| 1 | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
|
|---|
| 2 | <!DOCTYPE chapter PUBLIC "-//Samba-Team//DTD DocBook V4.2-Based Variant V1.0//EN" "http://www.samba.org/samba/DTD/samba-doc">
|
|---|
| 3 | <chapter id="net2000users">
|
|---|
| 4 | <title>A Distributed 2000-User Network</title>
|
|---|
| 5 |
|
|---|
| 6 | <para>
|
|---|
| 7 | There is something indeed mystical about things that are
|
|---|
| 8 | big. Large networks exhibit a certain magnetism and exude a sense of
|
|---|
| 9 | importance that obscures reality. You and I know that it is no more
|
|---|
| 10 | difficult to secure a large network than it is a small one. We all
|
|---|
| 11 | know that over and above a particular number of network clients, the
|
|---|
| 12 | rules no longer change; the only real dynamic is the size of the domain
|
|---|
| 13 | (much like a kingdom) over which the network ruler (oops, administrator)
|
|---|
| 14 | has control. The real dynamic then transforms from the technical to the
|
|---|
| 15 | political. Then again, that point is often reached well before the
|
|---|
| 16 | kingdom (or queendom) grows large.
|
|---|
| 17 | </para>
|
|---|
| 18 |
|
|---|
| 19 | <para>
|
|---|
| 20 | If you have systematically worked your way to this chapter, hopefully you
|
|---|
| 21 | have found some gems and techniques that are applicable in your
|
|---|
| 22 | world. The network designs you have worked with in this book have their
|
|---|
| 23 | strong points as well as weak ones. That is to be expected given that
|
|---|
| 24 | they are based on real business environments, the specifics of which are
|
|---|
| 25 | molded to serve the purposes of this book.
|
|---|
| 26 | </para>
|
|---|
| 27 |
|
|---|
| 28 | <para>
|
|---|
| 29 | This chapter is intent on wrapping up issues that are central to
|
|---|
| 30 | implementation and design of progressively larger networks. Are you ready
|
|---|
| 31 | for this chapter? Good, it is time to move on.
|
|---|
| 32 | </para>
|
|---|
| 33 |
|
|---|
| 34 | <para>
|
|---|
| 35 | In previous chapters, you made the assumption that your network
|
|---|
| 36 | administration staff need detailed instruction right down to the
|
|---|
| 37 | nuts and bolts of implementing the solution. That is still the case,
|
|---|
| 38 | but they have graduated now. You decide to document only those issues,
|
|---|
| 39 | methods, and techniques that are new or complex. Routine tasks such as
|
|---|
| 40 | implementing a DNS or a DHCP server are under control. Even the basics of
|
|---|
| 41 | Samba are largely under control. So in this section you focus on the
|
|---|
| 42 | specifics of implementing LDAP changes, Samba changes, and approach and
|
|---|
| 43 | design of the solution and its deployment.
|
|---|
| 44 | </para>
|
|---|
| 45 |
|
|---|
| 46 | <sect1>
|
|---|
| 47 | <title>Introduction</title>
|
|---|
| 48 |
|
|---|
| 49 | <para>
|
|---|
| 50 | Abmas is a miracle company. Most businesses would have collapsed under
|
|---|
| 51 | the weight of rapid expansion that this company has experienced. Samba
|
|---|
| 52 | is flexible, so there is no need to reinstall the whole operating
|
|---|
| 53 | system just because you need to implement a new network design. In fact,
|
|---|
| 54 | you can keep an old server running right up to the moment of cutover
|
|---|
| 55 | and then do a near-live conversion. There is no need to reinstall a
|
|---|
| 56 | Samba server just to change the way your network should function.
|
|---|
| 57 | </para>
|
|---|
| 58 |
|
|---|
| 59 | <para>
|
|---|
| 60 | <indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 61 | Network growth is common to all organizations. In this exercise,
|
|---|
| 62 | your preoccupation is with the mechanics of implementing Samba and
|
|---|
| 63 | LDAP so that network users on each network segment can work
|
|---|
| 64 | without impediment.
|
|---|
| 65 | </para>
|
|---|
| 66 |
|
|---|
| 67 | <sect2>
|
|---|
| 68 | <title>Assignment Tasks</title>
|
|---|
| 69 |
|
|---|
| 70 | <para>
|
|---|
| 71 | Starting with the configuration files for the server called
|
|---|
| 72 | <constant>MASSIVE</constant> in <link linkend="happy"/>, you now deal with the
|
|---|
| 73 | issues that are particular to large distributed networks. Your task
|
|---|
| 74 | is simple &smbmdash; identify the challenges, consider the
|
|---|
| 75 | alternatives, and then design and implement a solution.
|
|---|
| 76 | </para>
|
|---|
| 77 |
|
|---|
| 78 | <para>
|
|---|
| 79 | <indexterm><primary>VPN</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 80 | Remember, you have users based in London (UK), Los Angeles,
|
|---|
| 81 | Washington. DC, and, three buildings in New York. A significant portion
|
|---|
| 82 | of your workforce have notebook computers and roam all over the
|
|---|
| 83 | world. Some dial into the office, others use VPN connections over the
|
|---|
| 84 | Internet, and others just move between buildings.i
|
|---|
| 85 | </para>
|
|---|
| 86 |
|
|---|
| 87 | <para>
|
|---|
| 88 | What do you say to an employee who normally uses a desktop
|
|---|
| 89 | system but must spend six weeks on the road with a notebook computer?
|
|---|
| 90 | She is concerned about email access and how to keep coworkers current
|
|---|
| 91 | with changing documents.
|
|---|
| 92 | </para>
|
|---|
| 93 |
|
|---|
| 94 | <para>
|
|---|
| 95 | To top it all off, you have one network support person and one
|
|---|
| 96 | help desk person based in London, a single person dedicated to all
|
|---|
| 97 | network operations in Los Angeles, five staff for user administration
|
|---|
| 98 | and help desk in New York, plus one <emphasis>floater</emphasis> for
|
|---|
| 99 | Washington.
|
|---|
| 100 | </para>
|
|---|
| 101 |
|
|---|
| 102 | <para>
|
|---|
| 103 | You have outsourced all desktop deployment and management to
|
|---|
| 104 | DirectPointe. Your concern is server maintenance and third-level
|
|---|
| 105 | support. Build a plan and show what must be done.
|
|---|
| 106 | </para>
|
|---|
| 107 |
|
|---|
| 108 | </sect2>
|
|---|
| 109 | </sect1>
|
|---|
| 110 |
|
|---|
| 111 | <sect1>
|
|---|
| 112 | <title>Dissection and Discussion</title>
|
|---|
| 113 |
|
|---|
| 114 | <para>
|
|---|
| 115 | <indexterm><primary>passdb backend</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 116 | <indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 117 | In <link linkend="happy"/>, you implemented an LDAP server that provided the
|
|---|
| 118 | <parameter>passdb backend</parameter> for the Samba servers. You
|
|---|
| 119 | explored ways to accelerate Windows desktop profile handling and you
|
|---|
| 120 | took control of network performance.
|
|---|
| 121 | </para>
|
|---|
| 122 |
|
|---|
| 123 | <para>
|
|---|
| 124 | <indexterm><primary>ldapsam</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 125 | <indexterm><primary>tdbsam</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 126 | <indexterm><primary>smbpasswd</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 127 | <indexterm><primary>replicated</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 128 | The implementation of an LDAP-based passdb backend (known as
|
|---|
| 129 | <emphasis>ldapsam</emphasis> in Samba parlance), or some form of database
|
|---|
| 130 | that can be distributed, is essential to permit the deployment of Samba
|
|---|
| 131 | Primary and Backup Domain Controllers (PDC/BDCs). You see, the problem
|
|---|
| 132 | is that the <emphasis>tdbsam</emphasis>-style passdb backend does not
|
|---|
| 133 | lend itself to being replicated. The older plain-text-based
|
|---|
| 134 | <emphasis>smbpasswd</emphasis>-style passdb backend can be replicated
|
|---|
| 135 | using a tool such as <command>rsync</command>, but
|
|---|
| 136 | <emphasis>smbpasswd</emphasis> suffers the drawback that it does not
|
|---|
| 137 | support the range of account facilities demanded by modern network
|
|---|
| 138 | managers.
|
|---|
| 139 | </para>
|
|---|
| 140 |
|
|---|
| 141 | <para>
|
|---|
| 142 | <indexterm><primary>XML</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 143 | <indexterm><primary>SQL</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 144 | The new <emphasis>tdbsam</emphasis> facility supports functionality
|
|---|
| 145 | that is similar to an <emphasis>ldapsam</emphasis>, but the lack of
|
|---|
| 146 | distributed infrastructure sorely limits the scope for its
|
|---|
| 147 | deployment. This raises the following questions: Why can't I just use
|
|---|
| 148 | an XML-based backend, or for that matter, why not use an SQL-based
|
|---|
| 149 | backend? Is support for these tools broken? Answers to these
|
|---|
| 150 | questions require a bit of background.</para>
|
|---|
| 151 |
|
|---|
| 152 | <para>
|
|---|
| 153 | <indexterm><primary>directory</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 154 | <indexterm><primary>database</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 155 | <indexterm><primary>transaction processing</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 156 | <indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 157 | <emphasis>What is a directory?</emphasis> A directory is a
|
|---|
| 158 | collection of information regarding objects that can be accessed to
|
|---|
| 159 | rapidly find information that is relevant in a particular and
|
|---|
| 160 | consistent manner. A directory differs from a database in that it is
|
|---|
| 161 | generally more often searched (read) than updated. As a consequence, the
|
|---|
| 162 | information is organized to facilitate read access rather than to
|
|---|
| 163 | support transaction processing.</para>
|
|---|
| 164 |
|
|---|
| 165 | <para>
|
|---|
| 166 | <indexterm><primary>Lightweight Directory Access Protocol</primary><see>LDAP</see></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 167 | <indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 168 | <indexterm><primary>master</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 169 | <indexterm><primary>slave</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 170 | The Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) differs
|
|---|
| 171 | considerably from a traditional database. It has a simple search
|
|---|
| 172 | facility that uniquely makes a highly preferred mechanism for managing
|
|---|
| 173 | user identities. LDAP provides a scalable mechanism for distributing
|
|---|
| 174 | the data repository and for keeping all copies (slaves) in sync with
|
|---|
| 175 | the master repository.</para>
|
|---|
| 176 |
|
|---|
| 177 | <para>
|
|---|
| 178 | <indexterm><primary>identity management</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 179 | <indexterm><primary>Active Directory</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 180 | <indexterm><primary>OpenLDAP</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 181 | Samba is a flexible and powerful file and print sharing
|
|---|
| 182 | technology. It can use many external authentication sources and can be
|
|---|
| 183 | part of a total authentication and identity management
|
|---|
| 184 | infrastructure. The two most important external sources for large sites
|
|---|
| 185 | are Microsoft Active Directory and LDAP. Sites that specifically wish to
|
|---|
| 186 | avoid the proprietary implications of Microsoft Active Directory
|
|---|
| 187 | naturally gravitate toward OpenLDAP.</para>
|
|---|
| 188 |
|
|---|
| 189 | <para>
|
|---|
| 190 | <indexterm><primary>network</primary><secondary>routed</secondary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 191 | In <link linkend="happy"/>, you had to deal with a locally routed
|
|---|
| 192 | network. All deployment concerns focused around making users happy,
|
|---|
| 193 | and that simply means taking control over all network practices and
|
|---|
| 194 | usage so that no one user is disadvantaged by any other. The real
|
|---|
| 195 | lesson is one of understanding that no matter how much network
|
|---|
| 196 | bandwidth you provide, bandwidth remains a precious resource.</para>
|
|---|
| 197 |
|
|---|
| 198 | <para>In this chapter, you must now consider how the overall network must
|
|---|
| 199 | function. In particular, you must be concerned with users who move
|
|---|
| 200 | between offices. You must take into account the way users need to
|
|---|
| 201 | access information globally. And you must make the network robust
|
|---|
| 202 | enough so that it can sustain partial breakdown without causing loss of
|
|---|
| 203 | productivity.</para>
|
|---|
| 204 |
|
|---|
| 205 | <sect2>
|
|---|
| 206 | <title>Technical Issues</title>
|
|---|
| 207 |
|
|---|
| 208 | <para>
|
|---|
| 209 | There are at least three areas that need to be addressed as you
|
|---|
| 210 | approach the challenge of designing a network solution for the newly
|
|---|
| 211 | expanded business:
|
|---|
| 212 | </para>
|
|---|
| 213 |
|
|---|
| 214 | <itemizedlist>
|
|---|
| 215 | <listitem><para><indexterm><primary>mobility</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 216 | User needs such as mobility and data access</para></listitem>
|
|---|
| 217 |
|
|---|
| 218 | <listitem><para>The nature of Windows networking protocols</para></listitem>
|
|---|
| 219 |
|
|---|
| 220 | <listitem><para>Identity management infrastructure needs</para></listitem>
|
|---|
| 221 | </itemizedlist>
|
|---|
| 222 |
|
|---|
| 223 | <para>Let's look at each in turn.</para>
|
|---|
| 224 |
|
|---|
| 225 | <sect3>
|
|---|
| 226 | <title>User Needs</title>
|
|---|
| 227 |
|
|---|
| 228 | <para>
|
|---|
| 229 | The new company has three divisions. Staff for each division are spread across
|
|---|
| 230 | the company. Some staff are office-bound and some are mobile users. Mobile
|
|---|
| 231 | users travel globally. Some spend considerable periods working in other offices.
