| 1 | This document explains a couple of things that are specific to VMS.
|
|---|
| 2 | There are currently two "chapters", the first deals with cross-assembly
|
|---|
| 3 | issues, and the second deals with the VMS debugger and GNU-CC.
|
|---|
| 4 |
|
|---|
| 5 |
|
|---|
| 6 | ***********************************************************************
|
|---|
| 7 | ****************** Notes for Cross Assembly with VMS ******************
|
|---|
| 8 | ***********************************************************************
|
|---|
| 9 |
|
|---|
| 10 | If you wish to build gas on a non-VMS system to cross-assemble,
|
|---|
| 11 | you should use:
|
|---|
| 12 |
|
|---|
| 13 | configure ${hosttype} -target=vms
|
|---|
| 14 |
|
|---|
| 15 | and then follow the usual procedure. The object files generated on
|
|---|
| 16 | Unix will be correct from a binary point of view, but the real trick is
|
|---|
| 17 | getting them to the VMS machine. The format of the object file is
|
|---|
| 18 | a variable-length record, but each record contains binary data. gas
|
|---|
| 19 | writes the records in the same format that VMS would expect,
|
|---|
| 20 | namely a two-byte count followed by that number of bytes.
|
|---|
| 21 |
|
|---|
| 22 | If you try to copy the file to a VMS system using ftp, the ftp
|
|---|
| 23 | protocol will screw up the file by looking for nulls (record terminator for
|
|---|
| 24 | unix) and it will insert it's own record terminators at that point. This
|
|---|
| 25 | will obviously corrupt the file.
|
|---|
| 26 |
|
|---|
| 27 | If you try to transfer the file with ftp in binary mode, the
|
|---|
| 28 | file itself will not be corrupt, but VMS will think that the file contains
|
|---|
| 29 | fixed-length records of 512 bytes. You can use the public-domain FILE
|
|---|
| 30 | utility to change this with a command like:
|
|---|
| 31 |
|
|---|
| 32 | $FILE foo.o/type=variable
|
|---|
| 33 |
|
|---|
| 34 | If you do not have this utility available, the following program can be
|
|---|
| 35 | used to perform this task:
|
|---|
| 36 |
|
|---|
| 37 | #include <fab.h>
|
|---|
| 38 |
|
|---|
| 39 | #define RME$C_SETRFM 1
|
|---|
| 40 |
|
|---|
| 41 | struct FAB * fab;
|
|---|
| 42 |
|
|---|
| 43 | main(int argc, char * argv[]){
|
|---|
| 44 | int i, status;
|
|---|
| 45 | fab = (struct FAB*) malloc(sizeof(struct FAB));
|
|---|
| 46 | *fab = cc$rms_fab; /* initialize FAB*/
|
|---|
| 47 | fab->fab$b_fac = FAB$M_PUT;
|
|---|
| 48 | fab->fab$l_fop |= FAB$M_ESC;
|
|---|
| 49 | fab->fab$l_ctx = RME$C_SETRFM;
|
|---|
| 50 | fab->fab$w_ifi = 0;
|
|---|
| 51 | for(i=1;i<argc;i++){
|
|---|
| 52 | printf("Setting %s to variable length records.\n",argv[i]);
|
|---|
| 53 | fab->fab$l_fna = argv[i];
|
|---|
| 54 | fab->fab$b_fns = strlen(argv[i]);
|
|---|
| 55 | status = sys$open(fab,0,0);
|
|---|
| 56 | if((status & 7) != 1) lib$signal(status);
|
|---|
| 57 | fab->fab$b_rfm = FAB$C_VAR;
|
|---|
| 58 | status = sys$modify(fab,0,0);
|
|---|
| 59 | if((status & 7) != 1) lib$signal(status);
|
|---|
| 60 | status = sys$close(fab,0,0);
|
|---|
| 61 | if((status & 7) != 1) lib$signal(status);
|
|---|
| 62 | };
|
|---|
| 63 | }
|
|---|
| 64 |
|
|---|
| 65 | If you have NFS running on the VMS system, what you need to do
|
|---|
| 66 | depends upon which NFS software you are running on the VMS system. There
|
|---|
| 67 | are a number of different TCP/IP packages for VMS available, and only very
|
|---|
| 68 | limited testing has been performed. In the tests that has been done so
|
|---|
| 69 | far, the contents of the file will always be correct when transferring the
|
|---|
| 70 | file via NFS, but the record attributes may or may not be correct.
