1 | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
|
---|
2 | <!DOCTYPE chapter PUBLIC "-//Samba-Team//DTD DocBook V4.2-Based Variant V1.0//EN" "http://www.samba.org/samba/DTD/samba-doc">
|
---|
3 | <chapter id="securing-samba">
|
---|
4 |
|
---|
5 | <chapterinfo>
|
---|
6 | &author.tridge;
|
---|
7 | &author.jht;
|
---|
8 | <pubdate>May 26, 2003</pubdate>
|
---|
9 | </chapterinfo>
|
---|
10 |
|
---|
11 | <title>Securing Samba</title>
|
---|
12 |
|
---|
13 | <sect1>
|
---|
14 | <title>Introduction</title>
|
---|
15 |
|
---|
16 | <para>
|
---|
17 | <indexterm><primary>security</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
18 | <indexterm><primary>direct internet access</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
19 | <indexterm><primary>firewall</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
20 | <indexterm><primary>private network</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
21 | <indexterm><primary>barriers</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
22 | <indexterm><primary>deterents</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
23 | <indexterm><primary>secured networks</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
24 | The information contained in this chapter applies in general to all Samba installations. Security is
|
---|
25 | everyone's concern in the information technology world. A surprising number of Samba servers are being
|
---|
26 | installed on machines that have direct internet access, thus security is made more critical than it would have been had the
|
---|
27 | server been located behind a firewall and on a private network. Paranoia regarding server security is causing
|
---|
28 | some network administrators to insist on the installation of robust firewalls even on servers that are located
|
---|
29 | inside secured networks. This chapter provides information to assist the administrator who understands
|
---|
30 | how to create the needed barriers and deterents against <quote>the enemy</quote>, no matter where [s]he may
|
---|
31 | come from.
|
---|
32 | </para>
|
---|
33 |
|
---|
34 | <blockquote>
|
---|
35 | <para>
|
---|
36 | A new apprentice reported for duty to the chief engineer of a boiler house. He said, <quote>Here I am,
|
---|
37 | if you will show me the boiler I'll start working on it.</quote> Then engineer replied, <quote>You're leaning
|
---|
38 | on it!</quote>
|
---|
39 | </para>
|
---|
40 | </blockquote>
|
---|
41 |
|
---|
42 | <para>
|
---|
43 | Security concerns are just like that. You need to know a little about the subject to appreciate
|
---|
44 | how obvious most of it really is. The challenge for most of us is to discover that first morsel
|
---|
45 | of knowledge with which we may unlock the secrets of the masters.
|
---|
46 | </para>
|
---|
47 |
|
---|
48 | </sect1>
|
---|
49 |
|
---|
50 | <sect1>
|
---|
51 | <title>Features and Benefits</title>
|
---|
52 |
|
---|
53 | <para>
|
---|
54 | <indexterm><primary>moderately secure</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
55 | <indexterm><primary>perimeter firewall</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
56 | <indexterm><primary>host security</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
57 | <indexterm><primary>Samba security</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
58 | There are three levels at which security principles must be observed in order to render a site
|
---|
59 | at least moderately secure. They are the perimeter firewall, the configuration of the host
|
---|
60 | server that is running Samba, and Samba itself.
|
---|
61 | </para>
|
---|
62 |
|
---|
63 | <para>
|
---|
64 | Samba permits a most flexible approach to network security. As far as possible Samba implements
|
---|
65 | the latest protocols to permit more secure MS Windows file and print operations.
|
---|
66 | </para>
|
---|
67 |
|
---|
68 | <para>
|
---|
69 | <indexterm><primary>host-based protection</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
70 | <indexterm><primary>interface-based exclusion</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
71 | <indexterm><primary>resource-based exclusion</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
72 | Samba can be secured from connections that originate from outside the local network. This can be done using
|
---|
73 | <emphasis>host-based protection</emphasis>, using Samba's implementation of a technology known as
|
---|
74 | <quote>tcpwrappers,</quote> or it may be done be using <emphasis>interface-based exclusion</emphasis> so
|
---|
75 | &smbd; will bind only to specifically permitted interfaces. It is also possible to set specific share- or
|
---|
76 | resource-based exclusions, for example, on the <smbconfsection name="[IPC$]"/> autoshare. The <smbconfsection
|
---|
77 | name="[IPC$]"/> share is used for browsing purposes as well as to establish TCP/IP connections.
|
---|
78 | </para>
|
---|
79 |
|
---|
80 | <para>
|
---|
81 | <indexterm><primary>Access Control Entries</primary><see>ACE</see></indexterm>
|
---|
82 | <indexterm><primary>ACL</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
83 | <indexterm><primary>controls</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
84 | Another method by which Samba may be secured is by setting Access Control Entries (ACEs) in an Access
|
---|
85 | Control List (ACL) on the shares themselves. This is discussed in
|
---|
86 | <link linkend="AccessControls">File, Directory, and Share Access Controls</link>.
|
---|
87 | </para>
|
---|
88 |
|
---|
89 | </sect1>
|
---|
90 |
|
---|
91 | <sect1>
|
---|
92 | <title>Technical Discussion of Protective Measures and Issues</title>
|
---|
93 |
|
---|
94 | <para>
|
---|
95 | The key challenge of security is that protective measures suffice at best
|
---|
96 | only to close the door on known exploits and breach techniques. Never assume that
|
---|
97 | because you have followed these few measures, the Samba server is now an impenetrable
|
---|
98 | fortress! Given the history of information systems so far, it is only a matter of time
|
---|
99 | before someone will find yet another vulnerability.
|
---|
100 | </para>
|
---|
101 |
|
---|
102 | <sect2>
|
---|
103 | <title>Using Host-Based Protection</title>
|
---|
104 |
|
---|
105 | <para>
|
---|
106 | <indexterm><primary>outside threat</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
107 | <indexterm><primary>insecure</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
108 | <indexterm><primary>Internet</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
109 | In many installations of Samba, the greatest threat comes from outside
|
---|
110 | your immediate network. By default, Samba accepts connections from
|
---|
111 | any host, which means that if you run an insecure version of Samba on
|
---|
112 | a host that is directly connected to the Internet, you can be
|
---|
113 | especially vulnerable.
|
---|
114 | </para>
|
---|
115 |
|
---|
116 | <para>
|
---|
117 | <indexterm><primary>allow access</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
118 | <indexterm><primary>range of hosts</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
119 | One of the simplest fixes in this case is to use the <smbconfoption name="hosts allow"/> and
|
---|
120 | <smbconfoption name="hosts deny"/> options in the Samba &smb.conf; configuration file to
|
---|
121 | allow access to your server only from a specific range of hosts. An example might be:
|
---|
122 | <smbconfblock>
|
---|
123 | <smbconfoption name="hosts allow">127.0.0.1 192.168.2.0/24 192.168.3.0/24</smbconfoption>
|
---|
124 | <smbconfoption name="hosts deny">0.0.0.0/0</smbconfoption>
|
---|
125 | </smbconfblock>
|
---|
126 | </para>
|
---|
127 |
|
---|
128 | <para>
|
---|
129 | <indexterm><primary>localhost</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
130 | <indexterm><primary>private networks</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
131 | <indexterm><primary>called name</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
132 | The above will allow SMB connections only from <constant>localhost</constant> (your own
|
---|
133 | computer) and from the two private networks 192.168.2 and 192.168.3. All other
|
---|
134 | connections will be refused as soon as the client sends its first packet. The refusal
|
---|
135 | will be marked as <literal>not listening on called name</literal> error.
