| 1 |
|
|---|
| 2 | GCC Frequently Asked Questions
|
|---|
| 3 |
|
|---|
| 4 | The latest version of this document is always available at
|
|---|
| 5 | [1]http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/faq.html.
|
|---|
| 6 |
|
|---|
| 7 | This FAQ tries to answer specific questions concerning GCC. For
|
|---|
| 8 | general information regarding C, C++, resp. Fortran please check the
|
|---|
| 9 | [2]comp.lang.c FAQ, [3]comp.std.c++ FAQ, and the [4]Fortran
|
|---|
| 10 | Information page.
|
|---|
| 11 |
|
|---|
| 12 | Other GCC-related FAQs: [5]libstdc++-v3, and [6]GCJ.
|
|---|
| 13 | _________________________________________________________________
|
|---|
| 14 |
|
|---|
| 15 | Questions
|
|---|
| 16 |
|
|---|
| 17 | 1. [7]General information
|
|---|
| 18 | 1. [8]What is the relationship between GCC and EGCS?
|
|---|
| 19 | 2. [9]What is the relationship between GCC and Cygnus / Red Hat?
|
|---|
| 20 | 3. [10]What is an open development model?
|
|---|
| 21 | 4. [11]How do I report a bug?
|
|---|
| 22 | 5. [12]How do I get a bug fixed or a feature added?
|
|---|
| 23 | 6. [13]Does GCC work on my platform?
|
|---|
| 24 | 2. [14]Installation
|
|---|
| 25 | 1. [15]How to install multiple versions of GCC
|
|---|
| 26 | 2. [16]Dynamic linker is unable to find GCC libraries
|
|---|
| 27 | 3. [17]libstdc++/libio tests fail badly with --enable-shared
|
|---|
| 28 | 4. [18]GCC can not find GNU as/GNU ld
|
|---|
| 29 | 5. [19]cpp: Usage:... Error
|
|---|
| 30 | 6. [20]Optimizing the compiler itself
|
|---|
| 31 | 3. [21]Testsuite problems
|
|---|
| 32 | 1. [22]Unable to run the testsuite
|
|---|
| 33 | 2. [23]How do I pass flags like -fnew-abi to the testsuite?
|
|---|
| 34 | 3. [24]How can I run the test suite with multiple options?
|
|---|
| 35 | 4. [25]Older versions of GCC
|
|---|
| 36 | 1. [26]Is there a stringstream / sstream for GCC 2.95.2?
|
|---|
| 37 | 5. [27]Miscellaneous
|
|---|
| 38 | 1. [28]Friend Templates
|
|---|
| 39 | 2. [29]dynamic_cast, throw, typeid don't work with shared
|
|---|
| 40 | libraries
|
|---|
| 41 | 3. [30]Why do I need autoconf, bison, xgettext, automake, etc?
|
|---|
| 42 | 4. [31]Why can't I build a shared library?
|
|---|
| 43 | 5. [32]When building C++, the linker says my constructors,
|
|---|
| 44 | destructors or virtual tables are undefined, but I defined
|
|---|
| 45 | them
|
|---|
| 46 | 6. [33]Will GCC someday include an incremental linker?
|
|---|
| 47 | _________________________________________________________________
|
|---|
| 48 |
|
|---|
| 49 | General information
|
|---|
| 50 |
|
|---|
| 51 | What is the relationship between GCC and EGCS?
|
|---|
| 52 |
|
|---|
| 53 | In 1990/1991 gcc version 1 had reached a point of stability. For the
|
|---|
| 54 | targets it could support, it worked well. It had limitations inherent
|
|---|
| 55 | in its design that would be difficult to resolve, so a major effort
|
|---|
| 56 | was made to resolve those limitiations and gcc version 2 was the
|
|---|
| 57 | result.
|
|---|
| 58 |
|
|---|
| 59 | When we had gcc2 in a useful state, development efforts on gcc1
|
|---|
| 60 | stopped and we all concentrated on making gcc2 better than gcc1 could
|
|---|
| 61 | ever be. This is the kind of step forward we wanted to make with the
|
|---|
| 62 | EGCS project when it was formed in 1997.
|
|---|
| 63 |
|
|---|
| 64 | In April 1999 the Free Software Foundation officially halted
|
|---|
| 65 | development on the gcc2 compiler and appointed the EGCS project as the
|
|---|
| 66 | official GCC maintainers. The net result was a single project which
|
|---|
| 67 | carries forward GCC development under the ultimate control of the
|
|---|
| 68 | [34]GCC Steering Committee.
|
|---|
| 69 | _________________________________________________________________
|
|---|
| 70 |
|
|---|
| 71 | What is the relationship between GCC and Cygnus / Red Hat?
|
|---|
| 72 |
|
|---|
| 73 | It is a common mis-conception that Red Hat controls GCC either
|
|---|
| 74 | directly or indirectly.
