research-article

Restorative Effects of Visual and Pictorial Spaces After Stress Induction in Virtual Reality

Authors:

Siavash Eftekharifar,

Nikolaus F. TrojeAuthors Info & Claims

SAP '21: ACM Symposium on Applied Perception 2021

Article No.: 5, Pages 1 - 5

https://doi.org/10.1145/3474451.3476234

Published: 16 September 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Exposure to nature has been shown to have a positive effect on people’s mental health. Little research has compared restorative effects of simulated nature presented by different media. Here, we investigated stress recovery when viewing a computer-generated nature setting presented in visual and pictorial space in virtual reality. Participants experienced a stress induction task and were then put into one of two relaxation scenarios: they either viewed the nature scene in visual space, (they were immersed into it; presence condition), or they viewed a large depiction of it in pictorial space (picture condition). Participants’ affective state was assessed before and after stress induction, and after relaxation using the ZIPERS questionnaire. We additionally recorded electrodermal activity as a measure of physiological arousal. The results revealed that relaxation led to an increase in positive affect scores and a decrease in electrodermal activity only in the presence condition. The negative affect scores decreased significantly for both conditions similarly. Our results show that restoration is more effective in visual than in pictorial space.

References

[1]

Allison P Anderson, Michael D Mayer, Abigail M Fellows, Devin R Cowan, Mark T Hegel, and Jay C Buckey. 2017. Relaxation with immersive natural scenes presented using virtual reality. Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance 88, 6 (2017), 520–526.

[2]

Maria Bodin and Terry Hartig. 2003. Does the outdoor environment matter for psychological restoration gained through running?Psychology of Sport and Exercise 4, 2 (2003), 141–153.

[3]

Diana E Bowler, Lisette M Buyung-Ali, Teri M Knight, and Andrew S Pullin. 2010. A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments. BMC public health 10, 1 (2010), 456.

[4]

Gregory N Bratman, Gretchen C Daily, Benjamin J Levy, and James J Gross. 2015. The benefits of nature experience: Improved affect and cognition. Landscape and Urban Planning 138 (2015), 41–50.

[5]

Daniel K Brown, Jo L Barton, and Valerie F Gladwell. 2013. Viewing nature scenes positively affects recovery of autonomic function following acute-mental stress. Environmental Science & Technology 47, 11 (2013), 5562–5569.

[6]

Yvonne AW de Kort, Anneloes L Meijnders, Anne AG Sponselee, and Wijnand A IJsselsteijn. 2006. What’s wrong with virtual trees? Restoring from stress in a mediated environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology 26, 4 (2006), 309–320.

[7]

Michael J Duncan, Neil D Clarke, Samantha L Birch, Jason Tallis, Joanne Hankey, Elizabeth Bryant, and Emma LJ Eyre. 2014. The effect of green exercise on blood pressure, heart rate and mood state in primary school children. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 11, 4(2014), 3678–3688.

[8]

Garry Egger and John Dixon. 2014. Beyond obesity and lifestyle: a review of 21st century chronic disease determinants. BioMed research international 2014 (2014).

[9]

Gary Felsten. 2009. Where to take a study break on the college campus: An attention restoration theory perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology 29, 1 (2009), 160–167.

[10]

J Freeman, J Lessiter, E Keogh, FW Bond, and K Chapman. 2004. Relaxation Island: virtual, and really relaxing. In Proceedings of 7th International Workshop on Presence, Vol. 14. 67–72.

[11]

Shawn N Geniole, Joacy PF David, Roseanne FR Euzébio, Beatriz ZS Toledo, Andrea IM Neves, and Cheryl M McCormick. 2016. Restoring land and mind: The benefits of an outdoor walk on mood are enhanced in a naturalized landfill area relative to its neighboring urban area. Ecopsychology 8, 2 (2016), 107–120.

[12]

Patrik Grahn and Ulrika A Stigsdotter. 2003. Landscape planning and stress. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 2, 1 (2003), 1–18.

[13]

Terry Hartig. 2011. Issues in restorative environments research: Matters of measurement. Psicología ambiental 2011 (2011), 41–66.

[14]

Terry Hartig, Gary W Evans, Larry D Jamner, Deborah S Davis, and Tommy Gärling. 2003. Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology 23, 2 (2003), 109–123.

[15]

Terry Hartig, Marlis Mang, and Gary W Evans. 1991. Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environment and Behavior 23, 1 (1991), 3–26.

[16]

Helena Jahncke, Staffan Hygge, Niklas Halin, Anne Marie Green, and Kenth Dimberg. 2011. Open-plan office noise: Cognitive performance and restoration. Journal of Environmental Psychology 31, 4 (2011), 373–382.

[17]

Stephen Kaplan. 1995. The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology 15, 3 (1995), 169–182.

[18]

Florence-Emilie Kinnafick and Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani. 2014. The effect of the physical environment and levels of activity on affective states. Journal of Environmental Psychology 38 (2014), 241–251.

[19]

Jan Koenderink and Andrea van Doorn. 2008. The structure of visual spaces. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision 31, 2-3 (2008), 171.

Digital Library

[20]

Jan Koenderink and Andrea van Doorn. 2012. Gauge fields in pictorial space. SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences 5, 4 (2012), 1213–1233.

Digital Library

[21]

Jan J Koenderink and Andrea J van Doorn. 2003. Pictorial space.(2003).

[22]

Md Abdul Kuddus, Elizabeth Tynan, and Emma McBryde. 2020. Urbanization: a problem for the rich and the poor?Public Health Reviews 41, 1 (2020), 1.

[23]

Juyoung Lee, Bum-Jin Park, Yuko Tsunetsugu, Takahide Kagawa, and Yoshifumi Miyazaki. 2009. Restorative effects of viewing real forest landscapes, based on a comparison with urban landscapes. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 24, 3 (2009), 227–234.

[24]

Osmo Mattila, Arto Korhonen, Essi Pöyry, Kaisa Hauru, Jani Holopainen, and Petri Parvinen. 2020. Restoration in a virtual reality forest environment. Computers in Human Behavior 107 (2020), 106295.

Digital Library

[25]

Elisa Menardo, Diego Scarpanti, Margherita Pasini, and Margherita Brondino. 2019. Usability of Virtual Environment for Emotional Well-Being. In International Conference in Methodologies and Intelligent Systems for Techhnology Enhanced Learning. Springer, 45–52.

[26]

Jaap Peen, Robert A Schoevers, Aartjan T Beekman, and Jack Dekker. 2010. The current status of urban-rural differences in psychiatric disorders. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 121, 2 (2010), 84–93.

[27]

Chorong Song, Harumi Ikei, and Yoshifumi Miyazaki. 2018. Physiological effects of visual stimulation with forest imagery. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15, 2(2018), 213.

[28]

Yuko Tsunetsugu, Bum-Jin Park, and Yoshifumi Miyazaki. 2010. Trends in research related to “Shinrin-yoku”(taking in the forest atmosphere or forest bathing) in Japan. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine 15, 1 (2010), 27.

[29]

Roger S Ulrich, Robert F Simons, Barbara D Losito, Evelyn Fiorito, Mark A Miles, and Michael Zelson. 1991. Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology 11, 3 (1991), 201–230.

[30]

Deltcho Valtchanov, Kevin R Barton, and Colin Ellard. 2010. Restorative effects of virtual nature settings. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 13, 5(2010), 503–512.

[31]

Deltcho Valtchanov and Colin Ellard. 2010. Physiological and affective responses to immersion in virtual reality: Effects of nature and urban settings. Journal of Cybertherapy & Rehabilitation 3, 4 (2010), 359.

[32]

Agnes E Van den Berg, Sander L Koole, and Nickie Y van der Wulp. 2003. Environmental preference and restoration:(How) are they related?Journal of Environmental Psychology 23, 2 (2003), 135–146.

[33]

Daniela Villani, Francesco Riva, and Giuseppe Riva. 2007. New technologies for relaxation: The role of presence.International Journal of Stress Management 14, 3 (2007), 260.

[34]

Daniela Villani and Giuseppe Riva. 2012. Does interactive media enhance the management of stress? Suggestions from a controlled study. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 15, 1(2012), 24–30.

[35]

Xinxin Wang, Susan Rodiek, Chengzhao Wu, Yi Chen, and Yuxian Li. 2016. Stress recovery and restorative effects of viewing different urban park scenes in Shanghai, China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 15 (2016), 112–122.

[36]

Chia-Pin Yu, Hsiao-Yun Lee, and Xiang-Yi Luo. 2018. The effect of virtual reality forest and urban environments on physiological and psychological responses. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 35 (2018), 106–114.

[37]

Marvin Zuckerman. 1977. Development of a situation-specific trait-state test for the prediction and measurement of affective responses.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 45, 4(1977), 513.

Cited By

Ladakis IFilos DChouvarda I(2024)Virtual reality environments for stress reduction and management: a scoping reviewVirtual Reality10.1007/s10055-024-00943-y28:1Online publication date: 27-Feb-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10055-024-00943-y
Bluman MSnider KBaratz GCohen ACanetti DHasler B(2023)Virtual Reality-Based Joy Induction: The Role of Interactivity and Prior MoodCyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking10.1089/cyber.2022.025026:4(229-237)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2023
https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2022.0250

Restorative Effects of Visual and Pictorial Spaces After Stress Induction in Virtual Reality
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. Interaction paradigms

Recommendations

Is virtual reality emotionally arousing? Investigating five emotion inducing virtual park scenarios

Following the idea of using virtual environments (VEs) as mood induction procedures (MIPs), this study set out to examine whether five different virtual park scenarios would each elicit a specific affective state (i.e., joy, sadness, boredom, anger and ...
Closing the Loop: The Effects of Biofeedback Awareness on Physiological Stress Response Using Electrodermal Activity in Virtual Reality
CHI EA '24: Extended Abstracts of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
This paper presents the results of a user study examining the impact of biofeedback awareness on the effectiveness of stress management, utilizing Electrodermal Activity (EDA) as the primary metric within an immersive Virtual Reality (VR). Employing a ...
Voluntary facial activations regulate physiological arousal and subjective experiences during virtual social stimulation

Exposure to distressing computer-generated stimuli and feedback of physiological changes during exposure have been effective in the treatment of anxiety disorders (e.g., social phobia). Here we studied voluntary facial activations as a method for ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

SAP '21: ACM Symposium on Applied Perception 2021

September 2021

109 pages

ISBN:9781450386630

DOI:10.1145/3474451

Editors:
Eakta Jain
University of Florida, USA
,
Anne-Hélène Olivier
University of Rennes 2, France
,
Massimiliano Di Luca
University of Birmingham, UK
,
Katja Zibrek
Inria Rennes, France
,
Rebecca Fribourg
Trinity College Dublin, Ireland

Copyright © 2021 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 16 September 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

SAP '21

Sponsor:

SIGGRAPH

SAP '21: ACM Symposium on Applied Perception 2021

September 16 - 17, 2021

Virtual Event, France

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 43 of 94 submissions, 46%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

2
Total Citations
View Citations
173
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)46
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6

Reflects downloads up to 21 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Ladakis IFilos DChouvarda I(2024)Virtual reality environments for stress reduction and management: a scoping reviewVirtual Reality10.1007/s10055-024-00943-y28:1Online publication date: 27-Feb-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10055-024-00943-y
Bluman MSnider KBaratz GCohen ACanetti DHasler B(2023)Virtual Reality-Based Joy Induction: The Role of Interactivity and Prior MoodCyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking10.1089/cyber.2022.025026:4(229-237)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2023
https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2022.0250

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents