Defense Imperatives for the New Administration
It has been more than two generations since the presidency transitioned with American troops engaged in significant combat operations—a deployment begun in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 attacks.
Beyond the current military engagements in Iraq and Afghanistan, the nation faces other equally important national security challenges. These include nuclear proliferation, the potential for other regional conflicts into which we could be drawn, and the spread of militarily relevant technology even beyond nation-states.
The incoming leadership must be prepared to deal with the most pressing issues facing the Department of Defense today. The pressing issues described herein are daunting and may seem all-inclusive, but they are only a fraction of the defense challenges facing the new administration. This report describes just those issues that the next Secretary of Defense should place at the top of the agenda—issues that will require the attention of the Commander-in-Chief, and, if left unresolved, could lead to future military failure. This report offers recommendations drawn from reports prepared by the Defense Science Board, an advisory body to the Secretary of Defense, which address topics at the confluence of technology, policy, and management.
Table of Contents
Achieving national goals: introduction and summary
Protect and defend the homeland
Weapons of mass destruction challenge the safety of our homeland and our military forces
Our nuclear capability—weapons, skills, facilities—is declining
Maintain capability to project force around the world, to deter or defeat
Our military and civilian information infrastructure is highly vulnerable
DOD’s business practices are having a long-term debilitating effect on our military forces
Bring stability to states and regions
We lack robust plans and capabilities to support country-specific stability operations
Thwart terrorism and bring terrorists to justice, anytime and anywhere
We lack the deep penetration required for actionable intelligence—both foreign and domestic
Support state and local authorities in providing domestic catastrophe relief
The nation lacks validated operational contingency plans to respond to domestic catastrophes—whether natural or malicious
Lack of cooperation, rising costs, and organizational culture hinder the nation’s success
DOD cannot “go it alone”—its success depends on orchestrated government action
The “cost” of success may be high, and is getting higher
Why things are the way they are
These are urgent matters
Some key recommendations for addressing the pressing issues
References
Access Full Report [PDF 6.95MB]
NEWSLETTER
|
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list |
|
|