| 1 | /*
|
|---|
| 2 | Unix SMB/CIFS implementation.
|
|---|
| 3 |
|
|---|
| 4 | trivial database library
|
|---|
| 5 |
|
|---|
| 6 | Copyright (C) Andrew Tridgell 1999-2005
|
|---|
| 7 | Copyright (C) Paul `Rusty' Russell 2000
|
|---|
| 8 | Copyright (C) Jeremy Allison 2000-2003
|
|---|
| 9 |
|
|---|
| 10 | ** NOTE! The following LGPL license applies to the tdb
|
|---|
| 11 | ** library. This does NOT imply that all of Samba is released
|
|---|
| 12 | ** under the LGPL
|
|---|
| 13 |
|
|---|
| 14 | This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
|
|---|
| 15 | modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
|
|---|
| 16 | License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
|
|---|
| 17 | version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
|
|---|
| 18 |
|
|---|
| 19 | This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
|
|---|
| 20 | but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
|
|---|
| 21 | MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
|
|---|
| 22 | Lesser General Public License for more details.
|
|---|
| 23 |
|
|---|
| 24 | You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
|
|---|
| 25 | License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software
|
|---|
| 26 | Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA
|
|---|
| 27 | */
|
|---|
| 28 |
|
|---|
| 29 | #include "tdb_private.h"
|
|---|
| 30 |
|
|---|
| 31 | /* Uses traverse lock: 0 = finish, -1 = error, other = record offset */
|
|---|
| 32 | static int tdb_next_lock(struct tdb_context *tdb, struct tdb_traverse_lock *tlock,
|
|---|
| 33 | struct list_struct *rec)
|
|---|
| 34 | {
|
|---|
| 35 | int want_next = (tlock->off != 0);
|
|---|
| 36 |
|
|---|
| 37 | /* Lock each chain from the start one. */
|
|---|
| 38 | for (; tlock->hash < tdb->header.hash_size; tlock->hash++) {
|
|---|
| 39 | if (!tlock->off && tlock->hash != 0) {
|
|---|
| 40 | /* this is an optimisation for the common case where
|
|---|
| 41 | the hash chain is empty, which is particularly
|
|---|
| 42 | common for the use of tdb with ldb, where large
|
|---|
| 43 | hashes are used. In that case we spend most of our
|
|---|
| 44 | time in tdb_brlock(), locking empty hash chains.
|
|---|
| 45 |
|
|---|
| 46 | To avoid this, we do an unlocked pre-check to see
|
|---|
| 47 | if the hash chain is empty before starting to look
|
|---|
| 48 | inside it. If it is empty then we can avoid that
|
|---|
| 49 | hash chain. If it isn't empty then we can't believe
|
|---|
| 50 | the value we get back, as we read it without a
|
|---|
| 51 | lock, so instead we get the lock and re-fetch the
|
|---|
| 52 | value below.
|
|---|
| 53 |
|
|---|
| 54 | Notice that not doing this optimisation on the
|
|---|
| 55 | first hash chain is critical. We must guarantee
|
|---|
| 56 | that we have done at least one fcntl lock at the
|
|---|
| 57 | start of a search to guarantee that memory is
|
|---|
| 58 | coherent on SMP systems. If records are added by
|
|---|
| 59 | others during the search then thats OK, and we
|
|---|
| 60 | could possibly miss those with this trick, but we
|
|---|
| 61 | could miss them anyway without this trick, so the
|
|---|
| 62 | semantics don't change.
|
|---|
| 63 |
|
|---|
| 64 | With a non-indexed ldb search this trick gains us a
|
|---|
| 65 | factor of around 80 in speed on a linux 2.6.x
|
|---|
| 66 | system (testing using ldbtest).
