Skip to main content
Log in

A novel approach to MADM problems using Fermatean fuzzy Hamacher prioritized aggregation operators

  • Foundations
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A generalized form of union and intersection on FFS can be formulated from a generalized t-norm (TN) and t-conorm (TCN). Hamacher operations such as Hamacher product and Hamacher sum are good alternatives to produce such product and sum. The Hamacher operations can generate more flexible and more accurate results in decision-making process due to the working parameter involved in these operations. The intuitionistic fuzzy set, briefly as IFS and its extension involving Pythagorean fuzzy set (PFS) and Fermatean fuzzy set (FFS), are all effective tools to express uncertain and incomplete cognitive information with membership, nonmembership and hesitancy degrees. The Fermatean fuzzy set (FF-set) carries out uncertain and imprecise information smartly in exercising decision making than IFS and PFS. By adjusting the prioritization of attributes in FF environment, in this course of this article, we first device new operations on FF information using prioritized attributes and by employing HTN and HTCN, we discuss the basic operations. Induced by the Hamacher operations and FF-set, we propose FF Hamacher arithmetic and also geometric aggregation operators (AOs). In the first section, we introduce the concepts of an FF Hamacher prioritized AO and FF Hamacher prioritized weighted AO. In the second part, we develop FF Hamacher prioritized geometric operator (GO) and FF Hamacher prioritized weighted GO. We study essential properties and a few special cases of our newly proposed operators. Then, we make use of these proposed operators in developing tools which are key factors in solving the FF multi-attribute decision-making situations with prioritization. The university selection phenomena are considered as a direct application for analysis and to demonstrate the practicality and efficacy of our proposed model. The working parameter considered in these AOs is analyzed in different existing and proposed AOs. Further, comparison analysis is conducted for the authenticity of proposed & existing operators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Atanassov KT (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20:87–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atanassov KT (1989) More on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 33:37–46

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Aydemir SB, Gunduz SY (2020) Fermatean fuzzy TOPSIS method with dombi aggregation operators and its application in multi-criteria decision making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-191763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beliakov G, Pradera A, Calvo T (2007) Aggregation functions: a guide for practitioners. Springer, Heidelberg

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen T-Y (2012) Nonlinear assignment-based methods for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making analysis with incomplete preference information. Int J Inf Tech Decision Making 11:821–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen T-Y (2014) The extended linear assignment methods for multiple criteria decision-making based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Appl Math Model 38:2101–2117

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chen T-Y (2014) Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy QUALIFLEX method with a likelihood-based comparison approach for multiple criteria decision analysis. Inf Sci 261:149–169

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chen T-Y (2018) An interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy compromise approach with correlation-based closeness indices for multiple-criteria decision analysis of bridge construction methods. Complexity. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6463039

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen T-Y (2018) A novel PROMETHEE-based outranking approach for multiple criteria decision analysis with Pythagorean fuzzy information. IEEE Access 6:54495–54506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen TY (2018) An interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy outranking method with a closeness-based assignment model for multiple criteria decision making. Int J Intell Syst 33:126–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garg H (2016) A new generalized pythagorean fuzzy information aggregation using Einstein operations and its application to decision making. Int J Intell Syst 31:886–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garg H, Shahzadi G, Akram M (2020) Decision-making analysis based on Fermatean fuzzy Yager aggregation operators with application in COVID-19 testing facility. Math Problems Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7279027

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gou X, Xu Z, Ren P (2016) The properties of continuous Pythagorean fuzzy information. Int J Intell Syst 31:401–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadi A, Khan W, Khan A (2021) A novel approach to MADM problems using Fermatean fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators. Int J Intell Syst. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamachar H (1978) Uber logische verknunpfungenn unssharfer Aussagen und deren Zugenhorige Bewertungsfunktione Trappl, Klir, Riccardi (Eds), Progr Cybern Syst Res, 3: 276–288

  • Li W (2014) Approaches to decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application to enterprise financial performance assessment. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 27(1):1–8

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu PD (2014) Some Hamacher aggregation operators based on the interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and their application to group decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22(1):83–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parvathi R (2005) Theory of Operators on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets of Second Type and their Applications to Image Processing. Alagappa Univ, Karaikudi, India ((Ph.D. dissertation). Dept. Math)

  • Parvathi R, Vassilev P, Atanassov KT (2012) A note on the bijective correspondence between intuitionistic fuzzy sets and intuitionistic fuzzy sets of pth type. In: New Developments in Fuzzy Sets, Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, Generalized Nets and Related Topics. Volume I: Foundations. SRI PAS IBS PAN, Warsaw, pp. 143–147

  • Peng X, Yang Y (2015) Some results for Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 30:1133–1160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reformat MZ, Yager RR (2014) Suggesting recommendations using Pythagorean fuzzy sets illustrated using netflix movie data. Information processing and management of uncertainty in knowledge-based systems. Springer, Cham, pp 546–556

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ren P, Xu Z, Gou X (2016) Pythagorean fuzzy TODIM approach to multi-criteria decision making. Appl Soft Comput 42:246–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senapati T, Yager RR (2019) Fermatean fuzzy weighted averaging/geometric operators and its application in multi-criteria decision-making methods. Eng Appl Artif Intell 85:112–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senapati T, Yager RR (2019a) Fermatean fuzzy sets. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 11:663–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senapati T, Yager RR (2019b) Some new operations over Fermatean fuzzy numbers and application of Fermatean fuzzy WPM in multi criteria decision making. Informatica 30(2):391–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan CQ, Yi WT, Chen XH (2015) Hesitant fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators for multicriteria decision making. Appl Soft Comput 26:325–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J-C, Chen T-Y (2015) Likelihood-based assignment methods for multiple criteria decision analysis based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Optim Decision Making 14:425–457

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wei G, Alsaadi FE, Hayat T, Alsaedi A (2018) Bipolar Fuzzy Hamacher aggregation Operators in multi Attribute Decision Making. Int J Fuzzy Syst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-017-0338-6

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wu SJ, Wei GW (2017) Pythagorean fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators and their application to multi attribute decision making. Int J Knowl-based Intell Eng Syst 21:189–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu S-J, Wei G-W (2017) Pythagorean fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making. Inter J Knowl-based Intell Eng Systs 21:189–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao S (2014) Induced interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy Hamacher ordered weighted geometric operator and their application to multi attribute decision making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 27(1):527–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu ZS (2007) Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 15(6):1179–1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu ZS (2011) Approaches to multi attribute group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy power aggregation operators. Knowl Based Syst 24(6):749–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu ZS, Chen Q (2011) A multi-criteria decision making procedure based on intuitionistic fuzzy bonferroni means. J Syst Sci Syst Eng 20(2):217–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu ZS, Xia MM (2011) Induced generalized intuitionistic fuzzy operators. Knowl Based Syst 24(2):197–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu ZS, Yager RR (2006) Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Int J Gen Syst 35:417–433

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Xu ZS, Yager RR (2008) Dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute decision making. Int J Approx Reason 48(1):246–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR, Abbasov AM (2013) Pythagorean membership grades, complex numbers, and decision making. Int J Intell Syst 28:436–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng S, Mu Z, Balezentis T (2018) A novel aggregation method for Pythagorean fuzzy multi attribute group decision making. Int J Intell Syst 33(3):573–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X (2016) A novel approach based on similarity measure for Pythagorean fuzzy multi criteria group decision making. Int J Intell Syst 31:593–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Xu Z (2014) Extension of TOPSIS to multi criteria decision making with Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 29:1061–1078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou LY, Zhao XF, Wei GW (2014) Hesitant fuzzy hamacher aggregation operators and their application to multi attribute decision making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 26(6):2689–2699

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Khan and Khan discussed and formulated the measures. Jan and Afridi wrote the paper together.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Asghar Khan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animal performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jan, A., Khan, A., Khan, W. et al. A novel approach to MADM problems using Fermatean fuzzy Hamacher prioritized aggregation operators. Soft Comput 25, 13897–13910 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-06308-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-06308-w

Keywords

Navigation