|
|---|
| 75 |
|
|---|
| 76 | While Red Hat does donate hardware, network connections, code and
|
|---|
| 77 | developer time to GCC development, Red Hat does not control GCC.
|
|---|
| 78 |
|
|---|
| 79 | Overall control of GCC is in the hands of the [35]GCC Steering
|
|---|
| 80 | Committee which includes people from a variety of different
|
|---|
| 81 | organizations and backgrounds. The purpose of the steering committee
|
|---|
| 82 | is to make decisions in the best interest of GCC and to help ensure
|
|---|
| 83 | that no individual or company has control over the project.
|
|---|
| 84 |
|
|---|
| 85 | To summarize, Red Hat contributes to the GCC project, but does not
|
|---|
| 86 | exert a controlling influence over GCC.
|
|---|
| 87 | _________________________________________________________________
|
|---|
| 88 |
|
|---|
| 89 | What is an open development model?
|
|---|
| 90 |
|
|---|
| 91 | We are using a bazaar style [36][1] approach to GCC development: we
|
|---|
| 92 | make snapshots publicly available to anyone who wants to try them; we
|
|---|
| 93 | welcome anyone to join the development mailing list. All of the
|
|---|
| 94 | discussions on the development mailing list are available via the web.
|
|---|
| 95 | We're going to be making releases with a much higher frequency than
|
|---|
| 96 | they have been made in the past.
|
|---|
| 97 |
|
|---|
| 98 | In addition to weekly snapshots of the GCC development sources, we
|
|---|
| 99 | have the sources readable from a CVS server by anyone. Furthermore we
|
|---|
| 100 | are using remote CVS to allow remote maintainers write access to the
|
|---|
| 101 | sources.
|
|---|
| 102 |
|
|---|
| 103 | There have been many potential GCC developers who were not able to
|
|---|
| 104 | participate in GCC development in the past. We want these people to
|
|---|
| 105 | help in any way they can; we ultimately want GCC to be the best
|
|---|
| 106 | compiler in the world.
|
|---|
| 107 |
|
|---|
| 108 | A compiler is a complicated piece of software, there will still be
|
|---|
| 109 | strong central maintainers who will reject patches, who will demand
|
|---|
| 110 | documentation of implementations, and who will keep the level of
|
|---|
| 111 | quality as high as it is today. Code that could use wider testing may
|
|---|
| 112 | be integrated--code that is simply ill-conceived won't be.
|
|---|
| 113 |
|
|---|
| 114 | GCC is not the first piece of software to use this open development
|
|---|
| 115 | process; FreeBSD, the Emacs lisp repository, and the Linux kernel are
|
|---|
| 116 | a few examples of the bazaar style of development.
|
|---|
| 117 |
|
|---|
| 118 | With GCC, we are adding new features and optimizations at a rate that
|
|---|
| 119 | has not been done since the creation of gcc2; these additions
|
|---|
| 120 | inevitably have a temporarily destabilizing effect. With the help of
|
|---|
| 121 | developers working together with this bazaar style development, the
|
|---|
| 122 | resulting stability and quality levels will be better than we've had
|
|---|
| 123 | before.
|
|---|
| 124 |
|
|---|
| 125 | [1] We've been discussing different development models a lot over
|
|---|
| 126 | the past few months. The paper which started all of this introduced
|
|---|
| 127 | two terms: A cathedral development model versus a bazaar
|
|---|
| 128 | development model. The paper is written by Eric S. Raymond, it is
|
|---|
| 129 | called ``[37]The Cathedral and the Bazaar''. The paper is a useful
|
|---|
| 130 | starting point for discussions.
|
|---|
| 131 | _________________________________________________________________
|
|---|
| 132 |
|
|---|
| 133 | How do I report a bug?
|
|---|
| 134 |
|
|---|
| 135 | There are complete instructions [38]here.
|
|---|
| 136 | _________________________________________________________________
|
|---|
| 137 |
|
|---|
| 138 | How do I get a bug fixed or a feature added?
|
|---|
| 139 |
|
|---|
| 140 | There are lots of ways to get something fixed. The list below may be
|
|---|
| 141 | incomplete, but it covers many of the common cases. These are listed
|
|---|
| 142 | roughly in order of increasing difficulty for the average GCC user,
|
|---|
| 143 | meaning someone who is not skilled in the internals of GCC, and where
|
|---|
| 144 | difficulty is measured in terms of the time required to fix the bug.
|
|---|
| 145 | No alternative is better than any other; each has its benefits and
|
|---|
| 146 | disadvantages.
|
|---|
| 147 | * Hire someone to fix it for you. There are various companies and
|
|---|
| 148 | individuals providing support for GCC. This alternative costs
|
|---|
| 149 | money, but is relatively likely to get results.