|
|---|
| 232 | Everyone wants to be able to work without constraint of productivity.
|
|---|
| 233 | </para>
|
|---|
| 234 |
|
|---|
| 235 | <para>
|
|---|
| 236 | The challenge is not insignificant. In some parts of the world, even dial-up
|
|---|
| 237 | connectivity is poor, while in other regions political encumbrances severely
|
|---|
| 238 | curtail user needs. Parts of the global Internet infrastructure remain shielded
|
|---|
| 239 | off for reasons outside the scope of this discussion.
|
|---|
| 240 | </para>
|
|---|
| 241 |
|
|---|
| 242 | <para>
|
|---|
| 243 | <indexterm><primary>synchronize</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 244 | Decisions must be made regarding where data is to be stored, how it will be
|
|---|
| 245 | replicated (if at all), and what the network bandwidth implications are. For
|
|---|
| 246 | example, one decision that can be made is to give each office its own master
|
|---|
| 247 | file storage area that can be synchronized to a central repository in New
|
|---|
| 248 | York. This would permit global data to be backed up from a single location.
|
|---|
| 249 | The synchronization tool could be <command>rsync,</command> run via a cron
|
|---|
| 250 | job. Mobile users may use off-line file storage under Windows XP Professional.
|
|---|
| 251 | This way, they can synchronize all files that have changed since each logon
|
|---|
| 252 | to the network.
|
|---|
| 253 | </para>
|
|---|
| 254 |
|
|---|
| 255 | <para>
|
|---|
| 256 | <indexterm><primary>bandwidth</primary><secondary>requirements</secondary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 257 | <indexterm><primary>roaming profile</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 258 | No matter which way you look at this, the bandwidth requirements
|
|---|
| 259 | for acceptable performance are substantial even if only 10 percent of
|
|---|
| 260 | staff are global data users. A company with 3,500 employees,
|
|---|
| 261 | 280 of whom are mobile users who use a similarly distributed
|
|---|
| 262 | network, found they needed at least 2 Mb/sec connectivity
|
|---|
| 263 | between the UK and US offices. Even over 2 Mb/sec bandwidth, this
|
|---|
| 264 | company abandoned any attempt to run roaming profile usage for
|
|---|
| 265 | mobile users. At that time, the average roaming profile took 480
|
|---|
| 266 | KB, while today the minimum Windows XP Professional roaming
|
|---|
| 267 | profile involves a transfer of over 750 KB from the profile
|
|---|
| 268 | server to and from the client.
|
|---|
| 269 | </para>
|
|---|
| 270 |
|
|---|
| 271 | <para>
|
|---|
| 272 | <indexterm><primary>wide-area</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 273 | Obviously then, user needs and wide-area practicalities dictate the economic and
|
|---|
| 274 | technical aspects of your network design as well as for standard operating procedures.
|
|---|
| 275 | </para>
|
|---|
| 276 |
|
|---|
| 277 | </sect3>
|
|---|
| 278 |
|
|---|
| 279 | <sect3>
|
|---|
| 280 | <title>The Nature of Windows Networking Protocols</title>
|
|---|
| 281 |
|
|---|
| 282 | <para>
|
|---|
| 283 | <indexterm><primary>profile</primary><secondary>mandatory</secondary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 284 | Network logons that include roaming profile handling requires from 140 KB to 2 MB.
|
|---|
| 285 | The inclusion of support for a minimal set of common desktop applications can push
|
|---|
| 286 | the size of a complete profile to over 15 MB. This has substantial implications
|
|---|
| 287 | for location of user profiles. Additionally, it is a significant factor in
|
|---|
| 288 | determining the nature and style of mandatory profiles that may be enforced as
|
|---|
| 289 | part of a total service-level assurance program that might be implemented.
|
|---|
| 290 | </para>
|
|---|
| 291 |
|
|---|
| 292 | <para>
|
|---|
| 293 | <indexterm><primary>logon traffic</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 294 | <indexterm><primary>redirected folders</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 295 | One way to reduce the network bandwidth impact of user logon
|
|---|
| 296 | traffic is through folder redirection. In <link linkend="happy"/>, you
|
|---|
| 297 | implemented this in the new Windows XP Professional standard
|
|---|
| 298 | desktop configuration. When desktop folders such as <guimenu>My
|
|---|
| 299 | Documents</guimenu> are redirected to a network drive, they should
|
|---|
| 300 | also be excluded from synchronization to and from the server on
|
|---|
| 301 | logon or logout. Redirected folders are analogous to network drive
|
|---|
| 302 | connections.
|
|---|
| 303 | </para>
|
|---|
| 304 |
|
|---|
| 305 | <para><indexterm><primary>application servers</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 306 | Of course, network applications should only be run off
|
|---|
| 307 | local application servers. As a general rule, even with 2 Mb/sec
|
|---|
| 308 | network bandwidth, it would not make sense at all for someone who
|
|---|
| 309 | is working out of the London office to run applications off a
|
|---|
| 310 | server that is located in New York.
|
|---|
| 311 | </para>
|
|---|
| 312 |
|
|---|
| 313 | <para>
|
|---|
| 314 | <indexterm><primary>affordability</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 315 | When network bandwidth becomes a precious commodity (that is most
|
|---|
| 316 | of the time), there is a significant demand to understand network
|
|---|
| 317 | processes and to mold the limits of acceptability around the
|
|---|
| 318 | constraints of affordability.
|
|---|
| 319 | </para>
|
|---|
| 320 |
|
|---|
| 321 | <para>
|
|---|
| 322 | When a Windows NT4/200x/XP Professional client user logs onto
|
|---|
| 323 | the network, several important things must happen.
|
|---|
| 324 | </para>
|
|---|
| 325 |
|
|---|
| 326 | <itemizedlist>
|
|---|
| 327 | <listitem><para>
|
|---|
| 328 | <indexterm><primary>DHCP</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 329 | The client obtains an IP address via DHCP. (DHCP is
|
|---|
| 330 | necessary so that users can roam between offices.)
|
|---|
| 331 | </para></listitem>
|
|---|
| 332 |
|
|---|
| 333 | <listitem><para>
|
|---|
| 334 | <indexterm><primary>WINS</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 335 | <indexterm><primary>DNS</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 336 | The client must register itself with the WINS and/or DNS server.
|
|---|
| 337 | </para></listitem>
|
|---|
| 338 |
|
|---|
| 339 | <listitem><para>
|
|---|
| 340 | <indexterm><primary>Domain Controller</primary><secondary>closest</secondary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 341 | The client must locate the closest domain controller.
|
|---|
| 342 | </para></listitem>
|
|---|
| 343 |
|
|---|
| 344 | <listitem><para>
|
|---|
| 345 | The client must log onto a domain controller and obtain as part of
|
|---|
| 346 | that process the location of the user's profile, load it, connect to
|
|---|
| 347 | redirected folders, and establish all network drive and printer connections.
|
|---|
| 348 | </para></listitem>
|
|---|
| 349 |
|
|---|
| 350 | <listitem><para>
|
|---|
| 351 | The domain controller must be able to resolve the user's
|
|---|
| 352 | credentials before the logon process is fully implemented.
|
|---|
| 353 | </para></listitem>
|
|---|
| 354 | </itemizedlist>
|
|---|
| 355 |
|
|---|
| 356 | <para>
|
|---|
| 357 | Given that this book is about Samba and that it implements the Windows
|
|---|
| 358 | NT4-style domain semantics, it makes little sense to compare Samba with
|
|---|
| 359 | Microsoft Active Directory insofar as the logon protocols and principles
|
|---|
| 360 | of operation are concerned. The following information pertains exclusively
|
|---|
| 361 | to the interaction between a Windows XP Professional workstation and a
|
|---|
| 362 | Samba-3.0.20 server. In the discussion that follows, use is made of DHCP and WINS.
|
|---|
| 363 | </para>
|
|---|
| 364 |
|
|---|
| 365 | <para>
|
|---|
| 366 | As soon as the Windows workstation starts up, it obtains an
|
|---|
| 367 | IP address. This is immediately followed by registration of its
|
|---|
| 368 | name both by broadcast and Unicast registration that is directed
|
|---|
| 369 | at the WINS server.
|
|---|
| 370 | </para>
|
|---|
| 371 |
|
|---|
| 372 | <para>
|
|---|
| 373 | <indexterm><primary>Unicast</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 374 | <indexterm><primary>broadcast</primary><secondary>directed</secondary>
|
|---|
| 375 | </indexterm><indexterm><primary>NetBIOS</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 376 | Given that the client is already a domain member, it then sends
|
|---|
| 377 | a directed (Unicast) request to the WINS server seeking the list of
|
|---|
| 378 | IP addresses for domain controllers (NetBIOS name type 0x1C). The
|
|---|
| 379 | WINS server replies with the information requested.</para>
|
|---|
| 380 |
|
|---|
| 381 | <para>
|
|---|
| 382 | <indexterm><primary>broadcast</primary><secondary>mailslot</secondary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 383 | <indexterm><primary>Unicast</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 384 | <indexterm><primary>WINS</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 385 | The client sends two netlogon mailslot broadcast requests
|
|---|
| 386 | to the local network and to each of the IP addresses returned by
|
|---|
| 387 | the WINS server. Whichever answers this request first appears to
|
|---|
| 388 | be the machine that the Windows XP client attempts to use to
|
|---|
| 389 | process the network logon. The mailslot messages use UDP broadcast
|
|---|
| 390 | to the local network and UDP Unicast directed at each machine that
|
|---|
| 391 | was listed in the WINS server response to a request for the list of
|
|---|
| 392 | domain controllers.
|
|---|
| 393 | </para>
|
|---|
| 394 |
|
|---|
| 395 | <para>
|
|---|
| 396 | <indexterm><primary>protocol</primary><secondary>negotiation</secondary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 397 | <indexterm><primary>logon server</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 398 | <indexterm><primary>fail</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 399 | The logon process begins with negotiation of the SMB/CIFS
|
|---|
| 400 | protocols that are to be used; this is followed by an exchange of
|
|---|
| 401 | information that ultimately includes the client sending the
|
|---|
| 402 | credentials with which the user is attempting to logon. The logon
|
|---|
| 403 | server must now approve the further establishment of the
|
|---|
| 404 | connection, but that is a good point to halt for now. The priority
|
|---|
| 405 | here must center around identification of network infrastructure
|
|---|
| 406 | needs. A secondary fact we need to know is, what happens when
|
|---|
| 407 | local domain controllers fail or break?
