Skip to main content

On Fuzzy Driven Support for SD-Efficient Portfolio Selection

  • Conference paper
Adaptive and Natural Computing Algorithms (ICANNGA 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 4431))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2225 Accesses

Abstract

The stochastic dominance (SD) is based on an axiomatic model of risk-averse preferences and therefore, the SD-efficiency is an important property of selected portfolios. As defined with a continuum of criteria representing some measures of failure in achieving several targets, the SD does not provide us with a simple computational recipe. While limiting to a few selected target values one gets a typical multiple criteria optimization model approximating the corresponding SD approach. Although, it is rather difficult to justify a selection of a few target values, this difficulty can be overcome with the effective use of fuzzy target values. While focusing on the first degree SD and extending the target membership functions to some monotonic utility functions we get the multiple criteria model which preserves the consistency with both the first degree and the second degree SD. Further applying the reference point methodology to the multiple criteria model and taking advantages of fuzzy chance specifications we get the method that allows to model interactively the preferences by fuzzy specification of the desired distribution. The model itself guarantees that every generated solution is efficient according to the SD rules.

The research was partially supported by the Ministry of Science and Information Society Technologies under grant 3T11C 005 27.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 11439
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 14299
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bawa, V.S.: Safety-first, stochastic dominance and optimal portfolio choice. J. Finan. Quant. Anal. 13, 252–271 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Krzemienowski, A., Ogryczak, W.: On extending the LP computable risk measures to account downside risk. Comput. Optimization and Appls. 32, 133–160 (2005)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Levy, H.: Stochastic dominance and expected utility: survey and analysis. Manage. Sci. 38, 555–593 (1992)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Lewandowski, A., Wierzbicki, A.P. (eds.): Aspiration Based Decision Support Systems — Theory, Software and Applications. Springer, Berlin (1989)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Mansini, R., Ogryczak, W., Speranza, M.G.: On LP solvable models for portfolio selection. Informatica 14, 37–62 (2003)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Markowitz, H.M.: Portfolio selection. J. Fin. 7, 77–91 (1952)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McNamara, J.R.: Portfolio selection using stochastic dominance criteria. Decision Sci. 29, 785–801 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ogryczak, W.: Multiple criteria linear programming model for portfolio selection. Ann. Oper. Res. 97, 143–162 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Ogryczak, W.: Multiple criteria optimization and decisions under risk. Control & Cybernetics 31, 975–1003 (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Ogryczak, W., Ruszczyński, A.: From stochastic dominance to mean-risk models: semideviations as risk measures. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 116, 33–50 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Ribeiro, R.A., Zimmermann, H.-J., Yager, R.R., Kacprzyk, J. (eds.): Soft Computing in Financial Engineering. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Romaszkiewicz, A.: Portfolio selection with techniques of fuzzy and multicriteria optimization (in Polish). Ph.D. Thesis, Warsaw School of Economics (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rothschild, M., Stiglitz, J.E.: Increasing risk: I. A definition. J. Econ. Theory 2, 225–243 (1969)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Whitmore, G.A., Findlay, M.C. (eds.): Stochastic Dominance: An Approach to Decision–Making Under Risk. D.C. Heath, Lexington (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wierzbicki, A.P.: A mathematical basis for satisficing decision making. Math. Modelling 3, 391–405 (1982)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Yager, R.R., Filev, D.P.: Essentials of Fuzzy Modelling and Control. Wiley, Chichester (1994)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Bartlomiej Beliczynski Andrzej Dzielinski Marcin Iwanowski Bernardete Ribeiro

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ogryczak, W., Romaszkiewicz, A. (2007). On Fuzzy Driven Support for SD-Efficient Portfolio Selection. In: Beliczynski, B., Dzielinski, A., Iwanowski, M., Ribeiro, B. (eds) Adaptive and Natural Computing Algorithms. ICANNGA 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4431. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71618-1_64

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71618-1_64

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-71589-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-71618-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics