Abstract
Successful integration of digital technologies in the education of young children still needs to be solved. Despite a growing body of research focusing on learning through digital technologies in childhood, there are areas of knowledge where the impact of digital technologies has yet to be explored. A prominent example is nanoscience and nanotechnology (NST), a new interdisciplinary field that promises to solve long-standing global challenges. Considering that NST concerns elements that cannot be observed with the naked eye, their understanding by young children requires appropriate teaching methods. These distinctive aspects of NST align well with the capabilities of smart mobile devices, the critical feature of which is their ability to display interactive simulations and playful visualizations. This study investigates and compares the effect of using tablets and alternative experiential teaching on developing the ability to understand nanoscale elements. To implement the research, we conducted a week-long intervention, including experimental and control groups. Children in the experimental group participated in a nanoteaching session during the school curriculum, using educational software on tablets. The children in the control group participated in a precisely similar instruction but without using technology. To assess the children’s performance, the Nanoscale Elementary Knowledge Comprehension Test (TENANO) created for the needs of this study was used. The sample consisted of 101 s-grade primary school children in Greece. The results showed that teaching with tablets compared to alternative experiential teaching contributed significantly to developing young children’s nanoliteracy level. Moreover, gender and non-verbal cognitive ability did not seem to differentiate the development of children’s ability to understand nanoscale entities.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Availability of Data and Materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Akoumianakis, I., & Filippatos, T. (2020). The renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system as a link between obesity and coronavirus disease 2019 severity. Obesity Reviews, 21(9), e13077.
Aladé, F., Lauricella, A. R., Beaudoin-Ryan, L., & Wartella, E. (2016). Measuring with Murray: Touchscreen technology and preschoolers’ STEM learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 433–441.
Anthony, L., Brown, Q., Nias, J., Tate, B., & Mohan, S. (2012). Interaction and recognition challenges in interpreting children’s touch and gesture input on mobile devices. Proceedings of the 2012 ACM international conference on Interactive tabletops and surfaces (pp. 225–234). Association for Computing Machinery.
Aunio, P., & Niemivirta, M. (2010). Predicting children’s mathematical performance in grade one by early numeracy. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(5), 427–435.
Aunio, P., Aubrey, C., Godfrey, R., Pan, Y., & Liu, Y. (2008). Children’s early numeracy in England, Finland and People’s Republic of China. International Journal of Early Years Education, 16(3), 203–221.
Aunola, K., Leskinen, E., Lerkkanen, M., & Nurmi, J. E. (2004). Developmental dynamics of math performance from preschool to grade 2. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 699–713.
Beschorner, B., & Hutchison, A. (2013). iPads as a literacy teaching tool in early childhood. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1, 16–24.
Blonder, R., & Rap, S. (2013). It’s a small world after all: A nanotechnology activity in a science festival. Journal of Nano Education, 4, 47–56.
Blonder, R., & Sakhnini, S. (2012). Teaching two basic nanotechnology concepts in secondary school by using a variety of teaching methods. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13, 500–516.
Blonder, R., & Yonai, E. (2020). Exposing school students to nanoscience: A review of published programs. In K. D. Sattler (Ed.), 21st century nanoscience – A handbook: Public policy, education, and global trends (1st ed., Vol. 10). Taylor & Francis (CRC Press).
Calder, N. (2015). Apps: Appropriate, applicable, and appealing? In T. Lowrie & R. Jorgensen (Zevenbergen) (Eds.), Digital games and mathematics learning, mathematics education in the digital era (Vol. 4, pp. 233–250). Netherlands: Springer.
Chen, G., Cheng, W., Chang, T. W., Zheng, X., & Huang, R. (2014). A comparison of reading comprehension across paper, computer screens, and tablets: Does tablet familiarity matter? Journal of Computers in Education, 1(2–3), 213–225.
Chmiliar, L. (2017). Improving learning outcomes: The iPad and preschool children with disabilities. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 660.
Ciampa, K., & Gallagher, T. L. (2013). Getting in touch: Use of mobile devices in the elementary classroom. Computers in the Schools, 30(4), 309–328.
Clarke, L., & Abbott, L. (2016). Young pupils’, their teacher’s and classroom assistants’ experiences of iPads in a Northern Ireland school: “Four and five years old, who would have thought they could do that?” British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(6), 1051–1064.
Clements, D. H. (1999). Playing math with young children. Curriculum Administrator, 35(4), 25–28.
Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2007). Effects of a preschool mathematics curriculum: Summative research on the Building Blocks project. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38, 136–163.
Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2008). Mathematics and technology: Supporting learning for students and teachers. In O. N. Saracho & B. Spodek (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on science and technology in early childhood education (pp. 127–147). Charlotte: Information Age.
Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2013). Rethinking early mathematics: What is research based curriculum for young children? In L. D. English & J. T. Mulligan (Eds.), Reconceptualizing early mathematics learning (pp. 121–147). Springer.
Clements, D. H., Sarama, J., Spitler, M. E., Lange, A. A., & Wolfe, C. B. (2011). Mathematics learned by young children in an intervention based on learning trajectories: A large-scale cluster randomized trial. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(2), 127–166.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. Routledge.
Cook, D. A., & Artino, A. R., Jr. (2016). Motivation to learn: An overview of contemporary theories. Medical Education, 50(10), 997–1014.
Couse, L. J., & Chen, D. W. (2010). A Tablet computer for young children? Exploring its viability for early childhood education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43, 75–98.
Crescenzi, L., Jewitt, C., & Price, S. (2014). The role of touch in preschool children’s learning using iPad versus paper interaction. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 37(2), 86–96.
Delgado, C., Stevens, S. Y., Shin, N., & Krajcik, J. (2015). A middle school instructional unit for size and scale contextualized in nanotechnology. Nanotechnology Reviews, 4(1), 51–69.
Dorouka, P., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2023). Teaching nanotechnology concepts in early-primary education: an experimental study using digital games. International Journal of Science Education, 1–28.
Dorouka, P., Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2020a). Tablets and apps for promoting robotics, mathematics, STEM education and literacy in early childhood education. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 14(2), 255–274.
Dorouka, P., Papadakis, St., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2020b). The influence of digital technology on young children’s “nano-literacy.” In K. Plakitsi, E. Kolokouri, & A.-C. Kornelaki (Eds.), ISCAR (International Society of Cultural-historical Activity Research) Regional Conference ‘Crisis in contexts’, e-proceedings (pp. 308–320). University of Ioannina. 19-24 March 2019.
Dorouka, P., Papadakis, St., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2021a). Nanotechnology and mobile learning: Perspectives and opportunities in young children’s education. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 13(3), 237–252.
Dorouka, P., Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2021b). The contribution of the health crisis to young children’s nano-literacy through STEAM education. Hellenic Journal of STEM Education, 2(1), 1–7.
Dwyer, J. (2007). Computer-based learning in a primary school: Differences between the early and later years of primary schooling. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 35(1), 89–103.
Goodwin, K. (2012). Use of tablet technology in the classroom (pp. 6–93). NSW Department of Education and Communities.
Guernsey, L. (2012). Can your preschooler learn anything from an iPad App? Retrieved on December 20, 2022, from http://goo.gl/en6Bme
Haßler, B., Major, L., & Hennessy, S. (2016). Tablet use in schools: A critical review of the evidence for learning outcomes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(2), 139–156.
Herodotou, C. (2017). Mobile games and science learning: A comparative study of 4 and 5 years old playing the game Angry Birds. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), 6–16.
Herodotou, C. (2018). Young children and tablets: A systematic review of effects on learning and development. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(1), 1–9.
Hirsh-Pasek, K., Zosh, J. M., Golinkoff, R. M., Gray, J. H., Robb, M. B., & Kaufman, J. (2015). Putting education in Beducational^ apps: Lessons from the science of learning. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(1), 3–34.
Huber, B., Tarasuik, J., Antoniou, M. N., Garrett, C., Bowe, S. J., & Kaufman, J. (2016). Young children’s transfer of learning from a touchscreen device. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 56–64.
Hyde, J. S., & Mertz, J. E. (2009). Gender, culture, and mathematics performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 106, 8801–8807.
İpek, Z., Atik, A. D., Tan, S., & Erkoç, F. (2020). Opinions of biology teachers about nanoscience and nanotechnology education in Turkey. International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(1), 205–222.
Jayawardena, N. S., Ross, M., Quach, S., Behl, A., & Gupta, M. (2021). Effective online engagement strategies through gamification: A systematic literature review and a future research agenda. Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), 30(5), 1–25.
Jones, M. G., Blonder, R., & Kähkönen, A.-L. (2020). Challenges in nanoscience education. In K. D. Sattler (Ed.), 21st century nanoscience – A handbook: Public policy, education, and global trends. (Vol. 10). 10.1201/9780429351631: Taylor & Francis (CRC Press).
Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., Nabors Oláh, L., & Locuniak, M. N. (2006). Number sense growth in kindergarten: A longitudinal investigation of children at risk for mathematics difficulties. Child Development, 77, 153–175.
Judge, S., Floyd, K., & Jeffs, T. (2015). Using mobile media devices and apps to promote young children’s learning. In K. Heider & M. Renck-Jalongo (Eds.), Young children and families in the information age. Educating the young child (pp. 117–131). Netherlands: Springer.
Kabali, H. K., Irigoyen, M. M., Nunez-Davis, R., Budacki, J. G., Mohanty, S. H., Leister, K. P., et al. (2015). Exposure and use of mobile media devices by young children. Pediatrics, 136, 1044–1050.
Kähkönen, A. L., Laherto, A., Lindell, A., & Tala, S. (2016). Interdisciplinary nature of nanoscience: Implications for education. Global perspectives of nanoscience and engineering education (pp. 35–81). Springer.
Kalogiannakis, M., & Papadakis, S. (2020). The use of developmentally mobile applications for preparing pre-service teachers to promote STEM activities in preschool classrooms. In S. Papadakis & M. Kalogiannakis (Eds.), Mobile Learning applications in early childhood education (pp. 82–100). IGI Global.
Kalogiannakis, M., Papadakis, S., & Zourmpakis, A. I. (2021). Gamification in science education. A systematic review of the literature. Education Sciences, 11(1), 22.
Kerckaert, St., Vanderlinde, R., & van Braak, J. (2015). The role of ICT in early childhood education: Scale development and research on ICT use and influencing factors. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 23, 183–199.
Kolb, D. (1983). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development.
Kolb, D. A., Boyatzis, R. E., & Mainemelis, C. (2014). Experiential learning theory: Previous research and new directions. Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp. 227–247). Routledge.
Liu, N. S. H. (2013). iPad infuse creativity in solid geometry teaching. Turkish Online Journal of Education Technology, 12, 177–192.
Lubienski, S. T., Robinson, J. P., Crane, C. C., & Ganley, C. M. (2013). Girls’ and boys’ mathematics achievement, affect, and experiences: Findings from ECLS-K. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(4), 634–645.
Magana, A. J., Brophy, S. P., & Bryan, L. A. (2012). An integrated knowledge framework to characterize and scaffold size and scale cognition (FS2C). International Journal of Science Education, 34(14), 2181–2203.
Mattoon, C., Bates, A., Shifflet, R., Latham, N., & Ennis, S. (2015). Examining computational skills in prekindergarteners: The effects of traditional and digital manipulatives in a prekindergarten classroom. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 17(1), n1.
McManis, L. F. D., & Gunnewig, S. B. (2012). Finding the education in educational technology with early learners. YC Young Children, 67, 14–24.
Mehdipour, Y., & Zerehkafi, H. (2013). Mobile learning for education: Benefits and challenges. International Journal of Computational Engineering Research, 3(6), 93–101.
Miller, D., Robertson, D., Hudson, A., & Shimi, J. (2012). Signature pedagogy in early years education: A role for COTS game-based learning. Computers in the Schools, 29(1–2), 227–247.
Milman, N. B., Carlson-Bancroft, A., & Boogart, A. V. (2014). Examining differentiation and utilization of iPads across content areas in an independent, preK–4th grade elementary school. Computers in the Schools, 31(3), 119–133.
Mononen, R., & Aunio, P. (2013). Early mathematical performance in Finnish kindergarten and grade one. LUMAT, 1(3), 245–261.
Murriello, S., Contier, D., & Knobel, M. (2006). Challenges of an exhibit on nanoscience and nanotechnology. Journal of Science Communication, 5(4), A01.
Neumann, M. M. (2018). Using tablets and apps to enhance emergent literacy skills in young children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 42, 239–246.
Neumann, M. M., & Neumann, D. L. (2014). Touch screen tablets and emergent literacy. Early Childhood Education Journal, 42, 231–239.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. National Academies Press.
Nistor, G. C., & Iacob, A. (2018). The advantages of gamification and game-based learning and their benefits in the development of education. The International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Education (Vol. 1, pp. 308–312). “Carol I” National Defence University.
Nolan, J., & McBride, M. (2014). Beyond gamification: Reconceptualizing game-based learning in early childhood environments. Information, Communication & Society, 17(5), 594–608.
Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (1996). Children doing mathematics. Wiley-Blackwell.
Oakley, G., Wildy, H., & Berman, Y. E. (2018). Multimodal digital text creation using tablets and open-ended creative apps to improve the literacy learning of children in early childhood classrooms. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy. Online First Article.
Oliemat, E., Ihmeideh, F., & Alkhawaldeh, M. (2018). The use of touch-screen tablets in early childhood: Children’s knowledge, skills, and attitudes towards tablet technology. Children and Youth Services Review, 88, 591–597.
Panagiotakopoulos, C. T., Sarris, M. E., & Koleza, E. G. (2013). Playing with numbers: Development issues and evaluation results of a computer game for primary school students. In T. Sobh & K. Elleithy (Eds.), Emerging trends in computing, informatics, systems sciences, and engineering (Vol. 151, pp. 263–275). Springer.
Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Zaranis, N. (2016). Comparing tablets and PCs in teaching mathematics: An attempt to improve mathematics competence in early 215 childhood education. Preschool and Primary Education, 4(2), 241.
Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Zaranis, N. (2017). Improving mathematics teaching in kindergarten with realistic mathematical education. Early Childhood Education Journal, 45, 369–378.
Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Zaranis, N. (2021). Teaching mathematics with mobile devices and the Realistic Mathematical Education (RME) approach in kindergarten. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 1(1), 5–18.
Pasnik, S., & Llorente, C. (2013). Preschool teachers can use a PBS KIDS transmedia curriculum supplement to support young children’s mathematics learning: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Summative evaluation of the CPB-PBS ready to learn initiative. Waltham.
Pegrum, M., Oakley, G., & Faulkner, R. (2013). Schools going mobile: A study of the adoption of mobile handheld technologies in Western Australian independent schools. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29, 66–81.
Peikos, G., Spyrtou, A., Pnevmatikos, D., & Papadopoulou, P. (2020). Nanoscale science and technology education: Primary school students’ preconceptions of the lotus effect and the concept of size. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1–18.
Peikos, G., Spyrtou, A., Pnevmatikos, D., & Papadopoulou, P. (2022). A teaching learning sequence on nanoscience and nanotechnology content at primary school level: Evaluation of students’ learning. International Journal of Science Education, 44(12), 1932–1957.
Peirce, N. (2013). Digital game-based learning for early childhood. A state of the art report. Learnovate Centre.
Penuel, W. R., Pasnik, S., Bates, L., Townsend, E., Gallagher, L. P., Llorente, C., & Hupert, N. (2009). Preschool teachers can use a mediarich curriculum to prepare lowincome children for school success: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Education Development Center Inc, and SRI International.
Plowman, L., Stevenson, O., Stephen, C., & McPake, J. (2012). Preschool children’s learning with technology at home. Computers & Education, 59(1), 30–37.
Psycharis, S. (2016). The impact of computational experiment and formative assessment in inquiry-based teaching and learning approach in STEM education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(2), 316–326.
Reich, S. M., Yaw, J. C., & Warschauer, M. (2016). Tablet-based ebooks for young children: What does the research says? Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 37, 585–591.
Rideout, V. J. (2014). Learning at home: Families’ educational media use in America. A report of the families and media project. The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop.
Risconscente, M. (2012). Mobile learning games improves 5th graders’ fraction knowledge and attitudes. Los Angeles, CA: GameDesk Institute.
Roberts, T. A., Vadasy, P. F., & Sanders, E. A. (2018). Preschoolers’ alphabet learning: Letter name and sound instruction, cognitive processes, and English proficiency. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 44, 257–274.
Rogowsky, B. A., Terwilliger, C. C., Young, C. A., & Kribbs, E. E. (2018). Playful learning with technology: The effect of computer-assisted instruction on literacy and numeracy skills of preschoolers. International Journal of Play, 7(1), 60–80.
Sakhnini, S., & Blonder, R. (2015). Essential concepts of nanoscale science and technology for high school students based on a Delphi study by the expert community. International Journal of Science Education, 37(11), 1699–1738.
Schacter, J., & Jo, B. (2017). Improving preschoolers’ mathematics achievement with tablets: A randomized controlled trial. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 29(3), 313–327.
Schroeder, E. L., & Kirkorian, H. L. (2016). When seeing is better than doing: Preschoolers’ transfer of STEM skills using touchscreen games. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–12.
Semmelmann, K., Nordt, M., Sommer, K., Röhnke, R., Mount, L., & Prüfer, H.,…& Weigelt, S. (2016). U can touch this: How tablets can be used to study cognitive development. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1021.
Shamir, H., Feehan, K., & Yoder, E. (2017). Effects of personalized learning on kindergarten and first grade students’ early literacy skills. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU 2017) (Vol. 2, pp. 273–279). Porto.
Sheehan, K. J., & Uttal, D. H. (2016). Children’s learning from touch screens: A dual representation perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1220.
Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Siraj-Blatchford, J. (2003). More than computers-information and communication technology in the early years. British Association for Early Childhood Education (Early Education).
Spelke, E. S. (2005). Sex differences in intrinsic attitude for mathematics and science. American Psychology, 60, 950–958.