|
|---|
| 408 | </para>
|
|---|
| 409 |
|
|---|
| 410 | <para>
|
|---|
| 411 | <indexterm><primary>Domain Controller</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 412 | <indexterm><primary>PDC</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 413 | <indexterm><primary>BDC</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 414 | <indexterm><primary>netlogon</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 415 | Under most circumstances, the nearest domain controller
|
|---|
| 416 | responds to the netlogon mailslot broadcast. The exception to this
|
|---|
| 417 | norm occurs when the nearest domain controller is too busy or is out
|
|---|
| 418 | of service. Herein lies an important fact. This means it is
|
|---|
| 419 | important that every network segment should have at least two
|
|---|
| 420 | domain controllers. Since there can be only one PDC, all additional
|
|---|
| 421 | domain controllers are by definition BDCs.
|
|---|
| 422 | </para>
|
|---|
| 423 |
|
|---|
| 424 | <para>
|
|---|
| 425 | <indexterm><primary>authentication</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 426 | <indexterm><primary>Identity Management</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 427 | The provision of sufficient servers that are BDCs is an
|
|---|
| 428 | important design factor. The second important design factor
|
|---|
| 429 | involves how each of the BDCs obtains user authentication
|
|---|
| 430 | data. That is the subject of the next section, which involves key
|
|---|
| 431 | decisions regarding Identity Management facilities.
|
|---|
| 432 | </para>
|
|---|
| 433 |
|
|---|
| 434 | </sect3>
|
|---|
| 435 |
|
|---|
| 436 | <sect3>
|
|---|
| 437 | <title>Identity Management Needs</title>
|
|---|
| 438 |
|
|---|
| 439 | <para>
|
|---|
| 440 | <indexterm><primary>privacy</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 441 | <indexterm><primary>user credentials</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 442 | <indexterm><primary>validated</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 443 | <indexterm><primary>privileges</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 444 | Network managers recognize that in large organizations users
|
|---|
| 445 | generally need to be given resource access based on needs, while
|
|---|
| 446 | being excluded from other resources for reasons of privacy. It is
|
|---|
| 447 | therefore essential that all users identify themselves at the
|
|---|
| 448 | point of network access. The network logon is the principal means
|
|---|
| 449 | by which user credentials are validated and filtered and appropriate
|
|---|
| 450 | rights and privileges are allocated.
|
|---|
| 451 | </para>
|
|---|
| 452 |
|
|---|
| 453 | <para>
|
|---|
| 454 | <indexterm><primary>Identity Management</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 455 | <indexterm><primary>Yellow Pages</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 456 | <indexterm><primary>NIS</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 457 | Unfortunately, network resources tend to have their own Identity
|
|---|
| 458 | Management facilities, the quality and manageability of which varies
|
|---|
| 459 | from quite poor to exceptionally good. Corporations that use a mixture
|
|---|
| 460 | of systems soon discover that until recently, few systems were
|
|---|
| 461 | designed to interoperate. For example, UNIX systems each have an
|
|---|
| 462 | independent user database. Sun Microsystems developed a facility that
|
|---|
| 463 | was originally called <constant>Yellow Pages</constant>, and was renamed
|
|---|
| 464 | when a telephone company objected to the use of its trademark.
|
|---|
| 465 | What was once called <constant>Yellow Pages</constant> is today known
|
|---|
| 466 | as <constant>Network Information System</constant> (NIS).
|
|---|
| 467 | </para>
|
|---|
| 468 |
|
|---|
| 469 | <para>
|
|---|
| 470 | <indexterm><primary>NIS+</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 471 | NIS gained a strong following throughout the UNIX/VMS space in a short
|
|---|
| 472 | period of time and retained that appeal and use for over a decade.
|
|---|
| 473 | Security concerns and inherent limitations have caused it to enter its
|
|---|
| 474 | twilight. NIS did not gain widespread appeal outside of the UNIX world
|
|---|
| 475 | and was not universally adopted. Sun updated this to a more secure
|
|---|
| 476 | implementation called NIS+, but even it has fallen victim to changing
|
|---|
| 477 | demands as the demand for directory services that can be coupled with
|
|---|
| 478 | other information systems is catching on.
|
|---|
| 479 | </para>
|
|---|
| 480 |
|
|---|
| 481 |
|
|---|
| 482 | <para>
|
|---|
| 483 | <indexterm><primary>NIS</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 484 | <indexterm><primary>government</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 485 | <indexterm><primary>education</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 486 | Nevertheless, both NIS and NIS+ continue to hold ground in
|
|---|
| 487 | business areas where UNIX still has major sway. Examples of
|
|---|
| 488 | organizations that remain firmly attached to the use of NIS and
|
|---|
| 489 | NIS+ include large government departments, education institutions,
|
|---|
| 490 | and large corporations that have a scientific or engineering
|
|---|
| 491 | focus.
|
|---|
| 492 | </para>
|
|---|
| 493 |
|
|---|
| 494 | <para>
|
|---|
| 495 | <indexterm><primary>scalable</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 496 | <indexterm><primary>distributed</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 497 | Today's networking world needs a scalable, distributed Identity
|
|---|
| 498 | Management infrastructure, commonly called a directory. The most
|
|---|
| 499 | popular technologies today are Microsoft Active Directory service
|
|---|
| 500 | and a number of LDAP implementations.
|
|---|
| 501 | </para>
|
|---|
| 502 |
|
|---|
| 503 | <para>
|
|---|
| 504 | <indexterm><primary>multiple directories</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 505 | The problem of managing multiple directories has become a focal
|
|---|
| 506 | point over the past decade, creating a large market for
|
|---|
| 507 | metadirectory products and services that allow organizations that
|
|---|
| 508 | have multiple directories and multiple management and control
|
|---|
| 509 | centers to provision information from one directory into
|
|---|
| 510 | another. The attendant benefit to end users is the promise of
|
|---|
| 511 | having to remember and deal with fewer login identities and
|
|---|
| 512 | passwords.</para>
|
|---|
| 513 |
|
|---|
| 514 | <para>
|
|---|
| 515 | <indexterm><primary>network</primary><secondary>bandwidth</secondary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 516 | The challenge of every large network is to find the optimum
|
|---|
| 517 | balance of internal systems and facilities for Identity
|
|---|
| 518 | Management resources. How well the solution is chosen and
|
|---|
| 519 | implemented has potentially significant impact on network bandwidth
|
|---|
| 520 | and systems response needs.</para>
|
|---|
| 521 |
|
|---|
| 522 | <para>
|
|---|
| 523 | <indexterm><primary>LDAP server</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 524 | <indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary><secondary>master</secondary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 525 | <indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary><secondary>slave</secondary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 526 | In <link linkend="happy"/>, you implemented a single LDAP server for the
|
|---|
| 527 | entire network. This may work for smaller networks, but almost
|
|---|
| 528 | certainly fails to meet the needs of large and complex networks. The
|
|---|
| 529 | following section documents how you may implement a single
|
|---|
| 530 | master LDAP server with multiple slave servers.</para>
|
|---|
| 531 |
|
|---|
| 532 | <para>
|
|---|
| 533 | What is the best method for implementing master/slave LDAP
|
|---|
| 534 | servers within the context of a distributed 2,000-user network is a
|
|---|
| 535 | question that remains to be answered.</para>
|
|---|
| 536 |
|
|---|
| 537 | <para>
|
|---|
| 538 | <indexterm><primary>distributed domain</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 539 | <indexterm><primary>wide-area</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 540 | One possibility that has great appeal is to create a single,
|
|---|
| 541 | large distributed domain. The practical implications of this
|
|---|
| 542 | design (see <link linkend="chap7net"/>) demands the placement of
|
|---|
| 543 | sufficient BDCs in each location. Additionally, network
|
|---|
| 544 | administrators must make sure that profiles are not transferred
|
|---|
| 545 | over the wide-area links, except as a totally unavoidable
|
|---|
| 546 | measure. Network design must balance the risk of loss of user
|
|---|
| 547 | productivity against the cost of network management and
|
|---|
| 548 | maintenance.
|
|---|
| 549 | </para>
|
|---|
| 550 |
|
|---|
| 551 | <para>
|
|---|
| 552 | <indexterm><primary>domain name space</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 553 | The network design in <link linkend="chap7net2"/> takes the approach
|
|---|
| 554 | that management of networks that are too remote to be managed
|
|---|
| 555 | effectively from New York ought to be given a certain degree of
|
|---|
| 556 | autonomy. With this rationale, the Los Angeles and London networks,
|
|---|
| 557 | though fully integrated with those on the East Coast, each have their
|
|---|
| 558 | own domain name space and can be independently managed and controlled.
|
|---|
| 559 | One of the key drawbacks of this design is that it flies in the face of
|
|---|
| 560 | the ability for network users to roam globally without some compromise
|
|---|
| 561 | in how they may access global resources.
|
|---|
| 562 | </para>
|
|---|
| 563 |
|
|---|
| 564 | <para>
|
|---|
| 565 | <indexterm><primary>interdomain trusts</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 566 | Desk-bound users need not be negatively affected by this design, since
|
|---|
| 567 | the use of interdomain trusts can be used to satisfy the need for global
|
|---|
| 568 | data sharing.
|
|---|
| 569 | </para>
|
|---|
| 570 |
|
|---|
| 571 | <para>
|
|---|
| 572 | <indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 573 | <indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary><secondary>backend</secondary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 574 | <indexterm><primary>SID</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 575 | When Samba-3 is configured to use an LDAP backend, it stores the domain
|
|---|
| 576 | account information in a directory entry. This account entry contains the
|
|---|
| 577 | domain SID. An unintended but exploitable side effect is that this makes it
|
|---|
| 578 | possible to operate with more than one PDC on a distributed network.
|
|---|
| 579 | </para>
|
|---|
| 580 |
|
|---|
| 581 | <para>
|
|---|
| 582 | <indexterm><primary>WINS</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 583 | <indexterm><primary>wins.dat</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 584 | <indexterm><primary>SID</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 585 | How might this peculiar feature be exploited? The answer is simple. It is
|
|---|
| 586 | imperative that each network segment have its own WINS server. Major
|
|---|
| 587 | servers on remote network segments can be given a static WINS entry in
|
|---|
| 588 | the <filename>wins.dat</filename> file on each WINS server. This allows
|
|---|
| 589 | all essential data to be visible from all locations. Each location would,
|
|---|
| 590 | however, function as if it is an independent domain, while all sharing the
|
|---|
| 591 | same domain SID. Since all domain account information can be stored in a
|
|---|
| 592 | single LDAP backend, users have unfettered ability to roam.
|
|---|
| 593 | </para>
|
|---|
| 594 |
|
|---|
| 595 | <para>
|
|---|
| 596 | <indexterm><primary>NetBIOS name</primary><secondary>aliases</secondary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 597 | <indexterm><primary>fail-over</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 598 | This concept has not been exhaustively validated, though we can see no reason
|
|---|
| 599 | why this should not work. The important facets are the following: The name of
|
|---|
| 600 | the domain must be identical in all locations. Each network segment must have
|
|---|
| 601 | its own WINS server. The name of the PDC must be the same in all locations; this
|
|---|
| 602 | necessitates the use of NetBIOS name aliases for each PDC so that they can be
|
|---|
| 603 | accessed globally using the alias and not the PDC's primary name. A single master
|
|---|
| 604 | LDAP server can be based in New York, with multiple LDAP slave servers located
|
|---|
| 605 | on every network segment. Finally, the BDCs should each use failover LDAP servers
|
|---|
| 606 | that are in fact slave LDAP servers on the local segments.
|
|---|
| 607 | </para>
|
|---|
| 608 |
|
|---|
| 609 | <para>
|
|---|
| 610 | <indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary><secondary>updates</secondary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 611 | <indexterm><primary>domain tree</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 612 | <indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary><secondary>database</secondary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 613 | <indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary><secondary>directory</secondary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 614 | With a single master LDAP server, all network updates are effected on a single
|
|---|
| 615 | server. In the event that this should become excessively fragile or network
|
|---|
| 616 | bandwidth limiting, one could implement a delegated LDAP domain. This is also
|
|---|
| 617 | known as a partitioned (or multiple partition) LDAP database and as a distributed
|
|---|
| 618 | LDAP directory.
|
|---|
| 619 | </para>
|
|---|
| 620 |
|
|---|
| 621 | <para>
|
|---|
| 622 | As the LDAP directory grows, it becomes increasingly important
|
|---|
| 623 | that its structure is implemented in a manner that mirrors
|
|---|
| 624 | organizational needs, so as to limit network update and
|
|---|
| 625 | referential traffic. It should be noted that all directory
|
|---|
| 626 | administrators must of necessity follow the same standard
|
|---|
| 627 | procedures for managing the directory, because retroactive correction of
|
|---|
| 628 | inconsistent directory information can be exceedingly difficult.
