Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the acceptance and clinical utility of a large scale picture archiving and communication system (PACS) for vascular surgery. Questionnaires and one-on-one interviews were conducted with physicians and nurses in the department of vascular surgery at the Baltimore VA Medical Center where PACS has been in routine, hospital-wide use for more than 21/2 years. The perceptions of the clinical staff were assessed to determine the efficacy of PACS in comparison to the conventional film based alternative for the practice of vascular surgery and suggestions for improvements were solicited. There was consensus among the vascular surgery staff members that the use of PACS enhanced their clinical practices, both in and out of the operating room (OR). Vascular surgeons heavily rely on image display in the OR as a “road map” to help determine their operative approach and to guide their surgery. PACS offers unique intraoperative imaging capabilities including rapid image retrieval and improved archival, cine review, the ability to modify image contrast, and the ability to obtain direct quantitative measurements of the degree of vascular stenosis. The increased accessibility and availability of images throughout the hospital enables improvements in time management and in patient care.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Pomerantz SM, Siegel EL, Pickar E, et al: PACS in the Operating Room: Experience at the Baltimore VA Medical Center. Proceedings of IMACS Conference August 1995 (in publication)
Siegel EL, Diaconis JN, Pomerantz SM, et al.: Making Filmless Radiology Work. J Digit Imaging 8:151–155, 1995
Siegel EL: Plunging into PACS. Diagn Imaging 15:69–71, 1993
Gray JE, Karsell PR, Becker GP, et al.: Total Digital Radiology: Is it Feasible? Is it Desirable? AJR Am J Roentgenol 143:1345–1349, 1984
Siegel ES: Clinician Acceptance of PACS at the Baltimore VA Medical Center, RSNA paper presentation, November 29, 1995
Saarinen AO, Haynor DR, Loop JW, et al.: Modeling the Economics of PACS: What is important? Proc SPIE 1093:62–73, 1989
Mun SK, Horii S, Benson H, et al.: Experience with Image Management Networks at Three Universities: Is the Cup Half-Empty or Half-Full? Proc SPIE 1093:194–201, 1989
Straub WH, Gur D: The Hidden Costs of Delayed Access to Diagnostic Imaging Information: Impact on PACS Implementation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 155:613–616, 1990
Hilsenrath PE, Smith WL, Berbaum KS, et al.: Analysis of the Cost-Effectiveness of PACS. AJR Am J Roentgenol 156:177–180, 1991
Horii SC: Electronic Imaging Workstation: Ergonomic Issues and the User Interface. RadioGraphics 12:773–787, 1992
Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Pomerantz SM, et al: The Impact of Filmless Radiology on the Frequency of Clinician Consultations with Radiologists. ARRS annual meeting, San Diego, CA, May 5–10, 1996
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reiner, B.I., Siegel, E.L., Hooper, F. et al. Picture archiving and communication systems and vascular surgery: Clinical impressions and suggestions for improvement. J Digit Imaging 9, 167–171 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168613
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168613