|
|---|
| 150 | * [39]Report the problem to the GCC GNATS bug tracking system and
|
|---|
| 151 | hope that someone will be kind enough to fix it for you. While
|
|---|
| 152 | this is certainly possible, and often happens, there is no
|
|---|
| 153 | guarantee that it will. You should not expect the same response
|
|---|
| 154 | from this method that you would see from a commercial support
|
|---|
| 155 | organization since the people who read GCC bug reports, if they
|
|---|
| 156 | choose to help you, will be volunteering their time. This
|
|---|
| 157 | alternative will work best if you follow the directions on
|
|---|
| 158 | [40]submitting bugreports.
|
|---|
| 159 | * Fix it yourself. This alternative will probably bring results, if
|
|---|
| 160 | you work hard enough, but will probably take a lot of time, and,
|
|---|
| 161 | depending on the quality of your work and the perceived benefits
|
|---|
| 162 | of your changes, your code may or may not ever make it into an
|
|---|
| 163 | official release of GCC.
|
|---|
| 164 | _________________________________________________________________
|
|---|
| 165 |
|
|---|
| 166 | Does GCC work on my platform?
|
|---|
| 167 |
|
|---|
| 168 | The host/target specific installation notes for GCC include
|
|---|
| 169 | information about known problems with installing or using GCC on
|
|---|
| 170 | particular platforms. These are included in the sources for a release
|
|---|
| 171 | in INSTALL/specific.html, and the [41]latest version is always
|
|---|
| 172 | available at the GCC web site. Reports of [42]successful builds for
|
|---|
| 173 | several versions of GCC are also available at the web site.
|
|---|
| 174 | _________________________________________________________________
|
|---|
| 175 |
|
|---|
| 176 | Installation
|
|---|
| 177 |
|
|---|
| 178 | How to install multiple versions of GCC
|
|---|
| 179 |
|
|---|
| 180 | It may be desirable to install multiple versions of the compiler on
|
|---|
| 181 | the same system. This can be done by using different prefix paths at
|
|---|
| 182 | configure time and a few symlinks.
|
|---|
| 183 |
|
|---|
| 184 | Basically, configure the two compilers with different --prefix
|
|---|
| 185 | options, then build and install each compiler. Assume you want "gcc"
|
|---|
| 186 | to be the latest compiler and available in /usr/local/bin; also assume
|
|---|
| 187 | that you want "gcc2" to be the older gcc2 compiler and also available
|
|---|
| 188 | in /usr/local/bin.
|
|---|
| 189 |
|
|---|
| 190 | The easiest way to do this is to configure the new GCC with
|
|---|
| 191 | --prefix=/usr/local/gcc and the older gcc2 with
|
|---|
| 192 | --prefix=/usr/local/gcc2. Build and install both compilers. Then make
|
|---|
| 193 | a symlink from /usr/local/bin/gcc to /usr/local/gcc/bin/gcc and from
|
|---|
| 194 | /usr/local/bin/gcc2 to /usr/local/gcc2/bin/gcc. Create similar links
|
|---|
| 195 | for the "g++", "c++" and "g77" compiler drivers.
|
|---|
| 196 |
|
|---|
| 197 | An alternative to using symlinks is to configure with a
|
|---|
| 198 | --program-transform-name option. This option specifies a sed command
|
|---|
| 199 | to process installed program names with. Using it you can, for
|
|---|
| 200 | instance, have all the new GCC programs installed as "new-gcc" and the
|
|---|
| 201 | like. You will still have to specify different --prefix options for
|
|---|
| 202 | new GCC and old GCC, because it is only the executable program names
|
|---|
| 203 | that are transformed. The difference is that you (as administrator) do
|
|---|
| 204 | not have to set up symlinks, but must specify additional directories
|
|---|
| 205 | in your (as a user) PATH. A complication with --program-transform-name
|
|---|
| 206 | is that the sed command invariably contains characters significant to
|
|---|
| 207 | the shell, and these have to be escaped correctly, also it is not
|
|---|
| 208 | possible to use "^" or "$" in the command. Here is the option to
|
|---|
| 209 | prefix "new-" to the new GCC installed programs:
|
|---|
| 210 |
|
|---|
| 211 | --program-transform-name='s,\\\\(.*\\\\),new-\\\\1,'
|
|---|
| 212 |
|
|---|
| 213 | With the above --prefix option, that will install the new GCC programs
|
|---|
| 214 | into /usr/local/gcc/bin with names prefixed by "new-". You can use
|
|---|
| 215 | --program-transform-name if you have multiple versions of GCC, and
|
|---|
| 216 | wish to be sure about which version you are invoking.
|
|---|
| 217 |
|
|---|
| 218 | If you use --prefix, GCC may have difficulty locating a GNU assembler
|
|---|
| 219 | or linker on your system, [43]GCC can not find GNU as/GNU ld explains
|
|---|
| 220 | how to deal with this.