|
|---|
| 629 | </para>
|
|---|
| 630 |
|
|---|
| 631 | </sect3>
|
|---|
| 632 |
|
|---|
| 633 | </sect2>
|
|---|
| 634 |
|
|---|
| 635 |
|
|---|
| 636 | <sect2>
|
|---|
| 637 | <title>Political Issues</title>
|
|---|
| 638 |
|
|---|
| 639 | <para>
|
|---|
| 640 | As organizations grow, the number of points of control increases
|
|---|
| 641 | also. In a large distributed organization, it is important that the
|
|---|
| 642 | Identity Management system be capable of being updated from
|
|---|
| 643 | many locations, and it is equally important that changes made should
|
|---|
| 644 | become usable in a reasonable period, typically
|
|---|
| 645 | minutes rather than days (the old limitation of highly manual
|
|---|
| 646 | systems).
|
|---|
| 647 | </para>
|
|---|
| 648 |
|
|---|
| 649 | </sect2>
|
|---|
| 650 |
|
|---|
| 651 | </sect1>
|
|---|
| 652 |
|
|---|
| 653 | <sect1>
|
|---|
| 654 | <title>Implementation</title>
|
|---|
| 655 |
|
|---|
| 656 | <para>
|
|---|
| 657 | <indexterm><primary>winbind</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 658 | <indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 659 | <indexterm><primary>UID</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 660 | <indexterm><primary>GID</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 661 | Samba-3 has the ability to use multiple password (authentication and
|
|---|
| 662 | identity resolution) backends. The diagram in <link linkend="chap7idres"/>
|
|---|
| 663 | demonstrates how Samba uses winbind, LDAP, and NIS, the traditional system
|
|---|
| 664 | password database. The diagram only documents the mechanisms for
|
|---|
| 665 | authentication and identity resolution (obtaining a UNIX UID/GID)
|
|---|
| 666 | using the specific systems shown.
|
|---|
| 667 | </para>
|
|---|
| 668 |
|
|---|
| 669 | <figure id="chap7idres">
|
|---|
| 670 | <title>Samba and Authentication Backend Search Pathways</title>
|
|---|
| 671 | <imagefile scale="55">chap7-idresol</imagefile>
|
|---|
| 672 | </figure>
|
|---|
| 673 |
|
|---|
| 674 | <para>
|
|---|
| 675 | <indexterm><primary>smbpasswd</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 676 | <indexterm><primary>xmlsam</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 677 | <indexterm><primary>SMB passwords</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 678 | <indexterm><primary>tdbsam</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 679 | <indexterm><primary>mysqlsam</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 680 | <indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 681 | <indexterm><primary>distributed</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 682 | Samba is capable of using the <constant>smbpasswd</constant>,
|
|---|
| 683 | <constant>tdbsam</constant>, <constant>xmlsam</constant>,
|
|---|
| 684 | and <constant>mysqlsam</constant> authentication databases. The SMB
|
|---|
| 685 | passwords can, of course, also be stored in an LDAP ldapsam
|
|---|
| 686 | backend. LDAP is the preferred passdb backend for distributed network
|
|---|
| 687 | operations.
|
|---|
| 688 | </para>
|
|---|
| 689 |
|
|---|
| 690 | <para>
|
|---|
| 691 | <indexterm><primary>passdb backend</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 692 | Additionally, it is possible to use multiple passdb backends
|
|---|
| 693 | concurrently as well as have multiple LDAP backends. As a result, you
|
|---|
| 694 | can specify a failover LDAP backend. The syntax for specifying a
|
|---|
| 695 | single LDAP backend in &smb.conf; is:
|
|---|
| 696 | <screen>
|
|---|
| 697 | ...
|
|---|
| 698 | passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://master.abmas.biz
|
|---|
| 699 | ...
|
|---|
| 700 | </screen>
|
|---|
| 701 | This configuration tells Samba to use a single LDAP server, as shown in <link linkend="ch7singleLDAP"/>.
|
|---|
| 702 | <figure id="ch7singleLDAP">
|
|---|
| 703 | <title>Samba Configuration to Use a Single LDAP Server</title>
|
|---|
| 704 | <imagefile scale="65">ch7-singleLDAP</imagefile>
|
|---|
| 705 | </figure>
|
|---|
| 706 | <indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary><secondary>fail-over</secondary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 707 | <indexterm><primary>fail-over</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 708 | The addition of a failover LDAP server can simply be done by adding a
|
|---|
| 709 | second entry for the failover server to the single <parameter>ldapsam</parameter>
|
|---|
| 710 | entry, as shown here (note the particular use of the double quotes):
|
|---|
| 711 | <screen>
|
|---|
| 712 | ...
|
|---|
| 713 | passdb backend = ldapsam:"ldap://master.abmas.biz \
|
|---|
| 714 | ldap://slave.abmas.biz"
|
|---|
| 715 | ...
|
|---|
| 716 | </screen>
|
|---|
| 717 | This configuration tells Samba to use a master LDAP server, with failover to a slave server if necessary,
|
|---|
| 718 | as shown in <link linkend="ch7dualLDAP"/>.
|
|---|
| 719 | <figure id="ch7dualLDAP">
|
|---|
| 720 | <title>Samba Configuration to Use a Dual (Fail-over) LDAP Server</title>
|
|---|
| 721 | <imagefile scale="65">ch7-fail-overLDAP</imagefile>
|
|---|
| 722 | </figure>
|
|---|
| 723 | </para>
|
|---|
| 724 |
|
|---|
| 725 | <para>
|
|---|
| 726 | Some folks have tried to implement this without the use of double quotes. This is the type of entry they
|
|---|
| 727 | created:
|
|---|
| 728 | <screen>
|
|---|
| 729 | ...
|
|---|
| 730 | passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://master.abmas.biz \
|
|---|
| 731 | ldapsam:ldap://slave.abmas.biz
|
|---|
| 732 | ...
|
|---|
| 733 | </screen>
|
|---|
| 734 | <indexterm><primary>contiguous directory</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 735 | The effect of this style of entry is that Samba lists the users
|
|---|
| 736 | that are in both LDAP databases. If both contain the same information,
|
|---|
| 737 | it results in each record being shown twice. This is, of course, not the
|
|---|
| 738 | solution desired for a failover implementation. The net effect of this
|
|---|
| 739 | configuration is shown in <link linkend="ch7dualadd"/>
|
|---|
| 740 | </para>
|
|---|
| 741 |
|
|---|
| 742 | <figure id="ch7dualadd">
|
|---|
| 743 | <title>Samba Configuration to Use Dual LDAP Databases - Broken - Do Not Use!</title>
|
|---|
| 744 | <imagefile scale="55">ch7-dual-additive-LDAP</imagefile>
|
|---|
| 745 | </figure>
|
|---|
| 746 |
|
|---|
| 747 | <para>
|
|---|
| 748 | If, however, each LDAP database contains unique information, this may
|
|---|
| 749 | well be an advantageous way to effectively integrate multiple LDAP databases
|
|---|
| 750 | into one seemingly contiguous directory. Only the first database will be updated.
|
|---|
| 751 | An example of this configuration is shown in <link linkend="ch7dualok"/>.
|
|---|
| 752 | </para>
|
|---|
| 753 |
|
|---|
| 754 | <figure id="ch7dualok">
|
|---|
| 755 | <title>Samba Configuration to Use Two LDAP Databases - The result is additive.</title>
|
|---|
| 756 | <imagefile scale="55">ch7-dual-additive-LDAP-Ok</imagefile>
|
|---|
| 757 | </figure>
|
|---|
| 758 |
|
|---|
| 759 | <note><para>
|
|---|
| 760 | When the use of ldapsam is specified twice, as shown here, it is imperative
|
|---|
| 761 | that the two LDAP directories must be disjoint. If the entries are for a
|
|---|
| 762 | master LDAP server as well as its own slave server, updates to the LDAP
|
|---|
| 763 | database may end up being lost or corrupted. You may safely use multiple
|
|---|
| 764 | LDAP backends only if both are entirely separate from each other.
|
|---|
| 765 | </para></note>
|
|---|
| 766 |
|
|---|
| 767 | <para>
|
|---|
| 768 | It is assumed that the network you are working with follows in a
|
|---|
| 769 | pattern similar to what was covered in <link linkend="happy"/>. The following steps
|
|---|
| 770 | permit the operation of a master/slave OpenLDAP arrangement.
|
|---|
| 771 | </para>
|
|---|
| 772 |
|
|---|
| 773 | <procedure>
|
|---|
| 774 | <title>Implementation Steps for an LDAP Slave Server</title>
|
|---|
| 775 |
|
|---|
| 776 | <step><para>
|
|---|
| 777 | <indexterm><primary>SUSE Linux</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 778 | <indexterm><primary>Red Hat Linux</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 779 | Log onto the master LDAP server as <constant>root</constant>.
|
|---|
| 780 | You are about to change the configuration of the LDAP server, so it
|
|---|
| 781 | makes sense to temporarily halt it. Stop OpenLDAP from running on
|
|---|
| 782 | SUSE Linux by executing:
|
|---|
| 783 | <screen>
|
|---|
| 784 | &rootprompt; rcldap stop
|
|---|
| 785 | </screen>
|
|---|
| 786 | On Red Hat Linux, you can do this by executing:
|
|---|
| 787 | <screen>
|
|---|
| 788 | &rootprompt; service ldap stop
|
|---|
| 789 | </screen>
|
|---|
| 790 | </para></step>
|
|---|
| 791 |
|
|---|
| 792 | <step><para>
|
|---|
| 793 | <indexterm><primary>/etc/openldap/slapd.conf</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 794 | Edit the <filename>/etc/openldap/slapd.conf</filename> file so it
|
|---|
| 795 | matches the content of <link linkend="ch7-LDAP-master"/>.
|
|---|
| 796 | </para></step>
|
|---|
| 797 |
|
|---|
| 798 | <step><para>
|
|---|
| 799 | Create a file called <filename>admin-accts.ldif</filename> with the following contents:
|
|---|
| 800 | <screen>
|
|---|
| 801 | dn: cn=updateuser,dc=abmas,dc=biz
|
|---|
| 802 | objectClass: person
|
|---|
| 803 | cn: updateuser
|
|---|
| 804 | sn: updateuser
|
|---|
| 805 | userPassword: not24get
|
|---|
| 806 |
|
|---|
| 807 | dn: cn=sambaadmin,dc=abmas,dc=biz
|
|---|
| 808 | objectClass: person
|
|---|
| 809 | cn: sambaadmin
|
|---|
| 810 | sn: sambaadmin
|
|---|
| 811 | userPassword: buttercup
|
|---|
| 812 | </screen>
|
|---|
| 813 | </para></step>
|
|---|
| 814 |
|
|---|
| 815 | <step><para>
|
|---|
| 816 | Add an account called <quote>updateuser</quote> to the master LDAP server as shown here:
|
|---|
| 817 | <screen>
|
|---|
| 818 | &rootprompt; slapadd -v -l admin-accts.ldif
|
|---|
| 819 | </screen>
|
|---|
| 820 | </para></step>
|
|---|
| 821 |
|
|---|
| 822 | <step><para>
|
|---|
| 823 | <indexterm><primary>LDIF</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 824 | <indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary><secondary>preload</secondary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 825 | Change directory to a suitable place to dump the contents of the
|
|---|
| 826 | LDAP server. The dump file (and LDIF file) is used to preload
|
|---|
| 827 | the slave LDAP server database. You can dump the database by executing:
|
|---|
| 828 | <screen>
|
|---|
| 829 | &rootprompt; slapcat -v -l LDAP-transfer-LDIF.txt
|
|---|
| 830 | </screen>
|
|---|
| 831 | Each record is written to the file.
