs are too complicated and error-prone
|
---|
24 | * to be used by ordinary humans.
|
---|
25 | *
|
---|
26 | * So instead, I have rewritten the LSS functionality for
|
---|
27 | * XWPShell. SES is only used for kernel interfaces (KPIs)
|
---|
28 | * in XWPSEC32.SYS. As a result, the SECURE.SYS text file
|
---|
29 | * in \OS2\SECURITY\SESDB is not used either.
|
---|
30 | *
|
---|
31 | *
|
---|
32 | * <B>Concepts:</B>
|
---|
33 | *
|
---|
34 | * To implement XWPSec, I have reviewed the concepts of Linux,
|
---|
35 | * SES, and OS/2 LAN Server (Warp Server for e-Business).
|
---|
36 | * See subjects.c, users.c, and userdb.c for a discussion of
|
---|
37 | * security concepts which came out of this review.
|
---|
38 | *
|
---|
39 | * As a summary, XWPSec follows the SES security models, with a
|
---|
40 | * few simplifications. To make processing more efficient, user
|
---|
41 | * IDs and group IDs have been added (like Linux uid and gid) to
|
---|
42 | * allow looking up data based on numbers instead of names.
|
---|
43 | *
|
---|
44 | * <B>Recommended reading:</B>
|
---|
45 | *
|
---|
46 | * -- "SES Developer's Guide" (IBM SG244668 redbook). This
|
---|
47 | * sucks, but it's the only source for SES information.
|
---|
48 | *
|
---|
49 | * -- "Network Administrator Tasks" (BOOKS\A3AA3MST.INF
|
---|
50 | * on a WSeB installation). A very good book.
|
---|
51 | *
|
---|
52 | * -- Linux manpages for group(5) and passwd(5); Linux info
|
---|
53 | * page for chmod (follow the "File permissions" node).
|
---|
54 | *
|
---|
55 | *
|
---|
56 | * <b>XWPSec Authentication Model</b>
|
---|
57 | *
|
---|
58 | * Basically, there are two competing models of access permissions
|
---|
59 | * in the computing world, the POSIX model and the Windows/OS/2
|
---|
60 | * model. Since the POSIX model can be implemented as a subset of
|
---|
61 | * the OS/2 model, XWPSec follows the OS/2 model, with very
|
---|
62 | * fine-grained access permissions and different ACLs per resource.
|
---|
63 | *
|
---|
64 | * XWPSec implements the usual stuff like users, groups, and
|
---|
65 | * privileged processes with increased access rights. As opposed
|
---|
66 | * to the POSIX model, group membership is an M:N relation, meaning
|
---|
67 | * that any user can be a member of an infinite number of groups.
|
---|
68 | * Also, while the POSIX model only allows controlling permissions
|
---|
69 | * for the owner, group, and "world" (rwxrwxrwx model), XWPSec has
|
---|
70 | * real ACLs which are unlimited in size per resource.
|
---|
71 | *
|
---|
72 | * To implement this efficiently, XWPSec uses "subject handles", which
|
---|
73 | * is a concept borrowed from SES. However, XWPSec does not use the
|
---|
74 | * SES APIs for creating and managing those, but implements this
|
---|
75 | * functionality itself.
|
---|
76 | *
|
---|
77 | * For authorizing events, XWPSec uses the XWPSUBJECTINFO and
|
---|
78 | * XWPSECURITYCONTEXT structures, plus an array of RESOURCEACL
|
---|
79 | * structs which forms the global system ACL table shared with
|
---|
80 | * the ring-0 device driver.
|
---|
81 | *
|
---|
82 | *
|
---|
83 | * <b>Logon</b>
|
---|
84 | *
|
---|
85 | * XWPShell maintains a list of users that are currently
|
---|
86 | * logged on. There can be an infinite number of logged-on
|
---|
87 | * users. However, one user logon is special and is called
|
---|
88 | * the "local" logon: that user owns the shell, most
|
---|
89 | * importantly the Workplace Shell, and processes started
|
---|
90 | * via the shell run on behalf of that user.
|
---|
91 | *
|
---|
92 | * When a user logs on, XWPShell authenticates the credentials
|
---|
93 | * (normally, via user name and password), and creates one
|
---|
94 | * subject handle for that user plus one subject handle for
|
---|
95 | * every group that the user belongs to. XWPShell then rebuilds
|
---|
96 | * the system ACL table and sends it to the driver so it can
|
---|
97 | * perform authentication.
|
---|
98 | *
|
---|
99 | * Logon can thus happen in two situations. Most frequently,
|
---|
100 | * the local user logs on via the logon dialog when XWPShell
|
---|
101 | * starts up together with the system. However, XWPShell also
|
---|
102 | * allows any application to change its own security context
|
---|
103 | * be re-logging on with different credentials.
|
---|
104 | *
|
---|
105 | * This is the typical sequence of events when XWPShell is running:
|
---|
106 | *
|
---|
107 | * 1) When XWPShell starts up, it scans the process list to figure
|
---|
108 | * out all processes that are already running because of system
|
---|
109 | * startup. It then contacts the ring-0 driver, passing it an
|
---|
110 | * array of these PIDs, and thus enables local security. The
|
---|
111 | * driver then creates root security contexts for those processes.
|
---|
112 | *
|
---|
113 | * From that point on, all system events are authenticated until
|
---|
114 | * the system is shut down.
|
---|
115 | *
|
---|
116 | * (Before that, the driver does not deny access in order not to
|
---|
117 | * hickup the startup sequence.)
|
---|
118 | *
|
---|
119 | * 2) XWPShell displays the logon dialog.
|
---|
120 | *
|
---|
121 | * 3) After the user has entered his user name and password,
|
---|
122 | * XWPShell authenticates the user against the user database.
|
---|
123 | *
|
---|
124 | * 4) If the user was authenticated, XWPSec creates subjects
|
---|
125 | * for the user and his groups. With each subject creation,
|
---|
126 | * XWPShell rebuilds the system ACL list with the subject
|
---|
127 | * handles and sends them down to ring 0 so that the driver
|
---|
128 | * can perform authorization (see RESOURCEACL for details).
|
---|
129 | *
|
---|
130 | * 5) XWPShell sets the security context of itself (XWPSHELL.EXE)
|
---|
131 | * to contain these subject handles by calling a ring-0 driver
|
---|
132 | * API. Whoever owns XWPSHELL.EXE is, by definition, the "local"
|
---|
133 | * user.
|
---|
134 | *
|
---|
135 | * 6) XWPShell then changes the user profile (OS2.INI) via PrfReset,
|
---|
136 | * builds an environment for the Workplace Shell, and starts
|
---|
137 | * PMSHELL.EXE so that the WPS starts up with the user's Desktop.
|
---|
138 | * The WPS is started as a child of XWPSHELL.EXE and thus
|
---|
139 | * inherits its security context. Since the WPS uses WinStartApp
|
---|
140 | * to start applications, those will inherit the local user's
|
---|
141 | * security context as well.