Spyrtou, A., Manou, L., Peikos, G., & Papadopoulou, P. (2018). Investigating the Secrets of the Nanoworld. Athens: Gutenberg - Dardanos. In Greek.
Starcic, A., & Bagon, S. (2014). ICT-supported learning for inclusion of people with special needs: Review of seven educational technology journals, 1970–2011. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(2), 202–230.
Stevens, S., Sutherland, L. M., & Krajcik, J. S. (2009). The big ideas of nanoscale science and engineering: A guidebook for secondary teachers. NSTA Press.
Tai, L., Zhu, G., Yang, M., Cao, L., Xing, X., Yin, G., & Zhu, Y. (2021). Nanometer-resolution in situ structure of the SARS-CoV-2 postfusion spike protein. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(48), e2112703118.
Ting, Y. L. (2013). Using mobile technologies to create interwoven learning interactions: An intuitive design and its evaluation. Computers and Education, 60, 1–13.
Tretter, T. R., Jones, M. G., Andre, T., Negishi, A., & Minogue, J. (2006a). Conceptual boundaries and distances: Students’ and experts’ concepts of the scale of scientific phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 282–319.
Tretter, T. R., Jones, M. G., & Minogue, J. (2006b). Accuracy of scale conceptions in science: Mental maneuverings across many orders of spatial magnitude. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(10), 1061–1085.
Vavoula, G., & Karagiannidis, C. (2005). Designing mobile learning experiences. Panhellenic conference on informatics (pp. 534–544). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Verenikina, I., & Kervin, L. (2011). iPads, digital play and pre-schoolers. He Kupu, 2, 4–19.
Wang, F., Xie, H., Wang, Y., Hao, Y., & An, J. (2016). Using touchscreen tablets to help young children learn to tell time. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1800.
Watts, C. M., Moyer‐packenham, P. S., Tucker, S. I., Bullock, E. P., Shumway, J. F., Westenskow, A., & Jordan, K. (2016). An examination of children’s learning progression shifts while using touch screen virtual manipulative mathematics apps. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 814–828.
Wood, E., Petkovski, M., De Pasquale, D., Gottardo, A., Evans, M. A., & Savage, R. S. (2016). Parent scaffolding of young children when engaged with mobile technology. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 690.
Wu, W. H., Jim, Wu., & Y. C., Chen, C. Y., Kao, H. Y., Lin, C. H., & Huang, S. H. (2012). Review of trends from mobile learning studies: A meta-analysis. Computers in Education, 59(2), 817–827.
Zaranis, N., Kalogiannakis, M., & Papadakis, S. (2013). Using mobile devices for teaching realistic mathematics in kindergarten education. Creative Education, 4, 1–10.
Zevenbergen, R., & Logan, H. (2008). Computer use by preschool children: Rethinking practice as digital natives come to preschool. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 33, 37–44.
Zhou, S. (2022). Effect of mobile learning on the optimization of preschool education teaching mode under the epidemic. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2022, 2194373.
Funding
The research work was supported by the Hellenic Foundation for Research and Innovation (HFRI) under the 3rd Call for HFRI PhD Fellowships (Fellowship Number 5503).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, investigation, drafting, and writing, PD; methodology, validation, review and editing, and visualization, PD; writing—review and editing, and supervision, PD; MK; RB. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
Requirements regarding informed consent, confidentiality, and data use were carefully adhered to, both verbally and in writing, informing school staff, children, and guardians of the purpose of the study and their rights not to participate. In particular, before starting the first phase of the research, the research protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Department of Preschool Education of the University of Crete (1016/22-11-2021). The approval was approved by the Ethics and Research Ethics Committee of the University of Crete (REC-UOC) (no. 35/24.02.2022, https://www.ehde.uoc.gr/index.php/en), as well as by the Hellenic Institute of Educational Policy (IEP) (no. 3578/14-–03-2022).
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Consent to Participate
Consent to participate was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Consent for Publication
All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Statement Regarding Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals
The research protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Department of Preschool Education of the University of Crete (1016/22–11-2021). The approval was approved by the Ethics and Research Ethics Committee of the University of Crete (REC-UOC) (no. 35/24.02.2022, https://www.ehde.uoc.gr/index.php/en), as well as by the Hellenic Institute of Educational Policy (IEP) (no. 3578/14–03-2022).
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Dorouka, P., Kalogiannakis, M. & Blonder, R. Tablets and Apps for Promoting Nanoliteracy in Early Childhood Education: Results from an Experimental Study. J Sci Educ Technol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-024-10132-w
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-024-10132-w