|
|---|
| 67 | */
|
|---|
| 68 | tdb->methods->next_hash_chain(tdb, &tlock->hash);
|
|---|
| 69 | if (tlock->hash == tdb->header.hash_size) {
|
|---|
| 70 | continue;
|
|---|
| 71 | }
|
|---|
| 72 | }
|
|---|
| 73 |
|
|---|
| 74 | if (tdb_lock(tdb, tlock->hash, tlock->lock_rw) == -1)
|
|---|
| 75 | return -1;
|
|---|
| 76 |
|
|---|
| 77 | /* No previous record? Start at top of chain. */
|
|---|
| 78 | if (!tlock->off) {
|
|---|
| 79 | if (tdb_ofs_read(tdb, TDB_HASH_TOP(tlock->hash),
|
|---|
| 80 | &tlock->off) == -1)
|
|---|
| 81 | goto fail;
|
|---|
| 82 | } else {
|
|---|
| 83 | /* Otherwise unlock the previous record. */
|
|---|
| 84 | if (tdb_unlock_record(tdb, tlock->off) != 0)
|
|---|
| 85 | goto fail;
|
|---|
| 86 | }
|
|---|
| 87 |
|
|---|
| 88 | if (want_next) {
|
|---|
| 89 | /* We have offset of old record: grab next */
|
|---|
| 90 | if (tdb_rec_read(tdb, tlock->off, rec) == -1)
|
|---|
| 91 | goto fail;
|
|---|
| 92 | tlock->off = rec->next;
|
|---|
| 93 | }
|
|---|
| 94 |
|
|---|
| 95 | /* Iterate through chain */
|
|---|
| 96 | while( tlock->off) {
|
|---|
| 97 | tdb_off_t current;
|
|---|
| 98 | if (tdb_rec_read(tdb, tlock->off, rec) == -1)
|
|---|
| 99 | goto fail;
|
|---|
| 100 |
|
|---|
| 101 | /* Detect infinite loops. From "Shlomi Yaakobovich" <Shlomi@exanet.com>. */
|
|---|
| 102 | if (tlock->off == rec->next) {
|
|---|
| 103 | TDB_LOG((tdb, TDB_DEBUG_FATAL, "tdb_next_lock: loop detected.\n"));
|
|---|
| 104 | goto fail;
|
|---|
| 105 | }
|
|---|
| 106 |
|
|---|
| 107 | if (!TDB_DEAD(rec)) {
|
|---|
| 108 | /* Woohoo: we found one! */
|
|---|
| 109 | if (tdb_lock_record(tdb, tlock->off) != 0)
|
|---|
| 110 | goto fail;
|
|---|
| 111 | return tlock->off;
|
|---|
| 112 | }
|
|---|
| 113 |
|
|---|
| 114 | /* Try to clean dead ones from old traverses */
|
|---|
| 115 | current = tlock->off;
|
|---|
| 116 | tlock->off = rec->next;
|
|---|
| 117 | if (!(tdb->read_only || tdb->traverse_read) &&
|
|---|
| 118 | tdb_do_delete(tdb, current, rec) != 0)
|
|---|
| 119 | goto fail;
|
|---|
| 120 | }
|
|---|
| 121 | tdb_unlock(tdb, tlock->hash, tlock->lock_rw);
|
|---|
| 122 | want_next = 0;
|
|---|
| 123 | }
|
|---|
| 124 | /* We finished iteration without finding anything */
|
|---|
| 125 | return TDB_ERRCODE(TDB_SUCCESS, 0);
|
|---|
| 126 |
|
|---|
| 127 | fail:
|
|---|
| 128 | tlock->off = 0;
|
|---|
| 129 | if (tdb_unlock(tdb, tlock->hash, tlock->lock_rw) != 0)
|
|---|
| 130 | TDB_LOG((tdb, TDB_DEBUG_FATAL, "tdb_next_lock: On error unlock failed!\n"));
|
|---|
| 131 | return -1;
|
|---|
| 132 | }
|
|---|
| 133 |
|
|---|
| 134 | /* traverse the entire database - calling fn(tdb, key, data) on each element.
|
|---|
| 135 | return -1 on error or the record count traversed
|
|---|
| 136 | if fn is NULL then it is not called
|
|---|
| 137 | a non-zero return value from fn() indicates that the traversal should stop
|
|---|
| 138 | */
|
|---|
| 139 | static int tdb_traverse_internal(struct tdb_context *tdb,
|
|---|
| 140 | tdb_traverse_func fn, void *private_data,
|
|---|
| 141 | struct tdb_traverse_lock *tl)
|
|---|
| 142 | {
|
|---|
| 143 | TDB_DATA key, dbuf;
|
|---|
| 144 | struct list_struct rec;
|
|---|
| 145 | int ret, count = 0;
|
|---|
| 146 |
|
|---|
| 147 | /* This was in the initializaton, above, but the IRIX compiler
|
|---|
| 148 | * did not like it. crh
|
|---|
| 149 | */
|
|---|
| 150 | tl->next = tdb->travlocks.next;
|
|---|
| 151 |
|
|---|
| 152 | /* fcntl locks don't stack: beware traverse inside traverse */
|
|---|
| 153 | tdb->travlocks.next = tl;
|
|---|
| 154 |
|
|---|
| 155 | /* tdb_next_lock places locks on the record returned, and its chain */
|
|---|
| 156 | while ((ret = tdb_next_lock(tdb, tl, &rec)) > 0) {
|
|---|
| 157 | count++;
|
|---|
| 158 | /* now read the full record */
|
|---|
| 159 | key.dptr = tdb_alloc_read(tdb, tl->off + sizeof(rec),
|
|---|
| 160 | rec.key_len + rec.data_len);
|
|---|
| 161 | if (!key.dptr) {
|
|---|
| 162 | ret = -1;
|
|---|
| 163 | if (tdb_unlock(tdb, tl->hash, tl->lock_rw) != 0)
|
|---|
| 164 | goto out;
|
|---|
| 165 | if (tdb_unlock_record(tdb, tl->off) != 0)
|
|---|
| 166 | TDB_LOG((tdb, TDB_DEBUG_FATAL, "tdb_traverse: key.dptr == NULL and unlock_record failed!\n"));
|
|---|
| 167 | goto out;
|
|---|
| 168 | }
|
|---|
| 169 | key.dsize = rec.key_len;
|
|---|
| 170 | dbuf.dptr = key.dptr + rec.key_len;
|
|---|
| 171 | dbuf.dsize = rec.data_len;
|
|---|
| 172 |
|
|---|
| 173 | /* Drop chain lock, call out */
|
|---|
| 174 | if (tdb_unlock(tdb, tl->hash, tl->lock_rw) != 0) {
|
|---|
| 175 | ret = -1;
|
|---|
| 176 | SAFE_FREE(key.dptr);
|
|---|
| 177 | goto out;
|
|---|
| 178 | }
|
|---|
| 179 | if (fn && fn(tdb, key, dbuf, private_data)) {
|
|---|
| 180 | /* They want us to terminate traversal */
|
|---|
| 181 | ret = count;
|
|---|
| 182 | if (tdb_unlock_record(tdb, tl->off) != 0) {
|
|---|
| 183 | TDB_LOG((tdb, TDB_DEBUG_FATAL, "tdb_traverse: unlock_record failed!\n"));;
|
|---|
| 184 | ret = -1;
|
|---|
| 185 | }
|
|---|
| 186 | SAFE_FREE(key.dptr);
|
|---|
| 187 | goto out;
|
|---|
| 188 | }
|
|---|
| 189 | SAFE_FREE(key.dptr);
|
|---|
| 190 | }
|
|---|
| 191 | out:
|
|---|
| 192 | tdb->travlocks.next = tl->next;
|
|---|
| 193 | if (ret < 0)
|
|---|
| 194 | return -1;
|
|---|
| 195 | else
|
|---|
| 196 | return count;
|
|---|
| 197 | }
|
|---|
| 198 |
|
|---|
| 199 |
|
|---|
| 200 | /*
|
|---|
| 201 | a write style traverse - temporarily marks the db read only
|
|---|
| 202 | */
|
|---|
| 203 | int tdb_traverse_read(struct tdb_context *tdb,
|
|---|
| 204 | tdb_traverse_func fn, void *private_data)
|
|---|
| 205 | {
|
|---|
| 206 | struct tdb_traverse_lock tl = { NULL, 0, 0, F_RDLCK };
|
|---|
| 207 | int ret;
