Mathematics > Metric Geometry
[Submitted on 4 Nov 2011 (v1), last revised 21 Nov 2014 (this version, v6)]
Title:Multi-way spectral partitioning and higher-order Cheeger inequalities
View PDFAbstract:A basic fact in spectral graph theory is that the number of connected components in an undirected graph is equal to the multiplicity of the eigenvalue zero in the Laplacian matrix of the graph. In particular, the graph is disconnected if and only if there are at least two eigenvalues equal to zero. Cheeger's inequality and its variants provide an approximate version of the latter fact; they state that a graph has a sparse cut if and only if there are at least two eigenvalues that are close to zero.
It has been conjectured that an analogous characterization holds for higher multiplicities, i.e., there are $k$ eigenvalues close to zero if and only if the vertex set can be partitioned into $k$ subsets, each defining a sparse cut. We resolve this conjecture. Our result provides a theoretical justification for clustering algorithms that use the bottom $k$ eigenvectors to embed the vertices into $\mathbb R^k$, and then apply geometric considerations to the embedding.
We also show that these techniques yield a nearly optimal tradeoff between the expansion of sets of size $\approx n/k$, and the $k$th smallest eigenvalue of the normalized Laplacian matrix, denoted $\lambda_k$. In particular, we show that in every graph there is a set of size at most $2n/k$ which has expansion at most $O(\sqrt{\lambda_k \log k})$. This bound is tight, up to constant factors, for the "noisy hypercube" graphs.
Submission history
From: James Lee [view email][v1] Fri, 4 Nov 2011 06:57:56 UTC (32 KB)
[v2] Thu, 24 Nov 2011 01:19:49 UTC (31 KB)
[v3] Wed, 6 Jun 2012 09:48:48 UTC (27 KB)
[v4] Sat, 26 Jan 2013 11:17:37 UTC (27 KB)
[v5] Mon, 27 Jan 2014 05:00:04 UTC (31 KB)
[v6] Fri, 21 Nov 2014 17:28:58 UTC (32 KB)
Current browse context:
math.MG
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.