|
---|
136 | </para>
|
---|
137 |
|
---|
138 | </sect2>
|
---|
139 |
|
---|
140 | <sect2>
|
---|
141 | <title>User-Based Protection</title>
|
---|
142 |
|
---|
143 | <para>
|
---|
144 | If you want to restrict access to your server to valid users only, then the following
|
---|
145 | method may be of use. In the &smb.conf; <smbconfsection name="[global]"/> section put:
|
---|
146 | <smbconfblock>
|
---|
147 | <smbconfoption name="valid users">@smbusers, jacko</smbconfoption>
|
---|
148 | </smbconfblock>
|
---|
149 | </para>
|
---|
150 |
|
---|
151 | <para>
|
---|
152 | <indexterm><primary>smbusers</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
153 | This restricts all server access either to the user <emphasis>jacko</emphasis>
|
---|
154 | or to members of the system group <emphasis>smbusers</emphasis>.
|
---|
155 | </para>
|
---|
156 |
|
---|
157 | </sect2>
|
---|
158 |
|
---|
159 | <sect2>
|
---|
160 |
|
---|
161 | <title>Using Interface Protection</title>
|
---|
162 |
|
---|
163 | <para>
|
---|
164 | <indexterm><primary>network interface</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
165 | <indexterm><primary>accept connections</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
166 | <indexterm><primary>Internet</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
167 | By default, Samba accepts connections on any network interface that
|
---|
168 | it finds on your system. That means if you have an ISDN line or a PPP
|
---|
169 | connection to the Internet then Samba will accept connections on those
|
---|
170 | links. This may not be what you want.
|
---|
171 | </para>
|
---|
172 |
|
---|
173 | <para>
|
---|
174 | You can change this behavior using options like this:
|
---|
175 | <smbconfblock>
|
---|
176 | <smbconfoption name="interfaces">eth* lo</smbconfoption>
|
---|
177 | <smbconfoption name="bind interfaces only">yes</smbconfoption>
|
---|
178 | </smbconfblock>
|
---|
179 | </para>
|
---|
180 |
|
---|
181 | <para>
|
---|
182 | <indexterm><primary>interfaces</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
183 | <indexterm><primary>loopback interface</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
184 | <indexterm><primary>Ethernet adapters</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
185 | <indexterm><primary>listen for connections</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
186 | This tells Samba to listen for connections only on interfaces with a name starting with
|
---|
187 | <constant>eth</constant> such as <constant>eth0</constant> or <constant>eth1</constant>, plus on the loopback interface called
|
---|
188 | <constant>lo</constant>. The name you will need to use depends on what OS you are using. In the above, I used
|
---|
189 | the common name for Ethernet adapters on Linux.
|
---|
190 | </para>
|
---|
191 |
|
---|
192 | <para>
|
---|
193 | <indexterm><primary>PPP</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
194 | <indexterm><primary>SMB</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
195 | <indexterm><primary>cracker</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
196 | <indexterm><primary>confirm address</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
197 | If you use the above and someone tries to make an SMB connection to your host over a PPP interface called
|
---|
198 | <constant>ppp0</constant>, then [s]he will get a TCP connection refused reply. In that case, no Samba code
|
---|
199 | is run at all, because the operating system has been told not to pass connections from that interface to any
|
---|
200 | Samba process. However, the refusal helps a would-be cracker by confirming that the IP address provides
|
---|
201 | valid active services.
|
---|
202 | </para>
|
---|
203 |
|
---|
204 | <para>
|
---|
205 | <indexterm><primary>ignore connection</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
206 | <indexterm><primary>refusing connection</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
207 | <indexterm><primary>exploitation</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
208 | <indexterm><primary>denial of service</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
209 | <indexterm><primary>firewall</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
210 | A better response would be to ignore the connection (from, for example, ppp0) altogether. The
|
---|
211 | advantage of ignoring the connection attempt, as compared with refusing it, is that it foils those who
|
---|
212 | probe an interface with the sole intention of finding valid IP addresses for later use in exploitation
|
---|
213 | or denial of service attacks. This method of dealing with potential malicious activity demands the
|
---|
214 | use of appropriate firewall mechanisms.