|
---|
142 | *
|
---|
143 | * The following environment variables are set:
|
---|
144 | *
|
---|
145 | * -- USER is set to the user name;
|
---|
146 | * -- USERID is set to the user ID (uid);
|
---|
147 | * -- HOME is set to the user's home directory;
|
---|
148 | * -- OS2_INI is set to the user's OS2.INI file. This
|
---|
149 | * does not affect the profile (which has been
|
---|
150 | * changed using PrfReset before), but is still
|
---|
151 | * changed in case any program references this
|
---|
152 | * variable.
|
---|
153 | *
|
---|
154 | * All processes started by the WPS will inherit this
|
---|
155 | * environment since the WPS always copies its environment
|
---|
156 | * to child processes.
|
---|
157 | *
|
---|
158 | * 7) From then on, all system events will be authorized against
|
---|
159 | * the local user's security context, which contains the subject
|
---|
160 | * handles of the local user and his groups. For example, when
|
---|
161 | * an application opens a file, the driver will authorize this
|
---|
162 | * event against the ACLs stored in the user's subject infos
|
---|
163 | * and permit the operation or deny access.
|
---|
164 | *
|
---|
165 | * 8) When the user logs off via the new menu item in the Desktop's
|
---|
166 | * context menu (implemented by XWorkplace), XWorkplace will then
|
---|
167 | * terminate all processes running on behalf of this user and
|
---|
168 | * terminate the WPS process via DosExit. It sets a special flag
|
---|
169 | * in shared memory to indicate to XWPShell that this was not
|
---|
170 | * just a WPS restart (or trap), but a logoff event to prevent
|
---|
171 | * XWPShell from restarting the WPS immediately.
|
---|
172 | *
|
---|
173 | * 9) When XWPShell then realizes that the WPS has terminated and
|
---|
174 | * finds this flag, it logs off the user. Logging off implies
|
---|
175 | * again checking that no processes are running on behalf of
|
---|
176 | * the local user any more, changing the security context of
|
---|
177 | * XWPSHELL.EXE back to "noone", and deleting the subject
|
---|
178 | * handles that were created in (4.). Go back to (2.).
|
---|
179 | *
|
---|
180 | * Note: Version numbering in this file relates to XWorkplace version
|
---|
181 | * numbering.
|
---|
182 | *
|
---|
183 | *@@include #define INCL_DOSSEMAPHORES
|
---|
184 | *@@include #include <os2.h>
|
---|
185 | *@@include #include "helpers\xwpsecty.h"
|
---|
186 | */
|
---|
187 |
|
---|
188 | /*
|
---|
189 | * Copyright (C) 2000-2002 Ulrich Mller.
|
---|
190 | * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
|
---|
191 | * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
|
---|
192 | * the Free Software Foundation, in version 2 as it comes in the COPYING
|
---|
193 | * file of the XWorkplace main distribution.
|
---|
194 | * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
|
---|
195 | * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
|
---|
196 | * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
|
---|
197 | * GNU General Public License for more details.
|
---|
198 | */
|
---|
199 |
|
---|
200 | #if __cplusplus
|
---|
201 | extern "C" {
|
---|
202 | #endif
|
---|
203 |
|
---|
204 | #ifndef XWPSECTY_HEADER_INCLUDED
|
---|
205 | #define XWPSECTY_HEADER_INCLUDED
|
---|
206 |
|
---|
207 | /* ******************************************************************
|
---|
208 | *
|
---|
209 | * Global constants
|
---|
210 | *
|
---|
211 | ********************************************************************/
|
---|
212 |
|
---|
213 | #define XWPSEC_NAMELEN 32
|
---|
214 | #define XWPSEC_FULLNAMELEN 80
|
---|
215 |
|
---|
216 | /* ******************************************************************
|
---|
217 | *
|
---|
218 | * Subjects and security contexts
|
---|
219 | *
|
---|
220 | ********************************************************************/
|
---|
221 |
|
---|
222 | typedef unsigned long HXSUBJECT;
|
---|
223 |
|
---|
224 | typedef unsigned long XWPSECID;
|
---|
225 |
|
---|
226 | /*
|
---|
227 | *@@ XWPSUBJECTINFO:
|
---|
228 | * describes a subject.
|
---|
229 | *
|
---|
230 | * A subject represents either a user, a group, or a
|
---|
231 | * trusted process associated with an access control
|
---|
232 | * list.
|
---|
233 | *
|
---|
234 | * Subject handles allow for reusing ACLs efficiently
|
---|
235 | * when multiple users are logged on and also isolate
|
---|
236 | * the ring-0 driver from user and group management.
|
---|
237 | *
|
---|
238 | * Subject handle 0 is special and means "no restrictions".
|
---|
239 | * Only the superuser ("root") will have a subject handle
|
---|
240 | * of 0, regardless of the groups he's a member of. All
|
---|
241 | * other users will have nonzero subject handles.
|
---|
242 | *
|
---|
243 | * When a user logs on, subject handles get created
|
---|
244 | * that represent the access permissions of that user.
|
---|
245 | * Every running process has a list of subject handles
|
---|
246 | * associated with it (the security context), the sum
|
---|
247 | * of which allow for authorizing events. The driver
|
---|
248 | * only sees subject handles, not users or groups.
|
---|
249 | * However, the user and group IDs are listed in the
|
---|
250 | * subject info structure to allow the driver to audit
|
---|
251 | * events.
|
---|
252 | *
|
---|
253 | * Subject handles are created by XWPShell (ring 3)
|
---|
254 | * when users log on and then sent down to the ring-0
|
---|
255 | * driver together with a new system ACL list for future
|
---|
256 | * use.
|
---|
257 | *
|
---|
258 | * Comparison with other concepts:
|
---|
259 | *
|
---|
260 | * -- The concept of a "subject" has been taken from
|
---|
261 | * SES. However, with SES, a subject is much more
|
---|
262 | * complicated and not really well explained. The
|
---|
263 | * SES documentation sucks anyway.
|
---|
264 | *
|
---|
265 | * -- Warp (LAN) Server bases ACL entries on users and
|
---|
266 | * groups also, however without calling them "subjects".
|
---|
267 | * However, if I understood that right, LAN server can
|
---|
268 | * define an infinite number of ACL entries for each
|
---|
269 | * resource.
|
---|
270 | *
|
---|
271 | * -- Linux does not have the notion of a subject.
|
---|
272 | * Instead, all access rights are determined from
|
---|
273 | * the user id (uid) and group id (gid), apparently.
|
---|
274 | *
|
---|
275 | * -- Java seems to have something similar; it bases
|
---|
276 | * ACL entries on "principals", where a principal
|
---|
277 | * can either be a user or a group. See the API
|
---|
278 | * docs for java.security.acl.Acl.