|
|---|
| 221 |
|
|---|
| 222 | Another option that may be easier is to use the --program-prefix= or
|
|---|
| 223 | --program-suffix= options to configure. So if you're installing GCC
|
|---|
| 224 | 2.95.2 and don't want to disturb the current version of GCC in
|
|---|
| 225 | /usr/local/bin/, you could do
|
|---|
| 226 |
|
|---|
| 227 | configure --program-suffix=-2.95.2 <other configure options>
|
|---|
| 228 |
|
|---|
| 229 | This should result in GCC being installed as /usr/local/bin/gcc-2.95.2
|
|---|
| 230 | instead of /usr/local/bin/gcc.
|
|---|
| 231 | _________________________________________________________________
|
|---|
| 232 |
|
|---|
| 233 | Dynamic linker is unable to find GCC libraries
|
|---|
| 234 |
|
|---|
| 235 | This problem manifests itself by programs not finding shared libraries
|
|---|
| 236 | they depend on when the programs are started. Note this problem often
|
|---|
| 237 | manifests itself with failures in the libio/libstdc++ tests after
|
|---|
| 238 | configuring with --enable-shared and building GCC.
|
|---|
| 239 |
|
|---|
| 240 | GCC does not specify a runpath so that the dynamic linker can find
|
|---|
| 241 | dynamic libraries at runtime.
|
|---|
| 242 |
|
|---|
| 243 | The short explanation is that if you always pass a -R option to the
|
|---|
| 244 | linker, then your programs become dependent on directories which may
|
|---|
| 245 | be NFS mounted, and programs may hang unnecessarily when an NFS server
|
|---|
| 246 | goes down.
|
|---|
| 247 |
|
|---|
| 248 | The problem is not programs that do require the directories; those
|
|---|
| 249 | programs are going to hang no matter what you do. The problem is
|
|---|
| 250 | programs that do not require the directories.
|
|---|
| 251 |
|
|---|
| 252 | SunOS effectively always passed a -R option for every -L option; this
|
|---|
| 253 | was a bad idea, and so it was removed for Solaris. We should not
|
|---|
| 254 | recreate it.
|
|---|
| 255 |
|
|---|
| 256 | However, if you feel you really need such an option to be passed
|
|---|
| 257 | automatically to the linker, you may add it to the GCC specs file.
|
|---|
| 258 | This file can be found in the same directory that contains cc1 (run
|
|---|
| 259 | gcc -print-prog-name=cc1 to find it). You may add linker flags such as
|
|---|
| 260 | -R or -rpath, depending on platform and linker, to the *link or *lib
|
|---|
| 261 | specs.
|
|---|
| 262 |
|
|---|
| 263 | Another alternative is to install a wrapper script around gcc, g++ or
|
|---|
| 264 | ld that adds the appropriate directory to the environment variable
|
|---|
| 265 | LD_RUN_PATH or equivalent (again, it's platform-dependent).
|
|---|
| 266 |
|
|---|
| 267 | Yet another option, that works on a few platforms, is to hard-code the
|
|---|
| 268 | full pathname of the library into its soname. This can only be
|
|---|
| 269 | accomplished by modifying the appropriate .ml file within
|
|---|
| 270 | libstdc++/config (and also libg++/config, if you are building libg++),
|
|---|
| 271 | so that $(libdir)/ appears just before the library name in -soname or
|
|---|
| 272 | -h options.
|
|---|
| 273 | _________________________________________________________________
|
|---|
| 274 |
|
|---|
| 275 | GCC can not find GNU as/GNU ld
|
|---|
| 276 |
|
|---|
| 277 | GCC searches the PATH for an assembler and a loader, but it only does
|
|---|
| 278 | so after searching a directory list hard-coded in the GCC executables.
|
|---|
| 279 | Since, on most platforms, the hard-coded list includes directories in
|
|---|
| 280 | which the system assembler and loader can be found, you may have to
|
|---|
| 281 | take one of the following actions to arrange that GCC uses the GNU
|
|---|
| 282 | versions of those programs.
|
|---|
| 283 |
|
|---|
| 284 | To ensure that GCC finds the GNU assembler (the GNU loader), which are
|
|---|
| 285 | required by [44]some configurations, you should configure these with
|
|---|
| 286 | the same --prefix option as you used for GCC. Then build & install GNU
|
|---|
| 287 | as (GNU ld) and proceed with building GCC.
|
|---|
| 288 |
|
|---|
| 289 | Another alternative is to create links to GNU as and ld in any of the
|
|---|
| 290 | directories printed by the command `gcc -print-search-dirs | grep
|
|---|
| 291 | '^programs:''. The link to `ld' should be named `real-ld' if `ld'
|
|---|
| 292 | already exists. If such links do not exist while you're compiling GCC,
|
|---|
| 293 | you may have to create them in the build directories too, within the
|
|---|
| 294 | gcc directory and in all the gcc/stage* subdirectories.