|
|---|
| 71 |
|
|---|
| 72 | One proprietary TCP/IP/NFS package for VMS is known to
|
|---|
| 73 | automatically fix the record attributes of the object file if you NFS mount
|
|---|
| 74 | a unix disk from the VMS system, and if the file has a ".obj" extension on
|
|---|
| 75 | the unix system. Other TCP/IP packages might do this for you as well, but
|
|---|
| 76 | they have not been checked.
|
|---|
| 77 |
|
|---|
| 78 | No matter what method you use to get the file to the VMS system, it is
|
|---|
| 79 | always a good idea to check to make sure that it is the correct type by
|
|---|
| 80 | doing a "$dir/full" on the object file. The desired record attributes will
|
|---|
| 81 | be "None". Undesirable record attributes will be "Stream-LF" or anything
|
|---|
| 82 | else.
|
|---|
| 83 |
|
|---|
| 84 | Once you get the files on the VMS system, you can check their integrity
|
|---|
| 85 | with the "$anal/obj" command. (Naturally at some point you should rename
|
|---|
| 86 | the .o files to .obj). As far as the debugger is concerned, the records
|
|---|
| 87 | will be correct, but the debugger will not be able to find the source files,
|
|---|
| 88 | since it only has the file name, and not the full directory specification.
|
|---|
| 89 | You must give the debugger some help by telling it which directories to
|
|---|
| 90 | search for the individual files - once you have done this you should be
|
|---|
| 91 | able to proceed normally.
|
|---|
| 92 |
|
|---|
| 93 | It is a good idea to use names for your files which will be valid
|
|---|
| 94 | under VMS, since otherwise you will have no way of getting the debugger to
|
|---|
| 95 | find the source file when deugging.
|
|---|
| 96 |
|
|---|
| 97 | The reason for this is that the object file normally contins specific
|
|---|
| 98 | information that the debugger can use to positively identify a file, and if
|
|---|
| 99 | you are assembling on a unix system this information simply does not exist
|
|---|
| 100 | in a meaningful way. You must help the debugger by using the "SET FILE="
|
|---|
| 101 | command to tell the debugger where to look for source files. The debugger
|
|---|
| 102 | records will be correct, except that the debugger will not be initially
|
|---|
| 103 | able to find the source files. You can use the "SET FILE" command to tell
|
|---|
| 104 | the debugger where to look for the source files.
|
|---|
| 105 |
|
|---|
| 106 | I have only tested this with a SVr4 i486 machine, and everything seems to
|
|---|
| 107 | work OK, with the limited testing that I have done. Other machines may
|
|---|
| 108 | or may not work. You should read the chapters on cross-compilers in the gcc
|
|---|
| 109 | manual before fooling with this. Since gas does not need to do any floating
|
|---|
| 110 | point arithmetic, the floating point constants that are generated here should
|
|---|
| 111 | be correct - the only concern is with constant folding in the main compiler.
|
|---|
| 112 | The range and precision of floats and doubles are similar on the 486 (with
|
|---|
| 113 | a builtin 80387) and the VAX, although there is a factor of 2 to 4
|
|---|
| 114 | difference in the range. The double, as implemented on the 486, is quite
|
|---|
| 115 | similar to the G_FLOAT on the VAX.
|
|---|
| 116 |
|
|---|
| 117 | ***********************************************************************
|
|---|
| 118 | ****************** Notes for using GNU CC with the VMS debugger********
|
|---|
| 119 | ***********************************************************************
|
|---|
| 120 |
|
|---|
| 121 |
|
|---|
| 122 | 1) You should be aware that GNU-C, as with any other decent compiler,
|
|---|
| 123 | will do things when optimization is turned on that you may not expect.
|
|---|
| 124 | Sometimes intermediate results are not written to variables, if they are only
|
|---|
| 125 | used in one place, and sometimes variables that are not used at all will not be
|
|---|
| 126 | written to the symbol table. Also, parameters to inline functions are often
|
|---|
| 127 | inaccessible. You can see the assembly code equivalent by using KP7 in the
|
|---|
| 128 | debugger, and from this you can tell if in fact a variable should have the
|
|---|
| 129 | value that you expect. You can find out if a variable lives withing a register
|
|---|
| 130 | by doing a 'show symbol/addr'.
|
|---|
| 131 |
|
|---|
| 132 | 2) Overly complex data types, such as:
|
|---|
| 133 |
|
|---|
| 134 | int (*(*(*(*(*(* sarr6)[1])[1])[2])[3])[4])[5];
|
|---|
| 135 |
|
|---|
| 136 | will not be debugged properly, since the debugging record overflows an internal
|
|---|
| 137 | debugger buffer. gcc-as will convert these to *void as far as the debugger
|
|---|
| 138 | symbol table is concerned, which will avoid any problems, and the assembler
|
|---|
| 139 | will give you a message informing you that this has happened.
|
|---|
| 140 |
|
|---|
| 141 | 3) You must, of course, compile and link with /debug. If you link
|
|---|
| 142 | without debug, you still get traceback table in the executable, but there is no
|
|---|
| 143 | symbol table for variables.
|
|---|
| 144 |
|
|---|
| 145 | 4) Included in the patches to VMS.C are fixes to two bugs that are
|
|---|
| 146 | unrelated to the changes that I have made. One of these made it impossible to
|
|---|
| 147 | debug small programs sometimes, and the other caused the debugger to become
|
|---|
| 148 | confused about which routine it was in, and give this incorrect info in
|
|---|
| 149 | tracebacks.
|
|---|
| 150 |
|
|---|
| 151 | 5) If you are using the GNU-C++ compiler, you should modify the
|
|---|
| 152 | compiler driver file GNU_CC:[000000]GCC.COM (or GXX.COM). If you have a
|
|---|
| 153 | seperate GXX.COM, then you need to change one line in GXX.COM to:
|
|---|
| 154 | $ if f$locate("D",p2) .ne. P2_Length then Debug = " ""-G0"""
|
|---|
| 155 | Notice zero---> ^
|
|---|
| 156 | If you are using a GCC.COM that does both C and C++, add the following lines to
|
|---|
| 157 | GCC.COM:
|
|---|
| 158 |
|
|---|
| 159 | $!
|
|---|
| 160 | $! Use old style debugging records for VMS
|
|---|
| 161 | $!
|
|---|
| 162 | $ if (Debug.nes."" ).and. Plus then Debug = " ""-G0"""
|
|---|
| 163 |
|
|---|
| 164 | after the variables Plus and Debug are set. The reason for this, is that C++
|
|---|
| 165 | compiler by default generates debugging records that are more complex,
|
|---|
| 166 | with many new syntactical elements that allow for the new features of the
|
|---|
| 167 | language. The -G0 switch tells the C++ compiler to use the old style debugging
|
|---|
| 168 | records. Until the debugger understands C++ there is not any point to try and
|
|---|
| 169 | use the expanded syntax.
|
|---|
| 170 |
|
|---|
| 171 | 6) When you have nested scopes, i.e.:
|
|---|
| 172 | main(){
|
|---|
| 173 | int i;
|
|---|
| 174 | {int i;
|
|---|
| 175 | {int i;
|
|---|
| 176 | };};}
|
|---|
| 177 | and you say "EXAM i" the debugger needs to figure out which variable you
|
|---|
| 178 | actually want to reference. I have arranged things to define a block to the
|
|---|
| 179 | debugger when you use brackets to enter a new scope, so in the example above,
|
|---|
| 180 | the variables would be described as:
|
|---|
| 181 | TEST\main\i
|
|---|
| 182 | TEST\main\$0\i
|
|---|
| 183 | TEST\main\$0\$0\i
|
|---|
| 184 | At each level, the block name is a number with a dollar sign prefix, the
|
|---|
| 185 | numbers start with 0 and count upward. When you say EXAM i, the debugger looks
|
|---|
| 186 | at the current PC, and decides which block it is currently in. It works from
|
|---|
| 187 | the innermost level outward until it finds a block that has the variable "i"
|
|---|
| 188 | defined. You can always specify the scope explicitly.
|
|---|
| 189 |
|
|---|
| 190 | 7) With C++, there can be a lot of inline functions, and it would be
|
|---|
| 191 | rather restrictive to force the user to debug the program by converting all of
|
|---|
| 192 | the inline functions to normal functions. What I have done is to essentially
|
|---|
| 193 | "add" (with the debugger) source lines from the include files that contain the
|
|---|
| 194 | inline functions. Thus when you step into an inline function it appears as if
|
|---|
| 195 | you have called the function, and you can examine variables and so forth.
|
|---|
| 196 | There are several *very* important differences, however. First of all, since
|
|---|
| 197 | there is no function call involved, you cannot step over the inline function
|
|---|
| 198 | call - you always step into it. Secondly, since the same source lines are used
|
|---|
| 199 | in many locations, there is a seperate copy of the source for *each* usage.
|
|---|
| 200 | Without this, breakpoints do not work, since we must have a 1-to-1 mapping
|
|---|
| 201 | between source lines and PC.
|
|---|
| 202 | Since you cannot step over inline function calls, it can be a real pain
|
|---|
| 203 | if you are not really interested in what is going on for that function call.
|
|---|
| 204 | What I have done is to use the "-D" switch for the assembler to toggle the
|
|---|
| 205 | following behavior. With the "-D" switch, all inline functions are included in
|
|---|
| 206 | the object file, and you can debug everything. Without the "-D" switch
|
|---|
| 207 | (default case with VMS implementation), inline functions are included *only* if
|
|---|
| 208 | they did not come from system header files (i.e. from GNU_CC_INCLUDE: or
|
|---|
| 209 | GNU_GXX_INCLUDE:). Thus, without the switch the user only debugs his/her own
|
|---|
| 210 | inline functions, and not the system ones. (This is especially useful if you do
|
|---|
| 211 | a lot of stream I/O in C++). This probably will not provide enough granularity
|
|---|
| 212 | for many users, but for now this is still somewhat experimental, and I would
|
|---|
| 213 | like to reflect upon it and get some feedback before I go any further.
|
|---|
| 214 | Possible solutions include an interactive prompting, a logical name, or a new
|
|---|
| 215 | command line option in gcc.c (which is then passed through somehow to the guts
|
|---|
| 216 | of the assembler).
|
|---|
| 217 | The inline functions from header files appear after the source code
|
|---|
| 218 | for the source file. This has the advantage that the source file itself is
|
|---|
| 219 | numbered with the same line numbers that you get with an editor. In addition,
|
|---|
| 220 | the entire header file is not included, since the assembler makes a list of
|
|---|
| 221 | the min and max source lines that are used, and only includes those lines from
|
|---|
| 222 | the first to the last actually used. (It is easy to change it to include the
|
|---|
| 223 | whole file).
|
|---|
| 224 |
|
|---|
| 225 | 8) When you are debugging C++ objects, the object "this" is refered to
|
|---|
| 226 | as "$this". Actually, the compiler writes it as ".this", but the period is
|
|---|
| 227 | not good for the debugger, so I have a routine to convert it to a $. (It
|
|---|
| 228 | actually converts all periods to $, but only for variables, since this was
|
|---|
| 229 | intended to allow us to access "this".
|
|---|
| 230 |
|
|---|
| 231 | 9) If you use the asm("...") keyword for global symbols, you will not
|
|---|
| 232 | be able to see that symbol with the debugger. The reason is that there are two
|
|---|
| 233 | records for the symbol stored in the data structures of the assembler. One
|
|---|
| 234 | contains the info such as psect number and offset, and the other one contains
|
|---|
| 235 | the information having to do with the data type of the variable. In order to
|
|---|
| 236 | debug as symbol, you need to be able to coorelate these records, and the only
|
|---|
| 237 | way to do this is by name. The record with the storage attributes will take
|
|---|
| 238 | the name used in the asm directive, and the record that specifies the data type
|
|---|
| 239 | has the actual variable name, and thus when you use the asm directive to change
|
|---|
| 240 | a variable name, the symbol becomes invisible.
|
|---|
| 241 |
|
|---|
| 242 | 10) Older versions of the compiler ( GNU-C 1.37.92 and earlier) place
|
|---|
| 243 | global constants in the text psect. This is unfortunate, since to the linker
|
|---|
| 244 | this appears to be an entry point. I sent a patch to the compiler to RMS,
|
|---|
| 245 | which will generate a .const section for these variables, and patched the
|
|---|
| 246 | assembler to put these variables into a psect just like that for normal
|
|---|
| 247 | variables, except that they are marked NOWRT. static constants are still
|
|---|
| 248 | placed in the text psect, since there is no need for any external access.
|
|---|