|
---|
279 | *
|
---|
280 | *@@added V0.9.5 (2000-09-23) [umoeller]
|
---|
281 | */
|
---|
282 |
|
---|
283 | typedef struct _XWPSUBJECTINFO
|
---|
284 | {
|
---|
285 | HXSUBJECT hSubject;
|
---|
286 | // handle of this subject (unique),
|
---|
287 | // simply raised with each subject creation
|
---|
288 | XWPSECID id;
|
---|
289 | // ID related to this subject;
|
---|
290 | // -- for a user subject: the user id (uid); 0 if root
|
---|
291 | // -- for a group subject: the group id (gid)
|
---|
292 | // -- for a process subject: the process id (pid)
|
---|
293 | BYTE bType;
|
---|
294 | // one of:
|
---|
295 | #define SUBJ_USER 1
|
---|
296 | #define SUBJ_GROUP 2
|
---|
297 | #define SUBJ_PROCESS 3
|
---|
298 |
|
---|
299 | ULONG cUsage;
|
---|
300 | // usage count (to allow for reuse)
|
---|
301 |
|
---|
302 | } XWPSUBJECTINFO, *PXWPSUBJECTINFO;
|
---|
303 |
|
---|
304 | /*
|
---|
305 | *@@ XWPSECURITYCONTEXT:
|
---|
306 | * describes the security context for a process.
|
---|
307 | *
|
---|
308 | * For each process on the system, one security context
|
---|
309 | * defines its permissions via subject handles. Security
|
---|
310 | * contexts are created in ring 0 in the following
|
---|
311 | * situations:
|
---|
312 | *
|
---|
313 | * -- Via the DosExecPgm callout, when a new process is
|
---|
314 | * started. The driver then creates a security context
|
---|
315 | * with the same subject handles as the new process's
|
---|
316 | * parent process. This way process permissions inherit
|
---|
317 | * from each other.
|
---|
318 | *
|
---|
319 | * -- Via a ring-0 API that gets called by XWPShell to
|
---|
320 | * create security contexts for processes that are
|
---|
321 | * already running at startup, including XWPShell
|
---|
322 | * itself.
|
---|
323 | *
|
---|
324 | * Each subject handle in the context represents either a user,
|
---|
325 | * a group, or a trusted process. A subject handle of "0" is
|
---|
326 | * special and indicates root access. If such a subject handle
|
---|
327 | * is found, the driver grants full access and does not reject
|
---|
328 | * anything.
|
---|
329 | *
|
---|
330 | * As a result, the following are typical security contexts:
|
---|
331 | *
|
---|
332 | * -- A process running on behalf of a certain user will
|
---|
333 | * usually contain at least two subject handles, one
|
---|
334 | * for the user (if any ACLs were defined for that user
|
---|
335 | * at all), and one for each group that the user belongs
|
---|
336 | * to.
|
---|
337 | *
|
---|
338 | * -- Processes running on behalf of the superuser (root)
|
---|
339 | * will only have a single "0" subject handle.
|
---|
340 | *
|
---|
341 | * -- A trusted process that was defined by an adnimistrator
|
---|
342 | * will contain an additional subject handle with the access
|
---|
343 | * permissions defined for it. For example, if the program
|
---|
344 | * "C:\MASTER\MASTER.EXE" is given specific permissions,
|
---|
345 | * there would be one subject handle representing the
|
---|
346 | * ACLs for that in addition to those of the user running
|
---|
347 | * it.
|
---|
348 | *
|
---|
349 | * -- For processes that were started during system startup,
|
---|
350 | * the driver creates security contexts with a single "0"
|
---|
351 | * (root) subject handle when XWPShell passes a list of
|
---|
352 | * PIDs to the driver with the "initialization" ring-0 API.
|
---|
353 | * As a result, all processes started through CONFIG.SYS
|
---|
354 | * are considered trusted processes.
|
---|
355 | */
|
---|
356 |
|
---|
357 | typedef struct _XWPSECURITYCONTEXT
|
---|
358 | {
|
---|
359 | ULONG cbStruct;
|
---|
360 | ULONG ulPID; // process ID
|
---|
361 |
|
---|
362 | ULONG cSubjects; // no. of subject handles in this context
|
---|
363 |
|
---|
364 | HXSUBJECT aSubjects[1]; // array of cSubjects subject handles,
|
---|
365 | // determining the permissions of this
|
---|
366 | // process
|
---|
367 |
|
---|
368 | } XWPSECURITYCONTEXT, *PXWPSECURITYCONTEXT;
|
---|
369 |
|
---|
370 | /* ******************************************************************
|
---|
371 | *
|
---|
372 | * Access control
|
---|
373 | *
|
---|
374 | ********************************************************************/
|
---|
375 |
|
---|
376 | /*
|
---|
377 | * The following global permissions exist:
|
---|
378 | *
|
---|
379 | */
|
---|
380 |
|
---|
381 | #define XWPPERM_CREATEUSER 0x00000100
|
---|
382 | // permission to create new users
|
---|
383 |
|
---|
384 | #define XWPPERM_CHANGEUSER 0x00000200
|
---|
385 | // permission to change user information
|
---|
386 |
|
---|
387 | #define XWPPERM_CHANGEUSERPERM 0x00000400
|
---|
388 | // permission to change permissions for a
|
---|
389 | // given user
|
---|
390 |
|
---|
391 | #define XWPPERM_DELETEUSER 0x00000800
|
---|
392 | // permission to delete existing users
|
---|
393 |
|
---|
394 | #define XWPPERM_CREATEGROUP 0x00001000
|
---|
395 | // permission to create new groups
|
---|
396 |
|
---|
397 | #define XWPPERM_CHANGEGROUP 0x00002000
|
---|
398 | // permission to change group information
|
---|
399 |
|
---|
400 | #define XWPPERM_CHANGEGROUPERM 0x00000400
|
---|
401 | // permission to change permissions for a
|
---|
402 | // given group
|
---|
403 |
|
---|
404 | #define XWPPERM_DELETEGROUP 0x00008000
|
---|
405 | // permission to delete existing groups
|
---|
406 |
|
---|
407 | #define XWPPERM_QUERYUSERINFO 0x00010000
|
---|
408 | // permission to retrieve global user, group, and membership info
|
---|
409 |
|
---|
410 | /*
|
---|
411 | * The following permissions are defined per resource:
|
---|
412 | *
|
---|
413 | */
|
---|
414 |
|
---|
415 | #define XWPACCESS_READ 0x01 // "R"
|
---|
416 | // For files: Permission to read data from a file and
|
---|
417 | // copy the file.
|
---|
418 | // For directories: Permission to view the directory's
|
---|
419 | // contents.
|
---|
420 | // For copying a file, both the file and its directory
|
---|
421 | // need "Read" permission.
|
---|
422 | #define XWPACCESS_WRITE 0x02 // "W"
|
---|
423 | // For files: Permission to write data to a file.
|
---|
424 | // For directories: Permission to write to files
|
---|
425 | // in the directory, but not create files ("Create"
|
---|
426 | // is required for that).
|
---|
427 | // Should be used together with "Read", because
|
---|
428 | // "Write" alone doesn't make much sense.
|
---|
429 | // Besides, "Attrib" permission will also be
|
---|
430 | // required.
|
---|
431 | #define XWPACCESS_CREATE 0x04 // "C"
|
---|
432 | // Permission to create subdirectories and files
|
---|
433 | // in a directory. "Create" alone allows creation
|
---|
434 | // of the file only, but once it's closed, it
|
---|
435 | // cannot be changed any more.
