Temporal Dynamics of User Engagement on Instagram: A Comparative Analysis of Album, Photo, and Video Interactions
Pages 224 - 234
Abstract
Despite Instagram being an integral part of many people’s lives, it is relatively less studied than many other platforms (e.g., Twitter and Facebook). Furthermore, despite offering diverse content formats for user expression and interaction, prior works have not studied the temporal dynamics of user engagement across albums, photos, and videos. To address this gap, we present a pioneering temporal comparative analysis that unveils nuanced patterns in user interactions across content types. Our analysis sheds light on interaction longevity and disparities among album, photo, and video engagement. Additionally, it offers empirical comparisons through statistical tests, examines contributing factors such as post and uploader characteristics, and analyzes content composition’s impact on user engagement. The findings reveal distinct temporal engagement patterns. Despite initial spikes in interactions post-upload, albums exhibit somewhat more sustained interest, while photos and videos have shorter engagement lifespans. Moreover, a consistent trend between shallow (likes) and deep (comments) interactions persists across content types. Notably, concise content, characterized by shorter descriptions and minimal hashtags/mentions, consistently drives higher engagement, emphasizing its relevance across all content formats. These insights deepen comprehension of temporal nuances in user engagement on Instagram, offering valuable guidance for content creators and marketers to tailor strategies that evoke immediate and sustained user interest.
Supplemental Material
MP4 File - PaperSession-4_Digital_Art_einzeln_Donnerstag_240605_ElinThorgren
Temporal Dynamics of User Engagement on Instagram: A Comparative Analysis of Album, Photo, and Video Interactions
- Download
- 843.76 MB
References
[1]
[n. d.]. Starngage. https://starngage.com/plus/en-us. Accessed: 2023-03-31.
[2]
Kholoud Khalil Aldous, Jisun An, and Bernard J. Jansen. 2019. View, Like, Comment, Post: Analyzing User Engagement by Topic at 4 Levels across 5 Social Media Platforms for 53 News Organizations. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 13. 47–57.
[3]
A. Bakhshi, D. Shamma, and E. Gilbert. 2014. Faces engage us: Photos with faces attract more likes and comments on instagram. In Proc. CHI. 965–974.
[4]
Y. Borghol, S. Ardon, N. Carlsson, D. Eager, and A. Mahanti. 2012. The untold story of the clones: Content-agnostic factors that impact YouTube video popularity. In Proc. ACM KDD. 1186–1194.
[5]
Y. Borghol, S. Mitra, S. Ardon, N. Carlsson, D. Eager, and A. Mahanti. 2011. Characterizing and modelling popularity of user-generated videos. Performance Evaluation 68, 11 (2011), 1037–1055.
[6]
S. Carta, AS. Podda, DR. Recupero, R. Saia, and G. Usai. 2020. Popularity prediction of instagram posts. Information 11, 9 (2020), 453.
[7]
J. Deng, J. Guo, E. Ververas, I. Kotsia, and S. Zafeiriou. 2020. Retinaface: Single-shot multi-level face localisation in the wild. In Proc. IEEE/CVF CVPR. 5203–5212.
[8]
Olive Jean Dunn. 1964. Multiple comparisons using rank sums. Technometrics 6, 3 (1964), 241–252.
[9]
B. Efron. 1992. Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Springer.
[10]
E. Ferrara, R. Interdonato, and A. Tagarelli. 2014. Online popularity and topical interests through the lens of instagram. In Proc. ACM Conference on Hypertext and social media. 24–34.
[11]
K. Garimella and R. West. 2021. Evolution of Retweet Rates in Twitter User Careers: Analysis and Model. In Proc. AAAI ICWSM, Vol. 15. 1064–1068.
[12]
M. Gayberi and S.G. Oguducu. 2019. Popularity prediction of posts in social networks based on user, post and image features. In Proc. International Conference on Management of Digital EcoSystems. 9–15.
[13]
K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun. 2016. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proc. IEEE CVPR. 770–778.
[14]
G. Huang, M. Mattar, T. Berg, and E. Learned-Miller. 2008. Labeled faces in the wild: A database forstudying face recognition in unconstrained environments. In Workshop on faces in’Real-Life’Images: detection, alignment, and recognition.
[15]
J. Huang, V. Rathod, C. Sun, M. Zhu, A. Korattikara, A. Fathi, 2017. Speed/accuracy trade-offs for modern convolutional object detectors. In Proc. IEEE CVPR. 7310–7311.
[16]
J. Huang, C. Wang, M. Su, Q. Dai, and MZA. Bhuiyan. 2018. Inspecting influences on likes and comments of photos in instagram. In Proc. IEEE SmartWorld. 938–945.
[17]
JY. Jang, K. Han, and D. Lee. 2015. No reciprocity in" liking" photos: analyzing like activities in instagram. In Proc. ACM conference on hypertext and social media. 273–282.
[18]
JY. Jang, K. Han, D. Lee, H. Jia, and P. Shih. 2016. Teens engage more with fewer photos: temporal and comparative analysis on behaviors in instagram. In Proc. ACM Conference on hypertext and social media. 71–81.
[19]
Cheonsoo Kim and Sung-Un Yang. 2017. Like, comment, and share on Facebook: How each behavior differs from the other. Public Relations Review 43, 2 (2017), 441–449.
[20]
W.H. Kruskal and W.A. Wallis. 1952. Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Journal of the American statistical Association 47, 260 (1952), 583–621.
[21]
TY. Lin, P. Dollár, R. Girshick, K. He, B. Hariharan, and S. Belongie. 2017. Feature pyramid networks for object detection. In Proc. IEEE CVPR. 2117–2125.
[22]
Annukka K. Lindell. 2019. Left cheek poses garner more likes: the effect of pose orientation on Instagram engagement. Laterality 24, 5 (2019), 600–613. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2018.1556278 30526363.
[23]
H.B. Mann and D.R. Whitney. 1947. On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. The annals of mathematical statistics (1947), 50–60.
[24]
M. Mazloom, R. Rietveld, S. Rudinac, M. Worring, and W. Van Dolen. 2016. Multimodal popularity prediction of brand-related social media posts. In Proc. ACM Multimedia. 197–201.
[25]
A. Mohammadinodooshan and N. Carlsson. 2023. Effects of Political Bias and Reliability on Temporal User Engagement with News Articles Shared on Facebook. In Proc. PAM. Springer, 160–187.
[26]
O. Parkhi, A. Vedaldi, and A. Zisserman. 2015. Deep face recognition. British Machine Vision Association (2015).
[27]
Jürgen Pfeffer, Daniel Matter, and Anahit Sargsyan. 2023. The Half-Life of a Tweet. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 17. 1163–1167.
[28]
V. Pham, C. Pham, and T. Dang. 2020. Road damage detection and classification with detectron2 and faster R-CNN. In Proc. IEEE Big Data. 5592–5601.
[29]
Arthi Ramachandran, Lucy Wang, and Augustin Chaintreau. 2018. Dynamics and Prediction of Clicks on News from Twitter. In Proceedings of the 29th on Hypertext and Social Media (Baltimore, MD, USA) (HT ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 210–214. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209542.3209568
[30]
F. Sabate, J. Berbegal-Mirabent, A. Cañabate, and P. Lebherz. 2014. Factors influencing popularity of branded content in Facebook fan pages. European management journal 32, 6 (2014), 1001–1011.
[31]
S. Serengil. [n. d.]. DeepFace: A Lightweight Face Recognition and Facial Attribute Analysis (Age, Gender, Emotion and Race) Library for Python. https://github.com/serengil/deepface. Accessed 2023-05-22.
[32]
S. Serengil and A. Ozpinar. 2021. Hyperextended lightface: A facial attribute analysis framework. In Proc. International Conference on Engineering and Emerging Technologies. 1–4.
[33]
CrowdTangle Team. [n. d.]. CrowdTangle. https://www.crowdtangle.com/. Accessed: 2023-03-01.
[34]
Pier Paolo Tricomi, Marco Chilese, Mauro Conti, and Ahmad-Reza Sadeghi. 2023. Follow Us and Become Famous! Insights and Guidelines From Instagram Engagement Mechanisms. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM Web Science Conference 2023 (Austin, TX, USA) (WebSci ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 346–356. https://doi.org/10.1145/3578503.3583623
[35]
L. Vassio, M. Garetto, C. Chiasserini, and E. Leonardi. 2021. Temporal dynamics of posts and user engagement of influencers on facebook and instagram. In Proc. IEEE/ACM ASONAM. 129–133.
[36]
Luca Vassio, Michele Garetto, Emilio Leonardi, and Carla Fabiana Chiasserini. 2022. Mining and modelling temporal dynamics of followers’ engagement on online social networks. Social Network Analysis and Mining 12, 1 (2022), 96.
[37]
K. Wang, P. Wang, X. Chen, Q. Huang, Z. Mao, and Y. Zhang. 2020. A feature generalization framework for social media popularity prediction. In Proc. ACM Multimedia. 4570–4574.
[38]
Lior Wolf, Tal Hassner, and Itay Maoz. 2011. Face recognition in unconstrained videos with matched background similarity. In Proc. IEEE CVPR. 529–534.
[39]
Y. Wu, A. Kirillov, F. Massa, WY. Lo, and R. Girshick. 2019. Detectron2. https://github.com/facebookresearch/detectron2.
[40]
Z. Zhang, T. Chen, Z. Zhou, J. Li, and J. Luo. 2018. How to become Instagram famous: Post popularity prediction with dual-attention. In Proc. IEEE Big Data. 2383–2392.
[41]
A. Zohourian, H. Sajedi, and A. Yavary. 2018. Popularity prediction of images and videos on Instagram. In Proc. International Conference on Web Research. 111–117.
Index Terms
- Temporal Dynamics of User Engagement on Instagram: A Comparative Analysis of Album, Photo, and Video Interactions
Recommendations
Temporal dynamics of posts and user engagement of influencers on Facebook and Instagram
ASONAM '21: Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and MiningA relevant fraction of human interactions occurs on online social networks. Freshness of content seems to play an important role, with content popularity rapidly vanishing over time. In this paper, we investigate how influencers' generated content (i.e.,...
Faces engage us: photos with faces attract more likes and comments on Instagram
CHI '14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsPhotos are becoming prominent means of communication online. Despite photos' pervasive presence in social media and online world, we know little about how people interact and engage with their content. Understanding how photo content might signify ...
Instagram user characteristics and the color of their photos: Colorfulness, color diversity, and color harmony
AbstractThis study aims to explore the relationships between Instagram user characteristics and color features of their photos. Based on the assumption that individuals who are similar in characteristics would exhibit a similar style in their ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
May 2024
395 pages
ISBN:9798400703348
DOI:10.1145/3614419
Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 21 May 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Data Availability
PaperSession-4_Digital_Art_einzeln_Donnerstag_240605_ElinThorgren: Temporal Dynamics of User Engagement on Instagram: A Comparative Analysis of Album, Photo, and Video Interactions https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3614419.3644029#PaperSession-4_Digital_Art_einzeln_Donnerstag_240605_ElinThorgren.mp4
Conference
Websci '24
Sponsor:
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 245 of 933 submissions, 26%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 154Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)154
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)61
Reflects downloads up to 22 Sep 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML FormatGet Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in