|
|---|
| 832 | </para></step>
|
|---|
| 833 |
|
|---|
| 834 | <step><para>
|
|---|
| 835 | <indexterm><primary>LDAP-transfer-LDIF.txt</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 836 | Copy the file <filename>LDAP-transfer-LDIF.txt</filename> to the intended
|
|---|
| 837 | slave LDAP server. A good location could be in the directory
|
|---|
| 838 | <filename>/etc/openldap/preload</filename>.
|
|---|
| 839 | </para></step>
|
|---|
| 840 |
|
|---|
| 841 | <step><para>
|
|---|
| 842 | Log onto the slave LDAP server as <constant>root</constant>. You can
|
|---|
| 843 | now configure this server so the <filename>/etc/openldap/slapd.conf</filename>
|
|---|
| 844 | file matches the content of <link linkend="ch7-LDAP-slave"/>.
|
|---|
| 845 | </para></step>
|
|---|
| 846 |
|
|---|
| 847 | <step><para>
|
|---|
| 848 | Change directory to the location in which you stored the
|
|---|
| 849 | <filename>LDAP-transfer-LDIF.txt</filename> file (<filename>/etc/openldap/preload</filename>).
|
|---|
| 850 | While in this directory, execute:
|
|---|
| 851 | <screen>
|
|---|
| 852 | &rootprompt; slapadd -v -l LDAP-transfer-LDIF.txt
|
|---|
| 853 | </screen>
|
|---|
| 854 | If all goes well, the following output confirms that the data is being loaded
|
|---|
| 855 | as intended:
|
|---|
| 856 | <screen>
|
|---|
| 857 | added: "dc=abmas,dc=biz" (00000001)
|
|---|
| 858 | added: "cn=sambaadmin,dc=abmas,dc=biz" (00000002)
|
|---|
| 859 | added: "cn=updateuser,dc=abmas,dc=biz" (00000003)
|
|---|
| 860 | added: "ou=People,dc=abmas,dc=biz" (00000004)
|
|---|
| 861 | added: "ou=Groups,dc=abmas,dc=biz" (00000005)
|
|---|
| 862 | added: "ou=Computers,dc=abmas,dc=biz" (00000006)
|
|---|
| 863 | added: "uid=Administrator,ou=People,dc=abmas,dc=biz" (00000007)
|
|---|
| 864 | added: "uid=nobody,ou=People,dc=abmas,dc=biz" (00000008)
|
|---|
| 865 | added: "cn=Domain Admins,ou=Groups,dc=abmas,dc=biz" (00000009)
|
|---|
| 866 | added: "cn=Domain Users,ou=Groups,dc=abmas,dc=biz" (0000000a)
|
|---|
| 867 | added: "cn=Domain Guests,ou=Groups,dc=abmas,dc=biz" (0000000b)
|
|---|
| 868 | added: "uid=bobj,ou=People,dc=abmas,dc=biz" (0000000c)
|
|---|
| 869 | added: "sambaDomainName=MEGANET2,dc=abmas,dc=biz" (0000000d)
|
|---|
| 870 | added: "uid=stans,ou=People,dc=abmas,dc=biz" (0000000e)
|
|---|
| 871 | added: "uid=chrisr,ou=People,dc=abmas,dc=biz" (0000000f)
|
|---|
| 872 | added: "uid=maryv,ou=People,dc=abmas,dc=biz" (00000010)
|
|---|
| 873 | added: "cn=Accounts,ou=Groups,dc=abmas,dc=biz" (00000011)
|
|---|
| 874 | added: "cn=Finances,ou=Groups,dc=abmas,dc=biz" (00000012)
|
|---|
| 875 | added: "cn=PIOps,ou=Groups,dc=abmas,dc=biz" (00000013)
|
|---|
| 876 | </screen>
|
|---|
| 877 | </para></step>
|
|---|
| 878 |
|
|---|
| 879 | <step><para>
|
|---|
| 880 | Now start the LDAP server and set it to run automatically on system reboot by executing:
|
|---|
| 881 | <screen>
|
|---|
| 882 | &rootprompt; rcldap start
|
|---|
| 883 | &rootprompt; chkconfig ldap on
|
|---|
| 884 | </screen>
|
|---|
| 885 | On Red Hat Linux, execute the following:
|
|---|
| 886 | <screen>
|
|---|
| 887 | &rootprompt; service ldap start
|
|---|
| 888 | &rootprompt; chkconfig ldap on
|
|---|
| 889 | </screen>
|
|---|
| 890 | </para></step>
|
|---|
| 891 |
|
|---|
| 892 | <step><para>
|
|---|
| 893 | <indexterm><primary>chkconfig</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 894 | <indexterm><primary>service</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 895 | <indexterm><primary>rcldap</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 896 | Go back to the master LDAP server. Execute the following to start LDAP as well
|
|---|
| 897 | as <command>slurpd</command>, the synchronization daemon, as shown here:
|
|---|
| 898 | <screen>
|
|---|
| 899 | &rootprompt; rcldap start
|
|---|
| 900 | &rootprompt; chkconfig ldap on
|
|---|
| 901 | &rootprompt; rcslurpd start
|
|---|
| 902 | &rootprompt; chkconfig slurpd on
|
|---|
| 903 | </screen>
|
|---|
| 904 | <indexterm><primary>slurpd</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 905 | On Red Hat Linux, check the equivalent command to start <command>slurpd</command>.
|
|---|
| 906 | </para></step>
|
|---|
| 907 |
|
|---|
| 908 | <step><para>
|
|---|
| 909 | <indexterm><primary>smbldap-useradd</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 910 | On the master LDAP server you may now add an account to validate that replication
|
|---|
| 911 | is working. Assuming the configuration shown in <link linkend="happy"/>, execute:
|
|---|
| 912 | <screen>
|
|---|
| 913 | &rootprompt; /var/lib/samba/sbin/smbldap-useradd -a fruitloop
|
|---|
| 914 | </screen>
|
|---|
| 915 | </para></step>
|
|---|
| 916 |
|
|---|
| 917 | <step><para>
|
|---|
| 918 | On the slave LDAP server, change to the directory <filename>/var/lib/ldap</filename>.
|
|---|
| 919 | There should now be a file called <filename>replogfile</filename>. If replication worked
|
|---|
| 920 | as expected, the content of this file should be:
|
|---|
| 921 | <screen>
|
|---|
| 922 | time: 1072486403
|
|---|
| 923 | dn: uid=fruitloop,ou=People,dc=abmas,dc=biz
|
|---|
| 924 | changetype: modify
|
|---|
| 925 | replace: sambaProfilePath
|
|---|
| 926 | sambaProfilePath: \\MASSIVE\profiles\fruitloop
|
|---|
| 927 | -
|
|---|
| 928 | replace: sambaHomePath
|
|---|
| 929 | sambaHomePath: \\MASSIVE\homes
|
|---|
| 930 | -
|
|---|
| 931 | replace: entryCSN
|
|---|
| 932 | entryCSN: 2003122700:43:38Z#0x0005#0#0000
|
|---|
| 933 | -
|
|---|
| 934 | replace: modifiersName
|
|---|
| 935 | modifiersName: cn=Manager,dc=abmas,dc=biz
|
|---|
| 936 | -
|
|---|
| 937 | replace: modifyTimestamp
|
|---|
| 938 | modifyTimestamp: 20031227004338Z
|
|---|
| 939 | -
|
|---|
| 940 | </screen>
|
|---|
| 941 | </para></step>
|
|---|
| 942 |
|
|---|
| 943 | <step><para>
|
|---|
| 944 | Given that this first slave LDAP server is now working correctly, you may now
|
|---|
| 945 | implement additional slave LDAP servers as required.
|
|---|
| 946 | </para></step>
|
|---|
| 947 |
|
|---|
| 948 | <step><para>
|
|---|
| 949 | On each machine (PDC and BDCs) after the respective &smb.conf; files have been created as shown in
|
|---|
| 950 | <link linkend="ch7-massmbconfA">Primary Domain Controller &smb.conf; File &smbmdash; Part A + B + C</link> and
|
|---|
| 951 | on BDCs the <link linkend="ch7-slvsmbocnfA">Backup Domain Controller &smb.conf; File &smbmdash; Part A
|
|---|
| 952 | + B + C</link> execute the following:
|
|---|
| 953 | <screen>
|
|---|
| 954 | &rootprompt; smbpasswd -w buttercup
|
|---|
| 955 | </screen>
|
|---|
| 956 | This will install in the <filename>secrets.tdb</filename> file the password that Samba will need to
|
|---|
| 957 | manage (write to) the LDAP Master server to perform account updates.
|
|---|
| 958 | </para></step>
|
|---|
| 959 |
|
|---|
| 960 | </procedure>
|
|---|
| 961 |
|
|---|
| 962 | <example id="ch7-LDAP-master">
|
|---|
| 963 | <title>LDAP Master Server Configuration File &smbmdash; <filename>/etc/openldap/slapd.conf</filename></title>
|
|---|
| 964 | <screen>
|
|---|
| 965 | include /etc/openldap/schema/core.schema
|
|---|
| 966 | include /etc/openldap/schema/cosine.schema
|
|---|
| 967 | include /etc/openldap/schema/inetorgperson.schema
|
|---|
| 968 | include /etc/openldap/schema/nis.schema
|
|---|
| 969 | include /etc/openldap/schema/samba.schema
|
|---|
| 970 |
|
|---|
| 971 | pidfile /var/run/slapd/slapd.pid
|
|---|
| 972 | argsfile /var/run/slapd/slapd.args
|
|---|
| 973 |
|
|---|
| 974 | database bdb
|
|---|
| 975 | suffix "dc=abmas,dc=biz"
|
|---|
| 976 | rootdn "cn=Manager,dc=abmas,dc=biz"
|
|---|
| 977 |
|
|---|
| 978 | # rootpw = not24get
|
|---|
| 979 | rootpw {SSHA}86kTavd9Dw3FAz6qzWTrCOKX/c0Qe+UV
|
|---|
| 980 |
|
|---|
| 981 | replica host=lapdc.abmas.biz:389
|
|---|
| 982 | suffix="dc=abmas,dc=biz"
|
|---|
| 983 | binddn="cn=updateuser,dc=abmas,dc=biz"
|
|---|
| 984 | bindmethod=simple credentials=not24get
|
|---|
| 985 |
|
|---|
| 986 | access to attrs=sambaLMPassword,sambaNTPassword
|
|---|
| 987 | by dn="cn=sambaadmin,dc=abmas,dc=biz" write
|
|---|
| 988 | by * none
|
|---|
| 989 |
|
|---|
| 990 | replogfile /var/lib/ldap/replogfile
|
|---|
| 991 |
|
|---|
| 992 | directory /var/lib/ldap
|
|---|
| 993 |
|
|---|
| 994 | # Indices to maintain
|
|---|
| 995 | index objectClass eq
|
|---|
| 996 | index cn pres,sub,eq
|
|---|
| 997 | index sn pres,sub,eq
|
|---|
| 998 | index uid pres,sub,eq
|
|---|
| 999 | index displayName pres,sub,eq
|
|---|
| 1000 | index uidNumber eq
|
|---|
| 1001 | index gidNumber eq
|
|---|
| 1002 | index memberUID eq
|
|---|
| 1003 | index sambaSID eq
|
|---|
| 1004 | index sambaPrimaryGroupSID eq
|
|---|
| 1005 | index sambaDomainName eq
|
|---|
| 1006 | index default sub
|
|---|
| 1007 | </screen>
|
|---|
| 1008 | </example>
|
|---|
| 1009 |
|
|---|
| 1010 | <example id="ch7-LDAP-slave">
|
|---|
| 1011 | <title>LDAP Slave Configuration File &smbmdash; <filename>/etc/openldap/slapd.conf</filename></title>
|
|---|
| 1012 | <screen>
|
|---|
| 1013 | include /etc/openldap/schema/core.schema
|
|---|
| 1014 | include /etc/openldap/schema/cosine.schema
|
|---|
| 1015 | include /etc/openldap/schema/inetorgperson.schema
|
|---|
| 1016 | include /etc/openldap/schema/nis.schema
|
|---|
| 1017 | include /etc/openldap/schema/samba.schema
|
|---|
| 1018 |
|
|---|
| 1019 | pidfile /var/run/slapd/slapd.pid
|
|---|
| 1020 | argsfile /var/run/slapd/slapd.args
|
|---|
| 1021 |
|
|---|
| 1022 | database bdb
|
|---|
| 1023 | suffix "dc=abmas,dc=biz"
|
|---|
| 1024 | rootdn "cn=Manager,dc=abmas,dc=biz"
|
|---|
| 1025 |
|
|---|
| 1026 | # rootpw = not24get
|
|---|
| 1027 | rootpw {SSHA}86kTavd9Dw3FAz6qzWTrCOKX/c0Qe+UV
|
|---|
| 1028 |
|
|---|
| 1029 | access to *
|
|---|
| 1030 | by dn=cn=updateuser,dc=abmas,dc=biz write
|
|---|
| 1031 | by * read
|
|---|
| 1032 |
|
|---|
| 1033 | updatedn cn=updateuser,dc=abmas,dc=biz
|
|---|
| 1034 | updateref ldap://massive.abmas.biz
|
|---|
| 1035 |
|
|---|
| 1036 | directory /var/lib/ldap
|
|---|
| 1037 |
|
|---|
| 1038 | # Indices to maintain
|
|---|
| 1039 | index objectClass eq
|
|---|
| 1040 | index cn pres,sub,eq
|
|---|
| 1041 | index sn pres,sub,eq
|
|---|
| 1042 | index uid pres,sub,eq
|
|---|
| 1043 | index displayName pres,sub,eq
|
|---|
| 1044 | index uidNumber eq
|
|---|
| 1045 | index gidNumber eq
|
|---|
| 1046 | index memberUID eq
|
|---|
| 1047 | index sambaSID eq
|
|---|
| 1048 | index sambaPrimaryGroupSID eq
|
|---|
| 1049 | index sambaDomainName eq
|
|---|
| 1050 | index default sub
|
|---|
| 1051 | </screen>
|
|---|
| 1052 | </example>
|
|---|
| 1053 |
|
|---|
| 1054 | <example id="ch7-massmbconfA">
|
|---|
| 1055 | <title>Primary Domain Controller &smb.conf; File &smbmdash; Part A</title>
|
|---|
| 1056 | <smbconfblock>
|
|---|
| 1057 | <smbconfcomment>Global parameters</smbconfcomment>
|
|---|
| 1058 | <smbconfsection name="[global]"/>
|
|---|
| 1059 | <smbconfoption name="unix charset">LOCALE</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1060 | <smbconfoption name="workgroup">MEGANET2</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1061 | <smbconfoption name="passdb backend">ldapsam:ldap://massive.abmas.biz</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1062 | <smbconfoption name="username map">/etc/samba/smbusers</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1063 | <smbconfoption name="log level">1</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1064 | <smbconfoption name="syslog">0</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1065 | <smbconfoption name="log file">/var/log/samba/%m</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1066 | <smbconfoption name="max log size">0</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1067 | <smbconfoption name="smb ports">139</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1068 | <smbconfoption name="name resolve order">wins bcast hosts</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1069 | <smbconfoption name="time server">Yes</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1070 | <smbconfoption name="printcap name">CUPS</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1071 | <smbconfoption name="add user script">/opt/IDEALX/sbin/smbldap-useradd -m '%u'</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1072 | <smbconfoption name="delete user script">/opt/IDEALX/sbin/smbldap-userdel '%u'</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1073 | <smbconfoption name="add group script">/opt/IDEALX/sbin/smbldap-groupadd -p '%g'</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1074 | <smbconfoption name="delete group script">/opt/IDEALX/sbin/smbldap-groupdel '%g'</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1075 | <smbconfoption name="add user to group script">/opt/IDEALX/sbin/smbldap-groupmod -m '%g' '%u'</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1076 | <smbconfoption name="delete user from group script">/opt/IDEALX/sbin/smbldap-groupmod -x '%g' '%u'</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1077 | <smbconfoption name="set primary group script">/opt/IDEALX/sbin/smbldap-usermod -g '%g' '%u'</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1078 | <smbconfoption name="add machine script">/opt/IDEALX/sbin/smbldap-useradd -w '%u'</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1079 | <smbconfoption name="shutdown script">/var/lib/samba/scripts/shutdown.sh</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1080 | <smbconfoption name="abort shutdown script">/sbin/shutdown -c</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1081 | <smbconfoption name="logon script">scripts\logon.bat</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1082 | <smbconfoption name="logon path">\\%L\profiles\%U</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1083 | <smbconfoption name="logon drive">X:</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1084 | <smbconfoption name="domain logons">Yes</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1085 | <smbconfoption name="domain master">Yes</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1086 | <smbconfoption name="wins support">Yes</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1087 | <smbconfoption name="ldap suffix">dc=abmas,dc=biz</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1088 | <smbconfoption name="ldap machine suffix">ou=People</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1089 | <smbconfoption name="ldap user suffix">ou=People</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1090 | <smbconfoption name="ldap group suffix">ou=Groups</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1091 | <smbconfoption name="ldap idmap suffix">ou=Idmap</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1092 | <smbconfoption name="ldap admin dn">cn=sambaadmin,dc=abmas,dc=biz</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1093 | <smbconfoption name="idmap backend">ldap://massive.abmas.biz</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1094 | <smbconfoption name="idmap uid">10000-20000</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1095 | <smbconfoption name="idmap gid">10000-20000</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1096 | <smbconfoption name="printer admin">root</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1097 | <smbconfoption name="printing">cups</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1098 | </smbconfblock>
|
|---|
| 1099 | </example>
|
|---|
| 1100 |
|
|---|
| 1101 | <example id="ch7-massmbconfB">
|
|---|
| 1102 | <title>Primary Domain Controller &smb.conf; File &smbmdash; Part B</title>
|
|---|
| 1103 | <smbconfblock>
|
|---|
| 1104 | <smbconfsection name="[IPC$]"/>
|
|---|
| 1105 | <smbconfoption name="path">/tmp</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1106 |
|
|---|
| 1107 | <smbconfsection name="[accounts]"/>
|
|---|
| 1108 | <smbconfoption name="comment">Accounting Files</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1109 | <smbconfoption name="path">/data/accounts</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1110 | <smbconfoption name="read only">No</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1111 |
|
|---|
| 1112 | <smbconfsection name="[service]"/>
|
|---|
| 1113 | <smbconfoption name="comment">Financial Services Files</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1114 | <smbconfoption name="path">/data/service</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1115 | <smbconfoption name="read only">No</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1116 |
|
|---|
| 1117 | <smbconfsection name="[pidata]"/>
|
|---|
| 1118 | <smbconfoption name="comment">Property Insurance Files</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1119 | <smbconfoption name="path">/data/pidata</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1120 | <smbconfoption name="read only">No</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1121 |
|
|---|
| 1122 | <smbconfsection name="[homes]"/>
|
|---|
| 1123 | <smbconfoption name="comment">Home Directories</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1124 | <smbconfoption name="valid users">%S</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1125 | <smbconfoption name="read only">No</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1126 | <smbconfoption name="browseable">No</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1127 |
|
|---|
| 1128 | <smbconfsection name="[printers]"/>
|
|---|
| 1129 | <smbconfoption name="comment">SMB Print Spool</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1130 | <smbconfoption name="path">/var/spool/samba</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1131 | <smbconfoption name="guest ok">Yes</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1132 | <smbconfoption name="printable">Yes</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1133 | <smbconfoption name="browseable">No</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1134 | </smbconfblock>
|
|---|
| 1135 | </example>
|
|---|
| 1136 |
|
|---|
| 1137 | <example id="ch7-massmbconfC">
|
|---|
| 1138 | <title>Primary Domain Controller &smb.conf; File &smbmdash; Part C</title>
|
|---|
| 1139 | <smbconfblock>
|
|---|
| 1140 | <smbconfsection name="[apps]"/>
|
|---|
| 1141 | <smbconfoption name="comment">Application Files</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1142 | <smbconfoption name="path">/apps</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1143 | <smbconfoption name="admin users">bjones</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1144 | <smbconfoption name="read only">No</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1145 |
|
|---|
| 1146 | <smbconfsection name="[netlogon]"/>
|
|---|
| 1147 | <smbconfoption name="comment">Network Logon Service</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1148 | <smbconfoption name="path">/var/lib/samba/netlogon</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1149 | <smbconfoption name="admin users">root, Administrator</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1150 | <smbconfoption name="guest ok">Yes</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1151 | <smbconfoption name="locking">No</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1152 |
|
|---|
| 1153 | <smbconfsection name="[profiles]"/>
|
|---|
| 1154 | <smbconfoption name="comment">Profile Share</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1155 | <smbconfoption name="path">/var/lib/samba/profiles</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1156 | <smbconfoption name="read only">No</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1157 | <smbconfoption name="profile acls">Yes</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1158 |
|
|---|
| 1159 | <smbconfsection name="[profdata]"/>
|
|---|
| 1160 | <smbconfoption name="comment">Profile Data Share</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1161 | <smbconfoption name="path">/var/lib/samba/profdata</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1162 | <smbconfoption name="read only">No</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1163 | <smbconfoption name="profile acls">Yes</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1164 |
|
|---|
| 1165 | <smbconfsection name="[print$]"/>
|
|---|
| 1166 | <smbconfoption name="comment">Printer Drivers</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1167 | <smbconfoption name="path">/var/lib/samba/drivers</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1168 | <smbconfoption name="write list">root</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1169 | <smbconfoption name="admin users">root, Administrator</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1170 | </smbconfblock>
|
|---|
| 1171 | </example>
|
|---|
| 1172 |
|
|---|
| 1173 | <example id="ch7-slvsmbocnfA">
|
|---|
| 1174 | <title>Backup Domain Controller &smb.conf; File &smbmdash; Part A</title>
|
|---|
| 1175 | <smbconfblock>
|
|---|
| 1176 | <smbconfcomment># Global parameters</smbconfcomment>
|
|---|
| 1177 | <smbconfsection name="[global]"/>
|
|---|
| 1178 | <smbconfoption name="unix charset">LOCALE</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1179 | <smbconfoption name="workgroup">MEGANET2</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1180 | <smbconfoption name="netbios name">BLDG1</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1181 | <smbconfoption name="passdb backend">ldapsam:ldap://lapdc.abmas.biz</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1182 | <smbconfoption name="username map">/etc/samba/smbusers</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1183 | <smbconfoption name="log level">1</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1184 | <smbconfoption name="syslog">0</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1185 | <smbconfoption name="log file">/var/log/samba/%m</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1186 | <smbconfoption name="max log size">50</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1187 | <smbconfoption name="smb ports">139</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1188 | <smbconfoption name="name resolve order">wins bcast hosts</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1189 | <smbconfoption name="printcap name">CUPS</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1190 | <smbconfoption name="show add printer wizard">No</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1191 | <smbconfoption name="logon script">scripts\logon.bat</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1192 | <smbconfoption name="logon path">\\%L\profiles\%U</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1193 | <smbconfoption name="logon drive">X:</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1194 | <smbconfoption name="domain logons">Yes</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1195 | <smbconfoption name="os level">63</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1196 | <smbconfoption name="domain master">No</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1197 | <smbconfoption name="wins server">192.168.2.1</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1198 | <smbconfoption name="ldap suffix">dc=abmas,dc=biz</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1199 | <smbconfoption name="ldap machine suffix">ou=People</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1200 | <smbconfoption name="ldap user suffix">ou=People</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1201 | <smbconfoption name="ldap group suffix">ou=Groups</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1202 | <smbconfoption name="ldap idmap suffix">ou=Idmap</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1203 | <smbconfoption name="ldap admin dn">cn=sambaadmin,dc=abmas,dc=biz</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1204 | <smbconfoption name="utmp">Yes</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1205 | <smbconfoption name="idmap backend">ldap://massive.abmas.biz</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1206 | <smbconfoption name="idmap uid">10000-20000</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1207 | <smbconfoption name="idmap gid">10000-20000</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1208 | <smbconfoption name="printing">cups</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1209 |
|
|---|
| 1210 | <smbconfsection name="[accounts]"/>
|
|---|
| 1211 | <smbconfoption name="comment">Accounting Files</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1212 | <smbconfoption name="path">/data/accounts</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1213 | <smbconfoption name="read only">No</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1214 |
|
|---|
| 1215 | <smbconfsection name="[service]"/>
|
|---|
| 1216 | <smbconfoption name="comment">Financial Services Files</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1217 | <smbconfoption name="path">/data/service</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1218 | <smbconfoption name="read only">No</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1219 | </smbconfblock>
|
|---|
| 1220 | </example>
|
|---|
| 1221 |
|
|---|
| 1222 | <example id="ch7-slvsmbocnfB">
|
|---|
| 1223 | <title>Backup Domain Controller &smb.conf; File &smbmdash; Part B</title>
|
|---|
| 1224 | <smbconfblock>
|
|---|
| 1225 | <smbconfsection name="[pidata]"/>
|
|---|
| 1226 | <smbconfoption name="comment">Property Insurance Files</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1227 | <smbconfoption name="path">/data/pidata</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1228 | <smbconfoption name="read only">No</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1229 |
|
|---|
| 1230 | <smbconfsection name="[homes]"/>
|
|---|
| 1231 | <smbconfoption name="comment">Home Directories</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1232 | <smbconfoption name="valid users">%S</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1233 | <smbconfoption name="read only">No</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1234 | <smbconfoption name="browseable">No</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1235 |
|
|---|
| 1236 | <smbconfsection name="[printers]"/>
|
|---|
| 1237 | <smbconfoption name="comment">SMB Print Spool</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1238 | <smbconfoption name="path">/var/spool/samba</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1239 | <smbconfoption name="guest ok">Yes</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1240 | <smbconfoption name="printable">Yes</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1241 | <smbconfoption name="browseable">No</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1242 |
|
|---|
| 1243 | <smbconfsection name="[apps]"/>
|
|---|
| 1244 | <smbconfoption name="comment">Application Files</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1245 | <smbconfoption name="path">/apps</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1246 | <smbconfoption name="admin users">bjones</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1247 | <smbconfoption name="read only">No</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1248 |
|
|---|
| 1249 | <smbconfsection name="[netlogon]"/>
|
|---|
| 1250 | <smbconfoption name="comment">Network Logon Service</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1251 | <smbconfoption name="path">/var/lib/samba/netlogon</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1252 | <smbconfoption name="guest ok">Yes</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1253 | <smbconfoption name="locking">No</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1254 |
|
|---|
| 1255 | <smbconfsection name="[profiles]"/>
|
|---|
| 1256 | <smbconfoption name="comment">Profile Share</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1257 | <smbconfoption name="path">/var/lib/samba/profiles</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1258 | <smbconfoption name="read only">No</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1259 | <smbconfoption name="profile acls">Yes</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1260 |
|
|---|
| 1261 | <smbconfsection name="[profdata]"/>
|
|---|
| 1262 | <smbconfoption name="comment">Profile Data Share</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1263 | <smbconfoption name="path">/var/lib/samba/profdata</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1264 | <smbconfoption name="read only">No</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1265 | <smbconfoption name="profile acls">Yes</smbconfoption>
|
|---|
| 1266 | </smbconfblock>
|
|---|
| 1267 | </example>
|
|---|
| 1268 |
|
|---|
| 1269 | <sect2>
|
|---|
| 1270 | <title>Key Points Learned</title>
|
|---|
| 1271 |
|
|---|
| 1272 | <itemizedlist>
|
|---|
| 1273 | <listitem><para>
|
|---|
| 1274 | <indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary></indexterm><indexterm><primary>BDC</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 1275 | Where Samba-3 is used as a domain controller, the use of LDAP is an
|
|---|
| 1276 | essential component to permit the use of BDCs.
|
|---|
| 1277 | </para></listitem>
|
|---|
| 1278 |
|
|---|
| 1279 | <listitem><para>
|
|---|
| 1280 | <indexterm><primary>wide-area</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 1281 | Replication of the LDAP master server to create a network of BDCs
|
|---|
| 1282 | is an important mechanism for limiting WAN traffic.
|
|---|
| 1283 | </para></listitem>
|
|---|
| 1284 |
|
|---|
| 1285 | <listitem><para>
|
|---|
| 1286 | Network administration presents many complex challenges, most of which
|
|---|
| 1287 | can be satisfied by good design but that also require sound communication
|
|---|
| 1288 | and unification of management practices. This can be highly challenging in
|
|---|
| 1289 | a large, globally distributed network.
|
|---|
| 1290 | </para></listitem>
|
|---|
| 1291 |
|
|---|
| 1292 | <listitem><para>
|
|---|
| 1293 | Roaming profiles must be contained to the local network segment. Any
|
|---|
| 1294 | departure from this may clog wide-area arteries and slow legitimate network
|
|---|
| 1295 | traffic to a crawl.
|
|---|
| 1296 | </para></listitem>
|
|---|
| 1297 | </itemizedlist>
|
|---|
| 1298 |
|
|---|
| 1299 | </sect2>
|
|---|
| 1300 |
|
|---|
| 1301 | <figure id="chap7net">
|
|---|
| 1302 | <title>Network Topology &smbmdash; 2000 User Complex Design A</title>
|
|---|
| 1303 | <imagefile scale="80">chap7-net-Ar</imagefile>
|
|---|
| 1304 | </figure>
|
|---|
| 1305 |
|
|---|
| 1306 | <figure id="chap7net2">
|
|---|
| 1307 | <title>Network Topology &smbmdash; 2000 User Complex Design B</title>
|
|---|
| 1308 | <imagefile scale="80">chap7-net2-Br</imagefile>
|
|---|
| 1309 | </figure>
|
|---|
| 1310 |
|
|---|
| 1311 | </sect1>
|
|---|
| 1312 |
|
|---|
| 1313 | <sect1>
|
|---|
| 1314 | <title>Questions and Answers</title>
|
|---|
| 1315 |
|
|---|
| 1316 | <para>
|
|---|
| 1317 | There is much rumor and misinformation regarding the use of MS Windows networking protocols.
|
|---|
| 1318 | These questions are just a few of those frequently asked.
|
|---|
| 1319 | </para>
|
|---|
| 1320 |
|
|---|
| 1321 | <qandaset defaultlabel="chap07qa" type="number">
|
|---|
| 1322 | <qandaentry>
|
|---|
| 1323 | <question>
|
|---|
| 1324 |
|
|---|
| 1325 | <para>
|
|---|
| 1326 | <indexterm><primary>DHCP</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 1327 | <indexterm><primary>network</primary><secondary>bandwidth</secondary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 1328 | Is it true that DHCP uses lots of WAN bandwidth?
|
|---|
| 1329 | </para>
|
|---|
| 1330 |
|
|---|
| 1331 | </question>
|
|---|
| 1332 | <answer>
|
|---|
| 1333 |
|
|---|
| 1334 | <para>
|
|---|
| 1335 | <indexterm><primary>DHCP</primary><secondary>Relay Agent</secondary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 1336 | <indexterm><primary>routers</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 1337 | <indexterm><primary>DHCP</primary><secondary>servers</secondary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 1338 | It is a smart practice to localize DHCP servers on each network segment. As a
|
|---|
| 1339 | rule, there should be two DHCP servers per network segment. This means that if
|
|---|
| 1340 | one server fails, there is always another to service user needs. DHCP requests use
|
|---|
| 1341 | only UDP broadcast protocols. It is possible to run a DHCP Relay Agent on network
|
|---|
| 1342 | routers. This makes it possible to run fewer DHCP servers.
|
|---|
| 1343 | </para>
|
|---|
| 1344 |
|
|---|
| 1345 | <para>
|
|---|
| 1346 | <indexterm><primary>DHCP</primary><secondary>request</secondary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 1347 | <indexterm><primary>DHCP</primary><secondary>traffic</secondary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 1348 | A DHCP network address request and confirmation usually results in about six UDP packets.
|
|---|
| 1349 | The packets are from 60 to 568 bytes in length. Let us consider a site that has 300 DHCP
|
|---|
| 1350 | clients and that uses a 24-hour IP address lease. This means that all clients renew
|
|---|
| 1351 | their IP address lease every 24 hours. If we assume an average packet length equal to the
|
|---|
| 1352 | maximum (just to be on the safe side), and we have a 128 Kb/sec wide-area connection,
|
|---|
| 1353 | how significant would the DHCP traffic be if all of it were to use DHCP Relay?
|
|---|
| 1354 | </para>
|
|---|
| 1355 |
|
|---|
| 1356 | <para>
|
|---|
| 1357 | I must stress that this is a bad design, but here is the calculation:
|
|---|
| 1358 | <screen>
|
|---|
| 1359 | Daily Network Capacity: 128,000 (Kbits/s) / 8 (bits/byte)
|
|---|
| 1360 | x 3600 (sec/hr) x 24 (hrs/day)= 2288 Mbytes/day.
|
|---|
| 1361 |
|
|---|
| 1362 | DHCP traffic: 300 (clients) x 6 (packets)
|
|---|
| 1363 | x 512 (bytes/packet) = 0.9 Mbytes/day.
|
|---|
| 1364 | </screen>
|
|---|
| 1365 | From this can be seen that the traffic impact would be minimal.
|
|---|
| 1366 | </para>
|
|---|
| 1367 |
|
|---|
| 1368 | <para>
|
|---|
| 1369 | <indexterm><primary>DNS</primary><secondary>Dynamic</secondary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 1370 | <indexterm><primary>DHCP</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 1371 | Even when DHCP is configured to do DNS update (dynamic DNS) over a wide-area link,
|
|---|
| 1372 | the impact of the update is no more than the DHCP IP address renewal traffic and thus
|
|---|
| 1373 | still insignificant for most practical purposes.
|
|---|
| 1374 | </para>
|
|---|
| 1375 |
|
|---|
| 1376 | </answer>
|
|---|
| 1377 | </qandaentry>
|
|---|
| 1378 |
|
|---|
| 1379 | <qandaentry>
|
|---|
| 1380 | <question>
|
|---|
| 1381 |
|
|---|
| 1382 | <para>
|
|---|
| 1383 | <indexterm><primary>background communication</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 1384 | <indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary><secondary>master/slave</secondary><tertiary>background communication</tertiary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 1385 | How much background communication takes place between a master LDAP server and its slave LDAP servers?
|
|---|
| 1386 | </para>
|
|---|
| 1387 |
|
|---|
| 1388 | </question>
|
|---|
| 1389 | <answer>
|
|---|
| 1390 |
|
|---|
| 1391 | <para>
|
|---|
| 1392 | <indexterm><primary>slurpd</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 1393 | The process that controls the replication of data from the master LDAP server to the slave LDAP
|
|---|
| 1394 | servers is called <command>slurpd</command>. The <command>slurpd</command> remains nascent (quiet)
|
|---|
| 1395 | until an update must be propagated. The propagation traffic per LDAP slave to update (add/modify/delete)
|
|---|
| 1396 | two user accounts requires less than 10KB traffic.
|
|---|
| 1397 | </para>
|
|---|
| 1398 |
|
|---|
| 1399 | </answer>
|
|---|
| 1400 | </qandaentry>
|
|---|
| 1401 |
|
|---|
| 1402 | <qandaentry>
|
|---|
| 1403 | <question>
|
|---|
| 1404 |
|
|---|
| 1405 | <para>
|
|---|
| 1406 | LDAP has a database. Is LDAP not just a fancy database front end?
|
|---|
| 1407 | </para>
|
|---|
| 1408 |
|
|---|
| 1409 | </question>
|
|---|
| 1410 | <answer>
|
|---|
| 1411 |
|
|---|
| 1412 | <para>
|
|---|
| 1413 | <indexterm><primary>database</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 1414 | <indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary><secondary>database</secondary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 1415 | <indexterm><primary>SQL</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 1416 | <indexterm><primary>transactional</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 1417 | LDAP does store its data in a database of sorts. In fact, the LDAP backend is an application-specific
|
|---|
| 1418 | data storage system. This type of database is indexed so that records can be rapidly located, but the
|
|---|
| 1419 | database is not generic and can be used only in particular pre-programmed ways. General external
|
|---|
| 1420 | applications do not gain access to the data. This type of database is used also by SQL servers. Both
|
|---|
| 1421 | an SQL server and an LDAP server provide ways to access the data. An SQL server has a transactional
|
|---|
| 1422 | orientation and typically allows external programs to perform ad hoc queries, even across data tables.