|
---|
436 | #define XWPACCESS_EXEC 0x08 // "X"
|
---|
437 | // Permission to run (not copy) an executable
|
---|
438 | // or command file.
|
---|
439 | // Note: For .CMD and .BAT files, "Read" permission
|
---|
440 | // is also required.
|
---|
441 | // -- for directories: XWPSec defines this as
|
---|
442 | // with Unix, to change to a directory.
|
---|
443 | #define XWPACCESS_DELETE 0x10 // "D"
|
---|
444 | // Permission to delete subdirectories and files.
|
---|
445 | #define XWPACCESS_ATRIB 0x20 // "A"
|
---|
446 | // Permission to modify the attributes of a
|
---|
447 | // resource (read-only, hidden, system, and
|
---|
448 | // the date and time a file was last modified).
|
---|
449 | #define XWPACCESS_PERM 0x40
|
---|
450 | // Permission to modify the permissions (read,
|
---|
451 | // write, create, execute, and delete) assigned
|
---|
452 | // to a resource for a user or application.
|
---|
453 | // This gives the user limited administration
|
---|
454 | // authority for a given resource.
|
---|
455 | #define XWPACCESS_ALL 0x7F
|
---|
456 | // Permission to read, write, create, execute,
|
---|
457 | // or delete a resource, or to modify attributes
|
---|
458 | // or permissions.
|
---|
459 |
|
---|
460 | /*
|
---|
461 | *@@ XWPSECSTATUS:
|
---|
462 | *
|
---|
463 | *@@added V1.0.1 (2003-01-10) [umoeller]
|
---|
464 | */
|
---|
465 |
|
---|
466 | typedef struct _XWPSECSTATUS
|
---|
467 | {
|
---|
468 | BOOL fLocalSecurity; // TRUE if XWPSEC32.SYS is active
|
---|
469 |
|
---|
470 | // the following fields are only set if fLocalSecurity is TRUE
|
---|
471 |
|
---|
472 | ULONG cbAllocated; // fixed memory currently allocated in ring 0
|
---|
473 | ULONG cAllocations, // no. of allocations made since startup
|
---|
474 | cFrees; // no. of frees made since startup
|
---|
475 | USHORT cLogBufs, // current 64K log buffers in use
|
---|
476 | cMaxLogBufs; // max 64K log buffers that were ever in use
|
---|
477 | ULONG cLogged; // no. of syscalls that were logged
|
---|
478 | ULONG cGranted, // no. of syscalls where access was granted
|
---|
479 | cDenied; // ... and denied
|
---|
480 | } XWPSECSTATUS, *PXWPSECSTATUS;
|
---|
481 |
|
---|
482 |
|
---|
483 | /* ******************************************************************
|
---|
484 | *
|
---|
485 | * User Database
|
---|
486 | *
|
---|
487 | ********************************************************************/
|
---|
488 |
|
---|
489 | /*
|
---|
490 | *@@ XWPGROUPDBENTRY:
|
---|
491 | * group entry in the user database.
|
---|
492 | * See userdb.c for details.
|
---|
493 | */
|
---|
494 |
|
---|
495 | typedef struct _XWPGROUPDBENTRY
|
---|
496 | {
|
---|
497 | XWPSECID gid; // group ID
|
---|
498 | CHAR szGroupName[XWPSEC_NAMELEN]; // group name
|
---|
499 | } XWPGROUPDBENTRY, *PXWPGROUPDBENTRY;
|
---|
500 |
|
---|
501 | /*
|
---|
502 | *@@ XWPUSERINFO:
|
---|
503 | * description of a user in the user database.
|
---|
504 | * See userdb.c for details.
|
---|
505 | */
|
---|
506 |
|
---|
507 | typedef struct _XWPUSERINFO
|
---|
508 | {
|
---|
509 | XWPSECID uid; // user's ID (unique); 0 for root
|
---|
510 | CHAR szUserName[XWPSEC_NAMELEN];
|
---|
511 | CHAR szFullName[XWPSEC_FULLNAMELEN]; // user's clear name
|
---|
512 | } XWPUSERINFO, *PXWPUSERINFO;
|
---|
513 |
|
---|
514 | /*
|
---|
515 | *@@ XWPMEMBERSHIP:
|
---|
516 | *
|
---|
517 | *@@added V1.0.1 (2003-01-05) [umoeller]
|
---|
518 | */
|
---|
519 |
|
---|
520 | typedef struct _XWPMEMBERSHIP
|
---|
521 | {
|
---|
522 | ULONG cGroups;
|
---|
523 | XWPSECID aGIDs[1];
|
---|
524 | } XWPMEMBERSHIP, *PXWPMEMBERSHIP;
|
---|
525 |
|
---|
526 | /*
|
---|
527 | *@@ XWPUSERDBENTRY:
|
---|
528 | *
|
---|
529 | *@@added V1.0.1 (2003-01-05) [umoeller]
|
---|
530 | */
|
---|
531 |
|
---|
532 | typedef struct _XWPUSERDBENTRY
|
---|
533 | {
|
---|
534 | ULONG cbStruct;
|
---|
535 | XWPUSERINFO User;
|
---|
536 | CHAR szPassword[XWPSEC_NAMELEN];
|
---|
537 | XWPMEMBERSHIP Membership;
|
---|
538 | } XWPUSERDBENTRY, *PXWPUSERDBENTRY;
|
---|
539 |
|
---|
540 | /* ******************************************************************
|
---|
541 | *
|
---|
542 | * Logons
|
---|
543 | *
|
---|
544 | ********************************************************************/
|
---|
545 |
|
---|
546 | /*
|
---|
547 | *@@ XWPLOGGEDON:
|
---|
548 | * describes a current user (i.e. a user
|
---|
549 | * which is in the user database and is
|
---|
550 | * currently logged on, either locally
|
---|
551 | * or via network).
|
---|
552 | */
|
---|
553 |
|
---|
554 | typedef struct _XWPLOGGEDON
|
---|
555 | {
|
---|
556 | ULONG cbStruct; // size of entire structure
|
---|
557 | XWPSECID uid; // user's ID
|
---|
558 | CHAR szUserName[XWPSEC_NAMELEN];
|
---|
559 | ULONG cSubjects; // no. of entries in aSubjects array
|
---|
560 | HXSUBJECT aSubjects[1]; // array of subject handles of this user; one "0" entry if root
|
---|
561 | } XWPLOGGEDON, *PXWPLOGGEDON;
|
---|
562 |
|
---|
563 | /* ******************************************************************
|
---|
564 | *
|
---|
565 | * Errors
|
---|
566 | *
|
---|
567 | ********************************************************************/
|
---|
568 |
|
---|
569 | #define ERROR_XWPSEC_FIRST 31000
|
---|
570 |
|
---|
571 | #define XWPSEC_INTEGRITY (ERROR_XWPSEC_FIRST)
|
---|
572 | #define XWPSEC_STRUCT_MISMATCH (ERROR_XWPSEC_FIRST + 1) // V1.0.1 (2003-01-05) [umoeller]
|
---|
573 | // sizeof XWPSHELLQUEUEDATA does not match (different versions?)
|
---|
574 | #define XWPSEC_INVALID_DATA (ERROR_XWPSEC_FIRST + 2)
|
---|
575 | #define XWPSEC_CANNOT_GET_MUTEX (ERROR_XWPSEC_FIRST + 3)
|
---|
576 | #define XWPSEC_CANNOT_START_DAEMON (ERROR_XWPSEC_FIRST + 4)
|
---|
577 |
|
---|
578 | #define XWPSEC_INSUFFICIENT_AUTHORITY (ERROR_XWPSEC_FIRST + 5)
|
---|
579 |
|
---|
580 | #define XWPSEC_HSUBJECT_EXISTS (ERROR_XWPSEC_FIRST + 6)
|
---|
581 | #define XWPSEC_INVALID_HSUBJECT (ERROR_XWPSEC_FIRST + 7)
|
---|
582 |
|
---|
583 | #define XWPSEC_INVALID_PID (ERROR_XWPSEC_FIRST + 10)
|
---|
584 | #define XWPSEC_NO_CONTEXTS (ERROR_XWPSEC_FIRST + 11)
|
---|
585 |
|
---|
586 | #define XWPSEC_USER_EXISTS (ERROR_XWPSEC_FIRST + 20)
|
---|
587 | #define XWPSEC_NO_USERS (ERROR_XWPSEC_FIRST + 21)
|
---|
588 | #define XWPSEC_NO_GROUPS (ERROR_XWPSEC_FIRST + 22)
|
---|
589 | #define XWPSEC_INVALID_ID (ERROR_XWPSEC_FIRST + 23)
|
---|
590 | // invalid user or group ID
|
---|
591 |
|
---|
592 | #define XWPSEC_NOT_AUTHENTICATED (ERROR_XWPSEC_FIRST + 30)
|
---|
593 | #define XWPSEC_NO_USER_PROFILE (ERROR_XWPSEC_FIRST + 31) // V0.9.19 (2002-04-02) [umoeller]
|
---|
594 | #define XWPSEC_CANNOT_START_SHELL (ERROR_XWPSEC_FIRST + 32)
|
---|
595 | #define XWPSEC_INVALID_PROFILE (ERROR_XWPSEC_FIRST + 33)
|
---|
596 | #define XWPSEC_NO_LOGON (ERROR_XWPSEC_FIRST + 34)
|
---|
597 |
|
---|
598 | #define XWPSEC_DB_GROUP_SYNTAX (ERROR_XWPSEC_FIRST + 35)
|
---|
599 | #define XWPSEC_DB_USER_SYNTAX (ERROR_XWPSEC_FIRST + 36)
|
---|
600 | #define XWPSEC_DB_INVALID_GROUPID (ERROR_XWPSEC_FIRST + 37)
|
---|
601 |
|
---|
602 | #define XWPSEC_DB_ACL_SYNTAX (ERROR_XWPSEC_FIRST + 40)
|
---|
603 | #define XWPSEC_DB_ACL_DUPRES (ERROR_XWPSEC_FIRST + 41)
|
---|
604 | // more than one line for the same resource in ACL DB
|
---|
605 |
|
---|
606 | #define XWPSEC_RING0_NOT_FOUND (ERROR_XWPSEC_FIRST + 50)
|
---|
607 |
|
---|
608 | #define XWPSEC_QUEUE_INVALID_CMD (ERROR_XWPSEC_FIRST + 51)
|
---|
609 |
|
---|
610 | #define ERROR_XWPSEC_LAST (ERROR_XWPSEC_FIRST + 51)
|
---|
611 |
|
---|
612 | /* ******************************************************************
|
---|
613 | *
|
---|
614 | * XWPShell Shared Memory
|
---|
615 | *
|
---|
616 | ********************************************************************/
|
---|
617 |
|
---|
618 | #define SHMEM_XWPSHELL "\\SHAREMEM\\XWORKPLC\\XWPSHELL.DAT"
|
---|
619 | // shared memory name of XWPSHELLSHARED structure
|
---|
620 |
|
---|
621 | /*
|
---|
622 | *@@ XWPSHELLSHARED:
|
---|
623 | * shared memory structure allocated by XWPShell
|
---|
624 | * when it starts up. This can be requested by
|
---|
625 | * any process to receive more information and
|
---|
626 | * is also checked by XWorkplace at WPS startup
|
---|
627 | * to determine whether XWPShell is running or
|
---|
628 | * the WPS should be running in single-user
|
---|
629 | * mode.
|
---|
630 | */
|
---|
631 |
|
---|
632 | typedef struct _XWPSHELLSHARED
|
---|
633 | {
|
---|
634 | BOOL fNoLogonButRestart;
|
---|
635 | // when the shell process terminates, it
|
---|
636 | // can set this flag to TRUE to prevent
|
---|
637 | // the logon prompt from appearing; instead,
|
---|
638 | // the shell should be restarted with the
|
---|
639 | // same user
|
---|
640 | } XWPSHELLSHARED, *PXWPSHELLSHARED;
|
---|
641 |
|
---|
642 | /* ******************************************************************
|
---|
643 | *
|
---|
644 | * XWPShell Queue (Ring 3 API)
|
---|
645 | *
|
---|
646 | ********************************************************************/
|
---|
647 |
|
---|
648 | /*
|
---|
649 | * Ring-3 APIs are implemented via a regular OS/2 Control
|
---|
650 | * Program queue. Programs can call these APIs by allocating
|
---|
651 | * a chunk of shared memory, writing the pointer to that
|
---|
652 | * with a command code into this queue, and blocking on an
|
---|
653 | * event semaphore, which gets posted by XWPShell when the
|
---|
654 | * command has been processed. XWPShell then writes a
|
---|
655 | * result code (NO_ERROR or an error code) and possibly
|
---|
656 | * result data back into that shared memory.
|
---|
657 | *
|
---|
658 | * Since OS/2 reports the PID of the queue writer with the
|
---|
659 | * queue APIs, XWPShell can validate whether the writing
|
---|
660 | * process is authorized to perform a certain event. For
|
---|
661 | * example, when a process issues the "create new user"
|
---|
662 | * command, the queue thread in XWPShell will check the
|
---|
663 | * writer's PID and validate the security context of that
|
---|
664 | * process for whether the subjects of that process include
|
---|
665 | * sufficient permission for that command.