|
|---|
| 208 |
|
|---|
| 209 | /* we need to get a read lock on the transaction lock here to
|
|---|
| 210 | cope with the lock ordering semantics of solaris10 */
|
|---|
| 211 | if (tdb->methods->tdb_brlock(tdb, TRANSACTION_LOCK, F_RDLCK, F_SETLKW, 0, 1) == -1) {
|
|---|
| 212 | TDB_LOG((tdb, TDB_DEBUG_ERROR, "tdb_traverse_read: failed to get transaction lock\n"));
|
|---|
| 213 | tdb->ecode = TDB_ERR_LOCK;
|
|---|
| 214 | return -1;
|
|---|
| 215 | }
|
|---|
| 216 |
|
|---|
| 217 | tdb->traverse_read++;
|
|---|
| 218 | ret = tdb_traverse_internal(tdb, fn, private_data, &tl);
|
|---|
| 219 | tdb->traverse_read--;
|
|---|
| 220 |
|
|---|
| 221 | tdb->methods->tdb_brlock(tdb, TRANSACTION_LOCK, F_UNLCK, F_SETLKW, 0, 1);
|
|---|
| 222 |
|
|---|
| 223 | return ret;
|
|---|
| 224 | }
|
|---|
| 225 |
|
|---|
| 226 | /*
|
|---|
| 227 | a write style traverse - needs to get the transaction lock to
|
|---|
| 228 | prevent deadlocks
|
|---|
| 229 | */
|
|---|
| 230 | int tdb_traverse(struct tdb_context *tdb,
|
|---|
| 231 | tdb_traverse_func fn, void *private_data)
|
|---|
| 232 | {
|
|---|
| 233 | struct tdb_traverse_lock tl = { NULL, 0, 0, F_WRLCK };
|
|---|
| 234 | int ret;
|
|---|
| 235 |
|
|---|
| 236 | if (tdb->read_only || tdb->traverse_read) {
|
|---|
| 237 | return tdb_traverse_read(tdb, fn, private_data);
|
|---|
| 238 | }
|
|---|
| 239 |
|
|---|
| 240 | if (tdb->methods->tdb_brlock(tdb, TRANSACTION_LOCK, F_WRLCK, F_SETLKW, 0, 1) == -1) {
|
|---|
| 241 | TDB_LOG((tdb, TDB_DEBUG_ERROR, "tdb_traverse: failed to get transaction lock\n"));
|
|---|
| 242 | tdb->ecode = TDB_ERR_LOCK;
|
|---|
| 243 | return -1;
|
|---|
| 244 | }
|
|---|
| 245 |
|
|---|
| 246 | ret = tdb_traverse_internal(tdb, fn, private_data, &tl);
|
|---|
| 247 |
|
|---|
| 248 | tdb->methods->tdb_brlock(tdb, TRANSACTION_LOCK, F_UNLCK, F_SETLKW, 0, 1);
|
|---|
| 249 |
|
|---|
| 250 | return ret;
|
|---|
| 251 | }
|
|---|
| 252 |
|
|---|
| 253 |
|
|---|
| 254 | /* find the first entry in the database and return its key */
|
|---|
| 255 | TDB_DATA tdb_firstkey(struct tdb_context *tdb)
|
|---|
| 256 | {
|
|---|
| 257 | TDB_DATA key;
|
|---|
| 258 | struct list_struct rec;
|
|---|
| 259 |
|
|---|
| 260 | /* release any old lock */
|
|---|
| 261 | if (tdb_unlock_record(tdb, tdb->travlocks.off) != 0)
|
|---|
| 262 | return tdb_null;
|
|---|
| 263 | tdb->travlocks.off = tdb->travlocks.hash = 0;
|
|---|
| 264 | tdb->travlocks.lock_rw = F_RDLCK;
|
|---|
| 265 |
|
|---|
| 266 | /* Grab first record: locks chain and returned record. */
|
|---|
| 267 | if (tdb_next_lock(tdb, &tdb->travlocks, &rec) <= 0)
|
|---|
| 268 | return tdb_null;
|
|---|
| 269 | /* now read the key */
|
|---|
| 270 | key.dsize = rec.key_len;
|
|---|
| 271 | key.dptr =tdb_alloc_read(tdb,tdb->travlocks.off+sizeof(rec),key.dsize);
|
|---|
| 272 |
|
|---|
| 273 | /* Unlock the hash chain of the record we just read. */
|
|---|
| 274 | if (tdb_unlock(tdb, tdb->travlocks.hash, tdb->travlocks.lock_rw) != 0)
|
|---|
| 275 | TDB_LOG((tdb, TDB_DEBUG_FATAL, "tdb_firstkey: error occurred while tdb_unlocking!\n"));
|
|---|
| 276 | return key;
|
|---|
| 277 | }
|
|---|
| 278 |
|
|---|
| 279 | /* find the next entry in the database, returning its key */
|
|---|
| 280 | TDB_DATA tdb_nextkey(struct tdb_context *tdb, TDB_DATA oldkey)
|
|---|
| 281 | {
|
|---|
| 282 | u32 oldhash;
|
|---|
| 283 | TDB_DATA key = tdb_null;
|
|---|
| 284 | struct list_struct rec;
|
|---|
| 285 | char *k = NULL;
|
|---|
| 286 |
|
|---|
| 287 | /* Is locked key the old key? If so, traverse will be reliable. */
|
|---|
| 288 | if (tdb->travlocks.off) {
|
|---|
| 289 | if (tdb_lock(tdb,tdb->travlocks.hash,tdb->travlocks.lock_rw))
|
|---|
| 290 | return tdb_null;
|
|---|
| 291 | if (tdb_rec_read(tdb, tdb->travlocks.off, &rec) == -1
|
|---|
| 292 | || !(k = tdb_alloc_read(tdb,tdb->travlocks.off+sizeof(rec),
|
|---|
| 293 | rec.key_len))
|
|---|
| 294 | || memcmp(k, oldkey.dptr, oldkey.dsize) != 0) {
|
|---|
| 295 | /* No, it wasn't: unlock it and start from scratch */
|
|---|
| 296 | if (tdb_unlock_record(tdb, tdb->travlocks.off) != 0) {
|
|---|
| 297 | SAFE_FREE(k);
|
|---|
| 298 | return tdb_null;
|
|---|
| 299 | }
|
|---|
| 300 | if (tdb_unlock(tdb, tdb->travlocks.hash, tdb->travlocks.lock_rw) != 0) {
|
|---|
| 301 | SAFE_FREE(k);
|
|---|
| 302 | return tdb_null;
|
|---|
| 303 | }
|
|---|
| 304 | tdb->travlocks.off = 0;
|
|---|
| 305 | }
|
|---|
| 306 |
|
|---|
| 307 | SAFE_FREE(k);
|
|---|
| 308 | }
|
|---|
| 309 |
|
|---|
| 310 | if (!tdb->travlocks.off) {
|
|---|
| 311 | /* No previous element: do normal find, and lock record */
|
|---|
| 312 | tdb->travlocks.off = tdb_find_lock_hash(tdb, oldkey, tdb->hash_fn(&oldkey), tdb->travlocks.lock_rw, &rec);
|
|---|
| 313 | if (!tdb->travlocks.off)
|
|---|
| 314 | return tdb_null;
|
|---|
| 315 | tdb->travlocks.hash = BUCKET(rec.full_hash);
|
|---|
| 316 | if (tdb_lock_record(tdb, tdb->travlocks.off) != 0) {
|
|---|
| 317 | TDB_LOG((tdb, TDB_DEBUG_FATAL, "tdb_nextkey: lock_record failed (%s)!\n", strerror(errno)));
|
|---|
| 318 | return tdb_null;
|
|---|
| 319 | }
|
|---|
| 320 | }
|
|---|
| 321 | oldhash = tdb->travlocks.hash;
|
|---|
| 322 |
|
|---|
| 323 | /* Grab next record: locks chain and returned record,
|
|---|
| 324 | unlocks old record */
|
|---|
| 325 | if (tdb_next_lock(tdb, &tdb->travlocks, &rec) > 0) {
|
|---|
| 326 | key.dsize = rec.key_len;
|
|---|
| 327 | key.dptr = tdb_alloc_read(tdb, tdb->travlocks.off+sizeof(rec),
|
|---|
| 328 | key.dsize);
|
|---|
| 329 | /* Unlock the chain of this new record */
|
|---|
| 330 | if (tdb_unlock(tdb, tdb->travlocks.hash, tdb->travlocks.lock_rw) != 0)
|
|---|
| 331 | TDB_LOG((tdb, TDB_DEBUG_FATAL, "tdb_nextkey: WARNING tdb_unlock failed!\n"));
|
|---|
| 332 | }
|
|---|
| 333 | /* Unlock the chain of old record */
|
|---|
| 334 | if (tdb_unlock(tdb, BUCKET(oldhash), tdb->travlocks.lock_rw) != 0)
|
|---|
| 335 | TDB_LOG((tdb, TDB_DEBUG_FATAL, "tdb_nextkey: WARNING tdb_unlock failed!\n"));
|
|---|
| 336 | return key;
|
|---|
| 337 | }
|
|---|