|
---|
215 | </para>
|
---|
216 |
|
---|
217 | </sect2>
|
---|
218 |
|
---|
219 | <sect2 id="firewallports">
|
---|
220 | <title>Using a Firewall</title>
|
---|
221 |
|
---|
222 | <para>
|
---|
223 | <indexterm><primary>deny access</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
224 | <indexterm><primary>exposed</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
225 | <indexterm><primary>firewall active</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
226 | Many people use a firewall to deny access to services they do not want exposed outside their network. This can
|
---|
227 | be a good idea, although I recommend using it in conjunction with the above methods so you are protected even
|
---|
228 | if your firewall is not active for some reason.
|
---|
229 | </para>
|
---|
230 |
|
---|
231 | <para>
|
---|
232 | If you are setting up a firewall, you need to know what TCP and UDP ports to allow and block. Samba uses
|
---|
233 | the following:
|
---|
234 | <indexterm><primary>Port 135/TCP</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
235 | <indexterm><primary>Port 137/UDP</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
236 | <indexterm><primary>Port 138/UDP</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
237 | <indexterm><primary>Port 139/TCP</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
238 | <indexterm><primary>Port 445/TCP</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
239 | </para>
|
---|
240 |
|
---|
241 | <simplelist>
|
---|
242 | <member>Port 135/TCP - used by smbd</member>
|
---|
243 | <member>Port 137/UDP - used by nmbd</member>
|
---|
244 | <member>Port 138/UDP - used by nmbd</member>
|
---|
245 | <member>Port 139/TCP - used by smbd</member>
|
---|
246 | <member>Port 445/TCP - used by smbd</member>
|
---|
247 | </simplelist>
|
---|
248 |
|
---|
249 | <para>
|
---|
250 | <indexterm><primary>firewall setups</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
251 | The last one is important because many older firewall setups may not be aware of it, given that this port
|
---|
252 | was only added to the protocol in recent years.
|
---|
253 | </para>
|
---|
254 |
|
---|
255 | <para>
|
---|
256 | <indexterm><primary>configuring a firewall</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
257 | <indexterm><primary>high order ports</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
258 | <indexterm><primary>block incoming packets</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
259 | When configuring a firewall, the high order ports (1024-65535) are often used for outgoing connections and
|
---|
260 | therefore should be permitted through the firewall. It is prudent to block incoming packets on the high order
|
---|
261 | ports except for established connections.
|
---|
262 | </para>
|
---|
263 |
|
---|
264 | </sect2>
|
---|
265 |
|
---|
266 | <sect2>
|
---|
267 | <title>Using IPC$ Share-Based Denials </title>
|
---|
268 |
|
---|
269 | <para>
|
---|
270 | <indexterm><primary>IPC$</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
271 | <indexterm><primary>deny</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
272 | <indexterm><primary>security hole</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
273 | If the above methods are not suitable, then you could also place a more specific deny on the IPC$ share that
|
---|
274 | is used in the recently discovered security hole. This allows you to offer access to other shares while
|
---|
275 | denying access to IPC$ from potentially untrustworthy hosts.
|
---|
276 | </para>
|
---|
277 |
|
---|
278 | <para>
|
---|
279 | To do this you could use:
|
---|
280 | <smbconfblock>
|
---|
281 | <smbconfsection name="[IPC$]"/>
|
---|
282 | <smbconfoption name="hosts allow">192.168.115.0/24 127.0.0.1</smbconfoption>
|
---|
283 | <smbconfoption name="hosts deny">0.0.0.0/0</smbconfoption>
|
---|
284 | </smbconfblock>
|
---|
285 | </para>
|
---|
286 |
|
---|
287 | <para>
|
---|
288 | <indexterm><primary>IPC$</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
289 | <indexterm><primary>protection against attackers</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
290 | <indexterm><primary>valid username/password</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
291 | This instructs Samba that IPC$ connections are not allowed from anywhere except the two listed network
|
---|
292 | addresses (localhost and the 192.168.115 subnet). Connections to other shares are still allowed. Because the
|
---|
293 | IPC$ share is the only share that is always accessible anonymously, this provides some level of protection
|
---|
294 | against attackers who do not know a valid username/password for your host.