|
---|
666 | *
|
---|
667 | * The following commands are necessary:
|
---|
668 | *
|
---|
669 | * -- Query security context for a PID (no permissions required)
|
---|
670 | *
|
---|
671 | * -- Create user (admin permission required)
|
---|
672 | *
|
---|
673 | * -- Create group (admin permission required)
|
---|
674 | *
|
---|
675 | * -- Set User membership in groups
|
---|
676 | *
|
---|
677 | * -- Query user info
|
---|
678 | *
|
---|
679 | * -- Query group info
|
---|
680 | *
|
---|
681 | * -- Query permissions for a resource
|
---|
682 | *
|
---|
683 | * -- Set permissions for a resource
|
---|
684 | *
|
---|
685 | */
|
---|
686 |
|
---|
687 | #define QUEUE_XWPSHELL "\\QUEUES\\XWORKPLC\\XWPSHELL.QUE"
|
---|
688 | // queue name of the master XWPShell queue
|
---|
689 |
|
---|
690 | /*
|
---|
691 | *@@ QUEUEUNION:
|
---|
692 | *
|
---|
693 | *@@added V0.9.11 (2001-04-22) [umoeller]
|
---|
694 | */
|
---|
695 |
|
---|
696 | typedef union _QUEUEUNION
|
---|
697 | {
|
---|
698 | #define QUECMD_QUERYSTATUS 1
|
---|
699 |
|
---|
700 | XWPSECSTATUS Status;
|
---|
701 |
|
---|
702 | #define QUECMD_QUERYLOCALUSER 2
|
---|
703 | // return data for user that is
|
---|
704 | // currently logged on locally.
|
---|
705 | // Required authority: None.
|
---|
706 | // If NO_ERROR is returned, pLocalUser has been
|
---|
707 | // set to single XWPUSERDBENTRY structure
|
---|
708 | // in shared memory given to the caller.
|
---|
709 | // The caller must issue DosFreeMem.
|
---|
710 | // Note that the szPassword field is always
|
---|
711 | // nulled out.
|
---|
712 | // Possible error codes: see slogQueryLocalUser.
|
---|
713 | PXWPUSERDBENTRY pLocalUser;
|
---|
714 |
|
---|
715 | #define QUECMD_QUERYUSERS 3
|
---|
716 | // return info for all users that
|
---|
717 | // are defined in the userdb.
|
---|
718 | // Required authority: administrator.
|
---|
719 | // Possible error codes: see sudbQueryUsers.
|
---|
720 | // If NO_ERROR is returned, paUsers has been
|
---|
721 | // set to an array of cUsers XWPUSERDBENTRY
|
---|
722 | // structures as shared memory given to the
|
---|
723 | // caller. The caller must issue DosFreeMem.
|
---|
724 | // Note that the szPassword field for each
|
---|
725 | // user is always nulled out.
|
---|
726 | struct
|
---|
727 | {
|
---|
728 | ULONG cUsers;
|
---|
729 | PXWPUSERDBENTRY paUsers;
|
---|
730 | } QueryUsers;
|
---|
731 |
|
---|
732 | #define QUECMD_QUERYGROUPS 4
|
---|
733 | // return info for all groups that
|
---|
734 | // are defined in the userdb.
|
---|
735 | // Required authority: administrator.
|
---|
736 | // Possible error codes: see sudbQueryGroups.
|
---|
737 | // If NO_ERROR is returned, paGroups has been
|
---|
738 | // set to an array of cGroups XWPGROUPDBENTRY
|
---|
739 | // structures as shared memory given to the
|
---|
740 | // caller. The caller must issue DosFreeMem.
|
---|
741 | struct
|
---|
742 | {
|
---|
743 | ULONG cGroups;
|
---|
744 | PXWPGROUPDBENTRY paGroups;
|
---|
745 | } QueryGroups;
|
---|
746 |
|
---|
747 | #define QUECMD_QUERYPROCESSOWNER 5
|
---|
748 | // return the uid of the user who owns
|
---|
749 | // the given process.
|
---|
750 | // Required authority: administrator.
|
---|
751 | struct
|
---|
752 | {
|
---|
753 | ULONG ulPID; // in: PID to query
|
---|
754 | XWPSECID uid; // out: uid of owner, if NO_ERROR is returned
|
---|
755 | } QueryProcessOwner;
|
---|
756 |
|
---|
757 | #define QUECMD_CREATEUSER 6
|
---|
758 |
|
---|
759 | struct
|
---|
760 | {
|
---|
761 | CHAR szUserName[XWPSEC_NAMELEN]; // user name
|
---|
762 | CHAR szFullName[XWPSEC_FULLNAMELEN]; // user's clear name
|
---|
763 | CHAR szPassword[XWPSEC_NAMELEN]; // password
|
---|
764 | XWPSECID uidCreated; // out: uid of new user
|
---|
765 | } CreateUser;
|
---|
766 |
|
---|
767 | #define QUECMD_SETUSERDATA 7
|
---|
768 |
|
---|
769 | XWPUSERINFO SetUserData;
|
---|
770 |
|
---|
771 | #define QUECMD_DELETEUSER 8
|
---|
772 |
|
---|
773 | XWPSECID uidDelete;
|
---|
774 |
|
---|
775 | #define QUECMD_QUERYPERMISSIONS 9
|
---|
776 |
|
---|
777 | struct
|
---|
778 | {
|
---|
779 | CHAR szResource[CCHMAXPATH]; // in: resource to query
|
---|
780 | ULONG flAccess; // out: XWPACCESS_* flags
|
---|
781 | } QueryPermissions;
|
---|
782 |
|
---|
783 | } QUEUEUNION, *PQUEUEUNION;
|
---|
784 |
|
---|
785 | /*
|
---|
786 | *@@ XWPSHELLQUEUEDATA:
|
---|
787 | * structure used in shared memory to communicate
|
---|
788 | * with XWPShell.
|
---|
789 | *
|
---|
790 | * A client process must use the following procedure
|
---|
791 | * to communicate with XWPShell:
|
---|
792 | *
|
---|
793 | * 1) Open the public XWPShell queue.
|
---|
794 | *
|
---|
795 | * 2) Allocate a giveable shared XWPSHELLQUEUEDATA
|
---|
796 | * and give it to XWPShell as read/write.
|
---|
797 | *
|
---|
798 | * 3) Create a shared event semaphore in
|
---|
799 | * XWPSHELLQUEUEDATA.hev.
|
---|
800 | *
|
---|
801 | * 4) Set XWPSHELLQUEUEDATA.ulCommand to one of the
|
---|
802 | * QUECMD_* flags, specifying the data to be queried.
|
---|
803 | *
|
---|
804 | * 5) Write the XWPSHELLQUEUEDATA pointer to the
|
---|
805 | * queue.
|
---|
806 | *
|
---|
807 | * 6) Block on XWPSHELLQUEUEDATA.hevData, which gets
|
---|
808 | * posted by XWPShell when the data has been filled.
|
---|
809 | *
|
---|
810 | * 7) Check XWPSHELLQUEUEDATA.arc. If NO_ERROR,
|
---|
811 | * XWPSHELLQUEUEDATA.Data union has been filled
|
---|
812 | * with data according to ulCommand.
|
---|
813 | *
|
---|
814 | * 8) Close the event sem and free the shared memory.