|
|---|
| 1423 | An LDAP front end is a purpose-built tool that has a search orientation that is designed around specific
|
|---|
| 1424 | simple queries. The term <constant>database</constant> is heavily overloaded and thus much misunderstood.
|
|---|
| 1425 | </para>
|
|---|
| 1426 |
|
|---|
| 1427 | </answer>
|
|---|
| 1428 | </qandaentry>
|
|---|
| 1429 |
|
|---|
| 1430 | <qandaentry>
|
|---|
| 1431 | <question>
|
|---|
| 1432 |
|
|---|
| 1433 | <para>
|
|---|
| 1434 | <indexterm><primary>OpenLDAP</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 1435 | Can Active Directory obtain account information from an OpenLDAP server?
|
|---|
| 1436 | </para>
|
|---|
| 1437 |
|
|---|
| 1438 | </question>
|
|---|
| 1439 | <answer>
|
|---|
| 1440 |
|
|---|
| 1441 | <para>
|
|---|
| 1442 | <indexterm><primary>meta-directory</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 1443 | No, at least not directly. It is possible to provision Active Directory from and/or to an OpenLDAP
|
|---|
| 1444 | database through use of a metadirectory server. Microsoft MMS (now called MIIS) can interface
|
|---|
| 1445 | to OpenLDAP using standard LDAP queries and updates.
|
|---|
| 1446 | </para>
|
|---|
| 1447 |
|
|---|
| 1448 | </answer>
|
|---|
| 1449 | </qandaentry>
|
|---|
| 1450 |
|
|---|
| 1451 | <qandaentry>
|
|---|
| 1452 | <question>
|
|---|
| 1453 |
|
|---|
| 1454 | <para>
|
|---|
| 1455 | What are the parts of a roaming profile? How large is each part?
|
|---|
| 1456 | </para>
|
|---|
| 1457 |
|
|---|
| 1458 | </question>
|
|---|
| 1459 | <answer>
|
|---|
| 1460 |
|
|---|
| 1461 | <para><indexterm>
|
|---|
| 1462 | <primary>roaming profile</primary>
|
|---|
| 1463 | </indexterm>
|
|---|
| 1464 | A roaming profile consists of
|
|---|
| 1465 | </para>
|
|---|
| 1466 |
|
|---|
| 1467 | <itemizedlist>
|
|---|
| 1468 | <listitem><para>
|
|---|
| 1469 | Desktop folders such as <constant>Desktop</constant>, <constant>My Documents</constant>,
|
|---|
| 1470 | <constant>My Pictures</constant>, <constant>My Music</constant>, <constant>Internet Files</constant>,
|
|---|
| 1471 | <constant>Cookies</constant>, <constant>Application Data</constant>,
|
|---|
| 1472 | <constant>Local Settings,</constant> and more. See <link linkend="happy"/>, <link linkend="XP-screen001"/>.
|
|---|
| 1473 | </para>
|
|---|
| 1474 |
|
|---|
| 1475 | <para>
|
|---|
| 1476 | <indexterm><primary>folder redirection</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 1477 | Each of these can be anywhere from a few bytes to gigabytes in capacity. Fortunately, all
|
|---|
| 1478 | such folders can be redirected to network drive resources. See <link linkend="redirfold"/>
|
|---|
| 1479 | for more information regarding folder redirection.
|
|---|
| 1480 | </para></listitem>
|
|---|
| 1481 |
|
|---|
| 1482 | <listitem><para>
|
|---|
| 1483 | A static or rewritable portion that is typically only a few files (2-5 KB of information).
|
|---|
| 1484 | </para></listitem>
|
|---|
| 1485 |
|
|---|
| 1486 | <listitem><para>
|
|---|
| 1487 | <indexterm><primary>NTUSER.DAT</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 1488 | <indexterm><primary>HKEY_LOCAL_USER</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 1489 | The registry load file that modifies the <constant>HKEY_LOCAL_USER</constant> hive. This is
|
|---|
| 1490 | the <filename>NTUSER.DAT</filename> file. It can be from 0.4 to 1.5 MB.
|
|---|
| 1491 | </para></listitem>
|
|---|
| 1492 | </itemizedlist>
|
|---|
| 1493 |
|
|---|
| 1494 | <para>
|
|---|
| 1495 | <indexterm><primary>Microsoft Outlook</primary><secondary>PST files</secondary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 1496 | Microsoft Outlook PST files may be stored in the <constant>Local Settings\Application Data</constant>
|
|---|
| 1497 | folder. It can be up to 2 GB in size per PST file.
|
|---|
| 1498 | </para>
|
|---|
| 1499 |
|
|---|
| 1500 | </answer>
|
|---|
| 1501 | </qandaentry>
|
|---|
| 1502 |
|
|---|
| 1503 | <qandaentry>
|
|---|
| 1504 | <question>
|
|---|
| 1505 |
|
|---|
| 1506 | <para>
|
|---|
| 1507 | Can the <constant>My Documents</constant> folder be stored on a network drive?
|
|---|
| 1508 | </para>
|
|---|
| 1509 |
|
|---|
| 1510 | </question>
|
|---|
| 1511 | <answer>
|
|---|
| 1512 |
|
|---|
| 1513 | <para>
|
|---|
| 1514 | <indexterm><primary>UNC name</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 1515 | <indexterm><primary>Universal Naming Convention</primary><see>UNC name</see></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 1516 | Yes. More correctly, such folders can be redirected to network shares. No specific network drive
|
|---|
| 1517 | connection is required. Registry settings permit this to be redirected directly to a UNC (Universal
|
|---|
| 1518 | Naming Convention) resource, though it is possible to specify a network drive letter instead of a
|
|---|
| 1519 | UNC name. See <link linkend="redirfold"/>.
|
|---|
| 1520 | </para>
|
|---|
| 1521 |
|
|---|
| 1522 | </answer>
|
|---|
| 1523 | </qandaentry>
|
|---|
| 1524 |
|
|---|
| 1525 | <qandaentry>
|
|---|
| 1526 | <question>
|
|---|
| 1527 |
|
|---|
| 1528 | <para>
|
|---|
| 1529 | <indexterm><primary>wide-area</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 1530 | <indexterm><primary>network</primary><secondary>bandwidth</secondary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 1531 | <indexterm><primary>WINS</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 1532 | How much WAN bandwidth does WINS consume?
|
|---|
| 1533 | </para>
|
|---|
| 1534 |
|
|---|
| 1535 | </question>
|
|---|
| 1536 | <answer>
|
|---|
| 1537 |
|
|---|
| 1538 | <para>
|
|---|
| 1539 | <indexterm><primary>NetBIOS</primary><secondary>name cache</secondary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 1540 | <indexterm><primary>WINS server</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 1541 | <indexterm><primary>domain replication</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 1542 | MS Windows clients cache information obtained from WINS lookups in a local NetBIOS name cache.
|
|---|
| 1543 | This keeps WINS lookups to a minimum. On a network with 3500 MS Windows clients and a central WINS
|
|---|
| 1544 | server, the total bandwidth demand measured at the WINS server, averaged over an 8-hour working day,
|
|---|
| 1545 | was less than 30 KB/sec. Analysis of network traffic over a 6-week period showed that the total
|
|---|
| 1546 | of all background traffic consumed about 11 percent of available bandwidth over 64 Kb/sec links.
|
|---|
| 1547 | Background traffic consisted of domain replication, WINS queries, DNS lookups, and authentication
|
|---|
| 1548 | traffic. Each of 11 branch offices had a 64 Kb/sec wide-area link, with a 1.5 Mb/sec main connection
|
|---|
| 1549 | that aggregated the branch office connections plus an Internet connection.
|
|---|
| 1550 | </para>
|
|---|
| 1551 |
|
|---|
| 1552 | <para>
|
|---|
| 1553 | In conclusion, the total load afforded through WINS traffic is again marginal to total operational
|
|---|
| 1554 | usage &smbmdash; as it should be.
|
|---|
| 1555 | </para>
|
|---|
| 1556 |
|
|---|
| 1557 | </answer>
|
|---|
| 1558 | </qandaentry>
|
|---|
| 1559 |
|
|---|
| 1560 | <qandaentry>
|
|---|
| 1561 | <question>
|
|---|
| 1562 |
|
|---|
| 1563 | <para>
|
|---|
| 1564 | How many BDCs should I have? What is the right number of Windows clients per server?
|
|---|
| 1565 | </para>
|
|---|
| 1566 |
|
|---|
| 1567 | </question>
|
|---|
| 1568 | <answer>
|
|---|
| 1569 |
|
|---|
| 1570 | <para>
|
|---|
| 1571 | It is recommended to have at least one BDC per network segment, including the segment served
|
|---|
| 1572 | by the PDC. Actual requirements vary depending on the working load on each of the BDCs and the
|
|---|
| 1573 | load demand pattern of client usage. I have seen sites that function without problem with 200
|
|---|
| 1574 | clients served by one BDC, and yet other sites that had one BDC per 20 clients. In one particular
|
|---|
| 1575 | company, there was a drafting office that had 30 CAD/CAM operators served by one server, a print
|
|---|
| 1576 | server; and an application server. While all three were BDCs, typically only the print server would
|
|---|
| 1577 | service network logon requests after the first 10 users had started to use the network. This was
|
|---|
| 1578 | a reflection of the service load placed on both the application server and the data server.
|
|---|
| 1579 | </para>
|
|---|
| 1580 |
|
|---|
| 1581 | <para>
|
|---|
| 1582 | As unsatisfactory as the answer might sound, it all depends on network and server load
|
|---|
| 1583 | characteristics.
|
|---|
| 1584 | </para>
|
|---|
| 1585 |
|
|---|
| 1586 | </answer>
|
|---|
| 1587 | </qandaentry>
|
|---|
| 1588 |
|
|---|
| 1589 | <qandaentry>
|
|---|
| 1590 | <question>
|
|---|
| 1591 |
|
|---|
| 1592 | <para>
|
|---|
| 1593 | <indexterm><primary>NIS server</primary></indexterm><indexterm><primary>LDAP</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 1594 | I've heard that you can store NIS accounts in LDAP. Is LDAP not just a smarter way to
|
|---|
| 1595 | run an NIS server?
|
|---|
| 1596 | </para>
|
|---|
| 1597 |
|
|---|
| 1598 | </question>
|
|---|
| 1599 | <answer>
|
|---|
| 1600 |
|
|---|
| 1601 | <para>
|
|---|
| 1602 | The correct answer to both questions is yes. But do understand that an LDAP server has
|
|---|
| 1603 | a configurable schema that can store far more information for many more purposes than
|
|---|
| 1604 | just NIS.
|
|---|
| 1605 | </para>
|
|---|
| 1606 |
|
|---|
| 1607 | </answer>
|
|---|
| 1608 | </qandaentry>
|
|---|
| 1609 |
|
|---|
| 1610 | <qandaentry>
|
|---|
| 1611 | <question>
|
|---|
| 1612 |
|
|---|
| 1613 | <para>
|
|---|
| 1614 | Can I use NIS in place of LDAP?
|
|---|
| 1615 | </para>
|
|---|
| 1616 |
|
|---|
| 1617 | </question>
|
|---|
| 1618 | <answer>
|
|---|
| 1619 |
|
|---|
| 1620 | <para>
|
|---|
| 1621 | <indexterm><primary>NIS</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 1622 | <indexterm><primary>NIS schema</primary></indexterm>
|
|---|
| 1623 | No. The NIS database does not have provision to store Microsoft encrypted passwords and does not deal
|
|---|
| 1624 | with the types of data necessary for interoperability with Microsoft Windows networking. The use
|
|---|
| 1625 | of LDAP with Samba requires the use of a number of schemas, one of which is the NIS schema, but also
|
|---|
| 1626 | a Samba-specific schema extension.
|
|---|
| 1627 | </para>
|
|---|
| 1628 |
|
|---|
| 1629 | </answer>
|
|---|
| 1630 | </qandaentry>
|
|---|
| 1631 |
|
|---|
| 1632 | </qandaset>
|
|---|
| 1633 | </sect1>
|
|---|
| 1634 |
|
|---|
| 1635 | </chapter>
|
|---|
| 1636 |
|
|---|