|
---|
295 | </para>
|
---|
296 |
|
---|
297 | <para>
|
---|
298 | <indexterm><primary>access denied</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
299 | <indexterm><primary>IPC$</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
300 | <indexterm><primary>browse shares</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
301 | If you use this method, then clients will be given an <literal>`access denied'</literal> reply when they try
|
---|
302 | to access the IPC$ share. Those clients will not be able to browse shares and may also be unable to access
|
---|
303 | some other resources. This is not recommended unless for some reason you cannot use one of the other methods
|
---|
304 | just discussed.
|
---|
305 | </para>
|
---|
306 |
|
---|
307 | </sect2>
|
---|
308 |
|
---|
309 | <sect2>
|
---|
310 | <title>NTLMv2 Security</title>
|
---|
311 |
|
---|
312 | <para>
|
---|
313 | <indexterm><primary>NTLMv2</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
314 | To configure NTLMv2 authentication, the following registry keys are worth knowing about:
|
---|
315 | </para>
|
---|
316 |
|
---|
317 | <para>
|
---|
318 | <screen>
|
---|
319 | [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa]
|
---|
320 | "lmcompatibilitylevel"=dword:00000003
|
---|
321 | </screen>
|
---|
322 | </para>
|
---|
323 |
|
---|
324 | <para>
|
---|
325 | The value 0x00000003 means to send NTLMv2 response only. Clients will use NTLMv2 authentication;
|
---|
326 | use NTLMv2 session security if the server supports it. Domain controllers accept LM,
|
---|
327 | NTLM, and NTLMv2 authentication.
|
---|
328 | </para>
|
---|
329 |
|
---|
330 | <para>
|
---|
331 | <screen>
|
---|
332 | [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa\MSV1_0]
|
---|
333 | "NtlmMinClientSec"=dword:00080000
|
---|
334 | </screen>
|
---|
335 | </para>
|
---|
336 |
|
---|
337 | <para>
|
---|
338 | The value 0x00080000 means permit only NTLMv2 session security. If either NtlmMinClientSec or
|
---|
339 | NtlmMinServerSec is set to 0x00080000, the connection will fail if NTLMv2
|
---|
340 | session security is negotiated.
|
---|
341 | </para>
|
---|
342 | </sect2>
|
---|
343 | </sect1>
|
---|
344 |
|
---|
345 | <sect1>
|
---|
346 | <title>Upgrading Samba</title>
|
---|
347 |
|
---|
348 | <para>
|
---|
349 | <indexterm><primary>updates</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
350 | <indexterm><primary>important announcements</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
351 | <indexterm><primary>security vulnerability</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
352 | Please check regularly on <ulink noescape="1" url="http://www.samba.org/">http://www.samba.org/</ulink> for
|
---|
353 | updates and important announcements. Occasionally security releases are made, and it is highly recommended to
|
---|
354 | upgrade Samba promptly when a security vulnerability is discovered. Check with your OS vendor for OS-specific
|
---|
355 | upgrades.
|
---|
356 | </para>
|
---|
357 |
|
---|
358 | </sect1>
|
---|
359 |
|
---|
360 | <sect1>
|
---|
361 | <title>Common Errors</title>
|
---|
362 |
|
---|
363 | <para>
|
---|
364 | If all Samba and host platform configurations were really as intuitive as one might like them to be, this
|
---|
365 | chapter would not be necessary. Security issues are often vexing for a support person to resolve, not because
|
---|
366 | of the complexity of the problem, but because most administrators who post what turns out to be a security
|
---|
367 | problem request are totally convinced that the problem is with Samba.
|
---|
368 | </para>
|
---|
369 |
|
---|
370 | <sect2>
|
---|
371 | <title>Smbclient Works on Localhost, but the Network Is Dead</title>
|
---|
372 |
|
---|
373 | <para>
|
---|
374 | This is a common problem. Linux vendors tend to install a default firewall.
|
---|
375 | With the default firewall in place, only traffic on the loopback adapter (IP address 127.0.0.1)
|
---|
376 | is allowed through the firewall.
|
---|
377 | </para>
|
---|
378 |
|
---|
379 | <para>
|
---|
380 | The solution is either to remove the firewall (stop it) or modify the firewall script to
|
---|
381 | allow SMB networking traffic through. See <link linkend="firewallports">the Using a
|
---|
382 | Firewall</link> section.
|
---|
383 | </para>
|
---|
384 |
|
---|
385 | </sect2>
|
---|
386 |
|
---|
387 | <sect2>
|
---|
388 | <title>Why Can Users Access Other Users' Home Directories?</title>
|
---|
389 |
|
---|
390 | <para>
|
---|
391 | <quote>
|
---|
392 | <indexterm><primary>mapping home directory</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
393 | <indexterm><primary>own home directory</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
394 | We are unable to keep individual users from mapping to any other user's home directory once they have
|
---|
395 | supplied a valid password! They only need to enter their own password. I have not found any method to
|
---|
396 | configure Samba so that users may map only their own home directory.
|
---|
397 | </quote>
|
---|
398 | </para>
|
---|
399 |
|
---|
400 | <para><quote>
|
---|
401 | User xyzzy can map his home directory. Once mapped, user xyzzy can also map anyone else's home directory.
|
---|
402 | </quote></para>
|
---|
403 |
|
---|
404 | <para>
|
---|
405 | <indexterm><primary>security flaw</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
406 | <indexterm><primary>defined shares</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
407 | This is not a security flaw, it is by design. Samba allows users to have exactly the same access to the UNIX
|
---|
408 | file system as when they were logged on to the UNIX box, except that it only allows such views onto the file
|
---|
409 | system as are allowed by the defined shares.
|
---|
410 | </para>
|
---|
411 |
|
---|
412 | <para>
|
---|
413 | <indexterm><primary>UNIX home directories</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
414 | <indexterm><primary>permissions</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
415 | If your UNIX home directories are set up so that one user can happily <command>cd</command>
|
---|
416 | into another user's directory and execute <command>ls</command>, the UNIX security solution is to change file
|
---|
417 | permissions on the user's home directories so that the <command>cd</command> and <command>ls</command> are denied.
|
---|
418 | </para>
|
---|
419 |
|
---|
420 | <para>
|
---|
421 | <indexterm><primary>security policies</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
422 | <indexterm><primary>permissions</primary></indexterm>
|
---|
423 | Samba tries very hard not to second guess the UNIX administrator's security policies and
|
---|
424 | trusts the UNIX admin to set the policies and permissions he or she desires.
|
---|
425 | </para>
|
---|
426 |
|
---|
427 | <para>
|
---|
428 | Samba allows the behavior you require. Simply put the <smbconfoption name="only user">%S</smbconfoption>
|
---|
429 | option in the <smbconfsection name="[homes]"/> share definition.
|
---|
430 | </para>
|
---|
431 |
|
---|
432 | <para>
|
---|
433 | The <smbconfoption name="only user"></smbconfoption> works in conjunction with the <smbconfoption name="users">list</smbconfoption>,
|
---|
434 | so to get the behavior you require, add the line:
|
---|
435 | <smbconfblock>
|
---|
436 | <smbconfoption name="users">%S</smbconfoption>
|
---|
437 | </smbconfblock>
|
---|
438 | This is equivalent to adding
|
---|
439 | <smbconfblock>
|
---|
440 | <smbconfoption name="valid users">%S</smbconfoption>
|
---|
441 | </smbconfblock>
|
---|
442 | to the definition of the <smbconfsection name="[homes]"/> share, as recommended in
|
---|
443 | the &smb.conf; man page.
|
---|
444 | </para>
|
---|
445 | </sect2>
|
---|
446 |
|
---|
447 | </sect1>
|
---|
448 | </chapter>
|
---|