|
|---|
| 295 |
|
|---|
| 296 | GCC 2.95 allows you to specify the full pathname of the assembler and
|
|---|
| 297 | the linker to use. The configure flags are `--with-as=/path/to/as' and
|
|---|
| 298 | `--with-ld=/path/to/ld'. GCC will try to use these pathnames before
|
|---|
| 299 | looking for `as' or `(real-)ld' in the standard search dirs. If, at
|
|---|
| 300 | configure-time, the specified programs are found to be GNU utilities,
|
|---|
| 301 | `--with-gnu-as' and `--with-gnu-ld' need not be used; these flags will
|
|---|
| 302 | be auto-detected. One drawback of this option is that it won't allow
|
|---|
| 303 | you to override the search path for assembler and linker with
|
|---|
| 304 | command-line options -B/path/ if the specified filenames exist.
|
|---|
| 305 | _________________________________________________________________
|
|---|
| 306 |
|
|---|
| 307 | cpp: Usage:... Error
|
|---|
| 308 |
|
|---|
| 309 | If you get an error like this when building GCC (particularly when
|
|---|
| 310 | building __mulsi3), then you likely have a problem with your
|
|---|
| 311 | environment variables.
|
|---|
| 312 | cpp: Usage: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i586-unknown-linux-gnulibc1/2.7.2.3/cpp
|
|---|
| 313 | [switches] input output
|
|---|
| 314 |
|
|---|
| 315 | First look for an explicit '.' in either LIBRARY_PATH or
|
|---|
| 316 | GCC_EXEC_PREFIX from your environment. If you do not find an explicit
|
|---|
| 317 | '.', look for an empty pathname in those variables. Note that ':' at
|
|---|
| 318 | either the start or end of these variables is an implicit '.' and will
|
|---|
| 319 | cause problems.
|
|---|
| 320 |
|
|---|
| 321 | Also note '::' in these paths will also cause similar problems.
|
|---|
| 322 | _________________________________________________________________
|
|---|
| 323 |
|
|---|
| 324 | Optimizing the compiler itself
|
|---|
| 325 |
|
|---|
| 326 | If you want to test a particular optimization option, it's useful to
|
|---|
| 327 | try bootstrapping the compiler with that option turned on. For
|
|---|
| 328 | example, to test the -fssa option, you could bootstrap like this:
|
|---|
| 329 | make BOOT_CFLAGS="-O2 -fssa" bootstrap
|
|---|
| 330 | _________________________________________________________________
|
|---|
| 331 |
|
|---|
| 332 | Testsuite problems
|
|---|
| 333 |
|
|---|
| 334 | Unable to run the testsuite
|
|---|
| 335 |
|
|---|
| 336 | If you get a message about unable to find "standard.exp" when trying
|
|---|
| 337 | to run the GCC testsuites, then your dejagnu is too old to run the GCC
|
|---|
| 338 | tests. You will need to get a newer version of dejagnu from
|
|---|
| 339 | [45]http://www.gnu.org/software/dejagnu/dejagnu.html.
|
|---|
| 340 | _________________________________________________________________
|
|---|
| 341 |
|
|---|
| 342 | How do I pass flags like -fnew-abi to the testsuite?
|
|---|
| 343 |
|
|---|
| 344 | If you invoke runtest directly, you can use the --tool_opts option,
|
|---|
| 345 | e.g:
|
|---|
| 346 | runtest --tool_opts "-fnew-abi -fno-honor-std" <other options>
|
|---|
| 347 |
|
|---|
| 348 | Or, if you use make check you can use the make variable RUNTESTFLAGS,
|
|---|
| 349 | e.g:
|
|---|
| 350 | make RUNTESTFLAGS="--tool_opts '-fnew-abi -fno-honor-std'" check-g++
|
|---|
| 351 | _________________________________________________________________
|
|---|
| 352 |
|
|---|
| 353 | How can I run the test suite with multiple options?
|
|---|
| 354 |
|
|---|
| 355 | If you invoke runtest directly, you can use the --target_board option,
|
|---|
| 356 | e.g:
|
|---|
| 357 | runtest --target_board "unix{-fPIC,-fpic,}" <other options>
|
|---|
| 358 |
|
|---|
| 359 | Or, if you use make check you can use the make variable RUNTESTFLAGS,
|
|---|
| 360 | e.g:
|
|---|
| 361 | make RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board 'unix{-fPIC,-fpic,}'" check-gcc
|
|---|
| 362 |
|
|---|
| 363 | Either of these examples will run the tests three times. Once with
|
|---|
| 364 | -fPIC, once with -fpic, and once with no additional flags.
|
|---|
| 365 |
|
|---|
| 366 | This technique is particularly useful on multilibbed targets.
|
|---|
| 367 | _________________________________________________________________
|
|---|
| 368 |
|
|---|
| 369 | Older versions of GCC and EGCS
|
|---|
| 370 |
|
|---|
| 371 | Is there a stringstream / sstream for GCC 2.95.2?