|
---|
815 | *
|
---|
816 | *@@added V0.9.11 (2001-04-22) [umoeller]
|
---|
817 | */
|
---|
818 |
|
---|
819 | typedef struct _XWPSHELLQUEUEDATA
|
---|
820 | {
|
---|
821 | ULONG cbStruct; // size of XWPSHELLQUEUEDATA struct (for safety)
|
---|
822 |
|
---|
823 | ULONG ulCommand; // in: one of the QUECMD_* values
|
---|
824 |
|
---|
825 | HEV hevData; // in: event semaphore posted
|
---|
826 | // when XWPShell has produced
|
---|
827 | // the data
|
---|
828 |
|
---|
829 | APIRET arc; // out: error code set by XWPShell;
|
---|
830 | // if NO_ERROR, the following is valid
|
---|
831 |
|
---|
832 | QUEUEUNION Data; // out: data, format depends on ulCommand
|
---|
833 |
|
---|
834 | } XWPSHELLQUEUEDATA, *PXWPSHELLQUEUEDATA;
|
---|
835 |
|
---|
836 | /* ******************************************************************
|
---|
837 | *
|
---|
838 | * Ring-0 (driver) APIs
|
---|
839 | *
|
---|
840 | ********************************************************************/
|
---|
841 |
|
---|
842 | /*
|
---|
843 | * Ring 0 interfaces required to be called from XWPShell:
|
---|
844 | *
|
---|
845 | * -- Initialization: to be called exactly once when
|
---|
846 | * XWPShell starts up. This call enables local security
|
---|
847 | * and switches the driver into authorization mode:
|
---|
848 | * from then on, all system events are authenticated
|
---|
849 | * via the KPI callouts.
|
---|
850 | *
|
---|
851 | * With this call, XWPShell must pass down an array of
|
---|
852 | * PIDs that were already running when XWPShell was
|
---|
853 | * started, including XWPShell itself. For these
|
---|
854 | * processes, the driver will create security contexts
|
---|
855 | * as trusted processes.
|
---|
856 | *
|
---|
857 | * In addition, XWPShell sends down an array with all
|
---|
858 | * definitions of trusted processes so that the driver
|
---|
859 | * can create special security contexts for those.
|
---|
860 | *
|
---|
861 | * -- Query security context: XWPShell needs to be able
|
---|
862 | * to retrieve the security context of a given PID
|
---|
863 | * from the driver to be able to authorize ring-3 API
|
---|
864 | * calls such as "create user" or changing permissions.
|
---|
865 | *
|
---|
866 | * -- Set security context: changes the security context
|
---|
867 | * of an existing process. This is used by XWPShell
|
---|
868 | * to change its own context when the local user logs
|
---|
869 | * on. In addition, XWPShell will call this when a
|
---|
870 | * third party process has requested to change its
|
---|
871 | * context and this request was authenticated.
|
---|
872 | *
|
---|
873 | * -- ACL table: Whenever subject handles are created or
|
---|
874 | * deleted, XWPShell needs to rebuild the system ACL
|
---|
875 | * table to contain the fresh subject handles and
|
---|
876 | * pass them all down to the driver.
|
---|
877 | *
|
---|
878 | * -- Refresh process list: XWPShell needs to periodically
|
---|
879 | * call into the driver to pass it a list of processes
|
---|
880 | * that are currently running. Since there is no callout
|
---|
881 | * for when a process has terminated, the driver will
|
---|
882 | * end up with plenty of zombie PIDs after a while. This
|
---|
883 | * call will also be necessary before a user logs off
|
---|
884 | * after his processes have been terminated to make
|
---|
885 | * sure that subject handles are no longer in use.
|
---|
886 | */
|
---|
887 |
|
---|
888 | /*
|
---|
889 | *@@ ACCESS:
|
---|
890 | *
|
---|
891 | *@@added V1.0.1 (2003-01-05) [umoeller]
|
---|
892 | */
|
---|
893 |
|
---|
894 | typedef struct _ACCESS
|
---|
895 | {
|
---|
896 | HXSUBJECT hSubject; // subject handle; this is -1 if an entry
|
---|
897 | // exists for this resource but the user or
|
---|
898 | // group is not currently in use (because no
|
---|
899 | // such user is logged on)
|
---|
900 | BYTE fbAccess; // XWPACCESS_* flags
|
---|
901 | } ACCESS, *PACCESS;
|
---|
902 |
|
---|
903 | /*
|
---|
904 | *@@ RESOURCEACL:
|
---|
905 | * definition of a resource entry in the system access control
|
---|
906 | * list (ACL).
|
---|
907 | *
|
---|
908 | * At ring 0, the driver has a list of all RESOURCEACL entries
|
---|
909 | * defined for the system. Each entry in turn has an array of
|
---|
910 | * ACCESS structs listing the subject handles for the resource,
|
---|
911 | * for example, defining that subject handle 1 (which could be
|
---|
912 | * representing a user) may read and write this resource, subject
|
---|
913 | * handle 2 (representing one of the groups the user belongs to)
|
---|
914 | * may execute, and so on.
|
---|
915 | *
|
---|
916 | * There will only be one entry for any resource per subject.
|
---|
917 | * As a result, if the permissions for a resource are changed,
|
---|
918 | * the existing entry must be found and refreshed to avoid
|
---|
919 | * duplicates.
|
---|
920 | *
|
---|
921 | * The global ACL table is build by XWPShell whenever it needs
|
---|
922 | * updating and passed down to the driver for future use. It
|
---|
923 | * will need rebuilding whenever a subject handle gets created
|
---|
924 | * or when access permissions are changed by an administrator.
|
---|
925 | *
|
---|
926 | * The table will be build as follows by XWPShell:
|
---|
927 | *
|
---|
928 | * 1) XWPShell loads the file defining the ACLs for the entire
|
---|
929 | * system.
|
---|
930 | *
|
---|
931 | * For each definition in the file, it builds a RESOURCEACL
|
---|
932 | * entry. It checks the permissions defined for the resource
|
---|
933 | * in the file and sets up the array of ACCESS structures for
|
---|
934 | * the resource. If a permission was defined for a user for
|
---|
935 | * which a subject handle already exists (because the user
|
---|
936 | * is already logged on), that subject handle is stored.
|
---|
937 | * If a definition exists but none of the permissions apply
|
---|
938 | * to any of the current users (because those users are not
|
---|
939 | * logged on, or the groups are not in use yet), a dummy
|
---|
940 | * entry with a -1 subject handle is created to block access
|
---|
941 | * to the resource (see the algorithm description below).
|
---|
942 | *
|
---|
943 | * 2) XWPShell then sends the system ACL list down to the driver.
|
---|
944 | *
|
---|
945 | * During authorization, for any event, the driver first checks
|
---|
946 | * if a null ("root") subject handle exists in the process's
|
---|
947 | * security context. If so, access is granted unconditionally.
|
---|
948 | *
|
---|
949 | * Otherwise, ACLs apply to all subdirectories too, unless a more
|
---|
950 | * specific ACL entry is encountered. In other words,
|
---|
951 | * the driver authorizes events bottom-up in the following order:
|
---|
952 | *
|
---|
953 | * 1) It checks for whether an ACL entry for the given resource
|
---|
954 | * exists in the ACL table.
|
---|
955 | *
|
---|
956 | * If any ACL entry was found for the resource, access is
|
---|
957 | * granted if any ACL entry allowed access for one of the
|
---|
958 | * subjects in the process's security context. Access is denied
|
---|
959 | * if ACL entries existed for the resource but none allowed access,
|
---|
960 | * which includes the "blocker" -1 entry described above.