|
|---|
| 372 |
|
|---|
| 373 | Yes, it's at:
|
|---|
| 374 | [46]http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2000-q2/msg00700/sstream.
|
|---|
| 375 | _________________________________________________________________
|
|---|
| 376 |
|
|---|
| 377 | Miscellaneous
|
|---|
| 378 |
|
|---|
| 379 | Friend Templates
|
|---|
| 380 |
|
|---|
| 381 | In order to make a specialization of a template function a friend of a
|
|---|
| 382 | (possibly template) class, you must explicitly state that the friend
|
|---|
| 383 | function is a template, by appending angle brackets to its name, and
|
|---|
| 384 | this template function must have been declared already. Here's an
|
|---|
| 385 | example:
|
|---|
| 386 | template <typename T> class foo {
|
|---|
| 387 | friend void bar(foo<T>);
|
|---|
| 388 | }
|
|---|
| 389 |
|
|---|
| 390 | The above declaration declares a non-template function named bar, so
|
|---|
| 391 | it must be explicitly defined for each specialization of foo. A
|
|---|
| 392 | template definition of bar won't do, because it is unrelated with the
|
|---|
| 393 | non-template declaration above. So you'd have to end up writing:
|
|---|
| 394 | void bar(foo<int>) { /* ... */ }
|
|---|
| 395 | void bar(foo<void>) { /* ... */ }
|
|---|
| 396 |
|
|---|
| 397 | If you meant bar to be a template function, you should have
|
|---|
| 398 | forward-declared it as follows. Note that, since the template function
|
|---|
| 399 | declaration refers to the template class, the template class must be
|
|---|
| 400 | forward-declared too:
|
|---|
| 401 | template <typename T>
|
|---|
| 402 | class foo;
|
|---|
| 403 |
|
|---|
| 404 | template <typename T>
|
|---|
| 405 | void bar(foo<T>);
|
|---|
| 406 |
|
|---|
| 407 | template <typename T>
|
|---|
| 408 | class foo {
|
|---|
| 409 | friend void bar<>(foo<T>);
|
|---|
| 410 | };
|
|---|
| 411 |
|
|---|
| 412 | template <typename T>
|
|---|
| 413 | void bar(foo<T>) { /* ... */ }
|
|---|
| 414 |
|
|---|
| 415 | In this case, the template argument list could be left empty, because
|
|---|
| 416 | it can be implicitly deduced from the function arguments, but the
|
|---|
| 417 | angle brackets must be present, otherwise the declaration will be
|
|---|
| 418 | taken as a non-template function. Furthermore, in some cases, you may
|
|---|
| 419 | have to explicitly specify the template arguments, to remove
|
|---|
| 420 | ambiguity.
|
|---|
| 421 |
|
|---|
| 422 | An error in the last public comment draft of the ANSI/ISO C++ Standard
|
|---|
| 423 | and the fact that previous releases of GCC would accept such friend
|
|---|
| 424 | declarations as template declarations has led people to believe that
|
|---|
| 425 | the forward declaration was not necessary, but, according to the final
|
|---|
| 426 | version of the Standard, it is.
|
|---|
| 427 | _________________________________________________________________
|
|---|
| 428 |
|
|---|
| 429 | dynamic_cast, throw, typeid don't work with shared libraries
|
|---|
| 430 |
|
|---|
| 431 | The new C++ ABI in the GCC 3.0 series uses address comparisons, rather
|
|---|
| 432 | than string compares, to determine type equality. This leads to better
|
|---|
| 433 | performance. Like other objects that have to be present in the final
|
|---|
| 434 | executable, these std::typeinfo_t objects have what is called vague
|
|---|
| 435 | linkage because they are not tightly bound to any one particular
|
|---|
| 436 | translation unit (object file). The compiler has to emit them in any
|
|---|
| 437 | translation unit that requires their presence, and then rely on the
|
|---|
| 438 | linking and loading process to make sure that only one of them is
|
|---|
| 439 | active in the final executable. With static linking all of these
|
|---|
| 440 | symbols are resolved at link time, but with dynamic linking, further
|
|---|
| 441 | resolution occurs at load time. You have to ensure that objects within
|
|---|
| 442 | a shared library are resolved against objects in the executable and
|
|---|
| 443 | other shared libraries.
|
|---|
| 444 | * For a program which is linked against a shared library, no
|
|---|
| 445 | additional precautions need taking.
|
|---|
| 446 | * You cannot create a shared library with the "-Bsymbolic" option,
|
|---|
| 447 | as that prevents the resolution described above.
|
|---|
| 448 | * If you use dlopen to explicitly load code from a shared library,
|
|---|
| 449 | you must do several things. First, export global symbols from the
|
|---|
| 450 | executable by linking it with the "-E" flag (you will have to
|
|---|
| 451 | specify this as "-Wl,-E" if you are invoking the linker in the
|
|---|
| 452 | usual manner from the compiler driver, g++). You must also make
|
|---|
| 453 | the external symbols in the loaded library available for
|
|---|
| 454 | subsequent libraries by providing the RTLD_GLOBAL flag to dlopen.
|
|---|
| 455 | The symbol resolution can be immediate or lazy.
|
|---|
| 456 |
|
|---|
| 457 | Template instantiations are another, user visible, case of objects
|
|---|
| 458 | with vague linkage, which needs similar resolution. If you do not take
|
|---|
| 459 | the above precautions, you may discover that a template instantiation
|
|---|
| 460 | with the same argument list, but instantiated in multiple translation
|
|---|
| 461 | units, has several addresses, depending in which translation unit the
|
|---|
| 462 | address is taken. (This is not an exhaustive list of the kind of
|
|---|
| 463 | objects which have vague linkage and are expected to be resolved
|
|---|
| 464 | during linking & loading.)
|
|---|
| 465 |
|
|---|
| 466 | If you are worried about different objects with the same name
|
|---|
| 467 | colliding during the linking or loading process, then you should use
|
|---|
| 468 | namespaces to disambiguate them. Giving distinct objects with global
|
|---|
| 469 | linkage the same name is a violation of the One Definition Rule (ODR)
|
|---|
| 470 | [basic.def.odr].
|
|---|
| 471 |
|
|---|
| 472 | For more details about the way that GCC implements these and other C++
|
|---|
| 473 | features, please read the [47]ABI specification. Note the
|
|---|
| 474 | std::typeinfo_t objects which must be resolved all begin with "_ZTS".
|
|---|
| 475 | Refer to ld's documentation for a description of the "-E" &
|
|---|
| 476 | "-Bsymbolic" flags.
|
|---|
| 477 | _________________________________________________________________
|
|---|
| 478 |
|
|---|
| 479 | Why do I need autoconf, bison, xgettext, automake, etc?
|
|---|
| 480 |
|
|---|
| 481 | If you're using diffs up dated from one snapshot to the next, or if
|
|---|
| 482 | you're using the CVS repository, you may need several additional
|
|---|
| 483 | programs to build GCC.
|
|---|
| 484 |
|
|---|
| 485 | These include, but are not necessarily limited to autoconf, automake,
|
|---|
| 486 | bison, and xgettext.
|
|---|
| 487 |
|
|---|
| 488 | This is necessary because neither diff nor cvs keep timestamps
|
|---|
| 489 | correct. This causes problems for generated files as "make" may think
|
|---|
| 490 | those generated files are out of date and try to regenerate them.
|
|---|
| 491 |
|
|---|
| 492 | An easy way to work around this problem is to use the gcc_update
|
|---|
| 493 | script in the contrib subdirectory of GCC, which handles this
|
|---|
| 494 | transparently without requiring installation of any additional tools.
|
|---|
| 495 | (Note: Up to and including GCC 2.95 this script was called egcs_update
|
|---|
| 496 | .)
|
|---|
| 497 |
|
|---|
| 498 | When building from diffs or CVS or if you modified some sources, you
|
|---|
| 499 | may also need to obtain development versions of some GNU tools, as the
|
|---|
| 500 | production versions do not necessarily handle all features needed to
|
|---|
| 501 | rebuild GCC.
|
|---|
| 502 |
|
|---|
| 503 | In general, the current versions of these tools from
|
|---|
| 504 | [48]ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/ will work. At present, Autoconf 2.50 is not
|
|---|
| 505 | supported, and you will need to use Autoconf 2.13; work is in progress
|
|---|
| 506 | to fix this problem. Also look at
|
|---|
| 507 | [49]ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/ for any special versions
|
|---|
| 508 | of packages.
|
|---|
| 509 | _________________________________________________________________
|
|---|
| 510 |
|
|---|
| 511 | Why can't I build a shared library?
|
|---|
| 512 |
|
|---|
| 513 | When building a shared library you may get an error message from the
|
|---|
| 514 | linker like `assert pure-text failed:' or `DP relative code in file'.
|
|---|
| 515 |
|
|---|
| 516 | This kind of error occurs when you've failed to provide proper flags
|
|---|
| 517 | to gcc when linking the shared library.
|
|---|
| 518 |
|
|---|
| 519 | You can get this error even if all the .o files for the shared library
|
|---|
| 520 | were compiled with the proper PIC option. When building a shared
|
|---|
| 521 | library, gcc will compile additional code to be included in the
|
|---|
| 522 | library. That additional code must also be compiled with the proper
|
|---|
| 523 | PIC option.