|
---|
961 | *
|
---|
962 | * In any case, the search stops if an ACL entry was found
|
---|
963 | * in the table, and access is either granted or denied.
|
---|
964 | *
|
---|
965 | * 2) Only if no entry was found for the resource in any of the
|
---|
966 | * subject infos, we climb up to the parent directory and
|
---|
967 | * search all subject infos again. Go back to (1).
|
---|
968 | *
|
---|
969 | * 3) After the root directory has been processed and still no
|
---|
970 | * entry exists, access is denied.
|
---|
971 | *
|
---|
972 | * Examples:
|
---|
973 | *
|
---|
974 | * User "dumbo" belongs to the groups "users" and "admins".
|
---|
975 | * The following ACLs are defined:
|
---|
976 | *
|
---|
977 | * -- "users" may read "C:\DIR",
|
---|
978 | *
|
---|
979 | * -- "admins" may read and write "C:\",
|
---|
980 | *
|
---|
981 | * -- "admins" may create directories in "C:\DIR",
|
---|
982 | *
|
---|
983 | * -- "otheruser" may read "C:\OTHERDIR".
|
---|
984 | *
|
---|
985 | * Assuming that only "dumbo" is logged on presently and the following
|
---|
986 | * subject handles have thus been created:
|
---|
987 | *
|
---|
988 | * -- 1 for user "dumbo",
|
---|
989 | *
|
---|
990 | * -- 2 for group "users",
|
---|
991 | *
|
---|
992 | * -- 3 for group "admins",
|
---|
993 | *
|
---|
994 | * the system ACL table will contain the following entries:
|
---|
995 | *
|
---|
996 | * -- "C:\": 3 (group "admins") may read and write;
|
---|
997 | *
|
---|
998 | * -- "C:\DIR": 2 (group "users") may read, 3 (group "admins) may
|
---|
999 | * create directories;
|
---|
1000 | *
|
---|
1001 | * -- "C:\OTHERDIR": this will have a dummy -1 entry with no permissions
|
---|
1002 | * because the only ACL defined is that user "otheruser" may read, and
|
---|
1003 | * that user is not logged on.
|
---|
1004 | *
|
---|
1005 | * 1) Assume a process running on behalf of "dumbo" wants to open
|
---|
1006 | * C:\DIR\SUBDIR\TEXT.DOC for reading.
|
---|
1007 | * Since the security context of "dumbo" has the three subject
|
---|
1008 | * handles for user "dumbo" (1) and the groups "users" (2) and
|
---|
1009 | * "admins" (3), the following happens:
|
---|
1010 | *
|
---|
1011 | * a) We check the system ACL table for "C:\DIR\SUBDIR\TEXT.DOC"
|
---|
1012 | * and find no ACL entry.
|
---|
1013 | *
|
---|
1014 | * b) So we take the parent directory, "C:\DIR\SUBDIR",
|
---|
1015 | * and again we find nothing.
|
---|
1016 | *
|
---|
1017 | * c) Taking the next parent, "C:\DIR\", we find the above two
|
---|
1018 | * subject handles: since "users" (2) may read, and that is
|
---|
1019 | * part of the security context, we grant access.
|
---|
1020 | *
|
---|
1021 | * 2) Now assume that the same process wants to write the file back:
|
---|
1022 | *
|
---|
1023 | * a) Again, we find no ACL entries for "C:\DIR\SUBDIR\TEXT.DOC"
|
---|
1024 | * or "C:\DIR\SUBDIR".
|
---|
1025 | *
|
---|
1026 | * b) Searching for "C:\DIR", we find that "users" (2) may only read,
|
---|
1027 | + but not write. Also, "admins" (3) may create directories under
|
---|
1028 | * "C:\DIR", which is not sufficient either. Since no other entries
|
---|
1029 | * exist for "C:\DIR" that would permit write, we deny access.
|
---|
1030 | * That "admins" may write to "C:\" does not help since more
|
---|
1031 | * specific entries exist for "C:\DIR".
|
---|
1032 | *
|
---|
1033 | * 3) Now assume that the same process wants to create a new directory
|
---|
1034 | * under "C:\DIR\SUBDIR".
|
---|
1035 | *
|
---|
1036 | * a) Again, we find no ACL entries for "C:\DIR\SUBDIR".
|
---|
1037 | *
|
---|
1038 | * b) Searching for "C:\DIR", we find that "users" may only read,
|
---|
1039 | * which does not help. However, "admins" may create directories,
|
---|
1040 | * so we grant access.
|
---|
1041 | *
|
---|
1042 | * 4) Assume now that the process wants to create a new directory under
|
---|
1043 | * "C:\OTHERDIR".
|
---|
1044 | *
|
---|
1045 | * We find the ACL entry for "C:\OTHERDIR" and see only the -1
|
---|
1046 | * subject handle (for user "otheruser", who's not logged on),
|
---|
1047 | * and since no other permissions are set for us, we deny access.
|
---|
1048 | *
|
---|
1049 | *@@added V1.0.1 (2003-01-05) [umoeller]
|
---|
1050 | */
|
---|
1051 |
|
---|
1052 | typedef struct _RESOURCEACL
|
---|
1053 | {
|
---|
1054 | ULONG cbStruct; // size of entire structure; this is
|
---|
1055 | // sizeof(RESOURCEACL)
|
---|
1056 | // + cbName - 1
|
---|
1057 | // + cAccesses * sizeof(ACCESS)
|
---|
1058 | USHORT cAccesses; // no. of entries in array of ACCESS structs;
|
---|
1059 | // this comes right after szName, so its address
|
---|
1060 | // is szName + cbName
|
---|
1061 | USHORT cbName; // offset of array of ACCESS structs after szName
|
---|
1062 | // (includes null terminator and DWORD alignment
|
---|
1063 | // filler bytes)
|
---|
1064 | CHAR szName[1]; // fully qualified filename of this resource
|
---|
1065 | // (zero-terminated)
|
---|
1066 | } RESOURCEACL, *PRESOURCEACL;
|
---|
1067 |
|
---|
1068 | /*
|
---|
1069 | *@@ RING0BUF:
|
---|
1070 | *
|
---|
1071 | *@@added V1.0.1 (2003-01-05) [umoeller]
|
---|
1072 | */
|
---|
1073 |
|
---|
1074 | typedef struct _RING0BUF
|
---|
1075 | {
|
---|
1076 | ULONG cbTotal;
|
---|
1077 | ULONG cSubjectInfos; // no. of subject infos (directly after this struct)
|
---|
1078 | ULONG cACLs; // no. of RESOURCEACL structs (after subject infos)
|
---|
1079 | ULONG ofsACLs; // ofs of first RESOURCEACL struct from beginning of
|
---|
1080 | // RING0BUF
|
---|
1081 | } RING0BUF, *PRING0BUF;
|
---|
1082 |
|
---|
1083 | #endif
|
---|
1084 |
|
---|
1085 | #if __cplusplus
|
---|
1086 | }
|
---|
1087 | #endif
|
---|
1088 |
|
---|