|
|---|
| 524 |
|
|---|
| 525 | Adding the proper PIC option (-fpic or -fPIC) to the link line which
|
|---|
| 526 | creates the shared library will fix this problem on targets that
|
|---|
| 527 | support PIC in this manner. For example:
|
|---|
| 528 | gcc -c -fPIC myfile.c
|
|---|
| 529 | gcc -shared -o libmyfile.so -fPIC myfile.o
|
|---|
| 530 | _________________________________________________________________
|
|---|
| 531 |
|
|---|
| 532 | When building C++, the linker says my constructors, destructors or virtual
|
|---|
| 533 | tables are undefined, but I defined them
|
|---|
| 534 |
|
|---|
| 535 | The ISO C++ Standard specifies that all virtual methods of a class
|
|---|
| 536 | that are not pure-virtual must be defined, but does not require any
|
|---|
| 537 | diagnostic for violations of this rule [class.virtual]/8. Based on
|
|---|
| 538 | this assumption, GCC will only emit the implicitly defined
|
|---|
| 539 | constructors, the assignment operator, the destructor and the virtual
|
|---|
| 540 | table of a class in the translation unit that defines its first such
|
|---|
| 541 | non-inline method.
|
|---|
| 542 |
|
|---|
| 543 | Therefore, if you fail to define this particular method, the linker
|
|---|
| 544 | may complain about the lack of definitions for apparently unrelated
|
|---|
| 545 | symbols. Unfortunately, in order to improve this error message, it
|
|---|
| 546 | might be necessary to change the linker, and this can't always be
|
|---|
| 547 | done.
|
|---|
| 548 |
|
|---|
| 549 | The solution is to ensure that all virtual methods that are not pure
|
|---|
| 550 | are defined. Note that a destructor must be defined even if it is
|
|---|
| 551 | declared pure-virtual [class.dtor]/7.
|
|---|
| 552 | _________________________________________________________________
|
|---|
| 553 |
|
|---|
| 554 | Will GCC someday include an incremental linker?
|
|---|
| 555 |
|
|---|
| 556 | Incremental linking is part of the linker, not the compiler. As such,
|
|---|
| 557 | GCC doesn't have anything to do with incremental linking. Depending on
|
|---|
| 558 | what platform you use, it may be possible to tell GCC to use the
|
|---|
| 559 | platform's native linker (e.g., Solaris' ild(1)).
|
|---|
| 560 |
|
|---|
| 561 | References
|
|---|
| 562 |
|
|---|
| 563 | 1. http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/faq.html
|
|---|
| 564 | 2. http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/top.html
|
|---|
| 565 | 3. http://www.research.att.com/~austern/csc/faq.html
|
|---|
| 566 | 4. http://www.fortran.com/fortran/info.html
|
|---|
| 567 | 5. http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/faq/index.html
|
|---|
| 568 | 6. http://gcc.gnu.org/java/faq.html
|
|---|
| 569 | 7. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#general
|
|---|
| 570 | 8. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#gcc
|
|---|
| 571 | 9. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#cygnus
|
|---|
| 572 | 10. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#open-development
|
|---|
| 573 | 11. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#bugreport
|
|---|
| 574 | 12. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#support
|
|---|
| 575 | 13. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#platforms
|
|---|
| 576 | 14. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#installation
|
|---|
| 577 | 15. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#multiple
|
|---|
| 578 | 16. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#rpath
|
|---|
| 579 | 17. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#rpath
|
|---|
| 580 | 18. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#gas
|
|---|
| 581 | 19. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#environ
|
|---|
| 582 | 20. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#optimizing
|
|---|
| 583 | 21. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#testsuite
|
|---|
| 584 | 22. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#dejagnu
|
|---|
| 585 | 23. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#testoptions
|
|---|
| 586 | 24. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#multipletests
|
|---|
| 587 | 25. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#old
|
|---|
| 588 | 26. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#2.95sstream
|
|---|
| 589 | 27. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#misc
|
|---|
| 590 | 28. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#friend
|
|---|
| 591 | 29. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#dso
|
|---|
| 592 | 30. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#generated_files
|
|---|
| 593 | 31. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#picflag-needed
|
|---|
| 594 | 32. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#vtables
|
|---|
| 595 | 33. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#incremental
|
|---|
| 596 | 34. http://gcc.gnu.org/steering.html
|
|---|
| 597 | 35. http://gcc.gnu.org/steering.html
|
|---|
| 598 | 36. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#cathedral-vs-bazaar
|
|---|
| 599 | 37. http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/
|
|---|
| 600 | 38. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html
|
|---|
| 601 | 39. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html
|
|---|
| 602 | 40. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html
|
|---|
| 603 | 41. http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html
|
|---|
| 604 | 42. http://gcc.gnu.org/buildstat.html
|
|---|
| 605 | 43. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#gas
|
|---|
| 606 | 44. http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html
|
|---|
| 607 | 45. http://www.gnu.org/software/dejagnu/dejagnu.html
|
|---|
| 608 | 46. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2000-q2/msg00700/sstream
|
|---|
| 609 | 47. http://www.codesourcery.com/cxx-abi/
|
|---|
| 610 | 48. ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/
|
|---|
| 611 | 49. ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/
|
|---|